March 04, 2010
Israel and Apartheid
This is the Sixth Annual Israeli Apartheid Week. This article by Tony Karon in Rootless Cosmopolitan is a couple of years old, but still worth reading:
... the comparison with the essence of apartheid remains valid — in South Africa, black people lived under the control of a state over which they had no control even as they participated in a shared economy, on the West Bank and Gaza Palestinians live under a state over which they have no control which seeks to keep them out of a shared economy. But in both cases, they found themselves ruled by a state that denied them the rights of a sovereign people. Even now, after it has ostensibly withdrawn from Gaza, Israel still tightly controls Palestinian life there, determining whether the lights work and whether salaries are paid, who may enter and who may leave, and much of the time who will live and who will die. Sure, the Palestinians have an elected government (which the Israelis together with the U.S. are doing their best to subvert), but it isn’t allowed to govern — post-pullout Gaza, in fact, looks rather a lot like what the apartheid regime had in mind in its original Bantustan policy: A separate geographic state within which Africans could “exercise their political rights” while still remaining under effective sovereign control of the Pretoria regime. In the West Bank, Israel is the effective political authority, and there it creates restrictions on the movement of Palestinians every bit as odious — if not even more so — than those imposed on black people under apartheid. That’s because on the West Bank, Israel is not only maintaining overall sovereign control, as in Gaza, but is also trying to “cleanse” of Palestinians vast swathes of the best land illegally settled since 1967, and the networks of roads that connect them.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 04:56 AM | Permalink



















Comments
I've been (very) slowly reading Hannah Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism, and the second half of Karon's essay really brought Arendt's historical analysis of Jewish interaction with the European nobility alive for me. No doubt, the same dynamic of misguided subservience, sometimes in the name of normalization when no hope of such exists, other times for nothing more than a taste of power, has plagued many minority groups, but the pain it has caused Jews over and over is truely tragic.
How so many, be they American liberals, Israelis, or neo-cons, miss the lessons of history when thinking about the occupied territories is beyond me.
Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Mar 4, 2010 8:07:13 AM
is "boycott divestment sanctions" like a triple negative?
Posted by: eh | Mar 4, 2010 8:36:55 PM
No, it's a triple positive.
Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 5, 2010 11:25:54 AM
Calling Israel an apartheid state is way of passing a terminal moral judgement upon it by associating it with an entirely different country. South Africa is a vast land that came under the control of migrant colonialists from Europe. Israel is a tiny country that was reconquered by the same people who were exiled from it 1900 years earlier. The Arabs who were displaced were never a seperate, distinct people, but just part of the Arab populations who control all the 14 million square km of land around Israel. Sure they suffer and feel deprived, but the way out of the conflict is to engage in real negociations, not just ultimatums, and do a deal. If they want to continue the conflict in the hope of driving the Jews out, then thats their choice, but they must face the consequences.
Posted by: aguy109 | Mar 5, 2010 5:25:35 PM
Israel was one of the major arms sellers to South Africa well after the sanctions movement began.
How do you negotiate with a government that bulldozes peoples' homes just because they want to. That bulldozes olive groves that are hundreds of years old? That ignores UN resolutions time after time?
I would just suggest that the Palestinians who lived in Palestine were separate distinct individuals whose homes were, and are still being, stolen.
By the way, I don't believe that Israelis are different from Americans, or any other group. Just about every nation has committed these same crimes - we're the current champs at this. And I don't believe that the Israeli lobby gets away with anything that the Anglo-Saxon elites don't already want to happen.
Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Mar 5, 2010 8:40:05 PM
Perhaps we should distinguish between conditions in Israel and conditions in the territories.
Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 5, 2010 10:00:46 PM
Post a comment