| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The poetry of Ayatollah Khomeini | Main | An Ominous Warning on the Effects of Ocean Acidification »

February 17, 2010

Our World May be a Giant Hologram

HologMarcus Chown in New Scientist:

DRIVING through the countryside south of Hanover, it would be easy to miss the GEO600 experiment. From the outside, it doesn't look much: in the corner of a field stands an assortment of boxy temporary buildings, from which two long trenches emerge, at a right angle to each other, covered with corrugated iron. Underneath the metal sheets, however, lies a detector that stretches for 600 metres.

For the past seven years, this German set-up has been looking for gravitational waves - ripples in space-time thrown off by super-dense astronomical objects such as neutron stars and black holes. GEO600 has not detected any gravitational waves so far, but it might inadvertently have made the most important discovery in physics for half a century.

For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been scratching their heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their giant detector. Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them with an explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the noise before he knew they were detecting it. According to Craig Hogan, a physicist at the Fermilab particle physics lab in Batavia, Illinois, GEO600 has stumbled upon the fundamental limit of space-time - the point where space-time stops behaving like the smooth continuum Einstein described and instead dissolves into "grains", just as a newspaper photograph dissolves into dots as you zoom in. "It looks like GEO600 is being buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time," says Hogan.

If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who has just been appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, has an even bigger shock in store: "If the GEO600 result is what I suspect it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram."

The idea that we live in a hologram probably sounds absurd, but it is a natural extension of our best understanding of black holes, and something with a pretty firm theoretical footing. It has also been surprisingly helpful for physicists wrestling with theories of how the universe works at its most fundamental level.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 07:01 PM | Permalink

Comments

Well, Robin -- this is shattering. Hope everybody reads it. It certainly makes me appreciate those folks who believed the Universe was to be considered as light reflecting off the limbs of Lord Shiva as he danced. Were they SO wrong??

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 18, 2010 2:03:35 AM

This article was from 2009. There have been updates since then.

http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/update-on-geo-600-mystery-noise.html

Posted by: cvj | Feb 18, 2010 7:24:57 AM

As cvj points out subsequent results seem to undermine the claim that this experiment showed evidence for discrete spacetime, but more generally the "holographic hypothesis" is pretty popular among physicists looking for a theory of quantum gravity, here's a good Scientific American article from 2003 by one of the physicists who proposed it:

http://www.essentia.com/discovery/holographic_universe.htm

Posted by: Jesse M. | Feb 18, 2010 2:23:14 PM

Jesse M., I was hoping you'd show up. I was going to write to you and Prasad at CERN to please explain. I'm afraid I get only the Plain English part of this, and that part not very well. Am I the only one so remedial? Or are the invincibly ignorant just not reading? Open to help from all comers...

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 18, 2010 3:01:32 PM

Hi Elatia, you're probably better off asking someone at CERN, this holographic stuff is definitely beyond what I studied in college! I feel like I have some vague idea of what it's about from reading articles like the one I linked to and books like Susskind's The Black Hole Wars, but I could be way off in my understanding so don't take my word for it. Anyway, a while ago I wrote up a few paragraphs on what I thought it was about for a friend who asked me in an email, here's what I said:

Basically the holographic idea grew out of trying to figure out how much entropy was in a black hole, and in physics the entropy of a system is proportional to to how many different ways its internal parts could possibly be arranged, which means it's also proportional to the amount of "information" its internal structure could potentially encode (and mathematicians have a particular precise way of defining 'information'). What the physicists realized was that the entropy of a black hole would actually have to be proportional to the 2D area of the event horizon, which is the imaginary sphere around the center where once you cross it, you've passed the point of no return and even light can't escape the gravity of the center. And the entropy of a black hole defines the maximum amount of information you can pack into any 3D region of space, because as soon as you try to pack one more book or computer chip or whatever into that region which takes you over the limit, everything you had stored in there will collapse into a black hole.

So, physicists thought it was kind of weird that the maximum amount of information that could be packed into 3D region of space would be defined by the area of its 2D boundary, but then they did some crazy calculations in string theory (here's where I understand even less so my explanation will get progressively more handwavey) that backed it up--basically they figured out that a description of certain kinds of particles interacting in a certain kind of 4D universe would be "dual" to a description of certain other particles interacting in a different kind of 5D universe, which I think basically means that every specific fact about how the particles interact and the cause-and-effect relationships between the interactions in one universe would be the same in the other one even though the description of "where in space" these events are happening is different. Both these universes had laws that were sort of simplified versions of the laws of physics in the real universe, but putting it together with the black hole thing they think it means that whatever the ultimate laws of our universe, they'll work out so that any description of what's going on in any 3D region of space will be "dual" to a description of what's happening on its 2D boundary. In that sense you could say that everything going on in the sphere that represents the entire visible universe we can see with telescopes can also be interpreted as a sort of "hologram" determined by what's happening on the boundary of this giant sphere.

I think what a lot of physicists get out of this is that in a really fundamental theory of physics (which string theory is an attempt to find), the whole notion of there being a "space" in which events happen won't really be part of the most basic structure of the theory, that somehow space emerges out of the relationships between events and so there could be different ways of interpreting the same set of events in terms of spaces with different numbers of dimensions, and both interpretations would be equally valid. Think of simulating an imaginary universe on a computer, the same computer could simulate either a 2D world (imagine a game of Pac-Man or something) or a 3D world (uh, World of Warcraft?), nothing about the hardware of the computer has to change, the difference is just about different kinds of relationships between the bits in the computer that are used to represent different points in the simulated space, i.e. the details of how flipping one bit (corresponding to an event at some point in the space) affects other bits which are "nearby" in the space. A normal computer simulation would have to be one number of dimensions or the other, but if you were running a simulation of a world with "holographic" laws then the same set of bits in the computer could be used to generate two different visual outputs, on one monitor it would show you a 2D world and the other it would show you a 3D one, and every time some bits flipped in a way that gives you an event happening on one monitor (Pac Man eating power pellet) it would also correspond to something happening on the other monitor (troll killing an elf or whatever they do in World of Warcraft)

Posted by: Jesse M. | Feb 19, 2010 8:17:15 PM

In Autobiography of a Yogi by Paramahansa Yogananda, he describes an evening where his body becomes only "astral texture" and the "cosmic motion picture mechanism" is revealed as producing the picture of his body and all the furniture in the room. He then gives the Vedic interpretation of maya, the "magical power of illusion that underlies the phenomenal worlds." Until I re-read bits of the book searching for this section, I had forgotten how much he pointed out parallels between yogic insights and physics as they were understood in 1946 when the book was written. Fascinating article.

Posted by: scp | Feb 19, 2010 10:00:06 PM

Jesse M., thank you!!! I'm the wrong person for an accuracy check, but I love it!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 19, 2010 11:55:02 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Al on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

aguy109 on The Pathology of Stabilisation in Complex Adaptive Systems

Ken Pidcock on How to win a fight against twenty children

Erich on How to win a fight against twenty children

reader on How to win a fight against twenty children

Carlos on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

Janet Kerr on Olivia Chaney -Aupres de ma Blonde

omar on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

j_93 on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

droog on How to win a fight against twenty children

Mike Cope on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Dredd on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Louise Gordon on How to win a fight against twenty children

Seyma on Snowboarding at Night

aguy109 on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

aguy109 on Matzo ball memories

j_93 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Mike H. on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

Jim on the tyrant's wife

Evert Cilliers on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

modernguy(NeanderthalGuy) on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Orla Schantz on Bubbles: Spheres, Volume I: Microspherology

Kabir on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed