| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The Humanists: Errol Morris' Gates of Heaven (1978) | Main | Perceptions »

February 08, 2010

Obama Year 2: Quo Vadis? Fecking up?

by Michael Blim

Simply-barack-obama Question: The Barack Obama Administration in its first year has been characterized by

  1. fecklessness
  2. inexperience
  3. incompetence
  4. all of the above
  5. none of the above

My friends, as it used to be said in Chicago, vote early and often. 

For my part, I’ll vote number 4. After all, incompetence and inexperience can be fixed by learning from mistakes and getting rid of the boobies.

There is no cure for fecklessness, or for the feckless which is probably more to the point.

Still competence and experience might make fecklessness less likely.

Each time I try to I try to sum up and draw the line on this Administration’s losses, with the hope of starting anew, I end up feeling like an idiot. I then stop listening to the TV and talking about politics with my friends while I stanch my losses, and then I try again.

I have decided that “feck” should be a verb, and “to feck” is to “coward up.” Take that high school teachers of English. 

So, January 21. After the Playgirl centerfold wins in my home state, President Obama responds with the Volker rules. OK, I think. It’s bad, but he is finally getting it. 

By February 4, the President “fecks up.” About health care legislation, he tells democratic faithful, “I think it’s very important for us to have a methodical, open process over the next several weeks, and let’s go ahead and make a decision,” Erica Werner of the Associated Press reports. (Boston Globe, 2/6/10, A9)  “And it may be that … if Congress decides we’re not going to do it, even after all the facts are laid out, all the options are clear, then the American people can make a judgment as to whether this Congress has done the right thing for them or not. And that’s how democracy works.” (elipsis in the original)

Memo to the President: 

  1. Health care has been debated for a year – this after a half century of debate.
  2. You have majorities in the House and the Senate that have passed the legislation in one form or another. Pass the bill by whatever means are possible, and never mind the niceties. Fifty plus Joe seems right to me in the Senate. One trusts that Speaker Pelosi, who doesn’t seem to feck around, realizes she won’t be speaker next year if she doesn’t jam health care through the House. Mr. President, when people feel you are fecking around, it is important to shove it down their throats.
  3. Why did you take on that miserable attack dog Rahm Emmanuel in the White House if he weren’t going to bite the legs off people who don’t vote your way? Is there no price people are going to pay for f**cking you up?
  4. After Wall Street and the banks f**cked up the country, how can you feck this one too?

A lot of good, important, but below the fold things are happening in this administration. Departments and agencies are belling the many cats’ tails that eight years of open contempt for the government as a guarantor of the public’s interests had unleashed at the cost of life, limb and well being. Attorney General Holder is trying to wrest a bit of justice out of system of hell-bent on denying detainees their human rights, including a jury trial for those treated to water-boarding just a couple of years ago. The Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, has spoken of knowingly having served with gay men and lesbian members of the Armed Forces and has argued that they be set free to serve their country with dignity as they choose.

President Obama, I don’t want a one-term president: your one term, if so, will have been an ignoble failure for all that you would have sacrificed. You will have set back the prospects of reform for a generation, as President Carter did.

Stop fecking around. It’s all or nothing now.

Posted by Michael Blim at 12:08 AM | Permalink

Comments

Michael-

You have layed my thoughts out exactly, but with clarity.

When I voted for Obama I thought I was getting a sharp intellect with a heart and an understanding of what the stakes are given the close call we had with the abyss during the previous 8 years. Now I'm miserably non-plussed.

Fecklessness is precisely the problem. The intellect's there, but Obama has refused to use it and his superb communications skills to screw reform-obstructionists to the wall.

Intellect notwithstanding, he's acting like a fecking idiot.

Posted by: Jim | Feb 8, 2010 6:42:22 AM

Oh, and "feck" is a great verb, and potentially a very useful one especially when talking about Democrats.

Posted by: Jim | Feb 8, 2010 6:45:23 AM

For another angle:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/07/core_chicago_team_sinking_obama_presidency/?ref=fpblg

Posted by: Jim | Feb 8, 2010 9:04:43 AM

to distort slightly and inversely paraphrase Churchill -- never have so many talented people managed to achieve so little with so much.

Reminds me of another saying from somewhere:

We, the unworthy, in service to the ungrateful, have done so much, for so long, for so many that we can now do anything with nothing

Which would invert to:

We, the anointed, in control of the desperate, have done so little, so sporadically, for so few that we can now do nothing with everything

I'm sure it will all be fixed with another zero added to the debt ceiling.

There's a lovely universe right next door. Let's go!

Posted by: Carlos | Feb 8, 2010 9:29:27 AM

Narcissistic.

Posted by: Harry | Feb 8, 2010 9:29:55 AM

On the contrary, Obama has very competently sold out progressive causes, escalated our wars, and kept Gitmo open. You assume he hasn't wanted to. I think you're wrong. He knows that if he opposes Wall Street or the healthcare industry, they will give their money to the Republicans. Progressives, on the other hand, will continue to support the Democrats no matter what he does, as they always have. It's a pretty simple calculation.

Posted by: George Jones | Feb 8, 2010 10:02:22 AM

Heading back to Michael's argument, we have the Fuck-You party and the Feck-You party in a (now) perpetual war for the pork loins of the hog.

We sorely need at least a third party —a Fess-up party— which we'll never get in a million years what with all the fucking and fecking going on.

Strap yourself onto a plunging eagle a la Slim Pickin's for a ride to the Unterland.

Posted by: Jim | Feb 8, 2010 10:51:53 AM

Hey Mike, what do you think of Larry Lessig's prescription (which I had posted a couple of days ago): http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100222/lessig

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Feb 8, 2010 2:13:13 PM

How brave to be throwing blogs of stone from ivory towers. Like any of us can do better in the circumstances! We, the US, are the gold standard for fecklessness, so share the blame.

Posted by: narayan | Feb 8, 2010 2:14:13 PM

Michael, you, sir, are an ass.

Turn the mirror on yourself - how did YOU do this year?

I vote # 4 for YOU, Bozo!

Posted by: odysseus14 | Feb 8, 2010 4:00:00 PM

Heading back to Michael's argument, we have the Fuck-You party and the Feck-You party in a (now) perpetual war for the pork loins of the hog.

We sorely need at least a third party —a Fess-up party— which we'll never get in a million years what with all the fucking and fecking going on.

Strap yourself onto a plunging eagle a la Slim Pickin's for a ride to the Unterland.

A second helping of Monday Poem. Thanks, Jim.

Posted by: Ruchira | Feb 8, 2010 4:51:58 PM

I thought Lessig's comments really echoed Jeff Strabone's piece on Antonio Gramsci on 3QD. Also Lessig was on Bill Moyers Journal recently:

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02052010/watch.html

Posted by: Whoa | Feb 8, 2010 5:13:51 PM

How come there is more talk of what Obama should be doing but barely any talk about how he could possibly do it?

Is it really enough to think that "Obama should stop fecking around" as a possible strategy for accomplishing what all progressive's want? Hard to believe its that simple.

Posted by: chris | Feb 8, 2010 6:29:18 PM

Feck? Great idea.

http://wisdomofthewest.blogspot.com/search/label/Enthymemes

Best,
Jim H.

Posted by: Jim H. | Feb 9, 2010 2:23:01 PM

You think the Politicians are actually running things? Really...


Posted by: Ryan | Feb 9, 2010 2:26:51 PM

Heh, that was easy!

Inside Baseball, delivered w/xoxo, yo.

Posted by: BDR | Feb 9, 2010 2:27:39 PM

Fans of Father Ted will know that the irascible drunk Father Jack often screamed at people to "Feck off!"

Honestly, though, what can these Rahm-jobs be thinking? "Stupid fecking progressives lined up to put us in the White House, they actually fell for that Hope and Change line of jive, now we just need to fool them again in 2012. What are they gonna do, vote for Palin? Yuk yuk!"

The ninth and deepest circle of Hell according to Dante, is reserved for "sinners against family, betrayers, traitors against country." We progressives think the Rahm-jobs belong there.

Posted by: Tom Buckner | Feb 9, 2010 6:26:14 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

seth edenbaum on Habermas, Adorno, Politics

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Raza Husain on Think About Nature

Raza Husain on Getting Smarter

johnnyred on Getting Smarter

Lou on Throwing away ancient wisdom, painting with sound and staying awake: a conversation with radio dramatist and ZBS Foundation president Thomas Lopez

Sundar on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

flowers rainbows on Lift up your voices: The century-long battle for women's freedom

mr.ed on wagner in new york?

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed