March 10, 2010
So who WERE the two Tory ministers who had gay flings with Christopher Hitchens at Oxford?
Once in a while we think about removing "Gossip" from the list of subjects we cover here at 3QD from our banner. But then we just post something like this and move on.
Geofferey Levy in The Daily Mail:
Alpha minds in and around Westminster that normally grapple with issues such as the forthcoming election, the sinking pound and the war in Afghanistan, were turned this week towards a ticklish and wholly unexpected political mystery.
Which two ministers of Margaret Thatcher's government had gay relations with the writer Christopher Hitchens while at Oxford?
Since Hitchens's extraordinary claim emerged this week, the louche figure, now 60, who has been married twice, has fended off all requests for further information.
After all - even for a clever polemicist who takes his work very seriously - such a tantalising, if frivolous kiss-and-tell is bound to sell extra copies of his memoir Hitch-22 when it is published in the summer.
But those who knew 'Hitch' in his Balliol College years, between 1967 and 1970, when he read Politics, Philosophy and Economics while simultaneously running amok as a rabid Trotskyist (he got a third-class degree, incidentally), have little doubt his claims are true.
For although he has always enjoyed a reputation as a womaniser, at Oxford Hitchens was known to be bisexual.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 05:30 AM | Permalink



















Comments
Abbas;
Free copies of the Daily Mail are available to anyone coming off the plane at Heathrow (just so you don't think I've got a subscription). The original title in print was;
"So who WERE the two Tory ministers who had gay flings with a narcissistic Oxford Trot?"
-just in case you're interested.
Posted by: Pete Chapman | Mar 10, 2010 4:02:02 PM
Rather a good-looking young man, even if the lady seems more impressed with Martin and his... cigarette.
Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 10, 2010 5:39:28 PM
Abbas,
Interesting and worthwhile, if gossipy, post. I am partial to the view of the writer, Geoffrey Levy, in the Daily Mail.
"Which brings us back to why Hitchens would throw into his memoirs the titbit that he had slept with two former ministers.
"Yes, it may have been to publicise the book ['Hitch-22,'to be released this summer]. But one old friend believes there is another explanation. 'It was more than likely a pre-emptive move. Christopher knew if he didn't mention it, someone else would.'"
All of this reminds me of a biography of the conductor, composer Leonard Bernstein which came out about 20 or so years ago. (I'm afraid I can't remember the author.) The book reveled in the salacious descriptions and allusions to his homosexual adventures and preoccupations at different times in his life. Of particular interest was his later middle years. The reviewer (I believe it was in the New York Times) closed his assessment of the book and its author by saying that never has a book been so dwarfed by the stature of its subject.
I don't know that Hitch compares to Leonard Bernstein, but he is an outstanding writer, experienced, exceptionally literate, and enormously informed. So, we'll titillate ourselves [I include myself] in curiosity over the provocative details. Hopefully, we will return to evaluating the greater significance of his life, his writing, his ideas, and his impact - irrespective of our own political and literary views.
Posted by: Norman Costa | Mar 10, 2010 8:56:16 PM
I used to adore his writing in The Nation, back when it WAS The Nation.
I was astonished at his stance on the Iraq invasion, and asked him about that at a book-signing. He said he liked and trusted GWBush more than Clinton, because Bush was unapologetically what he was, but Clinton was a complete phony. Though I certainly don't see that as any reason to trust Bush with a gun, let alone nuclear weapons, I think he was right about Clinton's unctuousness and greed. I gather that opinion is not one he formed at Oxford. He wrote somewhere that he barely remembers him, and that he (Clinton)was pretty much a political lightweight at that time.
Someone at some forum or other accused Hitchens of being a snob, but if he was, he was awfully good at hiding it. I observed him and spoke with him at several booksignings, and up through the last person in very long lines, he would draw the person out and engage in conversation and put personal notes in each's book.
I think his warlike stand is the result of a mid-life crisis, of generation envy brought on by all that celebration of WWII heroism that was going on at the time.
Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 11, 2010 12:36:47 PM
Post a comment