| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« did somebody say Kapuściński? | Main | Jonathan Safran Foer’s contingent vegetarianism »

March 04, 2010

Israel and Apartheid

This is the Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week. This article by Tony Karon in Rootless Cosmopolitan is a couple of years old, but still worth reading:

IAW_2010poster_Toronto ... the comparison with the essence of apartheid remains valid — in South Africa, black people lived under the control of a state over which they had no control even as they participated in a shared economy, on the West Bank and Gaza Palestinians live under a state over which they have no control which seeks to keep them out of a shared economy. But in both cases, they found themselves ruled by a state that denied them the rights of a sovereign people. Even now, after it has ostensibly withdrawn from Gaza, Israel still tightly controls Palestinian life there, determining whether the lights work and whether salaries are paid, who may enter and who may leave, and much of the time who will live and who will die. Sure, the Palestinians have an elected government (which the Israelis together with the U.S. are doing their best to subvert), but it isn’t allowed to govern — post-pullout Gaza, in fact, looks rather a lot like what the apartheid regime had in mind in its original Bantustan policy: A separate geographic state within which Africans could “exercise their political rights” while still remaining under effective sovereign control of the Pretoria regime. In the West Bank, Israel is the effective political authority, and there it creates restrictions on the movement of Palestinians every bit as odious — if not even more so — than those imposed on black people under apartheid. That’s because on the West Bank, Israel is not only maintaining overall sovereign control, as in Gaza, but is also trying to “cleanse” of Palestinians vast swathes of the best land illegally settled since 1967, and the networks of roads that connect them.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 04:56 AM | Permalink

Comments

I've been (very) slowly reading Hannah Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism, and the second half of Karon's essay really brought Arendt's historical analysis of Jewish interaction with the European nobility alive for me. No doubt, the same dynamic of misguided subservience, sometimes in the name of normalization when no hope of such exists, other times for nothing more than a taste of power, has plagued many minority groups, but the pain it has caused Jews over and over is truely tragic.

How so many, be they American liberals, Israelis, or neo-cons, miss the lessons of history when thinking about the occupied territories is beyond me.

Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Mar 4, 2010 8:07:13 AM

is "boycott divestment sanctions" like a triple negative?

Posted by: eh | Mar 4, 2010 8:36:55 PM

No, it's a triple positive.

Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 5, 2010 11:25:54 AM

Calling Israel an apartheid state is way of passing a terminal moral judgement upon it by associating it with an entirely different country. South Africa is a vast land that came under the control of migrant colonialists from Europe. Israel is a tiny country that was reconquered by the same people who were exiled from it 1900 years earlier. The Arabs who were displaced were never a seperate, distinct people, but just part of the Arab populations who control all the 14 million square km of land around Israel. Sure they suffer and feel deprived, but the way out of the conflict is to engage in real negociations, not just ultimatums, and do a deal. If they want to continue the conflict in the hope of driving the Jews out, then thats their choice, but they must face the consequences.

Posted by: aguy109 | Mar 5, 2010 5:25:35 PM

Israel was one of the major arms sellers to South Africa well after the sanctions movement began.

How do you negotiate with a government that bulldozes peoples' homes just because they want to. That bulldozes olive groves that are hundreds of years old? That ignores UN resolutions time after time?

I would just suggest that the Palestinians who lived in Palestine were separate distinct individuals whose homes were, and are still being, stolen.

By the way, I don't believe that Israelis are different from Americans, or any other group. Just about every nation has committed these same crimes - we're the current champs at this. And I don't believe that the Israeli lobby gets away with anything that the Anglo-Saxon elites don't already want to happen.

Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 5, 2010 8:40:05 PM

Perhaps we should distinguish between conditions in Israel and conditions in the territories.

Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 5, 2010 10:00:46 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Al on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

aguy109 on The Pathology of Stabilisation in Complex Adaptive Systems

Ken Pidcock on How to win a fight against twenty children

Erich on How to win a fight against twenty children

reader on How to win a fight against twenty children

Carlos on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

Janet Kerr on Olivia Chaney -Aupres de ma Blonde

omar on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

j_93 on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

droog on How to win a fight against twenty children

Mike Cope on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Dredd on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Louise Gordon on How to win a fight against twenty children

Seyma on Snowboarding at Night

aguy109 on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

aguy109 on Matzo ball memories

j_93 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Mike H. on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

Jim on the tyrant's wife

Evert Cilliers on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

modernguy(NeanderthalGuy) on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Orla Schantz on Bubbles: Spheres, Volume I: Microspherology

Kabir on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed