| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« bloodlands | Main | Why is Rape Different? »

December 31, 2010

spirit duplicator

Flores_front
Every technology is a metaphor. That much is clear. The difficult matter is to sort out whether this is a primary or secondary function. Which is to say, did we initially make this universe of instruments, machines, tools, and devices as a way of talking about our condition, only then to discover, post hoc, that all the amassed hardware also proved useful for solving various practical problems (washing dishes, killing neighbors, etc.)? Or did it work the other way around? Did we set out to kill our neighbors, say, and then notice that the sword was a lovely way to say “violence”? At first glance, the latter may seem much more likely. But presumably the sword said “violence” before it was swung. If the question feels abstruse, remember that the stakes are high: Are we apes who learned to talk, or angels who learned to kill?
more from Yara Flores at Cabinet here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 10:07 AM | Permalink

Comments

All of the aforementioned?

Posted by: TalesNTypos | Dec 31, 2010 11:26:32 AM

How wonderful - I thought I was the only person who missed the purple. But, of course there will be many. It was a short-lived technology, used mainly by teachers so I think so lacks the widespread base needed for deep nostalgia.

However I think it was that smell that makes it so evocative for us users. It was powerful & clean & likely imprinted us via the limbic system. I can almost smell it just sitting here sending digital bits.
:)

Posted by: minh mcCloy | Jan 1, 2011 6:53:12 AM

Wow! I want more... Can we get Yara to write something for us?

Posted by: Aditya | Jan 1, 2011 10:47:23 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

over here on The Nominees for the 2010 3QD Prize in Science Are:

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

martina_j on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Raza Husain on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Bill on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

roger gathmann on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Doogle on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Kyle on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Peter John on Gezi Park

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed