| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Why Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu repeats his errors | Main | Pawan Sinha on how brains learn to see »

March 03, 2010

The Chicago boys and the Chilean earthquake

Andrew Leonard in Salon:

Md_horiz The ghost of Milton Friedman, writes Bret Stephens in the Wall Street Journal, "was surely hovering protectively over Chile in the early morning hours of Saturday."

Thanks largely to him, the country has endured a tragedy that elsewhere would have been an apocalypse.

Stephens' logic is simple. After the U.S.-backed coup in 1973, in which Gen. Pinochet seized power from the democratically elected president Salvador Allende, a group of Chilean economists mentored by Friedman, and known to history as "the Chicago boys," instituted a series of radical free market reforms. Since that point, averaged over the decades, Chile has experienced the strongest sustained economic growth in South America. Rich countries, argues Stephens, are more likely to institute and enforce building codes. Q.E.D. Milton Friedman saved lives.

Some might find it intellectually provocative to cite Milton Friedman's authority in an argument that depends on the foundation of successfully enforced government-mandated building code regulations. The building inspector is not exactly a libertarian hero. Others might wonder if a more important factor in Chile's relatively tough building codes might be the devastating 9.5 earthquake the country endured in 1960.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:08 AM | Permalink

Comments

Still, in a wealthy country, building codes are more likely to be followed, and inspectors are more likely to be paid enough that every schmuck developer can't bribe them.
I don't think that Chile is still some Chicago school laissez-faire utopia. Their last government was Socialist. But I think the hard push in that direction moved them into a new equilibrium that's perhaps a bit less statist, a bit more capitalist (vs socialist or feudal) than other S American countries.
The last finance minister actually ran a surplus during the good years, which allowed Chile to spend heavily without running up dangerous deficits in the 2008- crisis. Straight Keynesian economics, but how many countries actually do it? Also note that the new center-right government has promised to continue its predecessors fiscal policies, and how often do we see that?

Posted by: Antiquated Tory | Mar 3, 2010 11:35:52 AM

So, your choices are to be disappeared by a bloodthirsty regime, or disappear under the rubble from an earthquake?

Posted by: mr_goodbar | Mar 3, 2010 12:18:44 PM

Thank you so much for posting this link. I am writing from Chile, where the situation is very sad and very stressful. Chile had some of the best building regulaitons before Pinochet and Friedman.. they were relaxed with the free market and the result is evident today in Chile.... most of the buildings that collapsed killing people are either from the early 20th century and made of adobe or modern high rise flats built after the last really socialist government in Chile (1970-73), built during the dictatorship or the last 20 years of democracy. But a large percentage of people that died was due to the unannounced tidal wave that struck all over the central coast. Please don't forget that Chile is so much more than earthquakes or dictatorships...

Posted by: ITV | Mar 4, 2010 8:06:13 AM

Thank you for posting the link. Its funny how we gloss over unpalatable facts to prove a point.

Though Naomi Klein goes over the top but her 'shock doctrine' gives a glimpse of the atrocities and horrors of Pinochet regime...actions that were deemed necessary by Chicago Boys to bring in the economic reform.

From Pakistan perspective, reminds me of the military dictators era _ ayub, zia and musharraf. One thing you can count on during military regimes is that they will rule for 8-10 years which means some stability which leads to economic growth.

However, they always surround themselves with the very cronies that they have come to oust and who keep filling their pockets with immunity and increase in income inequality and poverty.

If we assume that military dictators bring in an economic miracle, why does it all comes crashing down within half a year of their departure like a house of cards.

Posted by: Vanguard | Mar 7, 2010 6:19:26 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Al on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

aguy109 on The Pathology of Stabilisation in Complex Adaptive Systems

Ken Pidcock on How to win a fight against twenty children

Erich on How to win a fight against twenty children

reader on How to win a fight against twenty children

Carlos on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

Janet Kerr on Olivia Chaney -Aupres de ma Blonde

omar on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

j_93 on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

droog on How to win a fight against twenty children

Mike Cope on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Dredd on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Louise Gordon on How to win a fight against twenty children

Seyma on Snowboarding at Night

aguy109 on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

aguy109 on Matzo ball memories

j_93 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Mike H. on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

Jim on the tyrant's wife

Evert Cilliers on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

modernguy(NeanderthalGuy) on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Orla Schantz on Bubbles: Spheres, Volume I: Microspherology

Kabir on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed