| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Christopher Hitchens and Claudius Galenus on Sports | Main | TONI MORRISON, WINNER OF THE PULITZER PRIZE FOR HER GRITTY NOVEL BELOVED, SMOLDERS AT THE INEQUITIES THAT BLACKS AND WOMEN STILL FACE »

February 13, 2010

Brain surgery boosts spirituality

From Nature:

News.2010 Removing part of the brain can induce inner peace, according to researchers from Italy. Their study provides the strongest evidence to date that spiritual thinking arises in, or is limited by, specific brain areas. To investigate the neural basis of spirituality, Cosimo Urgesi, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Udine, and his colleagues turned to people with brain tumours to assess the feeling before and after surgery. Three to seven days after the removal of tumours from the posterior part of the brain, in the parietal cortex, patients reported feeling a greater sense of self-transcendence. This was not the case for patients with tumours removed from the frontal regions of the brain. "Self-transcendence used to be considered just by philosophers and crank new age people," says co-author Salvatore Aglioti, a cognitive neuroscientist at the Sapienza University of Rome. "This is the first really close-up study on spirituality. We're dealing with a complex phenomenon that's close to the essence of being human."

The authors pinpointed two parts of the brain that, when damaged, led to increases in spirituality: the left inferior parietal lobe and the right angular gyrus. These areas at the back of the brain are involved in how we perceive our bodies in spatial relation to the external world. The authors of the study in the journal Neuron, say that their findings support the connection between mystic experiences and feeling detached from the body. "The most surprising part was the rapidity of the change," says Urgesi. "This discovery shows that some complex personality traits are more malleable than previously thought."

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:30 AM | Permalink

Comments

So brain damage causes spirituality?
It was obvious, but I guess we needed empirical proof.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Feb 13, 2010 10:12:03 AM

Dave:

As soon as I saw this post, I imagined you saying exactly what you wrote above.

You didn't disappoint :-)

Posted by: Ruchira | Feb 13, 2010 11:35:46 AM

I actually had already read the article a few days ago, but I'm glad you were thinking of me—
See this post:

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Feb 13, 2010 12:53:56 PM

The bottom line:
So if somebody you know suddenly takes up churchgoing, you might want to refer them to you're friendly, local neurologist!

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Feb 13, 2010 12:57:14 PM

Dave,

Not to be left behind, we discussed something along these lines at our own blog some months ago. The author is D who comments here often but after some confusion over his single letter moniker, now posts under the name Prasad.

Posted by: Ruchira | Feb 13, 2010 2:03:20 PM

Ruchira-
Thanks for the link.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Feb 13, 2010 2:18:28 PM


The research and publications of Andrew Newberg MD are relevant to this article and discussion:

http://www.andrewnewberg.com/qna.asp

He does a nice job of telling us what science can and can not tell us about spirituality and related matters.

His fMRI research is fascinating.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 13, 2010 2:43:56 PM

Norman,

Thanks for the link. I am casually familiar with Newberg's research. No, I don't believe either that science at this time, has a definitive answer to explain religious / spiritual thoughts, just as it doesn't for their absence. Also, I do not believe (from personal experience) that meditation and its related health benefits or "profound thoughts" (Newberg's terminology) are necessarily a religious experience for everyone.

Posted by: Ruchira | Feb 13, 2010 5:14:05 PM

Norman,

I had trouble getting past the first two sentences of the article you linked to (I did read more):

Beliefs are based on four key components - perceptions, emotions, cognitions, and social interactions - which are also deeply interconnected. These components all intersect in the workings of the human brain, which enables us to have all of our beliefs.

I thought: Is that true? How does he know? Why these four and no other? Why does he leave out temperament? Or imagination? Or subconscious learning? Etc.

I guess you had billed it as a report from science, so I approached it with that expectation. On the other hand, I'm quite comfortable with it as a report from a social science like psychology. ;-)

Posted by: Namit | Feb 13, 2010 6:44:54 PM

Also, I do not believe (from personal experience) that meditation and its related health benefits or "profound thoughts" (Newberg's terminology) are necessarily a religious experience for everyone.

I agree, as I have also spent thousands of hours on the cushion. If anything, it makes everything more groundless, and observation based,
As the Zen saying goes "If you see Buddha by the side of the road, kill him"

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Feb 13, 2010 8:05:57 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LKX0knZxFs

Posted by: Carlos | Feb 14, 2010 12:00:22 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Nominations Now Open

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Mnc on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Raza on CERN People

Frank on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Anderson on Hugh Kenner on the Pisan Cantos

Michelle M on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Mary on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

JM on CERN People

Jan on How to Want to Change Your Mind

ajay on Women and Islam: A Debate with Human Rights Watch

Angeleo Mysterioso on Bessie Coleman 1892-1926

Angeleo Mysterioso on Bessie Coleman 1892-1926

Angeleo Mysterioso on Bessie Coleman 1892-1926

dave on Women and Islam: A Debate with Human Rights Watch

Felix E F Larocca MD on the Starry Messenger

sms on CERN People

funny sms on Hugh Kenner on the Pisan Cantos

mkp on In The Name Of The Holy Cow...Yet Again...

Jon Harlow on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Jon Harlow on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

bjm on Hugh Kenner on the Pisan Cantos

Jesse M. on CERN People

wburrows on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Abbas Raza on Hugh Kenner on the Pisan Cantos

sf on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

sf on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed