| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Gandhians with a Gun? Arundhati Roy plunges into the sea of Gondi people | Main | Against Beauty »

March 21, 2010

Sceptic challenges guru to kill him live on TV

Jeremy Page in the Times of London:

ScreenHunter_04 Mar. 21 08.57 When a famous tantric guru boasted on television that he could kill another man using only his mystical powers, most viewers either gasped in awe or merely nodded unquestioningly. Sanal Edamaruku’s response was different. “Go on then — kill me,” he said.

Mr Edamaruku had been invited to the same talk show as head of the Indian Rationalists’ Association — the country’s self-appointed sceptic-in-chief. At first the holy man, Pandit Surender Sharma, was reluctant, but eventually he agreed to perform a series of rituals designed to kill Mr Edamaruku live on television. Millions tuned in as the channel cancelled scheduled programming to continue broadcasting the showdown, which can still be viewed on YouTube.

First, the master chanted mantras, then he sprinkled water on his intended victim. He brandished a knife, ruffled the sceptic’s hair and pressed his temples. But after several hours of similar antics, Mr Edamaruku was still very much alive — smiling for the cameras and taunting the furious holy man.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 03:58 AM | Permalink

Comments

But this is the wrong Holy Man.
Jesus or Mohammed could do it, I know they could!
Ram could get his army of monkeys to beat up this guy.
You just have the wrong quack.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 21, 2010 11:11:38 AM

What did Pandit Sharma hope to gain? Surely if he had killed him, he would be guilty of murder? How does Indian law work on this point?

And thus, he had the perfect excuse not to make the attempt. But he did anyway...

Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 21, 2010 4:22:16 PM

I do believe that the Indian law would have found him guilty of murder or at least, involuntary manslaughter if he had succeeded and if someone had the gumption to bring charges. But of course, the charlatan knew very well the limits of his own powers and that no such outcome was likely.

The only thing Pandit Sharma hoped to gain was money and power by his ability to bamboozle, confuse and intimidate. Unfortunately for him, he met someone who did not succumb to his manipulations and called his bluff.

But you will be surprised how many people will actually blame Mr Edamaruku for bursting the guru's bubble. After all, the Guru and his ilk provide drama in an otherwise boring, rational world.

Posted by: Ruchira | Mar 21, 2010 7:42:48 PM

Is it just me or does the Guru look a lot like Dick Cheney?

Posted by: Grendel | Mar 21, 2010 8:00:50 PM

He sure does. And Cheney used a very similar methodology of lies and intimidation in selling the Iraq war to Americans.

Posted by: Ruchira | Mar 21, 2010 8:33:54 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Nominations Now Open

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Gordon on Jonathan Haidt Decodes the Tribal Psychology of Politics

fa on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Elatia Harris on Smells (and the people who write about them)

rjm on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Rohan Maitzen on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

ray Butlers on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Pepito on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

Jaya Aninda Chatterjee on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Steve on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

ed rackley on That's not music – that's just noise!

Philosopher's Beard on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

DS on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Michael Cunningham on Suicide as Scene and Spectacle: Notes on The Bridge and Aokigahara - Suicide Forest

Bilal Tanweer on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Nithin on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

omar on Learning Urdu

Ankur on Learning Urdu

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Namit on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Ankur on Learning Urdu

Frank on Smells (and the people who write about them)

Nick Smyth on That's not music – that's just noise!

Jeff Strabone on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

panopticonopolis on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed