| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« What can literature tell us about the tragedies in Haiti and Chile? | Main | Older and wiser »

March 13, 2010

A Word About the Wise

Jim Holt in The New York Times:

Holt-t_CA0-popup There are two things I would hope for in a book about wisdom. First, some intellectual enlightenment as to what wisdom really is. Second, some practical ideas on how to be wiser in my own life. This book was a letdown in both respects. Yet reading it proved to be far from a waste of time. Stephen S. Hall is a veteran science journalist and the author of several previous books, most recently one about how the height of boys affects their life prospects, called “Size Matters.” As one might guess from that earlier title, Hall has a weakness for the arresting phrase. In the present book, bodies fall from the World Trade Center on 9/11 “like paperweight angels.” Montaigne’s pen is a “drill bit,” his essays are a “microscope.” The road to ­knowledge is “nettled with potential potholes.” (The nettle is a stinging plant, but it does not usually sting pavement.)

Nor can Hall resist a bit of spurious drama. One chapter opens with Inquisitor-like scientists “torturing” a gray-haired woman, when all they are really doing is giving her psychometric tests. His relentlessly fetching prose might be tolerable in a magazine piece — indeed, “Wisdom” germinated from an article he wrote on wisdom research for The New York Times Magazine — but at book length it becomes tiresome. All that is a matter of taste. It is in matters of substance that “Wisdom” can be most frustrating. Expectations raised by the importance of the topic and the obvious intelligence of the author are continually dashed by sketchy, hit-and-run exposition. Hall mentions five “strategies of emotion regulation” but divulges just one of them (“reappraisal”), leaving us to guess what the others might be. He says that “at least four distinct neurological approaches to problem solving” have been identified, yet I could count only two before he scudded off to a new theme. There’s both too little and too much here. One scientific study blurs into the next, amid a blizzard of truisms (“And finally, we must be open to change”) and references to Solon, the Buddha and Benjamin Franklin. If, as William James wisely observed, wisdom is knowing what to leave out, this is not a wise book.

But what is wisdom, really?

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:24 AM | Permalink

Comments

"But what is wisdom, really?"

What a profoundly wonderful question!

The answer is difficult, and in some degree not answerable, because wisdom is ever evolving just ahead of us in some degree.

The portion of that vastness of wisdom we think we can touch, see, feel, or cognitively envision is likewise so diverse as to strain our ability to grasp it.

There is motherly wisdom, fatherly wisdom, social wisdom, and personal wisdom.

In one sense one person's wisdom is another person's foolishness, because our nations and ethnicities are so varied.

Nevertheless, I think wisdom in the ultimate sense is that which applies to all of us as a species.

In that sense, wisdom's most primitive essence is our ability to avoid extinction as a species in this cosmos.

Posted by: Dredd | Mar 13, 2010 10:16:41 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Al on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

aguy109 on The Pathology of Stabilisation in Complex Adaptive Systems

Ken Pidcock on How to win a fight against twenty children

Erich on How to win a fight against twenty children

reader on How to win a fight against twenty children

Carlos on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

Janet Kerr on Olivia Chaney -Aupres de ma Blonde

omar on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

j_93 on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

droog on How to win a fight against twenty children

Mike Cope on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Dredd on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Louise Gordon on How to win a fight against twenty children

Seyma on Snowboarding at Night

aguy109 on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

aguy109 on Matzo ball memories

j_93 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Mike H. on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

Jim on the tyrant's wife

Evert Cilliers on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

modernguy(NeanderthalGuy) on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Orla Schantz on Bubbles: Spheres, Volume I: Microspherology

Kabir on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed