June 28, 2011
A Brief History of the Corporation: 1600 to 2100
Venkatesh Rao in Ribbon Farm:
On 8 June, a Scottish banker named Alexander Fordyce shorted the collapsing Company’s shares in the London markets. But a momentary bounce-back in the stock ruined his plans, and he skipped town leaving £550,000 in debt. Much of this was owed to the Ayr Bank, which imploded. In less than three weeks, another 30 banks collapsed across Europe, bringing trade to a standstill. On July 15, the directors of the Company applied to the Bank of England for a £400,000 loan. Two weeks later, they wanted another £300,000. By August, the directors wanted a £1 million bailout. The news began leaking out and seemingly contrite executives, running from angry shareholders, faced furious Parliament members. By January, the terms of a comprehensive bailout were worked out, and the British government inserted its czars into the Company’s management to ensure compliance with its terms.
If this sounds eerily familiar, it shouldn’t. The year was 1772, exactly 239 years ago today, the apogee of power for the corporation as a business construct. The company was the British East India company (EIC). The bubble that burst was the East India Bubble. Between the founding of the EIC in 1600 and the post-subprime world of 2011, the idea of the corporation was born, matured, over-extended, reined-in, refined, patched, updated, over-extended again, propped-up and finally widely declared to be obsolete. Between 2011 and 2100, it will decline — hopefully gracefully — into a well-behaved retiree on the economic scene.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 08:03 AM | Permalink






















Comments
In the U.S. there is a lot of revisionist history concerning corporations, because they were initially strongly disfavored here.
Posted by: Dredd | Jun 28, 2011 10:48:47 AM
"I am not sure who first came up with the term Peak Attention, but the analogy to Peak Oil is surprisingly precise."
Wow, pretty amazing article.
Posted by: Mal | Jun 28, 2011 11:09:28 AM
I have an unpleasant thought that informative articles like this cause the advent of Peak Boredom in this miseducated populace.
Thanks for all you do to keep us informed.
Posted by: Suzan | Jun 28, 2011 4:46:48 PM
A fascinating history lesson! Those (south Asians in particular) who forget their history are doomed...
Venkatesh Rao, however, skipped over the primary inducement for the EIC and the earlier European bandits to set out from their homelands; it was black gold, and not of the fossilized variety.
Arthur Wellesley, well before he became the Duke of Wellington and defeated Napoleon at Waterloo, was tramping through the equatorial forests of Malabar in south India, and battling the local resistance in an early predecessor of guerrilla warfare to seize control of the ancient and lucrative pepper and spice trade for the EIC.
It was this lopsided trade in these commodities that depleted the coffers of the Roman empire and built the wealth of the Indian cultivators and the Arab middlemen during the middle ages. The Hindu rulers of Malabar and the Arab traders had a mutually beneficial and peaceful and thriving business arrangement that was the antitheses of the mass killings and plundering raids and the dogmatic iconoclastic destruction that the north faced.
This system was, however, deeply shaken in 1498 when Vasco da Gama navigated the hitherto secret spice route to Malabar and fought the Indian/Arab alliance there. Later, the jihadist onslaught of Malabar by Mysore's Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan irretrievably fractured this alliance, especially after the Moplah descendants of the Arab traders turned and sided with the Mysorean invaders. The EIC then moved in, ostensibly to help the Malabari guerrillas resist the Mysoreans; only to renege and take control of Malabar from the greatly weakened Hindu rulers.
Wellesley then spent a few futile years chasing the Hindu guerrillas who resisted the EIC takeover, before going on to greater "glory" in the battlefields of Europe. His successors in the EIC hunted down and killed the leaders of the remaining resistance, and that set the stage for the EIC's subsequent dominance as a global mercantile corporation.
Posted by: Sam | Jun 28, 2011 6:52:28 PM
I am unspeakably grateful for the observations in this post.
Lightning at midnight is illumination, a lovely and graceful metaphor for enlightenment. Even a brief spark in Plato's Cave must cast long shadows and cannot help but reveal the contours of the beautiful stone walls.
We do not curse the moon for failing to show us the contents of a closed box, nor should we expect the light of these handfuls of words to reveal this moment with complete fidelity. And how could they, given that the equation to describe even a single photon crossing an unencumbered atom requires pages and pages of numbers?
Oh, but these words illuminate so much.
If I throw my keys on a table, I can pick them all up by grasping any one, which is to say that a relational view allows one to order a collection of stones by color or weight or time of collection or density or reactivity or ...
I feel that this writer has handed me the periodic table of the elements, turned on a light emitting diode in the cave, and said, "It's all just vibrating atoms, and you can get rid of those epicycles on epicycles if you just see the sun as the center of the solar system."
Thank you.
Posted by: ehj2 | Jun 30, 2011 8:34:55 AM
Post a comment