| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Waging War on Christmas, to Save Thanksgiving | Main | Bastard »

November 15, 2010

Some notes on the grammar of the curry

Chicken_vindaloo To someone from the subcontinent, it is hard to believe that Indian restaurant owners in the United States are not malicious, reactionary, or in thrall to an obscure formal ideology. How else to explain what seems to be a concerted effort to trivialize a noble family of cuisines, both by reducing them all to a monotonous handful of sauces, and by violating the general structural principles that make these meals meaningful? It is well known that Indian restaurant owners are at the forefront of the right-wing movement to construct a homogenous dehistoricized South Asian identity[1], and the tragedy of Bangladeshis cooking bad Punjabi food is lost on no one. But, for the moment, let us forget that this iteration of Indian food is a particular, abstracted and displaced version of the cuisine of the Punjab and its surroundings, and that it ignores most of the other cuisines of the subcontinent. And let us forget that “Indian” food really should mean South Asian food.

But how to explain this fetishism of particular signifiers, this combinatorial generation of a menu from {chicken, lamb, shrimp} and some handful of sauces, these ungrammatical and unpoetic culinary utterances? How to explain the same sauce applied, with minor variations, to produce aborted versions of the same dish under many different names. What drives such promiscuous corruption of the understanding? Whence such systemic violence?

Even the most materialistic among us must realize that if we have no hope of seizing the means of production, we can still hope to educate. The following curry is as an example, not an essential exemplar or generative grammar. All of these principles are violated somewhere; still, they are a glimpse into the overlapping set of rules and resemblances that make up the cuisines of South Asia, whose grandeur and allusive depth is matched only by those of the French and of the Japanese.

Finely slice a kilogram of onions and deep fry them in very hot oil until dark brown (not black) and crisp. Set them aside and strain the oil...

Reheat about a quarter cup of this oil. Fry 6 tsp of ginger paste and 6 tsp of garlic paste[2] together for about twenty minutes. The frying might seem excessive, but is necessary. Keep moving them around as you fry, and if they start to stick, sprinkle in some hot water. Ginger and garlic is a common combination, and occupies a role both structural (in contributing to the body of the curry) and as a spice. Try adding some fried garlic paste to the beginning of a braise or stew. It’s a foreign form (so was the sonnet, once), but a profound one. You can also do the same with ginger paste, but less naively: its sweetness is dangerous and must be tamed.

Add 4 tsp of powdered coriander seed, 3 of turmeric, 3 of cumin and 2 of chilli powder. Then fry. Again, the length of frying will seem excessive. These spices are not to be used Raw, they are not to taste Raw, and you must fry, doggedly, until you have triumphed over the Raw. Move them around as you fry, making sure they don’t stick and burn. If they stick, add a little water and continue. The oil will separate and the sharp discordant smells of the spices will soften and integrate; if you don’t do this they’ll taste jagged and unpleasant. This could take over a half hour.

You must be wary of cumin. Leaving it uncooked or using it in excess are blatant attempts at decontextualization and are typical of New Age recipes for vegetable curries and Indian restaurant cooks in a hurry. Avoid this horror. Whole cumin seed is also sputtered in hot oil at the beginning of some curries. This cumin oil can permissibly be detached from context and used to enrich a salad or grilled meat. Don’t overdo it though, unless you’re trying to make a point.

In general, chillies generate more light than heat: they sharpen and push forward all the other flavors. Heat is not an end in itself. Sometimes this principle is deliberately violated; sometimes, more grievously, it is accidentally violated. Restaurants that offer to make a dish in various levels of spiciness should be shunned. Spice must be integrated and cannot be tweaked at the last moment; the attempt to do this sacrifices depth for fungibility. If you can stand the heat, eat some whole raw chillies on the side. They have a lot of flavor.

You are now ready to add the meat, but first note that several layers of flavor have already been incorporated. The charms of most sub-continental cuisines are expressed synchronically[3], rather than in a series of courses, and the cook must fold in flavors one after the other. The more theoretically minded see in this a sly reference to the construction of ancient cities, each with its predecessor buried underneath.

Meat (here, goat) ideally comes from older animals that have had time to roam. Younger animals don’t braise as well, and are often dry when cooked in a curry. Don’t use a cut that’s very lean or tender. Separately prepared stock is generally not used (this is a subject for another time) and this means that bones should be left attached for most curries. With this in mind, add 2 kg of goat meat (pieces) and an appropriate amount of salt. Fry for a few minutes.

Now add the brown onions, a little at a time, crumbling them as you do. The foundational role of onions in Indian cooking has been ignored by most commentators on essence, perhaps because the variety of uses are incomprehensible to someone trained in, say, the French tradition. There, chopped onions might be used to give body to a braise (as in mirepoix), and small whole onions might appear in the final product. But onions can often form the backbone of a curry, and it is not unusual for them to appear at several different points in the recipe, in several different forms[4]: ground, chopped, sliced, sliced and deep-fried…. Onions are often eaten on the side, and raw onion cuts through meat and thick curries with sharp redemptive brilliance.

Here, apart from adding flavor, the onions thicken the curry. In Indian cooking, you rarely thicken with flour, and thickening with egg yolks would be incoherent. Instead, you use onions, coriander seed, nuts and such. The use of plant based thickeners should not be taken as a sign of vegetarianism or a commitment to purity; the exaggeration of the extent of vegetarianism in India is characteristic of the Right and is to be avoided.

You may now add potatoes (small or pieces), having peeled and deep-fried them until just brown on the outside. Potatoes are to be understood primarily as a vegetable rather than as a starch: they are almost always eaten with another starch, and a meal of just potatoes and rice or flatbread is not to be considered odd. In Bengal (which, not unrelatedly, prides itself on its literary and artistic culture) potatoes are treated with genuine respect and revered almost as much as fish (Bengali potatoes and fish are to be seen as the ideal to which the English fish and chips is an early and earthly approximation). That potatoes (like those other noble members of Solanaceae - tomatoes and chillies) were not part of the cuisines of the subcontinent until quite recently should convince you both that we live in a favored time and that essence must reflect history.

Add just enough hot water to cover the meat, then cover tightly and cook on low until the meat is almost done. Uncover and, in preparation for the final steps, turn up the heat, gird your loins, and evaporate most of the remaining liquid. This is a clarifying step for the cook and represents a symbolic stepping back in preparation for final transcendence.

Add ¾ kg of yogurt, lightly beaten, and stir for a few minutes. In this curry, yogurt acts as a souring agent and also adds further body. The pivotal role of cattle in the history of the Indo-European peoples has led to much cosmology, symbolism and stories, and the prevalence in subcontinental cooking of milk, yogurt and fresh cheese is to be seen as an instance of this. However, the subcontinent does not really have aged cheeses (and shows a general lack of enthusiasm for fermentation when compared to East Asia or Europe). Braising meat or chicken in yogurt and onions is a classic and common technique and is explored in its many iterations and echoes throughout the cuisines of the subcontinent. Here, this technique is hinted at but not fully executed.

Cover and cook on low heat until done. Use this opportunity to finish the bottle of wine you no doubt opened when you began. If you’re feeling festive, three-quarter or hard-boil some eggs, shell them, and toss them into the curry.



[1] Vindaloo, from Portugese “Vinha d’alho”, referring to wine vinegar and garlic, is a splendid dish from a rich local cuisine. In many Indian restaurants in the United States, it has become the addition of potatoes to a spicier variant of the generic curry. This is based on a misidentification of the “aloo” in vindaloo with aloo (=potato) in Hindi. If I was feeling combative, I would draw a parallel with the Hindu Right’s insertion of Ram into every local narrative.

[2] Make these in a food processor: garlic or ginger and a little water.

[3] Of course there are exceptions - Bengali food is one.

[4] This is why the regulations of certain religious groups stipulate the strict avoidance of onions as a means to signify utter renunciation

Posted by Rishidev Chaudhuri at 01:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

Evocative writing on an epicurean topic: a sensual analysis with analytical rigor of South Asian food with a semiotician's flair that is befitting of a Roland Barthes.

Posted by: Moin Rahman | Nov 15, 2010 10:30:36 AM

The beginning of this essay puts me in mind of Stanley Tucci's Big Night, about two brothers trying to serve real Italian food in New York City.

"Restaurants that offer to make a dish in various levels of spiciness should be shunned. Spice must be integrated and cannot be tweaked at the last moment; the attempt to do this sacrifices depth for fungibility."

Amen. When a nice Indian restaurant opened up by us we were delighted and initially impressed at our first visit. Then we ordered some takeout...It came neither Hot, Medium or Mild, as they left all spices out altogether! It was too sad even to complain about, and we haven't been able to convince ourselves to give them another chance.

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 15, 2010 10:38:38 AM

moar!

Posted by: urg | Nov 15, 2010 12:06:35 PM

Thank you for this.

Posted by: changezi | Nov 15, 2010 5:42:09 PM

Thank you and please post some more :-)

I'm mailing this link to all my friends (not exactly a mass-mail since I don't have that many friends. erm...)

Posted by: Shuchita | Nov 15, 2010 11:30:47 PM

A lovely post, thanks. Also recommend you check out Manju Singh's cookbook "The Spice Box" as a structural introduction to using spice in Gujurati cuisine -- caveat emptor, I am speaking as someone whose only familiarity with South Asian cuisines is through restaurants and through his own efforts at cooking, I found Singh's book incredibly helpful in understanding how to use spices.

Posted by: The Modesto Kid | Nov 16, 2010 10:05:45 AM

Gorgeous, gorgeousness.

What a great essay. And this is why I do not eat Indian food in New Orleans (my city) and have very limited experience with it at all. I am certain beyond measure that what I am getting is wrong. Just wrong, wrong wrongedy wrongness. And it's not that I'm one of those "I won't eat it if it isn't authentic" people. I'm not. But everything I have had in Indian restaurants has been so meh, so... generic, so mushy, badly cooked meat or vegetables covered in a hot one-note sauce. So much like eating at most American Chinese places. Just wrong. I know it should be something special and I don't know where to get that specialness.

Wish I had the patience to cook that. Glad I got to read about it.

Posted by: NOJuju | Nov 16, 2010 2:59:49 PM

hm, yes, nice post: makes me hungry.

I wonder if anyone has done a critical study of Indian food and labor? I am thinking about two things at the moment (though there are many issues to explore):

1) the translation of cuisine as it meets different labor pools/traditions. Here in L.A. most of the cooks in Indian restaurants are Mexican.

2) what I call the "fetish of the hot chapati," which (as I saw first-hand when my in-laws visited from India) relegates the laboring women to the kitchen to churn out (one at a time) hot chapatis for the menfolk, who wolf their food silently. Until dinner is over, at which time MIL & DIL finally eat their cold meal, with smaller rounds of roti, fashioned remnants of the chapati dough, standing in the kitchen.

As someone who was raised in a tradition in which the whole family sits together in raucous laughter and conversation over a jointly prepared meal, this was a bath of cold water.

When I see a long-winded process like that described above, it invariably recalls my experience with the in-laws, and the labor arrangements that they followed.

Posted by: mixtape | Nov 16, 2010 10:53:21 PM

Thank you! What a wonderful essay! I have been advocating for more food writing around here -- the kind Abbas could be proud of -- and now we have it. Bravo!

I want to try this, but have questions. When you say "fry," you mean "brown" -- no? British English readers know this, but for years, not being one, I was confused, and actually fried stuff I ought to have browned. I ask about this on my own behalf, and on behalf of readers who might be given to the same confusion. As per the direx in graf 6, for how long should we fry or brown or toast the ground spices? My friend from Bangalore says you can tell by the aroma when they're done -- but if you couldn't do that? Finally, what kind of oil do you like to use? It makes a difference to me because many oils sold simply as "cooking oil" break down with prolonged high heat, and while this may not be a gastronomic issue, it is something to think about for other reasons. Would you use coconut oil or grape seed oil?

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 16, 2010 11:59:09 PM

ghee?

Posted by: urg | Nov 17, 2010 2:31:46 PM

urg, I would use ghee, but the writer specified oil, and I hope to learn what kind he meant. While I'm at it -- no cardamom?

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 17, 2010 2:51:12 PM

This is an example of how not to write about food or about pretty much anything. If you are going to write about the 'grammar of curry,' you should work on the grammar of the language you are using.

Besides bad grammar, you begin with a commentary about the poor quality of food served in Indian restaurants, I presume in North America. You use very fancy, almost pretentious and awkward words and phrases to state your case, but you never qualify your assumptions. In the end you give a recipe for some curry, and I am not sure how this recipe helps your argument or informs the reader, as a good food critic should.

Posted by: Yousef Khan | Nov 17, 2010 11:32:35 PM

The above defense of Yousef Khan is common among Indian business people in the above business.
It is exactly similar to porn
stars defending their career.
It leaves doubt in some people's mind.

?Just admit that this is what leads to the best profit.
Amen.

Posted by: Rachel | Nov 18, 2010 1:34:23 AM

Hey Elatia,

The frying is with oil, on medium high heat. The pastes and spices will start to brown some, but it really is the aroma that tells you when they're done. You could use the times (twenty minutes for the pastes; twenty minutes to a half hour for the spices) as proxies. And if you're patient, you could experiment. You really can tell the difference in the final curry: spices that haven't been well-cooked taste sharp and jagged rather than round and integrated. That's vague, but if you make a small amount where you deliberately leave the spices undercooked, you'll see what I mean and then be able to tune things accordingly.

You want a neutral oil with a high smoke point. Coconut oil has too much flavor; this is desirable in a number of curries,  especially in South India, but not here. Grapeseed oil is good (neutral, high smoke point). You could also use refined canola oil or something like that.

If you're feeling festive, you could certainly substitute ghee for some / all of the oil, and you could add a garam masala (cardamom, clove and cinnamom powders in equal quantities is my mother's). Play around though - it's not an enhancement so much as a shift in register, and it makes everything richer, more fragrant and more baroque.  This is sometimes desirable, but not always.

Posted by: Rishidev Chaudhuri | Nov 18, 2010 2:22:03 AM

Dear Yousef,

Contrary to your opinion, I found Rishi's piece the opposite of pretentious: rather than present some high falutin' theory of food, Rishi gives a funny and tongue-in-cheek intro to the pitfalls of much of what is to be found in Indian restaurants in America, and then proceeds to simply give one example of how to cook a good curry, and an example with much useful info, I might add.

You, on the other hand, do sound pretentious with your, "I presume in North America," type of phrases. Why do you have to presume when he explicitly states that he is speaking of restaurants in the United States? And where's his "bad grammar?"

Man, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed! :-)

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Nov 18, 2010 6:12:05 AM

Elatia, if you will allow me into your kitchen, the next time I am in Boston, I will be happy to give you a hands-on, color-smell-consistency demonstration of a couple of standard curries - perhaps one veg and another non-veg. I will even bring the requisite masalas. Your provide the oil (and no, do not ever use ghee as your only medium for cooking curries - too rich, too cloying). Unfortunately, Aditya's sparse kitchen and Mother Hubbard cupboard are ill equipped for the job. Otherwise I would have asked you over to his apartment.

As a bonus, I will also cook for you a Bengali fish curry - a whole other kettle of fish in the pantheon of curries. (That's probably bad grammar. Hope Yousef doesn't get on my case)

Posted by: Ruchira | Nov 18, 2010 10:19:20 AM

Thank you, Rishidev! I've read one adds garam masala at a later time than the rest. Does one toast it separately from the other spices, in that case? I've had curries which I recognize to be mediocre, and some that I think are excellent, but authenticity is another matter -- I've never been to South Asia, and don't have the feel for its cuisines that I would if I'd traveled there. I only read and try out what I've read, provided it doesn't fly in the face of what I know about the action of heat on, um, molecules.

But Ruchira will save me. When she does, it sounds like a great 3QD post, that will pair nicely with this one. Ruchira, you are on!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Nov 18, 2010 10:56:31 AM

"When she does, it sounds like a great 3QD post, that will pair nicely with this one. Ruchira, you are on!"

Abbas, you will have to make sure you get the smell-o-vision wordpress plugin installed.

Paul Prudhomme once gave a very nice cooking demo of the development of various color levels of Roux and the flavor crust that is created at the bottom of the pan...does Indian cooking deglaze at any point?

Posted by: Carlos | Nov 19, 2010 9:52:31 AM

The moment of praxis has arrived!
See http://on.fb.me/hhdB1C
Thanks Rishi for informing and inspiring me into action.

Posted by: Moin Rahman | Nov 25, 2010 12:42:43 PM

My live photo blog, from last evening, as I went through the choreography of cooking an authentic goat curry per the score so well composed by Rishi can be seen here: http://on.fb.me/hhdB1C
And here a few of my personal observations:
"Almost everyone remarked that they had never tasted anything like this, where the spicing provided incisive depth as well as a sophisticated finish at once. Well, for me, it was one sheer meditative experience, where I hit the zone, pure and simple, losing track of time and place -- living every moment of it, from slicing of the onions and slow-frying the ginger-garlic paste, with hyperclarity where time froze to a standstill! It is about time that I write a book now titled "Zen and the Art of Punjabi Goat Curry Cooking" to capture what I experienced. I could give everyone, from philosophers Immanuel Kant to Maurice Merleau-Ponty a role, as it concerns aesthetics to phenomenology"

Posted by: Moin Rahman | Nov 26, 2010 9:02:08 AM

Rishi,
You've Done it!
And about sanguinary time too ;o)!!!
Excellent recipe but moreso the terrific humour that is so intrinsic to you!
Really looking forward to eating - or should that be gorging - on some more of your excellent cooking when you're "home" this Dec.
Cheers!
Lotsa Love as ever,
Chippy (Mamoooh!)

Posted by: Chippy Gangjee | Dec 11, 2010 3:59:59 AM

I'm spanish.
Sometimes, when group business traveling to a foreign city, let's say London, some other spanish coming with me asks: Where can we have here a good Paella?. To wich my answer is: nowhere. To eat paella you must go to Valencia, and not even that way you have your satisfaction guaranteed.
But of course the indian restaurants in the USA, and probably all over the world, make their dishes to the taste of the local population! They are there to make money. And that's the way cooking evolves. Just think that today tikka masala is THE english national dish. Who cares how truly indian it is?
Pure and museum food must be let to government sponsored places or to adventurous entrepeneurs. No one is obliged to be one of them.

Posted by: claudio | Dec 14, 2010 8:43:46 AM

Fantastic! Can't believe I've subjected you to the smells of my culinary disasters on so many occasions. I take heed of many of your warnings.

Posted by: Dwai | Jan 11, 2011 12:18:02 PM

This is perfect, Rishi! Why didn't you ever send it around?

Posted by: Anand | Jan 11, 2011 12:53:07 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Elatia Harris on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

Brad Wilson on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

X on Physics’s Pangolin

jo smith on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

Jesse M. on NAPOLEON CHAGNON: BLOOD IS THEIR ARGUMENT

David Clausen on Psychiatry’s mistaken manual

Abbas Raza on Poetry in Translation

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story

roger gathmann on NAPOLEON CHAGNON: BLOOD IS THEIR ARGUMENT

Norman Costa on Physics’s Pangolin

Norman Costa on Physics’s Pangolin

prasad on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

Frans on The Epistemology of Hatred: A Case Study of Irish Bogs

jh on Moving books

Sundar on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

Brad Wilson on Physics’s Pangolin

Brad Wilson on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

dr h s saini on the pao of love (part one)

joyce marie costa ingraham on My Father: A Veteran's Story

X on Physics’s Pangolin

Gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

Raza Husain on Physics’s Pangolin

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

nogodrod on messages sent from the dawn of history

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed