| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The Humanists: Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles | Main | Shadow Catchers: Camera-less Photography »

January 10, 2011

Mark Twain, the N Word and Compassion

Mark_twain_quotes by Fred Zackel

Didja hear?

This February, NewSouth Books will publish “Tom Sawyer” and “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” in a single volume, removing the “n” word and the word “injun” from the text. The word “slave” will replace the “n” word.

Mark Twain must be twirling in his grave.

Last year 2010 marked the 175th anniversary of his birth, the 100th anniversary of his death and the 125th anniversary of the American publication of "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."

This book "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" is, as Lionel Trilling said, was "America's most eloquent argument against racism."

If you never read it, don't wait for some instructor to force you.

As Twain himself said, "I never let schooling interfere with my education."

But let’s look at what else we can “hear” from Twain, the First Great, Internationally Famous California Writer.

Oh yeah. Mark Twain was a California writer.

Listen to the Voice in this 1865 yarn, “The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County,” his earliest success.

“I'll risk forty dollars that he can outjump any frog in Calaveras county.”

And later …

“I don't see no p'ints about that frog that's any better'n any other frog.”

The Jumping Frog was the first California International Best-seller. It made Twain famous. The story was spawned in the Gold Country. It traveled the world.

The story is about a con man getting conned. And what could be more All American?

Mark Twain said about the American art …

“To string incongruities and absurdities together in a wandering and sometimes purposeless way, and seem innocently unaware that they are absurdities, is the basis of the American art, if my position is correct.”

Yes, he was the first great California writer. Hard to believe, yes.

In San Francisco Twain met Bret Harte, who first printed the Jumping Frog. The two men started their feud. Harte was not a racist, but he was not opposed to using racism to boost his career. Twain was a casual racist at first. He was a Southerner, after all, had even spent time with the Confederate militia, but the treatment of minorities, especially the Chinese, in San Francisco opened his eyes and helped change his heart.

In San Francisco Mark Twain had his first earthquake, almost committed suicide, and found his voice. Oh, and he surfed naked, too. Really. In Hawaii, actually.

In San Francisco and Hawaii he was a young man. A redhead, by the way.

Twain spent the first two decades of his writing life NOT writing a full length manuscript.

Starting at 18, he wrote sketches and skits. Gradually he moved into tall tale fantasies and travel letters.

Out west (both Virginia City and San Francisco,) he was a reporter with feature stories, political news, and sketches. He wrote the tall tale and the burlesque.

His first full length book was "The Innocents Abroad," but it was merely a collection of travel letters.

His 1870 “Roughin’ It” was his first real book, and it was his recollections from Nevada, California, and even Hawaii. It too was short pieces.

Oh, btw, I find my own favorite Twain pieces, too, in “Roughin’ It.” When you get to Twain's Coyote essay, go ahead and read it aloud. Get a western drawl in the side of your mouth and read Coyote aloud. The slower the better. I swear we grab a time machine and go back almost 150 years when we say it aloud.

Most of his life’s work as a writer was episodic, anecdotal, and often not in context.

(I blame the lack of MFA programs in Creative Writing after the Civil War for that.)

Clemens only had nine years of true schooling, one of his deepest regrets.

In 1863 he took on a pseudonym to save himself from a gunslinger and a duel.

“The Celebrated Jumping Frog” was his earliest masterpiece. After its first publication, he revised it many times; five times by my count alone.

Twain was a thoughtful, painstaking craftsman. In all his work, he wrote from scratch, without an outline or a plan, as if writing a personal essay and then building towards an ending still unknown to him.

In all those revisions, he was searching for the scheme to the story, devising the pattern to each work while he endlessly revised it, searching for what made the work sing.

He once claimed the secret to discovering the story was discovering the proper “point of view.”

Mention “Point of View” and we can hear …

Huck Finn talking just to us.

Huck Finn, by the way, a fifteen year old, semi-literate victim of child abuse from his Pappy, says the most amazing thing about his American heritage in Chapter 31 of that wonderful book NewSouth is going to butcher, after he discovers “there’s a two hundred dollars reward on” his companion Jim.

If he turns Jim in for the reward, that action will “make him a slave again all his life …”

Now let me apologize in advance for Huck’s language, the only language he ever knew, the language of racism:

“And then think of me! It would get all around, that Huck Finn helped a nigger to get his freedom; and if I was to ever see anybody from that town again, I'd be ready to get down and lick his boots for shame. That's just the way: a person does a low-down thing, and then he don't want to take no consequences of it. Thinks as long as he can hide it, it ain't no disgrace. That was my fix exactly. The more I studied about this, the more my conscience went to grinding me, and the more wicked and low-down and ornery I got to feeling. And at last, when it hit me all of a sudden that here was the plain hand of Providence slapping me in the face and letting me know my wickedness was being watched all the time from up there in heaven …”

In case you never heard this, the N-word is used 283 times in the novel. Its usage is casual, constant. It was part of the koine of America. Yes, it is racist and vile and reprehensible … but it was common currency back then.

So the only Universe Huck Finn knows demands he turn Jim in. Even his religious upbringing says he must turn Jim in. He will get handsomely rewarded, too, for this betrayal.

“And I about made up my mind to pray; and see if I couldn't try to quit being the kind of a boy I was, and be better. So I kneeled down. But the words wouldn't come. Why wouldn't they? It warn't no use to try and hide it from Him. Nor from me, neither. I knowed very well why they wouldn't come. It was because my heart warn't right; it was because I warn't square; it was because I was playing double. I was letting on to give up sin, but away inside of me I was holding on to the biggest one of all. I was trying to make my mouth say I would do the right thing and the clean thing, and go and write to that nigger's owner and tell where he was …”

Huck writes the letter: “Miss Watson your runaway nigger Jim is down here two mile below Pikesville and Mr. Phelps has got him and he will give him up for the reward if you send. HUCK FINN.”

And in the first great act of empathy in American literature, this abused child says:

“I took it up, and held it in my hand. I was a trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself: "All right, then, I'll go to hell"- and tore it up.”

My word, what an astonishing moral development. He rejects racism!!

"All right, then, I'll go to hell”

Yes, Mark Twain is the author whom William Dean Howells once called "the Lincoln of our literature."

As Twain himself once said, "I don't believe in Hell but I'm afraid of it."

Let’s go back up that page in Chapter 31.

“We catched fish and talked, and we took a swim now and then to keep off sleepiness. It was kind of solemn, drifting down the big, still river, laying on our backs looking up at the stars, and we didn't ever feel like talking loud, and it warn't often that we laughed—only a little kind of a low chuckle. We had mighty good weather as a general thing, and nothing ever happened to us at all—that night, nor the next, nor the next.”

As I said, my own personal belief is that Huck’s two sentences that come next are the most powerful, most valuable sentences in the American canon.

“I was a-trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself, "All right, then, I'll GO to hell."

Those two sentences are why Ernest Hemingway said all modern American literature starts with Mark Twain.

Twain wrote once, “The difference between the right word and the almost right word is really a large matter — it's the difference between a lightning bug and the lightning.”

But if you do not know the context in which Huck Finn said those two sentences, then you will never get a grip on race relations in America.

Twain wrote the first half of the novel, got stuck, and set it aside for almost ten years.

Think about that ten year gap. How much of your OLD SELF must you crawl out of and throw away in order to climb into your NEW SELF?

A fifteen-year-old throwaway, a victim of child abuse, says, "All right, then, I'll GO to hell."

Huck Finn ends his story by saying he’s going west.

Horace Greeley said, Go West, Young Man, and grow up with your country.

Huck Finn becomes one of the Best Americans ever, in my book.

As you read Twain, pay attention to his art.

His narrator, Twain insisted, is an actor’s art rather than a writer’s art. Please notice the stage directions, for lack of a better phrase, in Twain’s writings. Written speech counterfeits impromptu oral speech.

“To string incongruities and absurdities together in a wandering and sometimes purposeless way, and seem innocently unaware that they are absurdities, is the basis of the American art, if my position is correct.”

Huck Finn is still one of the most banned books in America. John Steinbeck’s “Of Mice and Men” is another. Look for others while you are at it.

Read a Banned Book Today. With all the terrible words.

It'll make you a better person for it.

Posted by Frederick William Zackel at 12:30 AM | Permalink

Comments

Amen.

Posted by: Bill Crider | Jan 10, 2011 12:06:12 PM

I don't see an argument in this post for keeping the n-word in the novel. Much less for the claim that Huck Finn WITH the n-words in will make you a "better person".


Orwell in 3...2...1...

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Jan 10, 2011 12:21:31 PM

Thanks for, among other things, teaching me the word "koine!"

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Jan 10, 2011 12:44:05 PM

No bowdlerized Huck Finn!

Along with all the other good reasons for leaving the original language intact, I don't think Huck's epiphany would have been as powerful without the N word.

“I was a-trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself, "All right, then, I'll GO to hell."

Because of his religious beliefs, he thought there was a hell to go to. He was willing to suffer damnation so that he would not betray his friend.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jan 10, 2011 1:09:21 PM

Louise, what role is the n-word playing in the passage you cite?

I'm genuinely interested here, because a lot of people seem to think that the correct position on this issue is just plain and obvious, but there don't seem to be very many arguments floating around for this position. If Twain's novel really is about friendship and inner rebellion, I'm hard pressed to see why the n-word is so crucial.

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Jan 10, 2011 1:28:54 PM

Nick, First of all, that's the way people talked in those days, so it's an accurate reflection of the times. Now it's wrong to say colored people, too, although the NAACP hasn't changed its name.

I think you shouldn't change literature to keep pace with the times.

In the book, the N word classifies those so named as somehow less than human, perhaps even deserving of their enslavement. But Huck realizes it's not true, that Jim is fully human and his friend. He is willing to do the right thing, even if it means eternal torment. I think that is very powerful.

I think this holds true for misogyny as well. You can't bowdlerize what today might be considered misogynistic utterances in Western literature because they are misogynist. Without a contextual understanding of the culture the protagonist is in, meaning can be lost.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jan 10, 2011 1:59:20 PM

Another argument for keeping it as in the original: Not all blacks were slaves, so the change makes a false equivalency. Even without the question of returning a slave, Huck's feelings about race would have been the same.

Yes, it makes it difficult to read the book with the n-word there. It should be difficult to read.

Posted by: Sarah D. | Jan 10, 2011 9:12:36 PM

"Read a Banned Book Today."

But it's not a Banned Book, it's Required Reading. That's the whole impetus behind the bowdlerization- to make it easier for unimaginative middle school English teachers to heat and serve.
This is a great story about a prison break - but even the brilliant "All right, then, I'll GO to hell!" passage loses its impact when it's on the test.

Posted by: Vicki Baker | Jan 11, 2011 1:29:36 AM

What fucking foolishness. The NYT, the New Yorker etc.- all used Huck's word "nigger" in reviewing the book.
Let's join the grown-ups in the 21st century.

Posted by: Howard B | Jan 11, 2011 7:35:07 PM

Could it be that the presence of the n-word had been a useful excuse or pretext for not prescribing (i.e. for proscribing) this book in schools when the real scandals were quite different:
(i) depicting the active support of slavery on the part of some Christian churches during this era, meaning they ignored the doctrine that all men are equal in the sight of God;
(ii) depicting the poor white boy Huck Finn's refusal to buckle down to this religious authority, instead trusting his own human instincts and despite his fear of fire and brimstone.

Posted by: Barry Naughten | Jan 11, 2011 11:51:42 PM

I would have thought that the use of the 'n word' was essential context for the story. the more racist a community, the less tolerant it will be to members with contrasting views. The enormity of Huck's rebellion would be diminished without that context.

Posted by: kat | Jan 12, 2011 6:10:44 PM

I was taught and examined on this book, N-word and all, for "O level" in England back in the day. It wasn't quite as bad as Vicki makes out, but almost.

I'd be interested in hearing from black folk who think there's value in the book. Or if there aren't any, that also is worth considering.

Posted by: Sagredo | Jan 12, 2011 7:10:13 PM

Segredo is astonishing in his stupidity.
He wonders if there are any 'black folk' who might think there's value in the book.
Evidence that he has not risen from the 0 level.

Posted by: Howard B | Jan 14, 2011 10:27:03 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

Elatia Harris on Here’s how to change the world

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Thursday Poem

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed