| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Les Bisous | Main | On Your Marks, Get Set, Measure Heart Health »

May 23, 2011

Lisa Randall to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Science Prize

UPDATE 6/20/11: The winners have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/13/11: The finalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/11/11: The semifinalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/3/11: Voting round now open. Click here to see full list of nominees and vote.

Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,

Randall(web) We are very honored and pleased to announce that Lisa Randall has agreed to be the final judge for our third annual prize for the best writing in a blog or e-zine in the category of Science. (Details of last year's science prize, judged by Richard Dawkins, can be found here.) Professor Randall studies theoretical particle physics and cosmology at Harvard University.  Her research connects theoretical insights to puzzles in our current understanding of the properties and interactions of matter. She has developed and studied a wide variety of models to address these questions, the most prominent involving extra dimensions of space. Her work has involved improving our understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics, supersymmetry, baryogenesis, cosmological inflation, and dark matter. Randall’s research also explores ways to experimentally test and verify ideas and her current research focuses in large part on the Large Hadron Collider and dark matter searches and models.

Randall’s studies have made her among the most cited and influential theoretical physicists. She has also had a public presence through her writing, lectures, and radio and TV appearances.  Her book Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions was included in the New York Times' 100 notable books of 2005. Randall has also recently pursued art-science connections, writing a libretto for Hypermusic: A Projective Opera in Seven Planes that premiered in the Pompidou Center in Paris and co-curating an art exhibit Measure for Measure for the Los Angeles Arts Association.

Randall has received numerous awards and honors for her scientific endeavors. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Philosophical Society the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, was a fellow of the American Physical Society, and is a past winner of an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship, a National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award, a DOE Outstanding Junior Investigator Award, and the Westinghouse Science Talent Search. In 2003, she received the Premio Caterina Tomassoni e Felice Pietro Chisesi Award, from the University of Rome, La Sapienza.  In 2006, she received the Klopsteg Award from the American Society of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for her lectures and in 2007 she received the Julius Lilienfeld Prize from the American Physical Society for her work on elementary particle physics and cosmology and for communicating this work to the public.

Professor Randall was included in the list of Time Magazine's "100 Most Influential People" of 2007 and was one of 40 people featured in The Rolling Stone 40th Anniversary issue that year. Prof. Randall was featured in Newsweek's "Who's Next in 2006" as "one of the most promising theoretical physicists of her generation" and in Seed Magazine's "2005 Year in Science Icons".  In 2008, Prof. Randall was among Esquire Magazine's “75 Most Influential People.

Professor Randall earned her PhD from Harvard University and held professorships at MIT and Princeton University before returning to Harvard in 2001.

Professor Randall's new book Knocking on Heaven's Door comes out in September. You can pre-order it here. And follow her on Twitter here.

***

As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm New York City Time (EST) on May 31, 2011. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Professor Randall.

The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.

(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)

PrizeScienceAnnounce2011 Details (please read carefully before nominating):

The winners of this Science Prize will be announced on or around June 21, 2011. Here's the schedule:

May 23, 2011:

  • The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite blog entry or e-zine piece by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win. (Do NOT nominate a whole blog, just one individual blog post.)
  • Blog posts or e-zine articles longer than 4,000 words are not eligible.
  • Each person can only nominate one blog post.
  • Entries must be in English.
  • The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
  • The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after May 22, 2010.
  • You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog or e-zine (and we encourage you to).
  • Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
  • Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
  • Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.

May 31, 2011

  • The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
  • The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.

June 10, 2011

  • Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).

June 21, 2011 (or thereabouts)

  • The winners are announced.

One Final and Important Request

If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.

Best of luck and thanks for your attention!

Yours,

Abbas

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 10:24 AM | Permalink

Comments

http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: CakeHead | May 23, 2011 12:31:09 PM

http://theartinscience.blogspot.com/2010/07/who-heck-is-vitruvian-man.html

Posted by: Kimberley | May 23, 2011 12:32:35 PM

i would like to nominate this blog entry http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break
thanks

Posted by: dissensus | May 23, 2011 12:34:07 PM

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/morals-without-god/

This blog got close to 700 comments at the NYT and was also featured on The Human (national humanities center).

Posted by: Frans de Waal | May 23, 2011 12:37:38 PM

http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: Lenny | May 23, 2011 12:37:49 PM

http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: petites oreilles | May 23, 2011 12:39:28 PM

I nominate a recent post of mine:
http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2011/05/20/why-moths-lost-their-spots-and-cats-dont-like-milk-tales-of-evolution-in-our-time/

Posted by: Aatish | May 23, 2011 12:41:34 PM

I nominate

http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2011/05/12/blind-fish-in-dark-caves-shed-light-on-the-evolution-of-sleep/

Posted by: Darakhshan | May 23, 2011 12:52:35 PM

http://ohfortheloveofscience.com/2010/11/26/leviathan-melvillei/

Posted by: Allie | May 23, 2011 1:01:39 PM

I nominate

http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2011/05/15/when-nice-guys-finish-first-a-lesson-from-tiny-robots/

Posted by: Deepak | May 23, 2011 1:02:15 PM

I nominate Fadereu's blog post.

http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: Bhanuj | May 23, 2011 1:13:47 PM

Carl Zimmer's The Human Lake

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/03/31/the-human-lake/

From Hutchinson to Delbrück to the microbiome. The familiar Zimmer style applied to a really fascinating story.

Posted by: Ken Pidcock | May 23, 2011 1:26:39 PM

http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2010/11/rare-earth-elements-not-rare-just-playing-hard-to-get/

Posted by: Sarah | May 23, 2011 1:34:45 PM

"A Bump in the Night: When Sleepwalkers Turn Violent"

http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/81363

Posted by: Dan | May 23, 2011 1:42:28 PM

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/11/mutated-manuscripts-the-evolution-of-genes-and-texts/66617/

Posted by: Sam | May 23, 2011 3:14:43 PM

This post looks at a new "dual-track" theory of why we choke under pressure, whether on the golf course or during, say, a physics exam.

Posted by: David Dobbs | May 23, 2011 3:38:27 PM

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=serotonin-and-sexual-preference-is-2011-03-28

This post examines a recent study on serotonin and sexual preference in mice.

Posted by: Scicurious | May 23, 2011 5:04:27 PM

http://theastronomist.fieldofscience.com/2011/01/universe-and-life-is-asymmetric.html

Posted by: Alex | May 23, 2011 5:11:29 PM

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=circadian-clock-without-dna--histor-2011-02-11 academics are shy to comment in public, but I got lots of thanks and kudos by e-mail from the people in the field.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 23, 2011 5:35:49 PM

http://www.science3point0.com/themothergeek/2011/01/21/how-boner-is-misleading-the-science-behind-an-erect-penis/

Well, why not give it a shot.

Posted by: Jeanne Garbarino | May 23, 2011 6:00:33 PM

http://scienceblogs.com/observations/2010/06/cleaning_up_oil_spills.php

Posted by: Margaret Morgan | May 23, 2011 6:46:15 PM

I nominate a post by Jason Goldman: http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2011/03/defending_your_territory_is_pe.php

Posted by: AV Flox | May 23, 2011 8:02:38 PM

http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2011/01/spendid_fairy-wrens.php
Dr. Randall, all you need to read is the opening paragraph. Brilliant!

Posted by: Allie | May 23, 2011 8:06:12 PM

http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2011/05/is_pedagogy_specific_to_humans.php - I really enjoy Jason Goldman's work.

Posted by: Sharon | May 23, 2011 8:06:47 PM

This post is about how a group of cognitive psychologists overturned decades of thinking regarding a particular cognitive "error" made by human infants, by using a deceptively simple and very clever method.

http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2011/04/perseverative_error_piaget.php

Posted by: Jason G. Goldman | May 23, 2011 8:11:32 PM

http://www.biodiversityinfocus.com/blog/2011/04/11/the-fly-tree-of-life-big-science-big-results/

Posted by: Morgan Jackson | May 23, 2011 8:12:07 PM

I would like to nominate this April 2011 article on the great biologist E.O. Wilson, and how he is taking on the established views of kin selection as an explanation for altruism in evolution (which he himself had pioneered) in the face of fierce opposition from fellow scientists.

This 81 year old genius epitomizes Dylan Thomas' poem, "Do not go gentle into that good night".

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2011/04/17/where_does_good_come_from/?page=1

Posted by: Sam | May 23, 2011 8:18:22 PM

I nominate Eric Michael Johnson's piece about penis spines:
http://zinjanthropus.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/penis-spines-pearly-papules-and-pope-benedicts-balls/

(I hosted it at my blog, but unfortunately I can't take any of the credit for this amazing piece of writing!)

Posted by: Zinjanthropus | May 23, 2011 8:33:40 PM

This post has been nominated before, it compares a painting by Seurat to symmetries of the quantum world:

http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: Zolt | May 23, 2011 9:38:06 PM

On parallels between the movie Aliens and parasite life-cycles:

http://deepseanews.com/2011/05/this-is-clearly-an-important-species-were-dealing-with/

Posted by: Al Dove | May 23, 2011 9:47:00 PM

forensic psych related

Posted by: Taylor Leigh | May 23, 2011 10:02:44 PM

I personally like this one of mine: Why do women cry? Obviously, it's so they don't get laid.

Posted by: Christie | May 23, 2011 10:05:37 PM

Biology? Epidemiology? Sociology? Yes.

http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/

Posted by: Nicholas | May 23, 2011 11:12:18 PM

While I generally feel silly self-nominating for things, this was my favorite science explainer post of last year, looking at a bunch of measurements of the gravitational constant and the discrepancies between them. So what the hell, I'll throw it in here.

http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2010/08/measuring_gravity_aint_nothin.php

Posted by: Chad Orzel | May 23, 2011 11:55:54 PM

http://culturingscience.wordpress.com/

FANTASTIC blog.

Posted by: masha | May 24, 2011 12:05:24 AM

This one looks like a brand new blog, but the first post on it is just wonderful. I'm nominating this post about bubonic plague in the US:

http://puffthemutantdragon.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/bubonic-plague-in-america-part-i-la-outbreak/

Posted by: Pat Levine | May 24, 2011 12:22:24 AM

http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/?preview=true&preview_id=216&preview_nonce=9beb19531b

Posted by: r00r | May 24, 2011 12:39:51 AM

http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/?preview=true&preview_id=216&preview_nonce=9beb19531b

Posted by: Powerups | May 24, 2011 12:55:26 AM

Hookworms!
http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/

Posted by: Alise | May 24, 2011 12:56:27 AM

http://www.criticaltwenties.in/sciencetechnology/how-a-college-student-can-derive-the-rna-world-hypothesis-from-scratch


This is a brilliant exposition of how RNA is pivotal for life despite being a very unstable molecule. An informative, lucid and engaging post

Posted by: Abhilash Mishra | May 24, 2011 2:20:14 AM

I believe the following article from the "blogs" section of Scientific American (June 2010) deserves to be considered for the prize:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=one-reason-why-humans-are-special-a-2010-06-22

Posted by: Adrian Morgan | May 24, 2011 2:30:34 AM

http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/

Posted by: Nicholas | May 24, 2011 2:56:13 AM

I propose one of Dr Ben Still's Neutrino Blog posts. In this one he explains why some theories predict a possible "sterile neutrino". Like all his posts this is written with the lay reader in mind but he still manages not to dumb down the explanation so it remains really informative writing accessible to all. http://neutrinoscience.blogspot.com/2010/11/four-neutrinos-but-you-just-said-there.html

Posted by: Doubledoge | May 24, 2011 5:02:58 AM

http://telescoper.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/no-cox-please-were-british/

Posted by: Mrs Trellis | May 24, 2011 5:35:13 AM

Body Horrors!

Posted by: Lindsay | May 24, 2011 7:12:27 AM

I nominate Krystal D'Costa's Power, Confidence, and High Heels

http://www.anthropologyinpractice.com/2011/04/power-confidence-and-high-heels.html

Posted by: Jamie | May 24, 2011 9:15:37 AM

http://mattsoniak.com/2010/07/12/shell-games-the-social-and-behavioral-aspects-of-hermit-crab-real-estate/

Posted by: Erica | May 24, 2011 9:25:04 AM

http://bodyhorrors.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/blood-money-hookworm-economics-in-the-postbellum-south/?preview=true&preview_id=216&preview_nonce=9beb19531b

Posted by: leroy brown | May 24, 2011 11:37:49 AM

http://the-mouse-trap.com/2011/04/25/dichotomies-or-psychology-in-a-nutshell/
Explains the entire field of psychology in terms of its predominant dichotomies.

Posted by: Sandeep Gautam | May 24, 2011 12:42:40 PM

I nominate:
http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2011/05/12/blind-fish-in-dark-caves-shed-light-on-the-evolution-of-sleep/

The science of sleep is so little understood, and we roughly spend 1/3 of our life sleeping! Isn't this a shame? Two thumbs up for any research/popular article trying to gain insight in this complex field.

Posted by: Anindya | May 24, 2011 12:55:40 PM

The blog ERV, written by SA Smith makes retroviruses downright cool, especially their newfound place in animal evolution. I suppose today's entry has both charm and science all wrapped up in a tidy thought package,

http://scienceblogs.com/erv/2011/05/barnyard_week_white_chickens_a.php

Posted by: Bert Chadick | May 24, 2011 4:58:12 PM

http://www.scilogs.eu/en/blog/lindaunobel/2010-06-25/seeking-inspiration

Describes the story of a scientist in the lab with its usual dose of emotions...

Posted by: Akshat Rathi | May 24, 2011 6:19:55 PM

I found this to be very well written and easily understood. Very accessible to laypeople. It was also picked up by the press and referred to by them repeatedly.

How do you ID a dead Osama anyway? by Christie Wilcox

http://scienceblogs.com/observations/2011/05/how_do_you_id_a_dead_osama_any.php

Posted by: S Phillips | May 24, 2011 6:26:08 PM

I'd like to nominate a post of mine about one of my favorite geology words: ophiolite.

This post is one of my "Geology Word of the Week" posts.

http://georneys.blogspot.com/2011/02/geology-word-of-week-o-is-for-ophiolite.html

Posted by: Evelyn | May 24, 2011 11:57:03 PM

I'd like to nominate this fantastic post about the Levees and flood control:

http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2011/05/levees-and-the-illusion-of-flood-control/

Posted by: Evelyn | May 25, 2011 12:28:28 AM

I nominate:
http://fadereu.posterous.com/a-sunday-afternoon-watching-symmetry-break

Posted by: Jan | May 25, 2011 2:42:45 AM

http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2011/04/dear-hypothesis.html

Posted by: Chuck Magee | May 25, 2011 4:51:05 AM

Does economics count as a science? If so I would like to nominate a post on economics and the crisis:

http://thephilosophersbeard.blogspot.com/2011/01/economics-and-crisis-denial-and.html

Posted by: Philosopher's Beard | May 25, 2011 7:55:38 AM

I nominate: http://culturingscience.wordpress.com/2010/12/31/reflections-on-2010-humans-as-biological-machines-and-love-whatever

Posted by: Pablo | May 25, 2011 9:02:46 AM

I nominate: http://ohfortheloveofscience.com/2010/11/30/bufotoxin-tolerance-in-keelback-snakes-recent-adaptation-to-a-new-threat-or-preadaptation-from-an-ancient-foe/

Posted by: Kamille | May 25, 2011 11:16:27 AM

I nominate:

http://bytesizebio.net/index.php/2010/10/27/but-did-you-correct-your-results-using-a-dead-salmon/

You should be very careful in the statistical interpretation of your results. A dead salmon may look a bit too lively otherwise.

Posted by: Iddo | May 25, 2011 6:13:26 PM

I am particularly fond of this post I wrote for Deep Sea News: Quantifying Outreach to the Cult of Science
http://deepseanews.com/2010/11/from-the-editor%E2%80%99s-desk-quantifying-outreach-to-the-cult-of-science/

Posted by: Kevin Z | May 25, 2011 9:47:51 PM

Same post, just different locales.

http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2011/05/levees-and-the-illusion-of-flood-control/

or

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=levees-and-the-illusion-of-flood-co-2011-05-20


Anne Jefferson brings to life the relevance of coexistence with a natural process we have no hope in controlling over the long term.

Posted by: drogn | May 26, 2011 12:43:43 AM

http://culturingscience.wordpress.com/2011/01/05/when-adaptation-doesnt-happen/

When Adaptation Doesn't Happen

Posted by: James | May 26, 2011 9:11:19 AM

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/05/where_is_everybody.php

Posted by: Ian | May 26, 2011 9:57:35 AM

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/05/where_is_everybody.php

Posted by: Ian | May 26, 2011 10:01:28 AM

Logicomix book review:
http://thesoftanonymous.com/2011/04/02/book-review-logicomix/

Posted by: JamesL | May 26, 2011 2:13:29 PM

http://smellslikescience.com/field-notes-from-a-mayan-ruin/

Posted by: Dan Bailey | May 26, 2011 4:48:18 PM

I'd like to nominate
http://theartfulamoeba.com/2011/04/19/bombardier-beetles-bee-purple-and-the-sirens-of-the-night/

Posted by: Jennifer Frazer | May 27, 2011 12:00:30 PM

I nominate:

http://smellslikescience.com/the-psychology-of-killing-and-the-origins-of-war/

This is a fascinating article that really prompts discussion.

Posted by: Mara | May 27, 2011 12:40:44 PM

Please allow me to nominate this stunning article "International Astronomical Union has no Definition for Big Bang"

It is at http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/?p=66

Posted by: Reginald | May 27, 2011 2:11:17 PM

(I tried to post this earlier, so please delete it if a duplicate)

There are some very good articles posted here. I would like to nominate an article that exposes a fundamental flaw in Cosmology.

It quotes Jim Peebles, a leading Cosmology author, and is titled International Astronomical Union has no Definition for Big Bang.

The URL is
http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/?p=66

It is clearly written in plain English.

Posted by: Reginald Buck | May 27, 2011 7:26:45 PM

http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2011/01/heinrichs_digital_kentrosaurus.php

Posted by: Mike from Ottawa | May 27, 2011 11:18:45 PM

http://www.pasthorizons.com/index.php/archives/05/2011/the-bones-of-martyrs

Posted by: Mitch | May 28, 2011 7:11:39 AM

I nominate "IAU has no Definition for Big Bang".

http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/?p=66

This article is notable for several reasons. It quotes
cosmology's preeminent spokesperson, Princeton's
PJ Peebles, as saying the foundations of its leading
concept "Big Bang" has a serious fundamental problem.

It bolsters that with the amazing report that there is no
formal definition of Big Bang by the world's leading
astronomy agency.

Big bang is being taught in schools as science and it has failed to pass the most basic rules of the scientific method.

Best of all this landmark article is written in an easy to understand, sometimes
humorous, plain English.

Enjoy and think it through scientifically!

Posted by: Vienna Merritt Moore | May 28, 2011 1:01:22 PM

I nominate http://georneys.blogspot.com for her in-depth coverage of the earthquake in Japan, and subsequent follow up on the nuclear power plant disaster. Please give her serious consideration!

Posted by: LarianLeQuella | May 28, 2011 11:17:12 PM

A cool post, and the "regular" media overlooked the best parts of the study:

http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/2011/05/ebola_in_pigs_1.php

Posted by: Danielle M | May 29, 2011 12:34:07 AM

http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2011/04/dear-hypothesis.html

Posted by: Chuck Magee | May 29, 2011 6:21:51 AM

This post concerns my own work, but that is encouraged.

The post (and the blog) is about speculative biology, with science, speculation and art in about equal measures.

Posted by: Gert van Dijk | May 29, 2011 7:06:05 AM

I nominate Nicola Twilley's post about Rachel Laudan's talk about "Fueling Mexico City". http://www.ediblegeography.com/fueling-mexico-city-a-grain-revolution/

I'm nominating the write-up, rather than the original, because it gives a bit more context, but the original is every bit as deserving.

Posted by: Jeremy Cherfas | May 29, 2011 8:57:17 AM

Culturing Science - Can seabirds overfish a resource? The case of cormorants in Estonia

http://culturingscience.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/can-seabirds-overfish-a-resource/

Posted by: A | May 29, 2011 10:06:55 AM


http://blogs.nature.com/barbaraferreira/2010/11/22/tychos-drunken-moose-and-other-stories

Posted by: Mina Razzak | May 29, 2011 10:47:52 AM

I would like to nominate Finding My Tears for Japan: When 1 is worse than 1000. By Brian Zikmund-Fisher:

http://umrscblogs.org/2011/03/15/finding-my-tears-for-japan/

This is a very personal and moving account of the devastating impacts of the Japan earthquake, that draws on Brian's research in risk communication and decision making.

Posted by: Andrew Maynard | May 29, 2011 10:57:58 AM

I nominate:

At the Bleeding Edge: Benchmarking Next-Gen NanoTox Protocols

which is an exhortative call for radically new approaches to NIEHS' NanoToxicology research programs and protocols.

Urgently proposed are these implementations and initiatives, along with other admonishments:

- a new predictive prototype;
- a new NanoParticle-Protein Corona classification system;
- revolutionizing NanoMetrology;
- a dedicated NanoInformatics division; and
- Nano Torts standards-setting.

Posted by: LaVergne | May 29, 2011 1:33:24 PM

I nominate: http://blogs.nature.com/barbaraferreira/2011/05/28/is-the-world-real

Posted by: Barbara | May 29, 2011 2:23:39 PM

I'd like to nominate my post "Why we don't need a brain":
http://blog.ketyov.com/2011/03/why-we-dont-need-brain.html

As a neuroscientist studying the role that neuroplasticity plays in shaping cognition and recovery from brain damage, I'm fascinated by the degree to which recovery is possible. This post was my attempt to share some of that wonder.

Posted by: Bradley Voytek | May 29, 2011 2:25:20 PM

[Re-submission with link]

I nominate:

At the Bleeding Edge: Benchmarking Next-Gen NanoTox Protocols

http://www.nanopaprika.eu/profiles/blogs/at-the-bleeding-edge

which is an exhortative call for radically new approaches to NIEHS' NanoToxicology research programs and protocols.

Urgently proposed are these implementations and initiatives, along with other admonishments:

- a new predictive prototype;
- a new NanoParticle-Protein Corona classification system;
- revolutionizing NanoMetrology;
- a dedicated NanoInformatics division; and
- NanoTox Torts standards-setting.

Posted by: LaVergne | May 29, 2011 4:37:00 PM

"First Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect"
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26813/?ref=rss

Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 29, 2011 5:05:10 PM

"First Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect"
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26813/?ref=rss

Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 29, 2011 5:10:42 PM

http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=8335

"Back from the brink: victories in conservation" tells an important story about new scientific research, a huge network of volunteer scientists trying to save the world, and how some conservation efforts have succeeded in protecting endangered species.

Posted by: WhySharksMatter | May 29, 2011 5:56:10 PM

I have nominated this blog post because it really shows characteristics unique to blogs. First, It has numerous pictures that are close to where the subjects in the picture are mentioned in the article. Second, this is a blog post that includes info provided at an event not everyone can make it to. Being able to read a blog post about an event that just happened, that you were not able to attend is, in my opinion, one of the key niches for blogs.

Posted by: Garner Boogaerts | May 29, 2011 6:41:49 PM

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/03/31/the-human-lake/

I have nominated this blog post because it really shows characteristics unique to blogs. First, It has numerous pictures that are close to where the subjects in the picture are mentioned in the article. Second, this is a blog post that includes info provided at an event not everyone can make it to. Being able to read a blog post about an event that just happened, that you were not able to attend is, in my opinion, one of the key niches for blogs.

Posted by: Garner Boogaerts | May 29, 2011 6:43:26 PM

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/05/23/physics-and-the-immortality-of-the-soul/

Posted by: KJF | May 29, 2011 7:37:23 PM

The Human Lake by Carl Zimmer
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/03/31/the-human-lake/

Posted by: Marfy Goodspeed | May 29, 2011 8:14:01 PM

I notice that three people have nominated The Human Lake by Carl Zimmer, which is indeed an excellent choice.

However, it's also a test case for defining the 4000 word limit, because it's so close to being precisely that length that it's either slightly over or slightly under depending on how you count.

I make it 4011 words, which is slightly over, but if you argue that the "for further reading" paragraph at the end isn't really part of the post itself and doesn't count, then it comes in at slightly under.

Loom fans should consider nominating something else, in case the 3QD gods rule that The Human Lake is not eligible.

Posted by: Adrian Morgan | May 29, 2011 9:28:02 PM

Informative to a laymen.. about one of the most promising substance of future...

Posted by: Ravindra | May 30, 2011 1:19:10 AM

http://www.oceans-research-blog.blogspot.com/

Posted by: David Delaney | May 30, 2011 5:57:39 AM

http://realdoctorstu.com/2011/03/24/the-future-of-nuclear-power-after-fukushima-thorium-reactors/
A straight-forward post for the lay reader on the potential for thorium reactors as a viable and safer alternative to conventional nuclear power. The article was noticed by the Tampa Tribune and reprinted by them on April 17th.

Posted by: Stu | May 30, 2011 8:26:42 AM

I nominate this short piece on the performativity of epidemiology: how policy interventions based on epidemiological statistics may create a self-fulfilling prophecy.

http://screedsandquibbles.blogspot.com/2011/03/performativity-of-epidemiology-how.html

Posted by: Thomas Wells | May 30, 2011 8:48:05 AM

Here is a post explaining why there is so much more carbon in the universe than some of the lower mass elements.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/05/where-does-the-carbon-come-from/

Posted by: Rhett Allain | May 30, 2011 9:48:49 AM

»

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Norman Costa on Race Is Not Biology

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kai Matthews on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jon s on Race Is Not Biology

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Faith Healing

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jo smith on Guy de Maupassant

Geoff on Jeremy Scahill & Noam Chomsky on Secret U.S. Dirty Wars From Yemen to Pakistan to Laos

Jim on Friday Poem

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Jesse on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kenan Malik on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Pierre on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

chris on Race Is Not Biology

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed