| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« A Diatribe from the Remains of Dr. Fred McCabe | Main | perceptions »

July 12, 2010

Cadmium

ScreenHunter_02 Jul. 12 15.52 When I set out to write a book on all the great and hidden stories on the periodic table, I figured I’d have to delve into some strange and uncomfortable history. There was the inevitable brush with the alchemists, and humankind’s almost instinctual lust for gold and silver. I even ended up mapping out the elements on the periodic table, to reflect the intellectual currents of the past few centuries. What I didn’t expect was how relevant all that history would seem today, how often the same themes would come up again and again in current events and the news. But if it’s anything, the periodic table is still a microcosm for understanding all the wonderful and horrible things about the world.

I had reason to think of this last month when McDonalds recalled over 13 million Shrek-themed drinking glasses after discovering in them high levels of cadmium, element forty-eight. Cadmium can undoubtedly be one of the most beautiful elements—it has a long history in art as a pigment, and helped old masters produce vibrant colors no other substances of the time could. Even today, some shades—like cadmium yellow—retain the name.

But as the famous biologist Edward O. Wilson once said “In the natural world, beautiful usually means deadly.” Wilson was referring to how the brightest colored snakes, frogs, and insects usually harbor the deadliest venoms. But his wisdom applies equally well to the periodic table. Cadmium is one of the more poisonous elements on the table, and has one of its most notorious histories. Yet we keep making the same mistakes with it again and again. In fact, the first widespread recall of consumer goods with cadmium also involved drinking glasses. (Plus ça change…)

Cadmium sits below zinc on the periodic table, which means pure cadmium looks and acts like zinc, including having the same shiny finish as zinc. So, in the 1940s, some manufacturers decided to plate drinking glasses with cadmium and sell them in department stores.

This was bad enough—some atoms of cadmium would naturally slough off every time somebody filled the glass—but became a big problem when summer rolled around and people began drinking fruit juices like lemonade. These acidic juices scraped cadmium atoms off the cup’s surface in droves, and people around America fell ill with intense pain and diarrhea. McDonalds didn’t line its Shrek glasses with cadmium—it was used in the brightly colored paints on the outside, calculated to attract children’s attentions. But in recalling the line, the fast-food company cited the same fear of children ingesting cadmium while they drank.

There are restrictions on the use of cadmium in toys, but not many. And there are plenty of other chances, for children and adults, to be exposed to cadmium on a daily basis. Besides paints, cadmium finds widespread use in batteries and as a rust-proof lining in electronics. These uses for element forty-eight have declined recently, but certainly haven’t stopped, and many old cadmium-rich electronic items still lie around in offices and garages today. Shortly after 9/11, some public health officials suggested the lung ailments that rescue workers at Ground Zero developed might be traced to cadmium, since computers and other electronics were vaporized when the twin towers fell. Their troubles were traced to smoke and dust inhalation instead, but workers tested for the element did have elevated levels. And it’s telling how quickly the officials fingered cadmium as the culprit, because the danger persists.

For whatever reason, the United States is much more nonchalant about cadmium than other gorgeous poisons. We don’t tolerate mercury, that alluring liquid metal, in fish or consumer goods like thermometers any more. And we severely restrict the use of another element with a history strikingly similar to cadmium. Lead also makes bright paints, and it has many uses in electronics, like solder. It’s also, of course, quite harmful, especially to children, who show impaired mental development after exposure to lead. (Coincidentally, McDonalds has also faced problems with lead in its toys—the recall of 100,000 Chicago Bears bobblehead dolls in 2002.)

But while lead paint and lead gasoline have disappeared from the consumer market, cadmium has faced no such backlash. Indeed, there’s almost no discussion of it, despite repeated recalls of consumer goods with cadmium in the past year and the availability of alternatives, like lithium batteries, for many applications. The European Union recently banned cadmium in all electronics, and it might behoove the U.S. to do something similar, and to further restrict its use in toys and dishes. Unlike with brightly colored snakes, people unfortunately don’t have an inborn, instinctual fear of beautiful elements like cadmium. That doesn’t mean they’re not as deadly.

Posted by Sam Kean at 12:27 AM | Permalink

Comments

Yet children have a boundless curiosity for what's new, glitters or tastes nice, like another poison: read, sugar.

The problem with the eradication of cadmium is that most people we know, don't even know it exists.

An enjoyable piece.

Posted by: Felix E F Larocca MD | Jul 12, 2010 10:23:11 AM

In the late 19th century in US cities, cadmium pigments were used to give candy, sold to children, bright red and yellow colors. This was AFTER the toxic effects were well known. Indeed, the chemist who isolated cadmium (in the early 19th c.) noted the toxicity.

Which brings me to one point that may merit more care: cadmium was isolated in the early 19th c, and it wasn't until mid-19th century when cadmium pigments started to become widely available. So it probably isn't perfectly accurate to say that the Old Masters used cadmium pigments, as the term Old Master is generally not used (when it is used at all!) to designate painters who worked after 1800 or so

(I can't find an online reference for the toxic candies; I read about it years ago in Otto Beckmann's book "The Good Old Days: They Were Terrible!")

Posted by: giotto | Jul 12, 2010 6:31:58 PM

I'll never forget the summer I spent working in United Art supply in Fort Wayne Indiana when a heavily 'inked' amateur artist came up to the checkout with a small basket of brightly colored liquid pigments. "You're not using these for tatoos are you?" One of my co-workers perceptively asked; "These are toxic." "Sure," the guy replied to our dismay - "these colors are much brighter than regular tatoo inks!"

:(

Posted by: jb | Jul 12, 2010 7:55:36 PM

I'd like to say, from an artist's perspective, cadmium is very useful. It is not alone in its danger. Cobalt makes a very nice blue. Lead is still used in artists' paint, although it is somewhat obsolete. Any visual artist worth his/her salt, however, works with a professional's knowledge about handling the hazardous materials of our trade. Teachers (should) chastise students who wipe paint on their jeans, or keep open beverages in the same room as open solvent cans, etc.

Why industry uses cadmium for cheap toys, I couldn't guess. There are cheaper alternatives that are safer. My guess is that the McDonald's toys were made in a country with lax regulation, and that McDonald's execs didn't even think to ask about the paint.

P.S. One of my painting professors, long ago, mentioned that the US Congress had at one time taken up efforts to increase restrictions on cadmium

Oh, and cadmium tattoos? Wow. Well, I guess cigarettes are still legal...

Posted by: phil | Jul 14, 2010 10:57:36 PM

Sam, I've been reading the excerpt of the book on your site -- Bravo!!!! Amazon has my money now...

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 14, 2010 11:16:27 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

martina_j on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Raza Husain on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Bill on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

roger gathmann on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Doogle on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Kyle on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Peter John on Gezi Park

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed