January 29, 2011
Caught in the web
The internet has come a long way since Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the world wide web, turned on the first web server in Geneva on Christmas day 1990. Today, 2bn people are online; 800m of them are on Facebook. Every minute, 24 hours worth of video is uploaded to YouTube. Google, a company founded only 15 years ago, has a market capitalisation just short of $200bn and a mission statement that it intends “to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” – something no one thinks unlikely or even remarkable. We now bank, shop, communicate, work and date through the internet. The internet has come of age. It is as defining an achievement for humanity as the Enlightenment or the industrial revolution. But as the web’s youthful potential and teenage brashness give way to a more grown-up, complicated and multifaceted personality, our reaction to it has also changed. Our enthusiasm is tempered by a realisation that it is not simply an exciting force for good, as it was first seen. This year’s opening salvo of books about the internet does not laud web entrepreneurs or predict jetpacks and digital utopia. Instead, Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together, Evgeny Morozov’s The Net Delusion and John Brockman’s collection of essays all soberly assess the current state of the internet and ask: are the changes the internet brings to our society and our human nature actually beneficial?more from Ben Hammersley at the FT here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 09:21 AM | Permalink






















Comments
An interesting essay. The internet is a truly transformative technology. I use it for my job in information technology, reading many different newspapers and articles from around the world, banking, playing chess, making travel arrangements and keeping in contact with friends by email. I do not use it as a substitute for a social life. I am interested in the exchange of ideas, not the narcissistic practice of counting "cyberfriends" or the vomiting up of my personal life. For this reason, I have no interest in Facebook or Twitter or similar websites. I also prefer the anonymity of using a pseudonym because it keeps a line between one's public and private life. I am sure others on 3QD may disagree and find Facebook useful, but I see no good reason to give personal information to a profit making marketing corporation.
Posted by: J.Hawkins | Jan 29, 2011 6:34:13 PM
J. Hawkins --
So how would you characterize your involvement here at 3QD? Do you feel no social connection at all here beyond the exchange of ideas? Just curious.
Posted by: Zara | Jan 29, 2011 11:59:04 PM
Post a comment