| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Perceptions | Main | unpacking their library »

September 20, 2010

Midwest Peace

Justin E. H. Smith

IMG_0654 I am writing from a motel room somewhere in Indiana. The obese teenage girl who checked me in asked me where I stand in respect of today’s competition between the ‘Bears’ and the ‘Colts’, which, as I know without ever having sought to know, are two nearby cities’ football teams. When I gave her a Canadian postal code in lieu of a zip, she quickly apologized, red in the face, for her attempt at familiar chatter. Damn it, I thought, there I go othering myself again.

Now I’m in my room, there is a corn field out the window, and Every Which Way But Loose is on the TV. Clyde the orangutan just gave a biker gang the finger. Clint Eastwood, as I know in advance, is about to nail Sondra Locke. I hope you’ll excuse me if I get distracted and the narrative flow tapers off.

I am in the American Midwest for a little over a week. Officially, my purpose here is the usual one that takes me wherever I go: academic conferences. Behind this, however, there is a more personal reason: I wanted to return to the place I lived for two and a half years at the very beginning of the present century, and to see if I could make some sense out of it. There is another region of the world --the American West-- that will always form the deepest stratum of my psychogeographical sense. Yet the Midwest, too, managed to leave a thin but hard crust over some of the other layers, one that doesn't get in the way of deeper digging, necessarily, but still requires its own equipment and instruments of analysis.

My last trip through Indiana, in early Summer, 2003, was capped off by an ugly traffic accident on the Interstate, as I was travelling south-southeast from Chicago to Cincinnati. The police report is something I occasionally pull out and study when I want, for some perverse reason, to relive the trauma of it. I even brought it with me for my most recent Indiana road trip. One of the witnesses, Tricia Yoder, reports the event as follows: “I seen the black car [mine] driving in the left lane and the blue car [Travis Butler’s] driving in the right lane. The blue car tried to make a suden turn in front of the black car in order to turn around on the hi-way divider to go back the other direction, even thouh the sign said ‘no’ u-turn. The black car did’nt have time to stop and ran into the drivers side of the blue car. I seen it from behind the black car.”

I hit Travis Butler, in other words, who, as I would later learn, was born in 1954 and was a resident of Pulaski County. As I inferred at the time --having, in the millisecond before impact, thoroughly studied and committed to memory the POW-MIA sticker in the rear window on the driver's side-- Mr. Butler was a veteran of a certain bitter war. I hit the vet, and he got issued a moving violation on his way to the hospital. It still doesn't seem right. He was, I feel like saying, the legal cause of the collision, but I was the metaphysical cause. Like the ancient archer discussed by Bernard Williams in Shame and Necessity, it does not matter that he could not have known that a runner would be passing in the distance at the moment he let go the arrow. You can't hit someone who passes in front of you without shaking up the cosmos a bit. Our Christian, free-will-based legal system makes a distinction that our not yet fully de-Hellenized, fatalistic subconsciences can't quite accept. You can’t hit a guy without being tainted. You definitely can’t hit a Vietnam vet.  

After the cars had come to their resting places on the grassy center divider, I slithered out, stunned, and walked like a zombie over to his car. Are you alright? I asked. ‘Yeah’, he said. Good, I said. I was sincerely relieved for a moment. Then I saw blood streaming from the crown of his head and dripping down, in big, fast drops, behind his left ear. He was not alright.

(Clint has just barged into the YWCA where Sondra is staying. The appearance of a man has put the young women, with their nightgowns and curlers and face creams, into a frenzy.)

The collision solved at least one problem for me: I had been looking for a way to free myself of my 1991 Acura Integra, for which I did not want to have to pay the exorbitant fee required to bring it with me on my impending move to Canada. I was in fact, at that very moment, in connection with the move, hauling nearly my entire library in the trunk, back seat, front seat, front passenger floor, glove compartment, and dashboard of my Acura. I have recently related how some of my most intense interaction with my books occur when I, on frequent occasions, have been obliged to lug them from one domicile to another, but never have my books had quite such an impact as they did that day, when, having rapidly decelerated upon hitting the Vietnam vet's car, my precious copy of volume III of Adam and Tannery's edition of the Oeuvres complètes of René Descartes, which had been resting atop of the pile on the backseat behind my head, quickly accelerated, by some law of mechanical physics that the great French philosopher himself probably discovered, and struck me in the back of the skull.

This as much as the accident itself was a cause of my utter stupefaction, so that when I forced the door open and slithered out to go check on Travis, in my state of curiously heightened alertness I was able to examine the covers of all the great works of philosophy that were spilling out onto the grassy division. There went Jan-Baptista van Helmont's De Ortu medicinae! And there's the single-volume edition of Spinoza's collected works! Why, he barely wrote anything! Any scholar who works on Spinoza should be required to memorize him by heart, I thought. And there's Shame and Necessity! What a book! What a hammer of a book!

Within a few moments the Indiana state troopers would arrive, and I recall them scratching their heads and laughing as they went around picking up the far-flung works of philosophy. I recall seeing one of them holding Hegel’s Phänomenologie des Geistes. “Do you understand this?,” he asked me. No, I said. Not really.


IMG_0667 Beyond their content, which I confess by that stage of my life I had only very partially mastered, my books protected as a sort of prophylactic against the Midwest during my extended sojourn there. How could I be absorbed into this landscape of teddy-bears-and-American-flag motifs, of paper towels and doilies and wallpaper with geese with bows tied around their necks, where half the women are named ‘Barb’ and people have signs in their front lawns announcing their preferences in the upcoming election of a county sheriff-- how, I say, could this place absorb me if I build an impenetrable fortress out of books imported from Europe and from the coasts? It was not enough for me to do what most small-town university faculty do in parts of America that people who must be completely ignorant of 20th-century political history now insist on calling ‘red’: to build up an ethereal fortress out of NPR broadcasts and perhaps a subscription to the New Yorker. And they bump into each other on campus, each prepared to relate the content of exactly the same story about, say, the Kronos Quartet’s new genre-bending collaboration, while meanwhile the folk surrounding the campus have never so much as heard of the Kronos Quartet, and are satiated just by learning that, say, The Rock will be starring in a new comedy about a private investigator who has to go undercover in a kindergarten.

That was the arrangement, more or less, in the small Ohio town where I lived and taught for a year, before moving to the modest metropolis of Cincinnati, an hour or so away from the university. ‘Cincinnati’, as you may know, is in fact in the genitive case: it is the city ‘of Cincinnatus’, a Roman statesman who decided to retire to a quiet life of agriculture after performing his political service, rather than clinging to power for life. He is thus said to have been a model for George Washington in his refusal to take on the role of King of America. But there is nothing at all in Ohio's southernmost city that suggests the idyllic fields its Roman namesake must have plowed. The city is described by the diabolical reverend played by Robert Mitchum in Night of the Hunter as the ‘Sodom of the Ohio River’, and I consider that description more or less correct. The place could certainly stand to be razed in an act of divine vengeance.

Cincinnati, right at the boundary between the slaveholding and the free states, was well known before the Civil War for its bounty hunters, who, for a fee, would return runaway slaves across the river to Kentucky: slaves who perhaps believed too soon that they had made it to a better place. When I had just moved to Cincinnati in 2001, there was an extended period of military-style curfews, meant to quell the riots that had followed the police shooting of a black teenager, who had been the 40th black man killed by the police in a period of six years. De facto the curfew did not mean that you could not leave your home after dark, but only that you had better not look like a potential rioter if you do. Still, white people were encouraged not to leave home unless they had to. I still recall the white mayor going on telling Cincinnatians that during the period of the curfew this was a good time to ‘stay home with your family, watch TV, and pray.’ It was striking that these three distinct activities were held to go so naturally together, and the mayor’s easy elision of them has served for me ever since as a summary of the ethos of the place.

I'll spare most of the details of my time there. I wasted a lot of money on visits to a jovial and jaded psychoanalyst, who had once belonged to the true Freudian school but at this late stage in his career believed in nothing at all except human decency; ate at Skyline Chili almost daily; had a brief relationship with a Skyline Chili waitress (my one attempt to go native); went through a bizarre Platonizing phase in my metaphysical views; and spent altogether too much time time (for a grown man, anyway) in a weepy and simpering state. I also spent much of my time commuting, and often left the radio on ‘scan’ as I drove. I liked to see how quickly I could identify the Christian stations, and I found that I always could even before any overtly Christian views were expressed, simply in virtue of the unctuous and condescending tone. No one who listens to these emissions and finds them soothing could be fully emotionally mature.

(Clint and Sondra are ready to do it, but she is unwilling to permit Clyde to stay in bed with them. Clyde is unfazed.)

And I forgot to mention the most important thing about my time in Ohio, namely, that I had a cat named ‘Jim’. As a tiny kitten, Jim had suddenly appeared in the parking lot of a Kroger's. The bag girls were outside playing with him as I walked up one day. They asked me if I wanted to take him home, and I was delighted to say ‘yes’. Almost immediately I began inventing stories about him in my head. I imagined him to be a consummate Southwestern Ohioan. His full name, as it existed only in my head, was ‘Jim Mewker, the Tri-State Euchre King’. I imagined he ran his own HVAC business, complained about the tax-and-spend liberals, liked barbecues, had a moustache.

None of this had anything to do with his real personality of course. What made fantasy-Jim so amusing to me was precisely his total incongruity with real-Jim. Now you’re probably thinking at this point that there could be no possible world in which a counterpart-Jim would really be an HVAC man, a euchre player, and so on, at least if this counterpart-Jim were to remain a member of the same species as real-Jim. That is true, but there are cats out there for whom this description would be infinitely more plausible. Jim was evidently suffering from the trauma of an early separation from his mother. He was inconsolable when left alone for even a few seconds, and whenever possible preferred to be not just at my feet or in my lap, but pressed right up to my face. Real-Jim was a pathetic creature.

One night I awoke to find a bat fluttering around near the ceiling of my bedroom. My landlord (‘Barb’) did not believe me when I told her about this, and the only solution I could come up with was to go to Wal-Mart, to buy a one-man tent, and to set it up on top of my bed as a sort of mosquito net, except that rather than protecting me from mosquitoes it would protect me from my bat.

Now at first I was determined not to let Jim into the tent with me, since I found it very difficult to sleep with him pressed against my face. The very first night, as I zipped up the tent flap, Jim had what I can only call a fit of feline psychosis. He began to claw his way up to the top of the tent, and from there to slide down the side as if it were an airplane's emergency escape tube. He must have done this over 100 times, and would have kept on doing it all night if I had not let him in. He curled up on my face. I lay there wide awake, listening for the flutter of Satanic mammalian wings in the dark outer space of my bedroom. We were made for each other, Jim and I. Inside that one-man tent in that uninhabitable apartment in that damned city in Ohio, we found a shred of consolation.

--

For an extensive archive of Justin Smith's writing, please visit www.jehsmith.com.

To follow him on Facebook, please go here.

Posted by Justin E. H. Smith at 12:35 AM | Permalink

Comments

nicely done, sir.

Posted by: morgan meis | Sep 20, 2010 9:48:24 AM

"The obese teenage girl who checked me in asked me where I stand in respect of today’s competition between the ‘Bears’ and the ‘Colts’, which, as I know without ever having sought to know, are two nearby cities’ football teams."

I stopped reading after this. So obnoxious! Written as if (Anglo) Canada is a world apart from the US.

Posted by: Al | Sep 20, 2010 10:05:46 AM

Afraid of a bat? Fancy that!

Posted by: J.Hawkins | Sep 20, 2010 11:38:57 AM

"I stopped reading after this. So obnoxious! Written as if (Anglo) Canada is a world apart from the US."

Well, it is and it isn't. Based on my own travels through it and conversations with its inhabitants, I'd say Anglo Canada goes through periodic and always unresolved identity crises in relation to the US.

But Quebec (where Justin's postal code - and mine - is located) most definitely is a world apart, and, for an American (as I am, too, mostly - I was born to expats in Europe, and the few years I lived there left an indelible tinge of otherness in my sense of self), even a few years living here tends to give one a critical distance from the country of one's forebears which one may not have had before. (For me it was more a resurgence of that sense of otherness, now manifested as two layers.) Not to the degree, perhaps, that one might achieve from living in Europe or Japan, say, but to a real extent nonetheless.

Posted by: Kai | Sep 20, 2010 12:34:07 PM

One might also note that to the average American heartlander, Canada in general is a great white blank (one need only note how easily complete horseshit about Canadian healthcare is believed by a significant portion of Americans), and might as well be a world apart, ignorant of football, even though many Canadians do of course follow it, and despite the existence of the CFL (including Quebec's Alouettes.)

Posted by: Kai | Sep 20, 2010 12:52:38 PM

Thanks--
I loved it.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Sep 20, 2010 1:42:17 PM

Seems very true to me.

I enjoyed flinching in recognition.

Posted by: Alyssa P. | Sep 20, 2010 1:49:14 PM

For sheer provincial ignorance, I believe the deep boroughs of New York City and townie Boston are far more frightening than anything in the Midwest. At least in Ohio, you aren't surrounded by Northern New Jersey, Western Long Island and the Bronx, and all the dull masses they contain. Oh yeah, and I went to Montreal, and every one there was named "Pierre" -- hah hah -- and they talked about some strange game called "'ockey" -- hah-hah -- but I will say that the ambulance drivers all had advanced degrees in philosopy. I'll grant them that.

Posted by: Faze | Sep 20, 2010 3:32:01 PM

Interesting. The author notes that the teenage girl working at the motel was obese, and then worries that he has othered HIMSELF. Oy.

Posted by: Sarah D. | Sep 20, 2010 4:50:27 PM


Justin,

Nice piece of writing. I really cared about the time you worked in the Midwest and lived in Cincinnati.

Here's my favorite sentence:

"How could I be absorbed into this landscape of teddy-bears-and-American-flag motifs, of paper towels and doilies and wallpaper with geese with bows tied around their necks, where half the women are named ‘Barb’ and people have signs in their front lawns announcing their preferences in the upcoming election of a county sheriff-- how, I say, could this place absorb me if I build an impenetrable fortress out of books imported from Europe and from the coasts?"

Neither you, nor anyone else, asked for advice on dealing with a bat in the house, but here are two suggestions. 1. Whack 'em with a tennis racket. It's harder for them to evade the netting. 2. Use a fire extinguisher, the kind that produces a cold foam or dusting, to incapacitate them.

I look forward to more.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Sep 20, 2010 6:13:33 PM

Okay, now do Texas. I'll be your Beatrice in that inferno, but you have to promise not to make uncharitable remarks about my appearance.

READERS, follow Justin on Facebook. He writes for other places than 3QD.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Justin-E-H-Smith/141993125833185?ref=search

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 20, 2010 11:23:52 PM

Thanks Justin, a lovely piece, as much of your writing is. I've never been able to read more than a few sentences of Hegel myself. The fact that you can, and still write so lucidly and personally is of deep credit to you. Don't pay any attention to these people stopping reading after you said that about the obese girl. If the reader had gone on for just one more sentence he would have found you commenting on it yourself. He's the poorer for it. Best.

Posted by: Steven | Sep 21, 2010 12:09:45 AM

I hope to meet Justin some day in Texas. Better still, New Delhi?

Posted by: Ruchira | Sep 21, 2010 12:19:59 AM

Okay, now do Texas.
Texas is easy, even their burials are unique.
The undertaker just gives Texans enemas, and then buries then in shoe boxes.

But Justin, please continue---

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Sep 21, 2010 1:43:08 AM

No, Dave. Just by chance today I spent an hour walking through a cemetery in Austin and was completely charmed by the downright neighborly installations.

Posted by: Zara | Sep 21, 2010 2:11:14 AM

very nice!

Posted by: Stefany | Sep 21, 2010 4:23:50 AM

I am in the Midwest as well, next door to you, in Iowa.

Posted by: HMN | Sep 21, 2010 6:21:01 AM

Just by chance today I spent an hour walking through a cemetery in Austin and was completely charmed by the downright neighborly installations.

True, but Austin is at least a half hour from Texas.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Sep 21, 2010 10:30:54 AM

A lot of people seem to be upset with the label of "obese" - here's your sensitive Americans right there.

I also got into a car accident while traveling with a car full of book to a new location - books weighted down the car so much, it didn't flip when it would have if it was empty. So it was a relief to know they literally saved my life.

Posted by: Mikhail | Sep 21, 2010 12:56:17 PM

It's probably because I have such a narrow mind being from the mid-west, but this seems as pretty as it is shallow. You do 'other' yourself, this entire piece is just selfindulgent.

Posted by: Bridget | Sep 21, 2010 1:08:50 PM

I know it's fashionable for philosophers to flaunt their ignorance in the sciences, but books do not "accelerate" upon impact. The car decelerated, and the books in motion remained in motion. Study your Leibniz for that (I would say Newton, but Leibniz deserves the credit for his superior dot notation, especially relevant for the situation described).

p.s., sorry to be critical. Most of your writing is excellent, but such sloppiness is not expected from a scholar.

Posted by: Karl D | Sep 21, 2010 9:18:25 PM

Correction: Leibniz's fluxion (dy/dx or dy/dt) notation vs. Newton's dot notation. Well, ok, I am sloppy too.

Posted by: Karl D. | Sep 21, 2010 9:48:49 PM

Check your facts on this figure: "the 40th black man killed by the police in a period of six years", but otherwise great.

Posted by: manda | Sep 21, 2010 11:30:49 PM

Karl,

Can the inertial frame not be taken to be the car itself, or even Justin himself? In that case, wouldn't the book accelerate, as Newton and Leibniz would agree?

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 22, 2010 4:57:18 AM

You can pick any frame you want! However, the a reference frame attached to the car would be an accelerated frame, not an inertial one. I think both Newton and Leibniz would agree on this aspect of _Galilean_ relativity...

Cheers!

Posted by: Bill | Sep 22, 2010 5:39:32 AM

Justin-
I write the following comment with all due respect...
I lived in Indiana for five years, my husband Jonathan was born in Bloomington and raised in Fort Wayne.

Living in Indiana, I was able to hike in gorgeous state parks every time I had a day off, attend plays and visit the art museum regularly, and meet fascinating, sweet, hardworking people who were usually doing their darnedest to make a middle class life.

I get what you're saying about peace, dont get me wrong. Othering others renders peace a cloud in our coffee.

But I'm apalled by your elitist and simplified description of Indiana, not because I love Indiana so specifically ( I do...) but because it's ExACTLY why the populist right hates us liberal elites. Your disdain for them is palpable, they can see it in your eyes.

Did you know the Yoders are usually Amish or Mennonite? While you may have some disdain for religion itself, these are hardworking people with discipline, integrity, and character. They're fascinating once you put your judgements away.

Did you know that Kurt Vonnegut is from Indiana (Im sure you did, we all do) and his family was an erudite German family of architects, engineers, and civic leaders? I used to enjoy friday evenings of great conversation and hilarity at his family's old community center/ beer garden, the Rathskeller.

Did you know those cornfields you so disdain were once lush old growth forests teeming with all kinds of wildlife that European settlers destroyed in greed and ignorance?

But wait, I'm not commenting to defend Indiana by describing all the brilliant people hailing from its small towns or its underground caves as big as Columbia University's auditoriums.

I'm commenting, despite all my respect and affection for you, to reprimand the condescension we all harbor for the millions of Hoosiers and other Americans living in whatever predicaments they were brought into.

Unless we start treating them as one of us, the Tea Party's guests in Indiana and Iowa and everywhere else, or some other radicalized (in-your-academic-universe) plebes will continue to torture us with their misled fears, nauseating interest in football or IRL or NASCAR, and hurtful convictions about "immigrants".

Granted that might have been your point about Mideast peace, but I think you led yourself astray in your essay.

The tent/bat/cat imagery is great. But you do a better job of exposing your own hatred for the vast majority of Americans than you do of reminding your peers to take that chain mail of elitist disdain (for Bears and Colts and Obese teenagers and people with names like Barb who play Euchre) apart link by link, and perhaps start to live a full and humane life.

Posted by: Zee | Sep 22, 2010 7:35:23 AM

Stop spending so much time thinking about yourself and go do something positive in this world.

Posted by: Tom | Sep 22, 2010 8:44:00 AM

Right you are, Bill! Thanks.

Abbas

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Sep 22, 2010 9:23:47 AM

AI: If you stopped reading after the sentence about football teams, how did you know I ended up in Canada?

J. Hawkins: Yes, I'm afraid of bats. They look like they are from Hell, plus they carry rabies.

Sarah D.: I don't worry that I have othered myself, I announce that I have.

Elatia: I'll be in Texas in December. Watch out.

Mikhail: It's strange, isn't it? What word is more neutral than 'obese'? 'Corpulent'? And to the suggestion that this is not the sort of thing that one should comment on, I would reply: I am writing about things I notice, and how the hell am I supposed to not notice when a teenage girl weighs, like, 500 pounds?

Karl D.: Whatever.

Manda: I did.

Abbas: Thanks for dealing with that one.

Zee and Tom: Go read the Daily Kos or something.

Posted by: Justin Smith | Sep 22, 2010 6:32:08 PM

Well, Justin, as long as we're being flippant...

You poor soul. You had to take a faculty position in a town you didn't like. Want a tissue? But why would one take seriously the writings of someone whose best solution to a bat in his room is spending the night in a tent, sniffling with his cat?

From that oft cited commencement speech by David Foster Wallace, whose advice I myself just failed to heed:

"...The traffic jams and crowded aisles and long checkout lines give me time to think, and if I don't make a conscious decision about how to think and what to pay attention to, I'm gonna be pissed and miserable every time I have to shop. Because my natural default setting is the certainty that situations like this are really all about me. About MY hungriness and MY fatigue and MY desire to just get home, and it's going to seem for all the world like everybody else is just in my way. And who are all these people in my way? And look at how repulsive most of them are, and how stupid and cow-like and dead-eyed and nonhuman they seem in the checkout line, or at how annoying and rude it is that people are talking loudly on cell phones in the middle of the line. And look at how deeply and personally unfair this is.

Or, of course, if I'm in a more socially conscious liberal arts form of my default setting, I can spend time in the end-of-the-day traffic being disgusted about all the huge, stupid, lane-blocking SUV's and Hummers and V-12 pickup trucks, burning their wasteful, selfish, 40-gallon tanks of gas, and I can dwell on the fact that the patriotic or religious bumper-stickers always seem to be on the biggest, most disgustingly selfish vehicles, driven by the ugliest [responding here to loud applause] (this is an example of how NOT to think, though) most disgustingly selfish vehicles, driven by the ugliest, most inconsiderate and aggressive drivers.

...If I choose to think this way in a store and on the freeway, fine. Lots of us do. Except thinking this way tends to be so easy and automatic that it doesn't have to be a choice. It is my natural default setting. It's the automatic way that I experience the boring, frustrating, crowded parts of adult life when I'm operating on the automatic, unconscious belief that I am the centre of the world, and that my immediate needs and feelings are what should determine the world's priorities.

...Or I can choose to force myself to consider the likelihood that everyone else in the supermarket's checkout line is just as bored and frustrated as I am, and that some of these people probably have harder, more tedious and painful lives than I do.

...[If] you're aware enough to give yourself a choice, you can choose to look differently at this fat, dead-eyed, over-made-up lady who just screamed at her kid in the checkout line. Maybe she's not usually like this. Maybe she's been up three straight nights holding the hand of a husband who is dying of bone cancer. Or maybe this very lady is the low-wage clerk at the motor vehicle department, who just yesterday helped your spouse resolve a horrific, infuriating, red-tape problem through some small act of bureaucratic kindness. Of course, none of this is likely, but it's also not impossible. It just depends what you want to consider. If you're automatically sure that you know what reality is, and you are operating on your default setting, then you, like me, probably won't consider possibilities that aren't annoying and miserable. But if you really learn how to pay attention, then you will know there are other options."

Posted by: Chris | Sep 22, 2010 9:06:40 PM

I love this essay. Look at the building. I'm not sure I would have survived at all if I'd had to look at it while living there. It looks like instant death.

The essay reminds me a little of Winesburg, Ohio, especially the asides about Clint and Sondra and Clyde.

Zee, we can treat them like "one of us," but how do you have a conversation with the THEM side of US and THEM if not about their fears, their bigotry against people on the coasts and in urban areas, about NASCAR or their piped-in radio prayers? Maybe it's a matter of who is willing to give up their contempt first?

Norman, why would you have killed the bat? I would have tried to catch it in something, perhaps a butterfly net, and deposited it outdoors. The tent, however, was a creative solution.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Sep 23, 2010 12:00:15 AM

Yes, Justin, since we're being flippant,

3qd is the only blog i read, and only because My Uncle Abbas founded it.

I figured since you are so close with Abbas that you'd realize I am, in fact, running for public office.... in fact as a Dem....

So, when you've gone out and spent your Saturday knocking on 160 doors over 6 hours to build a brighter future, even though it's a fallen world and the Dems are maybe not perfect and the utopian solution might be different- I'll forgive the elitism in your essay.

In the meantime, I've got a fallen world to encounter in a lush, if often heartbreaking,reality.

Posted by: Zee | Sep 23, 2010 7:26:53 AM

Zee: Good luck running for office. I do hope you win. I for my part am grateful that I am *not* running for office, and am thereby freed up to describe my impressions of things and people, to divulge my limitations and prejudices, without this hampering my electoral aims. You and I are engaged in two very different sorts of project: is it at all surprising that we find it fitting to employ very different registers of speech?

I am a bit alarmed that the reaction to an essay whose principal aim was to convey how ridiculous and touchy I am, how out of touch with my fellow human beings and my countrymen, was: you're so ridiculous and out of touch. Well of course I am! That was the point of the essay! It was not a stump speech.

If it were my intention to talk about politics, you would find that we have much common ground as concerns our analysis of the causes of America's uneven distribution of wealth and educational resources. This is a level of analysis with which I am not unfamiliar. But there's more to life than politics. There's also reflection on the self, and the honest accounting of what is found there. You can't afford to do this in your line of work, but I can.

Chris: I do wish you had followed the advice of DFW's boring speech.

Posted by: Justin Smith | Sep 23, 2010 10:09:51 AM

Is interesting story of your journey to American steppe, and of your "going to the people" (хождение в народ). One question only, is placard announcing preference in election for sheriff of village commune sign of backwardness of American peasant?

Posted by: Vicki Baker | Sep 23, 2010 2:13:01 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

jo smith on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on Race Is Not Biology

Dave on Race Is Not Biology

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Boursin on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Usha Alexander on Race Is Not Biology

Abbas Raza on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

X on Race Is Not Biology

Usha Alexander on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

araldo on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Dr. X, Ph.D. on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on Physicists Create Quantum Link Between Photons That Don't Exist at the Same Time

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

omar on Why race as a biological construct matters

Dr. Smith on Race Is Not Biology

Sundar on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Sundar on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Sundar on Why race as a biological construct matters

Sundar on Race Is Not Biology

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

khaled on Evolution shapes new rules for ant behavior

musafir on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

araldo on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed