August 23, 2010
Akeel Bilgrami to Judge 2nd Annual 3QD Philosophy Prize
September 22, 2010, UPDATE: The winners have been announced.
September 10, 2010, UPDATE: See list of nine finalists here.
September 9, 2010, UPDATE: Voting round closed. See list of twenty semifinalists here.
September 3, 2010, UPDATE: Nominations are now closed. Go here to see the list of nominees and vote.
Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,
We are very honored and pleased to announce that Professor Akeel Bilgrami has agreed to be the final judge for our 2nd annual prize for the best blog writing in philosophy. (Details of last year's inaugural prize, judged by Professor Daniel C. Dennett, can be found here.) Akeel is the Johnsonian Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University as well as the Director of the Heyman Center for the Humanities there. He has two relatively independent sets of intellectual interests--in the Philosophy of Mind and Language, and in issues of Political Philosophy and Moral Psychology especially as they surface in politics, history, and culture. He teaches courses and seminars regularly in the department on Philosophy of Mind and Language and also in the Committee on Global Thought and Political Science on issues in Politics and Rationality as well as Religion and Politics in Global Context. For the last 17 years, I am proud to say, Akeel has also been my teacher and friend.
As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm EDT on August 31, 2010. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Akeel.
The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.
(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)
The winners of this philosophy prize will be announced on September 22, 2010. Here's the schedule:
August 21, 2010:
- The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite philosophy blog entry by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win. (Do NOT nominate a whole blog, just one individual blog post.)
- Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are not eligible.
- Each person can only nominate one blog post.
- Entries must be in English.
- The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
- The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after August 20, 2009.
- You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog (and we encourage you to).
- Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
- Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
- Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.
August 31, 2010
- The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
- The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.
September 8, 2010
- Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).
September 22, 2010
- The winners are announced.
One Final and Important Request
If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.
Best of luck and thanks for your attention!
Yours,
Abbas
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:00 AM | Permalink






















Comments
http://www.strangedoctrines.com/2010/05/windmills-of-your-mind.html
Posted by: Michael Drake | Aug 21, 2010 10:20:02 AM
I'm intellectually in love with the judge. A good thing I don't write philosophy...
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Aug 21, 2010 10:48:06 AM
For your consideration I offer,
http://tomkow.typepad.com/tomkowcom/2010/01/retributive-ethics.html
Since it's been a while since anyone came up with a new ethical theory …
Posted by: tomkow | Aug 21, 2010 5:06:16 PM
I'd like to nominate,
"The Retributive Theory of Property" http://www.tomkow.com/
This is an original account of property rights.
Posted by: David Gordon | Aug 21, 2010 6:57:41 PM
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/2010/03/09/why-and-how-do-we-separate-state-and-church-and-what-are-the-consequences-for-religious-liberty/
Posted by: Filip | Aug 22, 2010 9:16:38 AM
I'd like to nominate "The Myth of Sensory Immediacy – Why Berkeley Was Wrong"
http://philosophyandpsychology.com/?p=833
It's a critique of Berkeley's sense-data theory from an ecological perspective.
Posted by: Gary Williams | Aug 23, 2010 10:39:17 AM
I'd like to nominate 'Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology':
http://ttahko.net/blog/counterfactuals-and-modal-epistemology/
Published pretty much exactly a year ago on my blog, but still one of my favourite posts. It's a critique of Timothy Williamson's counterfactual analysis of modality.
Posted by: Tuomas Tahko | Aug 23, 2010 2:18:02 PM
If I can self-nominate, I'd like to put forward, "The Lockean Proviso and Federally Managed Lands." http://blog.kennypearce.net/archives/philosophy/political_philosophy/private_property/the_lockean_proviso_and_federa.html
This post contains a short and accessible introduction to Locke's theory of initial acquisition, then argues that libertarians of the Nozickian/Neo-Lockean variety, who accept the broad outlines of Locke's theory, must support a system of federally managed lands.
Posted by: Kenny | Aug 23, 2010 3:14:03 PM
Circling the line | by Jason Bivins
http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/05/20/circling-the-line/
Posted by: Jonathan VanAntwerpen | Aug 23, 2010 10:39:36 PM
Religions are hooked with God and divide us. Even 'A History of God' by Karen Armstrong has failed to bridge the divide. This short essay is a humble effort to clear the confusion about God.
