December 31, 2010
spirit duplicator
Every technology is a metaphor. That much is clear. The difficult matter is to sort out whether this is a primary or secondary function. Which is to say, did we initially make this universe of instruments, machines, tools, and devices as a way of talking about our condition, only then to discover, post hoc, that all the amassed hardware also proved useful for solving various practical problems (washing dishes, killing neighbors, etc.)? Or did it work the other way around? Did we set out to kill our neighbors, say, and then notice that the sword was a lovely way to say “violence”? At first glance, the latter may seem much more likely. But presumably the sword said “violence” before it was swung. If the question feels abstruse, remember that the stakes are high: Are we apes who learned to talk, or angels who learned to kill?more from Yara Flores at Cabinet here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 10:07 AM | Permalink






















Comments
All of the aforementioned?
Posted by: TalesNTypos | Dec 31, 2010 11:26:32 AM
How wonderful - I thought I was the only person who missed the purple. But, of course there will be many. It was a short-lived technology, used mainly by teachers so I think so lacks the widespread base needed for deep nostalgia.
However I think it was that smell that makes it so evocative for us users. It was powerful & clean & likely imprinted us via the limbic system. I can almost smell it just sitting here sending digital bits.
:)
Posted by: minh mcCloy | Jan 1, 2011 6:53:12 AM
Wow! I want more... Can we get Yara to write something for us?
Posted by: Aditya | Jan 1, 2011 10:47:23 PM
Post a comment