May 31, 2010
Richard Dawkins to judge 2nd Annual 3QD Prize in Science
June 21, 2010, UPDATE: The winners have been announced.
June 11, 2010, UPDATE: See list of nine finalists here.
June 8, 2010, UPDATE: Voting round closed. See list of twenty semifinalists here.
June 2, 2010, UPDATE: Nominations are now closed. Go here to see the list of nominees and vote.
May 31, 2010, UPDATE: Today is the last day for nominations.
Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,
A year ago we announced that we would start awarding four sets of prizes every year (on the two solstices and the two equinoxes) for the best blog writing in the areas of science, philosophy, politics, and arts & literature. We awarded the science prizes, judged by Steven Pinker, on June 21, then announced the winners of the philosophy prizes, judged by Daniel C. Dennett, on September 22, followed by the politics prizes, judged by Tariq Ali, for which the winners were announced on December 21, and finally, the arts & literature prizes were judged by Robert Pinsky, and the winners announced on March 22, 2010.
Thus we completed our first annual cycle of prizes having exceeded our own expectations of success: through our contests we found, for our readers as well as for ourselves, great new blogs and writers to read and follow, and the quality and range of the submissions was excellent in general. And we hope that in our own small way we also managed to spur and encourage good writing in the blogosphere by acknowledging and rewarding it. We are proud that well-known and highly accomplished experts agreed to serve as final judges for each of the four sets of prizes in the first year. We thank each of them again.
We are now ready to start the second cycle of annual prizes, and could not be more excited that Professor Richard Dawkins has agreed to judge the second annual science prize. Since we hardly ever mention him here at 3 Quarks, and many of you may not know who he is, let me say a few words to introduce him... Please, I am joking! I do actually, and very seriously, wish to say this: we could not have found a better judge for science writing, as in my opinion as well as that of many, many others, Richard is simply the best science writer of our time. We are very honored to have him.
As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm EDT on May 31, 2010. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Richard.
The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.
* * *
(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)
* * *
The winners of the science prize will be announced on June 21, 2010. Here's the schedule:
May 24, 2010:
- The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite science blog entry by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win.
- Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are not eligible.
- Each person can only nominate one blog post.
- Entries must be in English.
- The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
- The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after May 23, 2009.
- You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog (and we encourage you to).
- Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
- Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
- Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.
- You may also comment here on our prizes themselves, of course!
May 31, 2010
- The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
- The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.
June 7, 2010
- Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).
June 21, 2010
- The winners are announced.
And another Mini-Contest!
For each of our contests, I have asked designer friends of mine to produce "trophy" logos that the winners of that prize can display on their own blogs. You can see all of them here. I am now running out of designer friends, so here is an offer: send me your design for a logo for the winners of the Arts & Literature Prize (it must contain the same info as in the examples I have linked to, and the size is 160 X 350 pixels), and if I use it, I'll send you $25. Try. It'll be fun. Deadline: June 10, 2010.
One Final and Important Request
If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.
Best of luck and thanks for your attention!
Yours,
Abbas
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:00 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Carl Zimmer: "Why Madagascar’s Tapeworms Matter–To You"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/04/26/why-madagascars-tapeworms-matter-to-you/
Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 24, 2010 7:50:28 AM
Carl Zimmer: "How To Make A Superweed"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/05/04/how-to-make-a-superweed/
Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 24, 2010 7:52:53 AM
Did not read the rules carefully. Please delete the second nomination.
Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 24, 2010 9:01:09 AM
Yippee! Facebooking this immediately!
Posted by: Elatia Harris | May 24, 2010 9:34:54 AM
I really looove your blog, but somehow this prize announcement seems centered on associating 3qd with famous intellectuals by putting a virtual head up their behinds.
Posted by: steve d | May 24, 2010 12:15:50 PM
Another Zimmer nomination - one that stood out for me:
Carl Zimmer "Linux Versus E. coli"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/05/03/linux-versus-e-coli/
Posted by: Matt Miller | May 24, 2010 12:26:35 PM
Love Christina Agapakis's blog (Harvard grad school, studying synbio). Writes with humor, intelligence and - when it comes to the more contentious subjects - a welcome equanimity. For example, this blog on DIYbio:
http://scienceblogs.com/oscillator/2010/03/diybio_and_the_gentleman_scien.php
Posted by: Sue Taylor | May 24, 2010 1:21:42 PM
I'd love to nominate pharyngula@scienceblogs.com but he never seems to talk about science! He does happen to be a scientist who spends most of his energy not talking about science though, so he's right up the good Dr.'s alley. Is that sufficient qualification?
Posted by: Carlos | May 24, 2010 5:17:38 PM
Just a thought, folks. The most prominent science bloggers we can all think of do not lack for recognition and readers. I hope that this year the prizes will go to bloggers who are less well known than the most obvious ones. The Loom and Pharyngula -- to name two that have already been named -- could not be more splendid, but it was much more gratifying when, last year, relatively less recognized science bloggers prevailed on prize day. The almost 200 nominations that came in then showed how much talent there was where only a few of us had seen it, and helped to raise awareness about science writing in general. I'd like that to happen again.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | May 24, 2010 5:44:26 PM
I share the sentiments expressed above by Elatia Harris but have not read too any other science blogs. Perhaps
http://researchblogging.org/static/index/page/awards
is a source to find some more.
Posted by: gaddeswarup | May 24, 2010 6:05:27 PM
What Elatia said.
Posted by: Norman Costa | May 24, 2010 6:24:34 PM
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2010/05/psychological-science-sigmund-freud-a-dream-of-undying-fame.html
Freud, who always claimed to be a scientist was, in fact, primarily, the founder of a cult while his former mentor, Josef Breuer, was a true scientist. The book discussed in this blog -- including Dr. Costa's comments -- illuminate the difference between science and pseudoscience.
Posted by: Louis Breger | May 24, 2010 6:45:25 PM
Dark Matter Confronts Observations:
http://theastronomist.fieldofscience.com/2010/05/dark-matter-confronts-observations.html
Posted by: Alexander | May 24, 2010 9:41:10 PM
Carlos, to be fair, it's a little hard to separate science and atheism and, you know, rational thought. By the way, nine of Dawkins' ten books are about science--you should check them out! In any event, I agree with Elatia.
Posted by: billy | May 25, 2010 11:31:20 AM
Food Among the Ruins, farming Detroit, by Mark Dowie
http://www.guernicamag.com/features/1182/food_among_the_ruins/
Posted by: Editors | May 25, 2010 11:43:55 AM
Human Nature, by Mark Dowie
http://www.guernicamag.com/features/1004/human_nature/
Posted by: Editors | May 25, 2010 11:48:32 AM
Dear Editors of Guernica Magazine,
While we are great fans of yours, unfortunately our prizes are for writing on blogs, and so you don't qualify.
Sorry!
Best,
Abbas
Posted by: Abbas Raza | May 25, 2010 12:10:56 PM
Hard to pick from this excellent blog, but I've found his pieces on hierarchy particularly enlightening:
http://evolvingthoughts.net/2009/07/01/social-dominance-hierarchies/
Posted by: Jesse | May 25, 2010 2:15:17 PM
"The Magnalities of Nature" by C. Van Carter:
http://acrossdifficultcountry.blogspot.com/2010/03/magnalities-of-nature.html
Posted by: Joanne Pearson | May 25, 2010 3:50:26 PM
http://sciblogs.co.nz/code-for-life/2010/03/03/the-inheritance-of-face-recognition/
Posted by: Grant Jacobs | May 25, 2010 7:45:54 PM
Robert Whitaker, author of the new book Anatomy of an Epidemic, in Psychology Today:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mad-in-america/201005/schizophrenia-mystery-solved
Posted by: Louise Gordon | May 26, 2010 12:42:55 PM
Sciblogs NZ: http://sciblogs.co.nz/
This site keeps me up-to-date with everything science in NZ.
Posted by: Jean Fleming | May 26, 2010 7:58:06 PM
I'm rather proud of my co-blogger's and my post on the the history of menhaden and the first comprehensive study of any fishery:
http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=5166
Posted by: Southern Fried Scientist | May 27, 2010 1:05:38 AM
http://growingpassion.blogspot.com/2010/04/evolution-of-chloroplasts-endosymbiosis.html
Really nice post about chloroplasts. It's well set out, interesting and thought-provoking.
Posted by: Julian May | May 27, 2010 4:30:32 AM
Carl Zimmer's "The X-Woman's Finger Bone"
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/03/24/the-x-womans-fingerbone/
Posted by: Marfy Goodspeed | May 27, 2010 4:34:48 AM
Oxford and the origin of the Royal Society:
http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/science_blog/100202.html
Posted by: Jim Rossignol | May 27, 2010 7:56:50 AM
I am pretty proud of this post from my blog:
http://zinjanthropus.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/so-did-knuckle-walking-evolve-twice/
Posted by: zinjanthropus | May 27, 2010 8:02:17 AM
"Full-Spectrum Genomes" Carl Zimmer-The Loom blog Feb. 17, 2010
"The Book of Life is not enough. We need to read the Library of Life."Carl Zimmer
Posted by: David R Bachinsky | May 27, 2010 8:17:22 AM
"Are sandbar sharks more like bowhead whales or cod" is a summary of an important new shark conservation genetics paper, and includes some background on shark conservation.
http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=4698
Posted by: WhySharksMatter | May 27, 2010 8:49:22 AM
Matt Soniak's "Everybody Hurts (Even Crabs)" on mentalfloss.com. It was funny and informative, technically detailed without being a slog to read and may have coined the term "gastro-ethical."
http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/29679
Posted by: Dan Copen | May 27, 2010 9:41:34 AM
Swimming in Ethanol's Ethos.
Kristopher Hite explores the environmental impacts of cellulosic ethanol production and the possibility of practical implementation via genetic manipulation of fungal cellulase enzymes.
http://www.tompainesghost.com/2009/09/swimming-in-ethanols-effects.html
Posted by: Kris | May 27, 2010 11:00:08 AM
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/04/07/gut-bacteria-in-japanese-people-borrowed-sushi-digesting-genes-from-ocean-bacteria/
I was quite proud of this one and it helps that it's an amazing story.
Posted by: Ed Yong | May 27, 2010 12:19:02 PM
I think this is one of my best:
http://scienceblogs.com/observations/2010/01/evolution-the-curious-case-of-dogs.php
Posted by: NerdyChristie | May 27, 2010 1:23:10 PM
Can we nominate a comic strip as a blog post? If so, the strip "The Demon-Haunted World" from Calamities of Nature gets my nomination for great commentary on science
http://calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=307
Posted by: Carl Acheson | May 27, 2010 1:23:25 PM
Motions : emotions : doors
Automatic doors. Do they "expand the repertoire of implicitly communicative conventions" ?
Explore the various emotional responses to a door here:
http://www.reallymagazine.com/month_archive_73.htm#07DEC09
Posted by: helena | May 27, 2010 1:55:18 PM
http://www.esa.org/esablog/research/fire-ant-decapitating-flies-take-hold-in-florida-one-head-at-a-time/
This is my favorite post so far--it draws on several areas of research to explain one extraordinary process.
Posted by: Katie Kline | May 27, 2010 1:58:15 PM
I have always been fascinated with RNA and its role in evolution.
The current mRNA research is adding much to this understanding.
I very much enjoyed this post:
http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2010/04/paleovirology.html
Posted by: Dave Ranning | May 27, 2010 2:20:04 PM
Myrna Morales went to medical school in Cuba, and is now in graduate school for information science. She blogs about the intersection of medicine and information science. Here's her post on "orphan data."
http://medicineforthemasses.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/reflections-of-med-2-0-congress/
Posted by: Elatia Harris | May 27, 2010 2:36:47 PM
PZ Myers cover of Verner's experiment
Posted by: wsa | May 27, 2010 3:13:05 PM
PZ Myers cover of Verner's experiment:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/05/its_alive_1.php
Posted by: wsa | May 27, 2010 3:13:47 PM
I'd like to nominate my post "Dethroning the Red Queen," and its accompanying comment thread. It's as close as my blog has come to what I think of as the ideal in online science writing—I aimed to write a post that made use of online resources to provide deep background on a recent paper, and it sparked a good and substantive discussion with a reader that leads to a somewhat different, more critical interpretation of the original paper's result.
http://www.denimandtweed.com/2010/02/dethroning-red-queen.html
Posted by: Jeremy Yoder | May 27, 2010 3:18:54 PM
http://scientificchick.blogspot.com/2010/01/if-you-are-like-most-people-and-in.html
A no-nonsense and quirky look at the original research behind the news that cell phones can cure Alzheimer's disease.
Posted by: Scientific Chick | May 27, 2010 3:29:56 PM
Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are not eligible? Why? One of the important differences between print and online is that the "real-estate" on paper is limited and expensive, while there are no limits online. So, most of the best science blog-posts are longer because more words are needed to cover a story well - which is why so many MSM articles are deficient.
Posted by: Coturnix | May 27, 2010 3:44:47 PM
Funny take on the swine flu panic
Posted by: Craig | May 27, 2010 3:50:59 PM
Archive Fire's 'Breakdown, or a Degree of Difference' :
http://conflictions5.blogspot.com/2009/12/degree-of-difference.html
...and pretty much everything posted on Archive Fire in the range of politics, ecology and philosophy... it's awesome stuff!
Posted by: Eric | May 27, 2010 3:51:18 PM
Opps, put the link int he wrong box:
http://scientificchick.blogspot.com/2009/05/to-panic-or-not-to-panic-interview-with.html
Posted by: Craig | May 27, 2010 3:51:51 PM
I nominate my post on ape evolution:
http://evolvingthoughts.net/2009/06/19/apes-and-evolution-in-the-news/
Posted by: John S. Wilkins | May 27, 2010 4:14:30 PM
A Blog located in the NY Times written by Olivia Judson.
Posted by: Richard Lucia | May 27, 2010 5:12:16 PM
Rob Mitchum writes for the University of Chicago Medical Center's Science Life blog, which doesn't feel like a PR exercise. Sometimes he even writes about research that hasn't been done at the UofC, like this neat entry about the neuroscience of gambling.
http://sciencelife.uchospitals.edu/2009/11/09/slot-machines-neuroscience-in-action/
Posted by: Meera | May 27, 2010 5:14:27 PM
ditto re: Archive Fire
check out:
http://conflictions5.blogspot.com/2010/05/untangling-mesh-part-1-situated-knowing.html
Posted by: Lonnie G | May 27, 2010 5:35:28 PM
http://scienceblogs.com/primatediaries/2010/04/chimpanzees_prefer_fair_play_o.php
Posted by: EMJ | May 27, 2010 5:44:31 PM
Here's one of my posts that's received fairly positive feedback:
http://blog.professorastronomy.com/2009/06/in-defense-of-wasteful-science.html
Posted by: Kurtis Williams | May 27, 2010 5:48:26 PM
Is there an upside to depression?
http://scienceblogs.com/neuronculture/2010/03/is_there_an_upside_to_depressi.php
Posted by: David Dobbs | May 27, 2010 6:36:05 PM
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/30/caterpillars-use-bacteria-to-produce-green-islands-in-yellowing-leaves/#more-1088
Absolutely fascinating look at a symbiotic relationship between larval insects and bacteria.
Posted by: DB | May 27, 2010 7:57:13 PM
I nominate Arunn Narsimhan's Unruled Notebook for the blog post on laminar flow reversibility.
http://unrulednotebook.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/laminar-flow-reversibility-why-does-the-blob-rewind/
Posted by: Biswajit Banerjee | May 27, 2010 8:33:59 PM
http://thoughtfulanimal.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/path-integration-in-the-desert-ant/
Posted by: Jason G. Goldman | May 27, 2010 10:32:50 PM
I would like to nominate this entry. I am not a scientist-not given those gifts-but I envy anyone who can take what is being done in research and boil it down to something I can use and understand. This is always one of the first blogs I read every morning. Just delightful, informative and not the least bit intimidating!
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/04/27/power-breed-hypocrisy-%e2%80%93-the-powerful-judge-others-more-harshly-but-cheat-more-themselves/
Posted by: Pam Lakatos | May 27, 2010 10:48:04 PM
Bangladeshi brother Razib Choudhry (I think he may not like that term, he has never lived in BD) has an excellent blog. This entry is typical of the detail you will frequently find:
http://www.gnxp.com/wp/culture/experiments-in-cultural-transmission-and-human-cultural-evolution#more-316
Posted by: omar | May 27, 2010 11:15:58 PM
I wrote this post on the inheritance of eye colour in humans the day before I gave birth...
http://chickenoreggblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/the-complicated-genetics-of-human-eye-colour-inheritance/
Posted by: Hilary | May 27, 2010 11:46:16 PM
In the spirit of self-promotion. I was quite happy with this post, a quick take on the publication to two new human genomes from Africa:
http://theatavism.blogspot.com/2010/02/nucleotide-diversity-what-two-new.html
Posted by: david winter | May 27, 2010 11:59:24 PM
Taking away everything that's been nominated already or else is over 4000 words, and avoiding articles that are merely reports on specific scientific discoveries (which can be great, but I think a prize-winning article should go further), I'm left with two articles on my shortlist.
One of those is a Loom article, so I'll leave that to dedicated Loom followers. The other is the following article about the Mars Science Lab, dated October 2009.
http://www.scientificblogging.com/marsward/blog/msl_mars_action_hero_0
I'll go with that.
Posted by: Adrian Morgan | May 28, 2010 12:17:02 AM
http://thoughtfulanimal.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/russian-fox-study/
Posted by: Sara Engesser | May 28, 2010 1:09:03 AM
Just a note ... it isn't obvious before actually posting a comment that multiple pages of comments exist. The link to page two is, after all, rather tiny.
The reason I see an issue is that when checking whether or not a given article has already been nominated, people will likely perform a text search on the first page of comments only. That's what I did. No harm done, but as the list of nominations grows longer, the risk of duplicate nominations increases. And if people submit duplicates, they might well have nominated something else had they realised.
I'm just pointing this out as an issue to think about: whether there are practical ways to reduce the risk of duplicate nominations. Perhaps simply drawing attention to the existence of multiple comment pages would make a difference.
Posted by: Adrian Morgan | May 28, 2010 1:14:45 AM
http://sarahaskew.net/2010/05/02/a-blast-from-a-black-holes-past/
Posted by: ken | May 28, 2010 3:37:53 AM
This one!
http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2010/05/does_oral_sex_confer_an_evolut.php
Posted by: Dani D | May 28, 2010 3:46:39 AM
http://skepsisfera.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-dark-age.html
"A New Dark Age" from Skepsisfera - A post about the ongoing industrialisation of the science endeavour and a defense of the fundamental need for pure knowledge.
Posted by: Roberto | May 28, 2010 4:13:13 AM
A blog based on a newspaper photo form a blackboard, containing only very scarse info. Yet, the writer has done a very good job predicting what the article likely would be, and wrote about it in a very clear fashion.
Posted by: Sjoerd Hardeman | May 28, 2010 4:13:33 AM
And now the link in the main text:
http://www.scientificblogging.com/hammock_physicist/holographic_hot_horizons
Posted by: Sjoerd Hardeman | May 28, 2010 4:15:13 AM
How about this post explaining the rationale behind the use of dark energy in cosmology and why attempts to circumvent it tend to fail...
http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/08/21/why-we%E2%80%99re-stuck-with-dark-energy/
Posted by: Greg F. | May 28, 2010 5:24:03 AM
http://scienceblogs.com/observations/2010/04/evolution_watching_speciation.php
Posted by: complex field | May 28, 2010 6:58:08 AM
Please remove my earlier submission (May 28, 2010 12:17:02 AM) and replace with:
http://www.scientificblogging.com/marsward/blog/msl_mars_action_hero
(same article, minus irritating aside about long-past competition)
Posted by: Adrian Morgan | May 28, 2010 7:56:13 AM
i nominate ed yong's
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2009/09/29/the-evolution-of-the-past-tense-how-verbs-change-over-time/
Posted by: brooks | May 28, 2010 9:50:15 AM
What's more cool than evolution.. of T.rex! Legendary, right?!
Posted by: Vaishnavi raghunathan | May 28, 2010 10:47:14 AM
A post from my blog describing the discovery of hydrothermal vents and why it is such an exciting area of study.
http://hielochica.blogspot.com/2009/12/mysterious-love-child-of-geology-and_02.html
Posted by: Hielochica | May 28, 2010 11:03:47 AM
Vote for Sci!
http://scienceblogs.com/neurotopia/2009/09/friday_weird_science_the_hyena.php
The science of hyena mating!
Posted by: Scicurious | May 28, 2010 12:49:29 PM
Human Y Chromosome Mutation Rates
http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2009/08/human-y-chromosome-mutation-rates.html
Posted by: Larry Moran | May 28, 2010 12:52:05 PM
From my blog Surprising Science on Smithsonian.com, The World’s Strangest Scientific Names: http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/07/14/the-worlds-strangest-scientific-names/
Posted by: Sarah | May 28, 2010 1:27:37 PM
I nominate the essay, "On Seeing Yourself."
http://www.scienceessayist.com/2009/06/16/seeing-yourself/
Posted by: Ross | May 28, 2010 10:04:42 PM
I would like to nominate an article from my Psychological Science series:
"Psychological Science: The [Non-]Theory of Psychological Testing - Part 1"
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/06/psychological-science-the-non-theory-of-psychological-testing---part-1.html
Thank you.
Posted by: Norman Costa | May 28, 2010 10:36:08 PM
Well, my entry may be a little late, but I humbly assert that its the BEST !!!
http://dafka109.blogspot.com/2010/05/neotony-hypothesis-how-did-human.html
Posted by: aguy109 | May 29, 2010 1:01:01 AM
I nominate Ed Yong's exposé "Pigeons outperform humans at the Monty Hall Dilemma":
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/04/02/pigeons-outperform-humans-at-the-monty-hall-dilemma/
Every once in a while (which means, too often) I hear another fallacious argument on this basic logic problem. I'm just grateful that at least one animal responds rationally to conditional probabilities, even if it doesn't happen to be Homo sapiens. This blog post has restored my confidence in intelligent life on earth.
Posted by: T. Liu | May 29, 2010 2:12:33 AM
I nominate Ed Yong at Not Exactly Rocket Science.
Informative, witty and on the ball.
No particular post - all of them.
Posted by: zackoz | May 29, 2010 4:12:34 AM
I would like to nominate Christie Cox for her article: Ancient Sex Scandals: Did We Get It On With Neandertals?
http://scienceblogs.com/observations/2010/05/anceint_sex_scandals_did_we_ge.php
Posted by: MedScientist | May 29, 2010 6:18:14 AM
Sorry, that name should say Christie Wilcox
Posted by: MedScientist | May 29, 2010 6:19:23 AM
The Science Education with makeshift equipment by Peppe Liberti
http://peppe-liberti.blogspot.com/2010/03/science-education-with-makeshift.html
Posted by: peppe liberti | May 29, 2010 8:19:20 AM
I'd like to nominate my post "A Sense of Kinship":
http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html
Posted by: Ebonmuse | May 29, 2010 11:16:50 AM
I'd like to nominate my post "A Sense of Kinship":
http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html
Posted by: Ebonmuse | May 29, 2010 12:41:31 PM
Whoops - sorry for the double comment. Please feel free to delete one of them.
Posted by: Ebonmuse | May 29, 2010 2:44:05 PM
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2010/05/guest-post-slouching-towards-despotism.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JessesCafeAmericain+%28Jesse%27s+Caf%C3%A9+Am%C3%A9ricain%29
or
http://anecdotaleconomics.blogspot.com/2010/05/slouching-toward-despotism.html
This is a guest post by Keith Hazelton, in Jesse's Cafe Americain.
Posted by: Loihi | May 29, 2010 6:23:59 PM
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2010/05/here-is-why-fed-cannot-simply-inflate.html
'Here is Why the Fed Cannot Simply Continue to Inflate Its Way Out of Every Financial Crisis That It Creates.'
Posted by: Loihi | May 29, 2010 6:34:27 PM
"The Seafaring Killer Bacterium"
Cholera bacteria have a lengthy rap sheet . . . and an unexpected origin.
http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/02/14/the-seafaring-killer-bacterium/
Posted by: Jennifer Frazer | May 29, 2010 7:52:53 PM
I am a big fan of "The Artful Amoeba" and admire Jennifer Frazer's writing very much. She covers a wide range of intriguing natural phenomena in an understandable and entertaining way. "Killer Yeast from South America (?)" is a good example of a post that can tweak our assumption that we really understand the world around us.
Posted by: Jo McGraw | May 29, 2010 11:22:23 PM
Skullcaps and genomes:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/05/06/skull-caps-and-genomes/
Posted by: Carl Zimmer | May 30, 2010 12:52:36 AM
I'd like to nominate my post about the chemistry of kissing.
http://www.aschoonerofscience.com/?p=230
Posted by: Captain Skellett | May 30, 2010 8:18:16 AM
S.C. Kavassalis's 'The Language of Science – it’s “just a theory”'
http://badphysics.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/just-a-theory/
Posted by: jblogger | May 30, 2010 2:00:10 PM
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/the-world-is-digital/
This is a great blog. Many posts could have been proposed. However, I think this one is of particular interest because 1) it adresses an key question 2) a layman (at least me) can perfectly understand the point 3) despite this, even a top mathematician (Terence Tao) find the post interesting enough to comment it (and he rarely does so, which indicates it's not because he is a friend of rjlipton but because the post itself was truly of particular interest).
Posted by: Jiav | May 30, 2010 2:15:21 PM
I'd like to nominate this one, because it seemed to generate a lot of interest across a range of scientific disciplines.
http://telescoper.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/the-academic-journal-racket/
Posted by: Telescoper | May 30, 2010 2:17:19 PM
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/the-world-is-digital/
This is a great blog. Many posts could have been proposed. However, I think this one is of particular interest because 1) it adresses an key question 2) a layman (at least me) can perfectly understand the point 3) despite this, even a top mathematician (Terence Tao) find the post interesting enough to comment it (and he rarely does so, which indicates it's not because he is a friend of rjlipton but because the post itself was truly of particular interest).
Posted by: Jiav | May 30, 2010 2:25:51 PM
I self nominate my blog post "The Lightning Grief" (in Science Cheerleader) because I had fun writing it.
http://www.sciencecheerleader.com/2010/05/the-lightning-grief/
Posted by: John T. Collier | May 30, 2010 6:43:48 PM
Amy is currently at sea without web access but would like to submit: The Cove, dolphins, and Mercury
http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=4186
Posted by: Southern Fried Scientist | May 30, 2010 7:48:07 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.