March 03, 2010
The Chicago boys and the Chilean earthquake
Andrew Leonard in Salon:
The ghost of Milton Friedman, writes Bret Stephens in the Wall Street Journal, "was surely hovering protectively over Chile in the early morning hours of Saturday."
Thanks largely to him, the country has endured a tragedy that elsewhere would have been an apocalypse.
Stephens' logic is simple. After the U.S.-backed coup in 1973, in which Gen. Pinochet seized power from the democratically elected president Salvador Allende, a group of Chilean economists mentored by Friedman, and known to history as "the Chicago boys," instituted a series of radical free market reforms. Since that point, averaged over the decades, Chile has experienced the strongest sustained economic growth in South America. Rich countries, argues Stephens, are more likely to institute and enforce building codes. Q.E.D. Milton Friedman saved lives.
Some might find it intellectually provocative to cite Milton Friedman's authority in an argument that depends on the foundation of successfully enforced government-mandated building code regulations. The building inspector is not exactly a libertarian hero. Others might wonder if a more important factor in Chile's relatively tough building codes might be the devastating 9.5 earthquake the country endured in 1960.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:08 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Still, in a wealthy country, building codes are more likely to be followed, and inspectors are more likely to be paid enough that every schmuck developer can't bribe them.
I don't think that Chile is still some Chicago school laissez-faire utopia. Their last government was Socialist. But I think the hard push in that direction moved them into a new equilibrium that's perhaps a bit less statist, a bit more capitalist (vs socialist or feudal) than other S American countries.
The last finance minister actually ran a surplus during the good years, which allowed Chile to spend heavily without running up dangerous deficits in the 2008- crisis. Straight Keynesian economics, but how many countries actually do it? Also note that the new center-right government has promised to continue its predecessors fiscal policies, and how often do we see that?
Posted by: Antiquated Tory | Mar 3, 2010 11:35:52 AM
So, your choices are to be disappeared by a bloodthirsty regime, or disappear under the rubble from an earthquake?
Posted by: mr_goodbar | Mar 3, 2010 12:18:44 PM
Thank you so much for posting this link. I am writing from Chile, where the situation is very sad and very stressful. Chile had some of the best building regulaitons before Pinochet and Friedman.. they were relaxed with the free market and the result is evident today in Chile.... most of the buildings that collapsed killing people are either from the early 20th century and made of adobe or modern high rise flats built after the last really socialist government in Chile (1970-73), built during the dictatorship or the last 20 years of democracy. But a large percentage of people that died was due to the unannounced tidal wave that struck all over the central coast. Please don't forget that Chile is so much more than earthquakes or dictatorships...
Posted by: ITV | Mar 4, 2010 8:06:13 AM
Thank you for posting the link. Its funny how we gloss over unpalatable facts to prove a point.
Though Naomi Klein goes over the top but her 'shock doctrine' gives a glimpse of the atrocities and horrors of Pinochet regime...actions that were deemed necessary by Chicago Boys to bring in the economic reform.
From Pakistan perspective, reminds me of the military dictators era _ ayub, zia and musharraf. One thing you can count on during military regimes is that they will rule for 8-10 years which means some stability which leads to economic growth.
However, they always surround themselves with the very cronies that they have come to oust and who keep filling their pockets with immunity and increase in income inequality and poverty.
If we assume that military dictators bring in an economic miracle, why does it all comes crashing down within half a year of their departure like a house of cards.
Posted by: Vanguard | Mar 7, 2010 6:19:26 AM
Post a comment