December 21, 2010
The Winners of the 3 Quarks Daily 2010 Politics Prize
Lewis H. Lapham has picked the three winners:
- Top Quark, $1000: Stephen Walt, Why America is going to regret the Cordoba House controversy
- Strange Quark, $300: Huffington Post, The Two Most Essential, Abhorrent, Intolerable Lies Of George W. Bush's Memoir
- Charm Quark, $200: The Philosopher's Beard, Politics: Can't Someone Else Do It?
Here is what Mr. Lapham had to say about them:
As an editor, I take seriously the craft of writing. The political blog at its best accounts for the editorial process—for the checking of facts as well as the redrafting of manuscripts; the political blog at its worst disregards even the semblance of considered judgment, leaving the internet user to portion out the wheat of informed opinion from the chaff of paranoid rant. The readers and editors of 3QD nominated more than forty pieces of internet writing, then narrowed the field by a public vote to nine finalists. I cannot say these are the best pieces of political blog writing on the internet, but they are representative of the impassioned rhetoric that has engulfed the public political discourse.
In accordance with the rules of the 3QD political prize, I have chosen three entries that exemplify the spirit of the times.
1st Place: "Why America is Going to Regret the Cordoba House Controversy" by Stephen M. Walt
A measured, thoughtful response to the religious intolerance that surrounded the "mosque" at ground zero.
2nd Place: "The Two Most Essential, Abhorrent, Intolerable Lies of George W. Bush's Memoir" by Dan Froomkin
This post uses the publication of George Bush's memoir Decision Points as the occasion to reexamine the Bush years and remind us of the facts embedded in the history of his presidency.
3rd Place: "Politics: Can't Someone Else Do It?" by Thomas Rodham
A philosophical look at the constraints imposed upon liberal politicians during their terms in office. They expect too much from their time in government and their constituents expect too much from them.
Congratulations also from 3QD to the winners (I will send the prize money later today--and remember, you must claim the money within one month from today--just send me an email). And feel free to leave your acceptance speech as a comment here! And thanks to everyone who participated. Thanks also, of course, to Lewis Lapham for doing the final judging.
The three prize logos at the top of this post were designed, respectively, by Sughra Raza, Carla Goller, and me. I hope the winners will display them with pride on their own blogs!
Details about the prize here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 11:00 PM | Permalink






















Comments
Thank you, 3QD, for organising a marvellous competition.
Receiving this prize is the proudest moment of my blogging career and I will wear my charmed quark with pride.
Posted by: Thomas Rodham | Dec 22, 2010 5:57:31 AM
Congratulations to the winners, and many thanks to the editors of 3QuarksDaily.com for organizing the competition and advancing me to the finals.
Most of all, I wish to thank the readers of 3QD.com that made Twenty reasons Barack Obama stinks the top vote-getter in the competition. On this occasion, I'll defer to the wisdom of crowds.
Muhammad Cohen
Posted by: Muhammad Cohen | Dec 22, 2010 8:53:53 AM
I received the following message from Stephen M. Walt who has also given me permission to post it here:
Dear Abbas:
I’m writing to express my gratitude for having received the “Top Quark” prize in this year’s Politics competition. I’m a bit shocked, but it’s a pleasant sensation and I am genuinely thrilled. Among other things, my father is a nuclear physicist, and he’ll be tickled that I am now a “Top Quark.” Please convey my thanks for Mr. Lapham.
With thanks and warm good wishes,
Stephen Walt
Posted by: Abbas Raza | Dec 22, 2010 11:17:07 AM
Congratulations, everyone!
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 22, 2010 1:31:46 PM
Good!! And I love the design of the award for Top Quark.
Posted by: maniza | Dec 22, 2010 10:17:56 PM
Coming in at almost 7,000 words (counting quotes), one might have thought that the HuffPo piece on George Bush would not qualify for consideration ("Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are not eligible."), but truth be told it is a really good piece!
Posted by: Don Davies | Dec 22, 2010 11:31:04 PM
This is even better: http://blogs.crikey.com.au/this-blog-harms/2011/11/17/theorising-darwin-us-may-stockpile-and-transit-cluster-munitions/
Posted by: Steph Mathieson | Dec 3, 2011 10:36:02 AM
Post a comment