Posted by: Anand Rishi | Aug 24, 2010 10:02:27 AM
Complexity and the Substantial Form: http://www.oldtranslations.com/?p=257
Posted by: Owl | Aug 24, 2010 11:42:52 AM
The Leap: http://www.amandasilbernagel.com/?p=11
Posted by: Jaime | Aug 24, 2010 11:45:27 AM
The Philosopher's Stone:
http://robertpaulwolff.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Billly | Aug 24, 2010 12:44:11 PM
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog:
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/
Posted by: Billly | Aug 24, 2010 12:46:13 PM
I nominate http://branemrys.blogspot.com/2010/08/on-myers-on-baber.html
Posted by: praymont | Aug 24, 2010 12:53:23 PM
Secularism, atheism, antihumanism - by Stefanos Geroulanos
http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2010/06/03/secularism-atheism-antihumanism/
Posted by: Charles Gelman | Aug 24, 2010 2:54:00 PM
An essay on the art of "handwaving' in philosophical argumentation.
Posted by: David Wright | Aug 24, 2010 3:09:27 PM
http://visviva.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/on-handwaving/
Posted by: David Wright | Aug 24, 2010 3:11:44 PM
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/04/05/stanley
unfortunately you'll need to scroll down to my comment from April 8 2010 at 2pm.
2 reasons it should win: (1) it is hilarious. (2) i could really use the prize $$. PLEASE!
Posted by: dankaufman! | Aug 24, 2010 5:49:17 PM
Field Theory of Natural Selection:
http://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/2010/07/22/the-field-theory-of-natural-selection/
Philosophy of Biology FTW
Posted by: Noah | Aug 24, 2010 5:52:47 PM
Some people appear to misunderstand what the contest is about. You should not be nominating entire blogs, you should be nominating particular posts in those blogs. (Also, important as it is, Leiter's blog is not an appropriate one to nominate in any event; he hardly ever uses it to do any actual philosophy.)
Others are not providing links to the posts they want to nominate. I haven't got a clue what posts Anand Rishi and David Wright are nominating.
Posted by: Jeff | Aug 24, 2010 8:47:33 PM
'Can Death Harm Non-Persons?' @ Philosophy, et cetera:
http://www.philosophyetc.net/2009/11/can-death-harm-non-persons.html
P.S. Jeff, if you mouse-over their names, it looks like A.R. and D.W. entered their intended links in the 'url' field rather than the 'comment' field.
Posted by: Richard Chappell | Aug 24, 2010 11:11:00 PM
Hi there. I blog at Good, Bad and Bogus but here's a post I wrote for the Guardian Science Blog that I'd like to nominate. It's about philosophy and QM.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/aug/26/entropy-time-arrow-quantum-mechanics
Posted by: Michael Slezak | Aug 25, 2010 12:48:42 AM
http://brianleiternietzsche.blogspot.com/2010/07/katsafanas-on-nietzsches-philosophical.html
Posted by: Peter | Aug 25, 2010 12:31:44 PM
I nominate Wesley Buckwalter for his empirical work on bank cases
http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/experimental_philosophy/2010/07/further-experimental-work-on-the-bank-cases.html
for its advancement of our understanding of the factors that influence ordinary evaluations of third-personal knowledge ascribing sentences, and for all the discussion it has fostered all around the web by DeRose, Stanley, Nagel, Knobe, and others! http://el-prod.baylor.edu/certain_doubts/?p=1999
Posted by: Cressida | Aug 26, 2010 10:16:31 AM
Nominating "Warp, Weft, and Way," a group blog of Chinese and Comparative philosophy:
http://warpweftandway.wordpress.com/
Posted by: Manyul Im | Aug 26, 2010 2:20:23 PM
OK, I'll bite:
http://yeahokbutstill.blogspot.com/2010/08/marriage.html
Posted by: Nick | Aug 26, 2010 5:12:33 PM
From Chris Schoen's superb blog, underverse, this post:
http://underverse.blogspot.com/2010/07/we-just-live-in-it.html
PS -- I am very happy to see both Chris and Nick Smyth in this.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Aug 26, 2010 5:39:23 PM
"Other People's Icons"--
http://kazez.blogspot.com/2009/10/other-peoples-icons.html
Posted by: Jean Kazez | Aug 28, 2010 5:27:33 PM
Experimental philosophy blog post on gender differences and epistemic intuitions, which also got great coverage here on 3QD earlier this year!
http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/experimental_philosophy/2010/01/is-the-armchair-sexist.html
Posted by: Carolyn Marion | Aug 28, 2010 6:25:10 PM
"The Patriarchy, the Gynocracy, and Other Comforting Myths of Struggle"
http://theviewfromhell.blogspot.com/2010/07/patriarchy-gynocracy-and-other.html
Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 28, 2010 7:27:15 PM
Can their be partial (as opposed to impartial) desert?
http://agencyandresponsibility.typepad.com/flickers-of-freedom/2010/08/can-there-be-partial-as-opposed-to-impartial-desert.html
Posted by: Tamler Sommers | Aug 28, 2010 11:28:32 PM
"In Pursuit of the Play Dividend" at:
http://colinfarrelly.blogspot.com/2010/06/where-action-is-on-site-of-playful-life.html
Posted by: Colin Farrelly | Aug 29, 2010 8:27:15 AM
A rant about "deductive", or, don't diss the logician
http://entiaetnomina.blogspot.com/2009/08/rant-about-deductive.html
Posted by: Rafal | Aug 29, 2010 9:07:21 AM
"Am I a Consequentialist?" by David Sobel, at PEA Soup: http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2010/08/am-i-a-consequentialist.html
Posted by: David Shoemaker | Aug 29, 2010 12:22:38 PM
A clarification of Scott Shapiro's contribution to the Hart-Dworkin debate: http://thelure.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/a-lotta-hart-but-is-there-a-%E2%80%9Cthere%E2%80%9D-there/#more-1730
Posted by: anguslander | Aug 29, 2010 3:25:59 PM
Does Consciousness Matter (for Free Will & Moral Responsibility)?
http://agencyandresponsibility.typepad.com/flickers-of-freedom/2010/07/does-consciousness-matter.html
Posted by: Jorgen | Aug 29, 2010 3:41:21 PM
Hi, Quarks! My name is Jared and I am the founder and editor of the music and philosophy blog, Playtonic Dialogues. This sounds like a fantastic contest and I'd like to submit our post on how musician's have expressed their political dissent in light of Arizona's immigration laws. I hope you enjoy and please let me know if we could collaborate in the future!
http://playtonicdialogues.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/musicians-debate-methods-of-political-dissent/
Posted by: Jared Levy | Aug 30, 2010 1:59:31 AM
I though this thought provoking:
http://blog.talkingphilosophy.com/?p=1222
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Aug 30, 2010 3:55:21 PM
Ryle On Rules And Creativity:
http://specterofreason.blogspot.com/2010/07/ryle-on-rules-and-creativity.html
This is an in-depth (3,216 words) attempt to counter the vast prejudice against Gilbert Ryle. I aim to elucidate Ryle's notion of personhood, focusing on his notion of intelligence as it relates to rules and creativity, and drawing connections to Wittgenstein and ordinary language philosophy. I argue that Ryle is largely misunderstood by many of his critics and defenders alike, and that he deserves more respect from the philosophical community at large.
Posted by: Jason Streitfeld | Aug 31, 2010 8:25:05 AM
I think I might self-nominate this time. Just for the ride:
Raising Neanderthals: Metaphysics at the Limits of Science
Posted by: Daniel Rourke | Aug 31, 2010 12:51:42 PM
Do folks think that consciousness matters for moral responsibility ?
http://blog.philotropes.org/post/2010/08/29/Do-Folks-think-that-consciousness-matters
Posted by: Florian | Aug 31, 2010 4:01:09 PM
http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/pain-asymbolia-and-a-priori-defeasibility/
Posted by: richard brown | Aug 31, 2010 6:51:56 PM
I'll nominate our own Justin Smith's More on Non-Western Philosophy (the Very Idea).
Impeccable timing - just over an hour to spare, as I send this from the delightful New York Cafe (NYC) in San Francisco.
Posted by: Namit | Sep 1, 2010 1:57:27 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.