March 19, 2010
Manufacturing Depression
From The Guardian:
Gary Greenberg is a psychotherapist who joined a clinical trial for an antidepressant at a time when he was mildly depressed. He was diagnosed as severely depressed, got better, and found that his pill was a placebo. His book contains a major attack on antidepressants, and he blames the drug companies for the false advertising of their positive effects. He is also very critical of the concept of depression itself.
He is right that quite a lot of random clinical trials have failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of antidepressants – as opposed to placebos – in curing depression. However, he ignores the evidence that, for severe depression, they really can help. He accuses the drug industry of downplaying the numerous side-effects, such as the 774 papers showing their effect on sexual performance. In addition, he argues that the industry has successfully campaigned to persuade doctors and the public that they suffer in enormous numbers from a disease called depression when in fact they might not. Only someone who has not been seriously depressed could accept that. He suggests that those who benefit from antidepressants that raise serotonin levels might instead be thought of as suffering from Prozac-deficit disorder.
His main thesis seems to be that depression is not a disease or an illness.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 12:14 PM | Permalink



















Comments
What is the Guardian playing at? Wolpert is a hard line reductionist, with very particular views on depression - no review by him of this book would be anything other than hostile. I'm not in Greenberg's camp either, but I do think you'd want a reviewer more likely to approach the book with an open mind.
Posted by: Chris Horner | Mar 19, 2010 1:53:27 PM
Is there a reason this poorly written book review warrants a link? The author not only has no understanding of the recent science surrounding the debate, but cant seem to understand some wonderful , if complex, insights such as this : "He couches his judgments in the language of sickness and health rather than sin and virtue, which means he is cloaking his morality, even from himself, in science."
Posted by: tooearly | Mar 19, 2010 5:08:21 PM
Post a comment