March 02, 2010
Planet Pakistan
Robert M. Hathaway in The Wilson Quarterly:
An American visitor in Pakistan can’t help thinking at times that he has arrived in a parallel universe. Asked about the presence of Al Qaeda on their country’s soil, Pakistanis deny that there is any evidence of it. They lionize A. Q. Khan, who created the country’s nuclear weapons program and sold essential nuclear technology and knowledge to Iran, North Korea, and Libya, and they are incensed by American worries about the security of their country’s nuclear assets. Suicide bombings and political assassinations are near-daily occurrences, yet many Pakistanis are astonishingly complacent about the murderous groups behind them. They rail instead against the government that is powerless to prevent these attacks and an America that would like nothing better than to see an end to them.
Last October, when I visited, Pakistanis were fuming over the U.S. aid package recently approved by Congress. The $7.5 billion Kerry-Lugar bill tripled American support for Pakistan over a five-year period and reversed the overwhelmingly promilitary slant of previous U.S. aid. Instead of going almost entirely to the armed forces, American dollars will flow to schools and clinics, economic development, and efforts to promote the rule of law and democratic governance. Pakistan’s friends in Washington were jubilant. Yet most Pakistanis I spoke with insisted that because the aid came with conditions—the U.S. secretary of state must certify that Pakistan is working to end government support for extremist and terrorist groups, for example—it was an affront and a threat to their country’s sovereignty. One legislator complained that what Pakistan was being asked to accept was less an aid package than a treaty of surrender.
Denial is a national habit in Pakistan. With a long history of failed governance and political leaders who put their personal interests first, Pakistanis point their fingers at the United States, their arch-enemy India, or the all-purpose malefactor often described in the local news media as the “hidden hand”—anyone but themselves to explain their nation’s past failings and precarious present.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 05:25 AM | Permalink




















Comments
Perhaps, like Karzai in Afghanistan they can be convinced to expand the heroin supply, take over elections, and silence the press.
Give them time under our "persuasion" and another happy little democracy is sure to spring forth.
Posted by: Dredd | Mar 2, 2010 7:39:31 AM
"They lionize A. Q. Khan, who created the country’s nuclear weapons program and sold essential nuclear technology and knowledge to Iran, North Korea, and Libya, and they are incensed by American worries about the security of their country’s nuclear assets"
Says a proud citizen of the only country ever to use a nuclear bomb against civilians. It would be funny if it weren't so disgustingly hypocritical.
Posted by: Pepito | Mar 2, 2010 8:13:21 AM
Excellent review, particularly the last paragraph. Only Pakistanis can save themselves and become a modern nation. They must refuse any outside aid and depend upon their own abilities and self-respect to build their nation.
Posted by: Tasnim | Mar 2, 2010 10:04:07 AM
This whole article is "shallowly hypocritical" and chauvinistic. Why post it? Perhaps just for that reason?
I love this one:
"Clinton’s candor was refreshing. More than that, it was essential: It is past time for Pakistanis and Americans to have an honest conversation. For instance, Clinton bluntly told Pakistani business leaders they must pay more taxes." !!!
It's very hard to imagine Clinton doing anything at all refreshing.
And what about the report last year, quickly hushed up, that US intelligence was fully cognizant of Pakistan's nuclear buildup all along?
Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 2, 2010 10:13:15 AM
Mr. Rob, Hurt'em-Hate-away--has written a hate filled piece of crap.
Posted by: m | Mar 2, 2010 3:56:45 PM
a sinking economy; corrupt judiciary and jaded, ineffectual civil society; violence at every corner; spread of wahabbism; corrupt army; corrupt politicians; wretched poverty; trouble in the east, south, west; & the elites drinking scotch!
of course, an incisive article by an American is so quick to produce venomous comments of Pakistani defensiveness. And once again, those elites blame the messenger.
Posted by: saga | Mar 2, 2010 11:16:58 PM
um, no 'Pakistani defensiveness' from me, just an 'incisive' pointing out of American exceptionalism and hypocrisy. I fail to see how an American citizen has a moral right to point out 'denial' in others when it's clear that a large part of American history is itself based on denial.
Posted by: Pepito | Mar 3, 2010 8:35:48 AM
saga, do you actually not see that everything you cite in your post is true of the US? Do you believe that jingoism, and chauvinism will help us?
And do you not know how many Americans are in jail, or have lost their jobs for speaking the truth, or even worse in the eyes of our elites, for acting on their beliefs?
Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 3, 2010 12:13:21 PM
>do you actually not see that everything you cite in your post is true of the US?
to a degree that is true of almost any country (past or present). if you seriously think America as a society or country are as bad as those of Paksitan then you are clearly don't understand what is going on in either place.
Yeah, America is not an angel but that doesn't excuse all the screw-ups that Pakistani ruling elite (political or military) made or the denial that the author talks about. He may be a hypocrite but true (mostly).
Posted by: pc | Mar 3, 2010 7:20:25 PM
Post a comment