| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Dissolving forms and genres, breaking apart illusions and reading self-help for the very smart: Colin Marshall talks to David Shields, author of Reality Hunger: A Manifesto | Main | Perceptions »

May 10, 2010

Virtually my BFF

Bianca Hello, my name is Sarah Firisen and I am a software developer and a writer. But wait, my name is also Bianca Zanetti and I used to be a fashion designer with a string of stores. No, I am not schizophrenic, I am Sarah in my real life and Bianca in my Second Life. My Second Life has not been so active in recent months, but in my virtual heyday I went to parties, art gallery openings and weddings. My husband, in real and virtual life, was very active in the “ROMA (SPQR)” world, owned a beautiful Roman villa that I built for him, and was even a Roman Senator for one term. During our virtual travels we made many friends and a few enemies. We met some really crazy people and some really great ones. Some of those friendships even carried over into our real lives and in one case we spent a lovely evening in the real Rome with the real life representation of one of our avatar friends.

People had a lot to say about our virtual social lives; many of them just didn’t understand how we could waste our time in this way and one person said, “I want to have real friendships with real people.” But here’s the thing, they were real people. Behind each cartoon avatar was a real person with a real story, real heartbreak, real issues, real insanity, real needs. It turned out that virtual friendships are much like real friendships, with perhaps a few unique twists; people lie, they exaggerate, they boast,  on occasion you can believe you are friends with a twenty-five year woman, only to find out that she is actually a fifty-five year old man and, of course, they hook up and a few weeks later have a nasty, acrimonious break up. There is no doubt that for some people Second Life usage does seem to tread a fine line between entertainment and avoidance of real life problems and issues, but for most it is a chance to play out some (mostly harmless) fantasies and to connect with new people across the globe.

I raise the subject of my foray into virtual worlds because of a recent article in the New York Times discussing whether young people’s use of the social web and text messaging is eroding their ability to form and sustain “normal” friendships, “The question on researchers’ minds is whether all that texting, instant messaging and online social networking allows children to become more connected and supportive of their friends — or whether the quality of their interactions is being diminished without the intimacy and emotional give and take of regular, extended face-to-face time.”

This question reminds me of a debate I had with a high level executive at a firm at which I used to work. The debate was over the use of social media tools within the firm. As the executive began to heatedly deny any possible virtue in the use of such tools, it then became clear that he didn’t really approve of email either, in fact, he wasn’t such a fan of the telephone. He said, “If I can’t sit opposite someone and see the whites of their eyes I can’t tell if they’re lying or not” - I should add, he’s an auditor. What this technophobic executive was missing, at least as far as I was concerned, was that, while there are no doubt times when you really need to have a face-to-face conversation, but there are other times when other communications tools are just fine, may even be better. Certainly, a threaded email discussion provides a searchable record of a conversation; a phone call or a video chat is usually a far cheaper, greener alternative than flying halfway across the country for one meeting; a social media conversation can allow an open dialogue and exchange of information between a wide range of disparate colleagues and friends.

I am not claiming that it is a good thing for young people to spend all their time online and to conduct all their relationships solely through social media and texting. But, why should the immediate conclusion be that to do so some of the time is to the detriment of their friendships? Indeed, the Times piece goes on to quote various experts and parents who believe that, “technology is bringing children closer than ever... technology allows them to be connected to their friends around the clock.”

I know that using Facebook has really strengthened some of my friendships, reconnecting me to people that I had either lost touch with or had previously only exchanged Christmas cards with and perhaps the odd email message. Now we have a window into each other’s lives that spurs conversations and engenders a real feeling of newfound intimacy. Even with friends I have always been closer to and see more regularly, Facebook allows us to engage in dialogues that often spill over into our “real life” socializing and like some of the teens quoted in the Times piece, we use often Facebook as a tool for making social plans. I share funny things my kids say and am happy to have a chance to watch far flung friends’ children grow up as I look at photos of their soccer games, birthday parties and the other daily minutia of family life that we might not normally share with those around us (and I know that some people are going to say, “and really don’t need to share”).

It is true, as I discussed in my last post, that young people clearly need to be taught appropriate and safe usage of the social web. They need parents and other adults to monitor their usage to make sure that their online relationships don’t become their sole method of interaction with their friends and peers. But, how is this different from anything else with parenting? Left to their own devices children would eat nothing but candy and ice cream and watch television all day, but most parents don’t allow this, they help their children to learn to moderate themselves. We teach them why it’s important to eat a balanced diet and to spend their leisure time in a diverse range of activities.

My virtual Second Life, as long as it didn’t totally subsume my real life, was a fun communications platform. For some people it is an addiction and can have a very destructive impact on their lives, on more than one occasion leading to divorce. However, the fact that some people have an unhealthy relationship with the medium shouldn’t tarnish the whole experience for everyone else, anymore than it does with most other objects of addiction.

There is just no escaping that this is the world our children are increasingly exposed to. These are tools that they will likely need in their future education and career endeavors - just think how email has moved into the mainstream of business tools. There may well come a time when the only way to look for a job is online. With the emergence of mobile health and banking - and others - there is a growing likelihood that by the time they are adults, our children will receive a significant amount of their health services through their mobile devices, will bank with them and pay for services with them. To demonize their use of mobile devices and texting is to ignore the certain pervasiveness of these devices in their future lives. They may even be going for their job interviews in virtual worlds and attending college seminars there (both are things that happen today in Second Life).

The Social Web is their future, it is our jobs as parents and educators to tell them how to navigate it and to place it in the appropriate context of a balanced life.

Posted by Sarah Firisen at 12:10 AM | Permalink

Comments

If the most real life you can get is Second Life or Facebook and its competitors, you need professional help. Lots of it. And stop say "like."

Posted by: mr.ed | May 10, 2010 6:26:36 AM

mr.ed you really need to RE-READ the WHOLE article again.
Sarah I think it was very well written and dead bang on!

Posted by: Todd MacIsaac | May 10, 2010 11:11:32 AM

Mr. Ed... i also think you should reread the whole thing and UNDERSTAND what its written there. There is more than that of course, and i have already emailed my toughts to Sarah, but my feeling is that you totally lost th real point of the whole thing. Which is, in short, "use your brain to guide your kids, but make sure to "know and understand" what they are using before even thinking to put it in place"

Posted by: Roberto | May 10, 2010 3:30:33 PM

Sarah, relax. Professionally I can assure you of not suffering from psychosis, using DSM-ETC or any other --- and doubtlessly more accurate --- criteria.
Your essay is right on the mark and it goes to your credit that Bringham Young University has released a statement supporting psychotherapy by phone.
Is that too far from a virtual ‘friendship’?
I say not.
http://www.byu.edu/webapp/home/index.jsp

Posted by: Felix E F Larocca MD | May 10, 2010 4:59:04 PM

Who is the lady so beautifully portrayed?

Just curious

Posted by: Felix E F Larocca MD | May 10, 2010 5:53:20 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Ken Pidcock on The need for critical science journalism

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed