| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Pakistan’s General Problem | Main | 3QD Science Prize Semifinalists 2011 »

June 10, 2011

Man Is Not Cat Food

Tumblr_lmaox8GjiO1qhwx0o Barbara Ehrenreich in the Los Angeles Review of Books:

In the last decade, human vanity has taken a major hit. Traits once thought to be uniquely, even definingly human have turned up in the repertoire of animal behaviors: tool use, for example, is widespread among non-human primates, at least if a stick counts as a tool. We share moral qualities, such as a capacity for altruism with dolphins, elephants and others; our ability to undertake cooperative ventures, such as hunting, can also be found among lions, chimpanzees and sharks. Chimps are also capable of “culture,” in the sense of socially transmitted skills and behaviors peculiar to a particular group or band. Creatures as unrelated as sea gulls and bonobos indulge in homosexuality and other nonreproductive sexual activities. There are even animal artists: male bowerbirds, who construct complex, obsessively decorated structures to attract females; dolphins who draw dolphin audiences to their elaborately blown sequences of bubbles. Whales have been known to enact what look, to human divers, very much like rituals of gratitude.

The discovery of all these animal talents has contributed to an explosion of human interest in animals — or what, as the human-animal gap continues to narrow, we should properly call “other animals.” We have an animal rights movement that militantly objects to the eating of nonhuman animals as well as their enslavement and captivity. A new field of “animal studies” has sprung up just in the last decade or so, complete with college majors and academic journals. Ever since the philosopher Peter Singer’s groundbreaking 1976 Animal Liberation, one book after another has attempted to explore the inner lives and emotions of nonhuman animals. Bit by bit, we humans have had to cede our time-honored position at the summit of the “great chain of being” and acknowledge that we share the planet — not very equitably or graciously of course — with intelligent, estimable creatures worthy of moral consideration.

But it will take more than a few PETA protests or seasons of the Discovery channel to cut humans down to size. Contempt for animals is built into our languages: think of the word “bestial” or fressen, the German word for the distinctive way animals are thought to eat. In the great monotheistic religions, human superiority is as much taken for granted as the superiority of God over humans. Nonhuman animals were created in the service of humans, as if the deity wanted to leave us with a fully-stocked refrigerator. They offer up their flesh, their pelts and often their labor, and that, as Immanuel Kant saw it, was their mission on earth.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:33 PM | Permalink

Comments

Hey baby, depends on the cat. Depends on the man.

In general if we had no "men" (or "women") the Earth environment would not be in trouble due to the current age of insanity.

But I digress ...

Posted by: Dredd | Jun 10, 2011 1:51:50 PM

I am all for respecting animals. I'm in awe of the Emperor penguins who can withstand Antarctic winters standing in wind chills of minus 100 degrees for months without eating. I'm amazed by 2 ounce hummingbirds that can fly 6,000 miles. But this does not mean we should hated ourselves. Animals may use twigs as tools, but this is pretty far from building a space shuttle. Birds sing, but they don't compose symphonies. People are animals, but they are by far the most intelligent and accomplished animals on Earth.

Posted by: J.Hawkins | Jun 10, 2011 2:12:30 PM

The great sun-screen in the sky will tell the final story in this so called “great chain of being”.

The final chapter is already entitled To Be or Not To Be.

So far, "great" is not likely a word that would fit anywhere in a full cosmic description of the human species on this planet.

Posted by: Dredd | Jun 10, 2011 7:02:24 PM

For those animal lovers who appreciated this posting (as much as I did) I'd suggest reading Ishmael: My Adventure of the Mind and Spirit by Daniel Quinn.

For a contrasting view of our kind, I have another suggestion:

Gog by Giovanni Papini

Posted by: Felix E F Larocca MD | Jun 10, 2011 7:57:46 PM

J. Hawkins, I don't understand where you got the idea that anyone said we should hate ourselves. So we build shuttles, compose symphonies, etc., and we destroy huge swaths of land, can destroy cities and people with bombs, introduce non-native species to some environs that then eats up the native species, and we kill each other often over minor arguments, etc. In other words, I've always found "we are the most intelligent species on earth" to be a declaration that has no bearing on whether we like ourselves or hate ourselves, but it has led to that entitlement thinking. For all our skills we've acted pretty damn stupid throughout history, and we have yet to live as long as some other species.

The continued whaling and killing of dying species is another part of the entitlement "superior" attitude; people who buy poached ivory or eat fish at restaurants that are on extinction warning lists, or fur coats, as if one can't live a few years without eating one type of fish while it replenishes. It doesn't cause me to be self-loathing of humans, but some of them, yes.

Posted by: Wulfstan | Jun 11, 2011 7:58:56 AM

All us creatures should live and breathe on this earth in harmony. The term 'other animals' is correct. Thank you for your insights.

Posted by: Pearlie Guerrier | Jun 12, 2011 3:08:58 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

roger gathmann on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Doogle on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Kyle on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Peter John on Gezi Park

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed