| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« perceptions | Main | Cocktail construction »

April 04, 2011

Get a grip, India!

by Vivek Menezes

Cricket_bat Look, the fact is that cricket barely qualifies as an international sport.

There are a billion and a half subcontinentals who’ve been fed cricket, cricket and more cricket for decades – the very definition of a captive audience – so there’s steady interest here. But look beyond, and we’re talking a very steep, genuinely precipitous, drop-off to England, Australia, South Africa and the West Indies, where “our” sport runs a distant third or fourth to the popularity of football, rugby, basketball, athletics, swimming, etc. And after England and its overseas spawn, you may as well stop counting, because you’re done with all the legitimate cricketing sides in the world. Pretty pathetic, isn’t it?

Indians don’t like to consider this truth, but it’s become quite apparent that most other countries only continue with cricket because India is obsessed with it – they play to keep us company, to humiliate us when the chance presents itself, and, especially, to pick up generous paychecks which would be entirely unforthcoming if India grew up, and concentrated its efforts on real sports, played by a majority of nations, the kind of sports that show up at the Olympics.

But you see, that precise sticking point is the crux of why Indians are obsessed with cricket – it’s another plain fact that we’re really, really horrible at sports where the rest of the world competes, and we hate the Olympics, beacause we get ritually creamed each year (at Beijing, India’s best Olympics ever, little tiny countries like Mongolia out-ranked us. Yes, Mongolia.)


So that’s why you saw – first and above all else - genuine relief flooding Mukesh Ambani and Rajnikanth and Aamir Khan’s faces at the exact same moment in the TV coverage of Saturday’s match.

These guys, three sides of the same spurious coin, sitting in the same front row, had come to roar in glorious triumph, but tiny Sri Lanka gave them heartburn all the way up to the 35th over of the Indian innings. Only then, only when crushing victory became inevitable and all sport had gone out of the occasion – that’s when our heroes in the stands awoke. That's when Aamir Khan started to wave the flag with calculated abandon. It was a moment that comes with ultimate rarity in Indian sports - our guys  on top, racing towards a famous victory.

Because, you see, up to and excepting the cup victory, the annals of modern Indian sport are nothing but migraine-inducing, an endless litany of disappointments, failue and humiliations.

We are a billion people grown accustomed to being thrashed on the playing-fields. We Indians celebrate quarter-finals defeats, and fourth-place finishes, the way other countries get excited about actual victories.

In the old days, we took the lickings with a certain resigned acceptance – poor country, no facilities, etc. But now we have that much-advertised, resurgent middle class and all that other stuff that drives Tom Friedman into frothing ecstasies. And suddenly, increasingly, we have bourgeois angst about our national image – look at China, look at South Korea, and what about Mongolia, dammit – and so we have developed a kind of real national performance anxiety about sports.

When that happen, again and again and again, we reach for the only antidote that’s worked - that little blue pill called cricket.

But even when cricket delivers the happy ending, it doesn’t quite satisfy. And this goes beyond the fact that we dominate the sport so ludicrously that it’s probably actually unfair when we take on Sri Lanka. Actually, it's because every knowledgeable cricket fan knows the game’s integrity is in tatters. Over the past few years, it has become increasingly clear that we’re talking about an unusually manipulated and fake sport, with corruption now part of its very DNA.

Why are we so eager to forget the last Cup – perhaps the biggest lurching failure in the history of organized international sports – paid for by an embezzler, studded with obviously thrown matches, and spot-fixing, and garnished with a sizzling murder case? Talk to old-timers, and you'll understand the silence - to a man, they believe the rot is still embedded. And could anyone be blamed for thinking the way they do, when just last week we watched Pakistan spill catch after catch off Tendulkar, any of which would have turned the match the other way instantly? Is this cricket?

Let’s also remember the sport was riven apart again just this past year, when the Pakistani tour of England was interrupted by proven match-fixing that included the captain of the team, and the superb  Mohammed Aamer.


Does anyone imagine that it is only the Pakistanis who are prone to the inducement of hundreds of thousands of dollars for bowling a few no-balls, or perhaps quietly running out your team-mate?
After all, where is the money coming from? Isn't it obvious that the trail of corruption leads directly across the border into our own society?


**

Now, don’t get me wrong, I have all the necessary cricketing bona fides in place, this is an insider’s plea. Born in Bombay, gifted my first bat when just about capable of walking, I worshipped the ground traversed by Sunil Gavaskar’s short, stubby legs, like every other Indian boy my age.

Staying close to the sport through sheer dint of emotion, I bowled spin to inebriated Americans in my college's residential corridors, and then even made cricket my career for the few years that WorldTel tried to dominate the sport from a small suite of offices in New York. There, I put in my time for cricket:  tried (unsuccessfully) to nurture the USA to a World Cup berth,  and (unsuccessfully) to make streaming cricket video a lucrative Internet business, and (successfully, for a time) to build Sachin Tendulkar a better official website than Michael Jordan’s, etc.

But somewhere around the time that the IPL took off, the shine came off the ball for me.

It was, and remains apparent, that the make-up of this league, and composition of the teams, is utterly fixed from top to bottom. It's racketeering, plain and simple. The administrators of the game are the owners of the teams, and the main beneficiaries of side-contracts to boot. The sport now reeks  incestuousness, and the pipeline of pure cash thrown up in this Ponzi-style scheme has completely warped the game we once loved, probably irrevocably.

But it was always the case, only now glaringly apparent – look at a Yuvraj for example – that our cricket players are barely athletic by any objective standard. Even today, I’d bet the American women’s soccer team would whup the Indian team’s ass in collective fitness, flexibility, stamina, and probably co-ordination as well. But add to this the fact that the Indian team occupies a staggeringly disproportionate bubble of comforts. Where the Indian hockey team (hockey is the national sport!) travels by train, and literally has to fight to get decently nutritive food at its training camps, the cricket lifestyle is now five-star all the way, with even the subs garnering crores in commercial deals.

And then, as pointed to above, the Indian cricket team gets to flex its muscles in a non-sport. We beat up on New Zealand’s seventh best set of athletes, and the country goes into hysterics as though it says something wonderful about us. Within hours of beating Sri Lanka, that global athletic power, in a sport almost no one gives a shit about outside the subcontinent, the state and central governments were falling over themselves to hand out incredibly large cash awards to each player, and the coaches as well. Crores each, plots of land, luxury vehicles, the sky's the limit for our cricketers.

But put it into perspective - Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi, literally at the same time, won another doubles tournament to earn back the #1 ranking in the world.

You know, tennis, a sport that’s actually played in more than a handful of countries, and where a world championship implies beating genuinely world-class athletes.

I mean, if Sreesanth can get half-a-million dollars cold cash for bowling quite badly, and taking zero wickets, against a team of semi-professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka,  then my man Lee's prolly taken home at least a billion for his multiple-Grand Slam championships, and Olympic medal, earned against the world's best. Half a billion, at the least. Yes?  Yes? Is that crickets I hear?


**

And so the ultimate truth: cricket has become a pox, a monstrous and pervasive cloud of pure ballyhoo that has destroyed Indian sport across the board.


It sucks up all the money and all the attention, and all of our collective athletic energies disappear into this black hole of a colonialist non-sport, leaving only ashes in its wake.

Imagine if you are Viswanathan Anand (or even Ivana Furtado) – winning chess world championships one after another,  against the best minds on the planet, with very little attention paid, and certainly nothing like the obscene bonanza that is currently being poured on the heads of our cricket players. Or Climax Lawrence, stalwart of Indian football, which has exactly one world-class pitch available to it in the entire country (not usable in the monsoons), and remember that Indian football was forced to take a grnt(from the BCCI!) to find adequate training facilities.

Now here's something to root for - treated like dirt for decades, Indian football has developed a core of gritty young players who can hang with the better Asian teams for long stretches, even though they have to beg and fight for facilities that fall short of even high-school set-ups in Germany or Japan.

Indian football has a hope, and a plan, to break into the top 100 in the world within 5 years, a worthy and realistic goal. There are no billionaire cheerleaders, and no Bollywood insiders packing the stands.  But it's football, truly global. Now that we've been there and done that with regard to this silly Cup, can we please move on to real sports?

Posted by Vivek Menezes at 12:22 AM | Permalink

Comments

Brilliant piece! This sorely needs to be said. The World Cup final and its aftermath have surely dealt a body blow to other sports in India.

Posted by: Anonymouse | Apr 4, 2011 10:54:07 AM

"against a team of semi-professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka"

really? I don't think you watch cricket.

Posted by: MegJag | Apr 4, 2011 11:03:13 AM

Well said. I have been arguing for long whether its a sport or a national pastime (as the US likes to call baseball). The sad part of the victory is that all other sports take a huge backseat after this. I would not have been as harsh on Amir and Mukesh. Nothing wrong in cheering for the country. i am sure Amir would have done it for a football team too. Its even funnier when most fans do not know the first things about cricket but are just fair weather fans caught in the frenzy.

Posted by: Fidelis Lobo | Apr 4, 2011 11:05:03 AM

You are a complete Idiot. In America, people do not play International Football nor do they play other Sports which are en vogue in the Worlde. In America, Baseball, Football, and Basketball reign. Who cares? It is what the People enjoy. Realise this: They are an enjoyment, not Life. You take this too seriously. India have other problems whereto they need attend.

Posted by: Shahenshah | Apr 4, 2011 11:08:17 AM

What? Sell your souls for a sliver of conformist football? No way! Here in America, we play all kinds of sports that nobody else cares about: baseball, American football, lacrosse. You've got to embrace your national sports and evangelize them to the world. How boring would it be if everybody only played football everywhere? Long live sports diversity!

Posted by: X | Apr 4, 2011 11:09:48 AM

Cricket was never and still is not considered the national sport of India. That title goes to Field Hockey and India has won 8 Olympic Gold medals in that game. Cricket really exploded after 1983 after India beat the mighty west Indies. Its not a growth sport worldwide (except in the subcontinent). The TRP came out today. 67 million people watched the final. World Cup of football finals have nearly 600 million viewers. I am glad they won it and events like this galvanize the country, but LETS NOT GET CARRIED away and thats the point Vivek was trying to make.

Posted by: Fidelis Lobo | Apr 4, 2011 11:16:44 AM

I am sorry, your point is? Also I do not see any harm in celebrating things that we are good at as opposed to lamenting about all those things we don't know about. And how does only "a few nations" play this, any kind of argument? I mean, if it is numbers, I am sure we have many viewers anyway. And you brought up that bit about colonial hangover and cricket bastardisation? Wow! Never heard that before.

"Against a team of semi-professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka" Totally classy.

Posted by: Kavya | Apr 4, 2011 11:18:14 AM

"Against a team of semi-professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka"

I know Vivek stretched that a bit but we also have to remember that in 1983 India beat a team that included hall of famers like Gordan Grenidge, Clive Loyd, Andy roberts, Viv Richards, Ambrose etc. Every player on that team was considered a super star. I don't believe players like Suraj Radiv would have even got a sniff on that West Indian team. Thats a time when Cricket meant something in the West Indies. Right now its literally almost dead.

Posted by: Fidelis Lobo | Apr 4, 2011 11:27:29 AM

With all due respect, while the author makes some fair points, he also seems to have a case of Globalitis. This is a dreaded condition where some people want their country to conform to "world standards". Blech.

Spend more on the Olympics, if you will. Remember what sports are in aid of though- national spirit, teamwork, unity in diversity, grittiness and sportsmanship. Our Cricket team fits these parameters, methinks.

Posted by: Varun | Apr 4, 2011 11:42:03 AM

So if the IPL hadn't happened, you would have been okay with this?

India has not been good at sports. And you needed a 1000+ word article to tell us that? Would losing the World Cup suddenly have led to a vast improvement in Hockey, and the other sports you apparently care about?

I am not sure why this sport has to be compared to another sport? Its not like people are saying that India is now the best sporting nation in the world. Its a sport we are passionate about, and our team played really well to win the highest title. Why can't the nation just enjoy that for what its worth?

You don't see people making the argument that since the Bible outsells Shakespeare by a vast margin, people should not enjoy reading his works?

Posted by: addicted | Apr 4, 2011 12:34:59 PM

addicted

There has been lots of money and maybe cricket-centric infractructure that will follow because of the world cup victory. Which is good but we have seen that if we spend the money on good training we could be no.1 at any other sports. Paes and Bhupathi both were a product of the BAT academy and money that was well spent. The point is we spend too much money and energy on a sport that nobody except us care about. Would the country rally around our Kabbadi team? Now thats a sport that is native to the country but our media and our advertisers do not tell us that thats the case.

Posted by: MultiFacetted | Apr 4, 2011 12:54:52 PM

Varun

Its not a shame to aspire to be would class.

Posted by: WorldClass | Apr 4, 2011 12:56:02 PM

I meant WORLD Class.

Posted by: WorldClass | Apr 4, 2011 1:00:23 PM

Fair enough. But as others have pointed out, the Americans worship a game played in only one other country on earth (football; Canada, which might as well be the 51st state). Why shouldn't Indians enjoy being the best at something? As for postcolonial--the most satisfying trick in the book is to beat your former master at his own game. It is no shame to top the other cricket nations.

Posted by: Festus | Apr 4, 2011 1:10:06 PM

Festus

Actually its not fair to say that the Americans only adore footbal. Yes the super bowl is a big thing, but they do dominate in Atheletics, Swimming, Basketball and have even made gains in the only world sport that is football/soccer. You cannot really call them one trick pony. And a for beating the former masters I do not recall Sri Lanka/Pakistan or Australia running India at anytime.

Posted by: AmericanDream | Apr 4, 2011 1:15:33 PM

The only reason NFL is popular in the States is because of GAMBLING. With the creation of the IPL, cricket is having the same fate.

Posted by: NFLCricket | Apr 4, 2011 1:39:50 PM

[quote] we hate the Olympics, beacause we get ritually creamed each year (at Beijing, India’s best Olympics ever, little tiny countries like Mongolia out-ranked us. Yes, Mongolia.) [/quote]

bring on Mongolia. 1v1. let's see who fares well in all the sports out there. FFS there is so much cultural, socio - economic context behind it. It is so easy to tweak olympics medal tally. kenya does better than south africa and brazil combined. what should i infer?

compare with countries of similar background. we are top 3 commonwealth sporting nation out there. we beat England in last commonwealth games.

condition of sports in india sucks to be honest. but this article is dire. i can write a better article why cricket should go.

Posted by: hawklord | Apr 4, 2011 5:27:55 PM

I think that the author makes several good points, but... Several of the Indian players come from middle classes, some of them did not have any political or family connections to start with; Dhoni worked as a ticket collector in the railways for 3 years. Generally, it seems to be one game in which talented players reached the top without connections and without regard to which part of the country they came from. Saurav Ganguly backed several players outside Bengal. Earlier Eknath Solkar, son of a groundsman in Bombay became a national player. May be it is one game which gives hope and sense of pride for several in the country where things are heavily stacked against them. It may be similar in Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

Posted by: gaddeswarup | Apr 4, 2011 5:43:37 PM

Indians have small hearts to boot!
http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?717627

Posted by: Snow Storm | Apr 4, 2011 5:57:52 PM

gaddeawarup

I think that would hold good for any sport. PT USha, Milkha Singh,Vijender Singh have all come from poor or middle class upbringings. The point is if oppurtunity is given Indians can excell in any sport.

Posted by: Hopeforeveryone | Apr 4, 2011 8:40:18 PM

Hopeforeveryone
True. There was a paper a couple of years ago by Anirudh Krishna and Eric Heglund:
http://www.sanford.duke.edu/krishna/documents/EPW_krishna_haglund_Olympics.pdf
which discuses India's lack of success in Olympics and Nobel prizes. I wonder whether it throws some light on these issues. I think thattheir theory is in terms of 'affectively participating populations':"Advancing information and enabling access are as much a critical part of raising Olympic achievement as they are of enhancing development success and other achievements. In general, information and access are crucial for effective participation. Where more people are able to participate more effectively – in the economy, in competitive sports, in public decision-making, and in other walks of life – the country will grow faster and more citizens will benefit."
Perhaps for some reason or other, cricket fared better than other sports.

Posted by: gaddeswarup | Apr 5, 2011 12:00:48 AM

Why so bitter, Vivek? So according to you, how many countries need to be playing a sport for a nation to be justifiably euphoric about winning a World Cup? 10? 20? 150? Is there a magic number?
So when people were dancing in the streets of Johannesburg in 2007 after South Africa won the rugby world cup, should police have been shouting out on megaphones "Everybody back in their homes, rugby is only played by a handful of countries!"? And perhaps when Ricky Ponting had his head buried in the Mohali turf as his side were being beaten (one of the images of the tournament, IMHO) what he was really thinking was, "Who cares if we win or lose, cricket is only the No.3 sport in Australia, anyway", right?

Posted by: Rajiv | Apr 5, 2011 1:09:04 AM

Since you brought it up, the No.1 sport that nobody gives a shit about is probably tennis doubles, Vivek. The only players who play it are failed singles players, which is why it is so dominated by people on the wrong side of 35. So Lee & Hesh are No.1. Do you know who's No.2? Do you? Nobody does because nobody gives a rat's arse for tennis doubles, Vivek.

Posted by: Rajiv | Apr 5, 2011 1:49:22 AM

[quote] I mean, if Sreesanth can get half-a-million dollars cold cash for bowling quite badly, and taking zero wickets, against a team of semi-professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka, then my man Lee's prolly taken home at least a billion for his multiple-Grand Slam championships, and Olympic medal, earned against the world's best. Half a billion, at the least. Yes? Yes? Is that crickets I hear? [/quote]

Classic. Masterpiece.

Sehwag scored DUCK against the a semi professional twentysomethings from tiny, war-ravaged Sri Lanka [talking about the same team which murdered English team in QFs]. He should give back his medal. Probably my man Jesse Ryder deserves it.

Btw, who is that your man Lee? The same guy who plays cricket just to keep us company?

And never a footballer capped in WC winning team played poorly. Last time I checked Spain beat Netherlands in final by 11-0. Apparently everyone from the winning team scored. Yes? Yes? Is that football I hear? ROFL.

Posted by: hawklord | Apr 5, 2011 1:59:12 AM

strike out my Lee/Leander comment. I stick to rest of it.

Posted by: hawklord | Apr 5, 2011 2:09:52 AM

Hats off to the blogger Menezes for calling spade a spade very boldly. Good analysis. But I do not agree the comments he made about Sri Lankan team.
--Mohan S

Posted by: MOHAN SIROYA | Apr 5, 2011 4:58:11 AM

They've all gone fat and lazy, indians and so the comfortable and lazy way to fame is all that they can hope for and rejoice over. Brilliant article, but from comments I read, this article is not read by brilliant people..some can't even write a sentence properly so why do they try to
comment on something they can't even comprehend?

Posted by: Angela alvares | Apr 5, 2011 5:28:02 AM

Very good points, Vivek. And wicked timing! :)

Posted by: M73 | Apr 5, 2011 6:02:06 AM

One thing I realized after watching the tourney is that the only athletic aspect of the game is fielding. And in that aspect of the game we sucked. This could be one sport where the fitness levels don't have to be world class and you could still be no. 1.

Posted by: Fieldingmatters | Apr 5, 2011 8:26:07 AM

Oh dear, I fear Mr Menezes spent too much time in the US. What makes cricket so special is that it is played by regularly sized players. Not over-sized hyper-athletes.
Only cricket is played at the highest level by all sizes. It showcases both teamwork in the field and individual brilliance with the bat or when bowling. The ball is hard and bounces off the pitch at a huge range of speeds and angles depending on the bowler and the state of the pitch. Fast bowlers can get the ball to the batsman at nearly almost 100mph. Batsmen have to react in a split second and have to have the courage not simply to duck away. Spin bowlers, spinning the ball are masters at deception. deceiving the batsman with flight. Cricketers are as much the result of of technique as of physique.

Yet, it is suggested that cricket be abandoned, for what? Football? Football/soccer is a great game but it has the same colonial past as other world sports and where it dominates, you can be sure that it sucks up huge resources at the cost of other sports - just look at Europe, most of Africa and Latin America. Its governing body, FIFA operates with a, I dare say, colonial arrogance that has to be experienced to be believed. Track & Field through the Olympics? To do well, you need to be very rich, have a unique genetic heritage like Kenya or the Caribbean or come from an oppressive, undemoncratic and authoritarian country with an inferiority complex and so, something to prove to the rest of the world.

Well done India on winning the cricket World Cup. Its cricket team, ably lead by Dhoni, is a credit to India.

Posted by: Dirk de Vos | Apr 5, 2011 8:52:11 AM

Excellent article. The whole country is rotten, not only in sport, but in every single thing you can think of.

Posted by: Arun | Apr 5, 2011 8:58:13 AM

Jesus! I wasted 10 minutes of my life reading this nonsense. This is pure garbage. A little surprised that 3quarksdaily accepted this piece.

Wonder what the author of this article has to say about the World Champions 'Green Bay Packers'. How silly of Americans to watch the Super Bowl (all 115 million)and obsess over it.

Cricket is also the number one sport in Australia: http://www.theage.com.au/news/cricket/everybody-out-of-the-pool-cricket-has-bowled-us-over/2007/05/09/1178390390322.html

The subcontinent has over 1.5 billion people and cricket is by far the most popular sport in this region.

Guess 1 out of 4 humans obsessing over a sport does not make it big enough.

Posted by: Surprised | Apr 5, 2011 10:31:37 AM

Mr De Vos,

I have read Vivek's artical and at no point he has indication that we need to dump cricket. I think he will be more than happy if other sports get atleast some recognition. The same argument you make for cricket (i.e. any sized player can excel) can be made for football too. The Sachin tendulkars of football (Pele, Marodona and now Messi) are all small players in stature. If we get even 1 tenth of investment we get for cricket into football be could have a more than decent team. Atleast its a game where 11 athletes run for 90 straight minutes and mostly look far more fitter than most cricketers. Its also a sport that has to leave some really good teams behind in its world cup because the level is so high worldwide. I do not believe Vivek's rant was because he despises cricket. It was more of a rant to take a step back and look at sporting scene more objectively.

Posted by: fitindia | Apr 5, 2011 10:38:21 AM

Surprised

Not that it matters Cricket is not the number one sport in Australia. Might have been is 2007 but as a game its interest is rapidly detoriating.

This is Australia sports landscape and I am sure Vivek would be happy if we spent our limited sports budget like the Australias did.

"Throughout the country a wide variety of sports are played. According to official government statistics, in 2005–06, the most popular sports in terms of crowd attendance were Australian rules football, horse racing, rugby league, motorsport, cricket, rugby union and association football in descending order."

Posted by: AllSports | Apr 5, 2011 10:55:04 AM

All sports:

Your stats are from 05-06. Anyway, maybe cricket is not popular in Australia anymore and that's fine.

The author could have simply said that India should invest more in other sports. I am fine with that and most others will be as well.

The central theme of the author is that because cricket is not truly a global sport like soccer, the Indian obsession over it is not as worthy. I think ignoring the fact that cricket is the most popular sport of one-fourth of homo sapiens belies his main argument.

Posted by: Surprised | Apr 5, 2011 11:05:22 AM

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2011/04/cricket_passion.html

Posted by: Surprised | Apr 5, 2011 11:14:52 AM

Surprised

Straight from the legal source. Pretty much showing how the game is slowly dying in Australia.

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4174.0~2009-10~Main+Features~Most+popular+sports+attended?OpenDocument

I am also OK with the central theme.

Just because Americans are obsessed with a steroid filled game like NFL football, does not mean its right. The sad part is over the last 10-15 years the sport of cricket is very regionalized to the South East Asian continent.

Look at it objectively. The West Indies no longer cares. Their youth are embrassing football, basketball and atheletic as thats their ticket to US scholarships. As illustrated above the Australians are slowly going away. New Zealand generally has a team of semi professionals. South Africa is a bit interested but even there Atheletics and football dominate. Zimbawe ( not sure what the status there is ). England is so EPL dominant. So that only leaves India/Pakistan/Sri Lanka where in interest is sky high. When so few countries care and ever fewer die for the sport its becomes a case where "even a blind squirrel can find a nut sometimes". So that why the author is right is suggesting we do not get carried away.

The population makes it look like that 1 in four people really are interested in the game. But the TRP after the finals extrapolated to only around 70 million people watching it. Compare that to 300-600 million for the FIFA WC and you realised its still a very regional sport.

I don't want to get into the IPL aspect of the game. That is just plain scary because from a technical aspect of the game the it just sucks. Keiran Pollard is a prime example.

Posted by: AllSports | Apr 5, 2011 11:25:41 AM

Very relevant. Those who have played other sport like badminton and table tennis or for that matter ANY OTHER sport apart from cricket, will know what universality of the spirit of sport is. If every single follower of cricket were to say a cry for another sport in this hugely potential country of India, we will have more to dream up, more to celebrate and include. But it's always unfortunate that we hide behind the pitiable conditions of the uncertainty that cricket brings because we do not have another to be proud of. The Indian spectator has become victims to an
inflated idea of sport were the very foundation is shaky and nobody is aware that they contribute to the cancer of shame in the wholistic sense of sport. Common guys let us be proud of cricket, but yes there are now more important things to do for sport. We need to build the impetus for real sporting action.

All those talking about America should know that America is a hub for a diverse sporting spectrum and there is a lot happening here. Merely Comparing Indian cricket to American baseball or football is baseless. In india how many of us actually witness a Ranji trophy or the club level games. How many of us actually know the names of the local players from our cities. The foundation of the Indian cricket spectator is a desperation from the emotions that come from a deep deprivation for national integrity. That is the politics of cricket which has drilled this deep into the mass psyche of this otherwise potentially dynamic and talented nation.

I do not say no to cricket, because every sport is an experience of the heightened human spirit in play. Unfortunately there is the mirroring of the helpless middle class elected Indian governance that finds its seed in the politics of Cricket in India. A game that has actually become a cancer like sleaze that every stakeholder including the media and corporate have their hands in very deep for their own selfish reasons. A mass hysteria that unfortunately is blinding the nation from a vision of including so much more in a distribution of actual possibilities. So for those who think cricket is the beginning and the end for Indian sporting action, I
say a prayer for your well being.

Posted by: Santhosh kumar | Apr 5, 2011 12:47:09 PM

Words of wisdom by Santhosh kumar. Vivek put it desperately to say the least.

Posted by: Well Said | Apr 5, 2011 1:22:09 PM

What is remarkable is how many people have chosen to comment on what is essentially a standard bit of liberal elitist "blowing off steam" with no deeper meaning conveyed or even intended. I am sure even the author of that piece didnt really mean for people to take it seriously!

Posted by: omar | Apr 5, 2011 1:58:07 PM

vivek menezes , Get a life.

Posted by: A Sports Fan | Apr 5, 2011 2:11:36 PM

A Sports Fan. Very enlightening.

Posted by: AllSports | Apr 5, 2011 2:16:00 PM

You know what. its only on the internet you people can say anything. what have you done for the development of other sport? hell! have you even played anything in your entire life? you just want to write something. be heard and then get back to your books.. so just shut it.

Posted by: A Sports Fan | Apr 5, 2011 2:18:56 PM

Omar... But I thought cricket itself was invented by elitist blowhards. So how come we land up playing and defending it?

Posted by: AllSports | Apr 5, 2011 2:20:16 PM

AllSports, see, you are not an elitist blowhard,so you dont know how it works. Since I am one, I can tell you:
The basic methodology is called "bait and switch". Take a modestly relevant target (say the poor sporting performance of India in the Olympics, btw, themselves a highly commercialized show of hypernationalism). Then substitute a straw man created our of the words "commercialization" or "nationalism" or whatever is fashionable to attack at this moment. Shake vigorously. Throw in the general direction of other elitist blowhards. Let them run with it and throw it back. A limited chain reaction within the tiny elitist blowhardosphere can then ensue, providing entertainment for a few minutes. Then move on to the next target. It always works....but dont make the mistake of looking for any deeper meaning in this game. Its what we do to fill the dull moments between other dull moments.

Posted by: omar | Apr 5, 2011 4:06:43 PM

Omar, my husband has recently taken to calling me an "elitist liberal blowhard," not in so many words but close. I think I will forward him your pithy definition. The irony is that I love sports, both the plebian and elitist (with the exception of American football) variety. He once used to but has tuned out in late age. Doesn't that make "him" more of an ELB than me?

Posted by: Ruchira | Apr 5, 2011 7:51:30 PM

Boring piece! Regular hipster douche monolouge! Dude, if people enjoy a sport ~ let them enjoy the bloody sport. If you have a problem with it, its your problem!

Stop trying to psycho analyze the whole country. We'd prefer the psycho analysis be done by non hipster-douches!

Posted by: Bullsh | Apr 6, 2011 12:11:19 AM

All of the comments miss the meat in this article. That is, how the game has been thoroughly corrupted by us Indians and sub-continentals at the same time that it has been "taken over" by us. The global importance (or not) of cricket is irrelevant. It is what it is, and Indian sport is sui generis.

But the emperor has no clothes, not because cricket is of no account worldwide, but because greedy business interests and shady underworld betting syndicates have destroyed a once truly noble and culturally unique game.

It was all over when the ICC 'decided' to move its headquarters from London to Dubai. Gimme a break, that's a smoking gun, if there ever was one, that cricket, as the world and the English once knew it, is stone cold dead.

Posted by: Manish Sharma | Apr 6, 2011 4:15:04 AM

Manish, I salute you for doing what none of us could do. You have probably made Vivek throw up his breakfast!
Well played Sir, well played.

Posted by: omar | Apr 6, 2011 10:42:52 AM

MR. MENEZES IS A CONFUSED DESI. WHILE I AM SURE HE TAKES PRIDE THAT INDIA CAME OUT TOPS IN A COMPETITION WATCHED BY ALMOST 20 PERCENT OF HUMANITY, NOTWITHSTANDING THAT ONLY A HANDFUL OF COUNTRIES PLAY , HE IS MORTIFIED BY THE LACK OF ATTENTION PAID TO THE OTHER SPORTS IN INDIA. HE HAS A POINT BUT DONT RUN DOWN THE INDIAN VICTORY- CMON CHINA IS BUILDING A CRICKET TEAM, THAT IS THE KIND OF IMPACT THE GAME IS HAVING GLOBALLY. ITS A GAME OF STRATEGY,CONCENTRATION AND ATHLETICICM. A BASEBALL PLAYER EVEN THOUGH A SUPERB ATHLETE WOULD BE HARD PRESSED TO FACE LASITH MALINGA'S YORKERS!OR FOR THAT MATTER TO BOWL AS ACCURATELY AT 70 PER CENT OF HIS PACE OR FIGURE OUT MURALIS DOOSRA. WAKE UP MY FRIEND DONT KNOCK THE GAME, TRY TO IMPROVE THE LOT OF THE OTHER SPORTS INSTEAD!!!!

Posted by: ashok | Apr 7, 2011 12:28:28 AM

Ashok,

Just screaming in capital letters does not mean you are correct. :) Just wanted to point it out. And while we are at it lets tone down the gross exageration that 20% of humanity watched the game. The viewership was closer to 70 million viewers for the finals. 67 million for the semi-finals. That would be closer to 2% of humanity mostly concentrated in 2 or 3 countries out of 195 or so countries of the world. Nobody watches Ranji. Duleep and Deodhar trophy matches in India anymore and test matches are not sold out. If 20% of humanity loves this sport, then there would be good attendance for the domestic cricket too. And do not bring up IPL because that version cricket is more like two hours of staged entertainment like the WWE. Such freakish implementation of the game could damage whatever is left of the game in the long run. Your other point that the fact that China is building a team does not mean much. China builds a team for every sport that ever exists and wants to dominate each one of those sports. China also does well in many of the sports it starts playing. Every game played has strategy and needs concerntration. The game is what it is and people like us who understand it will enjoy it, but lets not get carried away and think its growing rapidly the world over. Infact it is slowly detoriating in many of the original Cricket playing countries. You can go ahead now also call me a confused desi, but that will not chance the facts about India's modern day pastime which is cricket. Just stating reality in the face of the hype.

Posted by: AllSports | Apr 7, 2011 9:54:36 AM

well bowled, vivek. after religion and movies this is the opium which keeps the masses from revolting against oppression. most engaging. a pleasure read.

Posted by: cajetan vaz | Apr 8, 2011 9:24:24 PM

Vaz, how would you go about proving your thesis?

Posted by: omar | Apr 9, 2011 9:21:25 PM

Omar, I thought I'd venture some scene-setting for Vaz's proof.

Posted by: M73 | Apr 10, 2011 3:55:53 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Matt on The Science Mystique

Eleutheria on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Elatia Harris on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

PeteChapman on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Chris on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

DAS on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

DAS on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

DAS on the culture animal

Raza Husain on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Dredd on NORTH KOREA’S NERVE WAR

Dredd on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Raza Husain on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

Dana on germ houses

musafir on Tuesday Poem

soubriquet on Tuesday Poem

Eli on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Jim on Tuesday Poem

Josef Stern on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Shelley on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

Bill on The Beautiful German Language

Eleutheria on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Eleutheria on Tuesday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed