November 30, 2010
information overload
Worry about information overload has become one of the drumbeats of our time. The world’s books are being digitized, online magazines and newspapers and academic papers are steadily augmented by an endless stream of blog posts and Twitter feeds; and the gadgets to keep us participating in the digital deluge are more numerous and sophisticated. The total amount of information created on the world’s electronic devices is expected to surpass the zettabyte mark this year (a barely conceivable 1 with 21 zeroes after it). Many feel the situation has reached crisis proportions. In the academic world, critics have begun to argue that universities are producing and distributing more knowledge than we can actually use. In the recent best-selling book “The Shallows,” Nicholas Carr worries that the flood of digital information is changing not only our habits, but even our mental capacities: Forced to scan and skim to keep up, we are losing our abilities to pay sustained attention, reflect deeply, or remember what we’ve learned. Beneath all this concern lies the sense that humanity is experiencing an unprecedented change — that modern technology is creating a problem that our culture and even our brains are ill equipped to handle. We stand on the brink of a future that no one can ever have experienced before. But is it really so novel?more from Ann Blair at the Boston Globe here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 09:36 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Interesting, but today really IS novel. Sure, people can use various tools to cull what they want or need from the dross and will find ways to get by. However, the huge difference is that just about anybody can add to the information load at will, and in bulk, with no really specialized tools. There isn't even a bad editorial eye on most of what gets uploaded; there's no eye at all. Then we've got millions of people reading and perhaps downloading all sorts of stuff of unknown, and maybe unknowable, quality, and using it to create yet more "information" to put out there. The dramatic power shift in terms of who gets to publish makes an enormous difference. Nothing like Wikileaks was possible before; it is now. So yes, it is unprecedented and far more important than this article supposes.
Posted by: Sarah D. | Dec 1, 2010 12:37:43 PM
Post a comment