March 21, 2010
Sceptic challenges guru to kill him live on TV
Jeremy Page in the Times of London:
When a famous tantric guru boasted on television that he could kill another man using only his mystical powers, most viewers either gasped in awe or merely nodded unquestioningly. Sanal Edamaruku’s response was different. “Go on then — kill me,” he said.
Mr Edamaruku had been invited to the same talk show as head of the Indian Rationalists’ Association — the country’s self-appointed sceptic-in-chief. At first the holy man, Pandit Surender Sharma, was reluctant, but eventually he agreed to perform a series of rituals designed to kill Mr Edamaruku live on television. Millions tuned in as the channel cancelled scheduled programming to continue broadcasting the showdown, which can still be viewed on YouTube.
First, the master chanted mantras, then he sprinkled water on his intended victim. He brandished a knife, ruffled the sceptic’s hair and pressed his temples. But after several hours of similar antics, Mr Edamaruku was still very much alive — smiling for the cameras and taunting the furious holy man.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 03:58 AM | Permalink




















Comments
But this is the wrong Holy Man.
Jesus or Mohammed could do it, I know they could!
Ram could get his army of monkeys to beat up this guy.
You just have the wrong quack.
Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 21, 2010 11:11:38 AM
What did Pandit Sharma hope to gain? Surely if he had killed him, he would be guilty of murder? How does Indian law work on this point?
And thus, he had the perfect excuse not to make the attempt. But he did anyway...
Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 21, 2010 4:22:16 PM
I do believe that the Indian law would have found him guilty of murder or at least, involuntary manslaughter if he had succeeded and if someone had the gumption to bring charges. But of course, the charlatan knew very well the limits of his own powers and that no such outcome was likely.
The only thing Pandit Sharma hoped to gain was money and power by his ability to bamboozle, confuse and intimidate. Unfortunately for him, he met someone who did not succumb to his manipulations and called his bluff.
But you will be surprised how many people will actually blame Mr Edamaruku for bursting the guru's bubble. After all, the Guru and his ilk provide drama in an otherwise boring, rational world.
Posted by: Ruchira | Mar 21, 2010 7:42:48 PM
Is it just me or does the Guru look a lot like Dick Cheney?
Posted by: Grendel | Mar 21, 2010 8:00:50 PM
He sure does. And Cheney used a very similar methodology of lies and intimidation in selling the Iraq war to Americans.
Posted by: Ruchira | Mar 21, 2010 8:33:54 PM
Post a comment