| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Epiphany at the Waterhole, Part One | Main | Fela Anikulapo-Kuti: Musician-turned-Musical »

January 03, 2011

Trying is All We Have

By Namit Arora

(An excerpt from a longer work of fiction.)

Beauties It has been a month since they first slept together. He wondered why their verbal sparring had increased in recent days. Just this morning at her place, Liz set off on the youth-obsessed American culture and the skinny ideals of female beauty manufactured by the consumer industry—a conspiracy, she said, to keep women down.

‘But ideals of female beauty have always existed in every culture,’ Ved argued.

‘Yes, but ours have become horribly unhealthy and unrealistic. I saw this even in my teens some twenty years ago, when I was in fact quite skinny.’

‘Aren’t ideals usually unrealistic? I mean consider the buxom beauties of Indian temple art,’ he chuckled. ‘I’ve never met an Indian woman who came even close.’

‘My point is that ideals don’t have to be unrealistic. Can we not have realistic ideals?’

‘Perhaps in theory. But in real life there is always some power that tries to promote unrealistic ideals—to contain us, classify us, gain from us. In our culture, such power is exercised through marketing. Fortunately, women here also have the power to free themselves from the narrow ideals of beauty impressed on them.’

‘I know that sounds very logical to you,’ she retorted. ‘But it’s easier said than done. You don’t know the pressure this culture puts on women, how it ruins their self-esteem, causes them anxiety and self-loathing—not to mention eating disorders and health problems. Do you know that some college sororities even have puking contests after dinner? You don’t know. You are not constantly evaluated by the shape of your tits and butt, are you?’

‘No, but that may be because I don’t have tits,’ he tried to inject some humor.

‘What pains me more,’ she ignored his comment, ‘is the knowledge that so many women don’t see the big picture. Some even become co-conspirators with men in their own oppression.’

‘Co-conspirators? Wait a minute. Are you saying that American men conspire to oppress women?’

‘What I mean is that it is still a man’s world, customized to serve his interests, desires, lusts. Most men embrace this subconsciously. What’s worse is that most women accept and even further this status quo. They don’t even realize, let alone champion, their own interests.’

‘Well, what solution do you propose?’ he asked. ‘Oppressors are also victims in this case. Men, too, have pressures—the same culture also lays down unrealistic ideals of success for them, which include being rich and famous, and scoring with skinny women. It may not be as physical but the demands on men are no less damaging to their souls.’

‘When it comes to gender issues,’ her voice turned sarcastic, ‘it sure must be convenient for men to conflate oppressors and victims.’

‘I think you’re wrong,’ he said testily. ‘Women are not a single group. They have a great many identities and interests, a lot of which coincide more with other men’s than with other women’s. Oppressor and victim are fluid and amorphous terms. One must always look at particulars to pronounce judgment.’

‘Maybe so, but the narrow assessment of women in this culture is just plain insidious. And one way or another, it all goes back to men.’

Her mind is made, he thought. Did she even hear his argument? ‘Listen, if your imagined sisters don’t use their heads, why feel sorry for them? If not this, then something else will find a way to control them, and even men. Such is the nature of power in human societies.’

‘Yes, and it is worth resisting such power. That is why we need to educate women, to help them see how they are manipulated and controlled, how they are being held down. That they deserve better in their relationships. I do feel sorry for them!’

‘But not all relationships are bad,’ he pointed out. ‘How do you figure out the relationships where women deserve better?’

‘Wherever they do not share power equally with men.’

‘But does it matter if the women are resentful or not? I mean, I’m unsure about the merits of provoking all unequal power relationships, particularly those rooted in tradition or mutual convenience, and which may seem more objectionable to outsiders than to the woman involved.’

‘Would you have used this argument for slavery as well, that not all slaves seem to mind?’

An old trick in rhetoric: resort to extreme comparisons, with Hitler, slavery, genocide. ‘That’s an absurd comparison, Liz. Women don’t live under oppressive institutions in America. About their angst and insecurities in this day and age, all I can say is: stop blaming others! Get over it!’

‘These are no ordinary insecurities, Ved. You won’t understand because you are a man. You are not subject to the same depressing messages constantly from age six. Behold, you girls! This is the ideal, desirable female body! This is what men want! And you know what? Once we internalize it, we can’t just give it up one fine day.’

‘Look, I can’t help it that I am a man, but I think—’

‘If only you would try to understand women! Instead, you speak from your high perch to us lesser mortals, breaking the news about our weakness to the world—hey, look here, how even these modern, educated women keep themselves in chains!’

‘Listen, your making this so personal helps no one. See how wretched it makes you feel? Why let what you did not create, or what you cannot wish away, cause you such heartburn? Why let it consume you? You owe it to yourself to remain functional, to even cultivate a measure of comic detachment, in a world that is, and will always be, partly unjust.’

‘I know that!’ she screamed. ‘I don’t let it consume me for God’s sake. It happens! OK?’ She stormed out of the room, leaving him to stare blanky at a small globe on her desk. He mentally replayed everything he had said, searching for something to apologize for. But all he regretted was getting into this conversation in the first place.

He felt guilty too. Easy for him to say what he did. How well does he really understand the experience of women? He needs to work on that, doesn’t he? And, deep down, how broad is his own ideal of female beauty? In her place, wouldn’t he feel threatened too? He went looking for her and found her on the sunny balcony. Moving closer, he put his arm around her. She resisted at first, and then relaxed against him.

Later, trying to enter her mind to see the world from within, he thought: each of us inhabits a world somewhat different from all others. We harbor all manner of models and theories, but without inhabiting the skin of others, can we truly understand their experience of life, in all its dimensions? Not quite, but trying is the best we can do, even though it may not lead us closer to the Truth. Trying is all we have.
__________________________

Image sources here and here.
__________________________

More writing by Namit Arora?
__________________________

Posted by Namit Arora at 10:08 AM | Permalink

Comments

Very well written... I am impressed... Liz sounds a lot like someone I know... and comically so

Posted by: Abhishek | Jan 3, 2011 11:41:47 AM

my personal Google ad with this piece: a porn filter.

Posted by: Clem | Jan 3, 2011 12:07:55 PM

I like that he says "trying is all we have", but also rejects her views as invalid not even giving consideration to them. It displays quite accurately the problem women face, that men cannot fathom the world that women face, even though it is a world created by men.

Posted by: Zygar | Jan 3, 2011 3:15:13 PM

Spot on depiction of mansplaining. Made me laugh quite a lot.

Posted by: Vicki Baker | Jan 3, 2011 3:47:04 PM

But the ideal woman shape she's talking about is not the one men like that much. As they say, if all men are chasing the supermodel type, how come fat women still get laid, married and have children?

Posted by: Andrew C | Jan 3, 2011 6:49:26 PM

Doubt if men have any "ideal woman shape" in their heads when they're heading out for the night. And even if they do, or think they do... the need to get laid can make for startling trade-offs. Men aren't hung up at all when it comes to a little more here or a little more there... provided the going looks good. Much like dogs actually.

Posted by: zhava | Jan 3, 2011 9:23:50 PM

I don't know, but I can tell when all the curves are in the right place--
Of course, that is part the conditions of my time and place, along with those genes expressing themselves, probably with some epigenetics also playing with things.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Jan 3, 2011 9:31:15 PM

How many women like corpulent men? Probably not many.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jan 3, 2011 10:53:33 PM

It starts with dolls in childhood.

Posted by: prasad | Jan 4, 2011 10:02:45 AM

And continues into adult Ken clubs:


Ken

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jan 4, 2011 11:55:58 AM

When I started reading this piece, I said to myself "Wow, a good piece of fiction in 3 Quarks. This is a welcome change". The piece starts out strong, but then gets bogged down. I can't imagine anyone really talking like they talk as the conversation goes on. There seems to be a "point" behind the story, which I think tends to ruin it. The narrative hints at the fact that power relationships are complex, but then buys into the "patriarchy" meme. Especially in romantic relationships, power is rarely simple.

Posted by: Ian Kaplan | Jan 4, 2011 3:36:17 PM

Louise said: "How many women like corpulent men? Probably not many."

I know a few sassy looking women who are attracted to tubby blokes. One particular guy (according to rumor anyway) has Ron Jeremy-like skills in the bedroom which seems to have made up for aesthetic shortcomings elsewhere. I mean would you prefer bad sex with a GQ poser or orgasmic thrills with a tubby Casanova? Unless the latter is seriously off-putting I'm sure a lot of women would go for it over poorly endowed plastic perfection.

I do realize porn is a bit of a segue - but Ron Jeremy despite his girth, scary hairiness, generally unkempt appearance and morning shadow was voted high in a survey by female porn stars who put an X beside their preferred partners. In addition to being hung, Ron according to the legend, is also witty, considerate, somewhat erudite and well... exciting. He looks like a lump of lard but a lot of his female associates seriously dig him... so go figure.

Posted by: zhava | Jan 4, 2011 8:31:52 PM

Presumably the increasing portrayed preference for thin women is because thinness is an indicator of higher social status (both men and women), which in turn is due to increasing obesity.

Posted by: Sagredo | Jan 4, 2011 11:37:52 PM

Liz lost me at the "men are to blame" bit. Otherwise, yeah.

Posted by: Sagredo | Jan 4, 2011 11:56:34 PM

I would challenge someone to post one of these 'unhealthy' ideals next to a picture of a 200 lb 5'6" woman and explain why the first one is unhealthier.

People need to lose weight, including women.

Beyond that, a few of these posts are just ridiculous; obviously there will be outliers who are attracted to lardos, whether they be male or female, but it is not the norm. The Ron Jeremy talk is just ridiculous anecdote.

Posted by: Fill | Jan 6, 2011 2:21:10 PM

". . . it is still a man’s world, customized to serve his interests, desires, lusts. Most men embrace this subconsciously. What’s worse is that most women accept and even further this status quo."

What on earth does this even mean? Ya know, it's time to grow up and cast off the victim garb. This is utter nonsense.

Posted by: Pierce Harlan | Feb 21, 2011 5:50:03 PM

For us there is only the trying. The rest is not our business. T.S. Eliot

Posted by: Purush | Mar 30, 2011 11:53:39 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Joe on the culture animal

Sundar on the culture animal

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Matt on The Science Mystique

Eleutheria on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Elatia Harris on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

PeteChapman on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Jacky Corey on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Chris on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

DAS on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

DAS on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

DAS on the culture animal

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed