January 30, 2010
Meis on Rye: Is it really any surprise Holden Caulfield's not the hero he once was?
Our own Morgan Meis, six months ago, in The Smart Set:
I'm for the kids. It’s crazy not to be. Are you, dear reader, mighty Atlas, going to hold the world in place and keep it from changing into something new? One lesson of all hitherto existing human history is that the kids have the advantage in the long run. This is a function of time and finitude. The only real wisdom comes in realizing that the kids of today will get their comeuppance with the swift passing of a decade or so. They, too, will wake up one day to find themselves representatives of what was, instead of what shall be. The kids keep on coming.
We learned recently (from a New York Times article by Jennifer Schuessler) that Holden Caulfield, the anti-hero of J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, has lost his appeal among the teenage crowd. This came without fair warning. No pimply representative of the Millennials stepped forward to cushion the blow. Instead, we are informed by Barbara Feinberg — "who has observed numerous class discussions of 'Catcher'" — that a 15-year-old boy from Long Island has said, "Oh, we all hated Holden in my class. We just wanted to tell him, ‘Shut up and take your Prozac.’"
It is easy to respond defensively and with contempt. People don't like to have their heroes snubbed, especially when the snubbing comes from some little punk from Long Island whose fingers are surely rubbed raw from constant tweeting, texting, gaming, and masturbation. We (shall we define 'we' as that part of the population over 30?) find subtle ways to undercut the legions of cheeky hormone machines.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 04:07 PM | Permalink



















Comments
Seems we now are subject to a lot of looking back at Salinger and his work. Here, for example, a
number of distinguished people wonder about Catcher's appeal for today's kids:
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/reaching-holden-caulfields-grandchildren/
But for a truly good and careful look at what Salinger did in his rather limited output,leave it to a outstanding fiction writer to make worthwhile analysis:
Here is David Lodge--
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/opinion/30lodge.html?ref=opinion
Posted by: fred lapides | Jan 30, 2010 5:23:03 PM
"We (shall we define 'we' as that part of the population over 30?) find subtle ways to undercut the legions of cheeky hormone machines."
I wouldn't be so sure about it. Although I did like 'Catcher in the Rye' when I read it (in my early 20s, and I'm in my mid-30s now), I agree with these modern teenagers: I found Holden an obnoxious little brat. I would have loved to drop him in the middle of say, Somalia so he could see what real problems look like.
Posted by: Pepito | Jan 30, 2010 8:05:59 PM
Pepito, by that logic, cranky Somalians who just don't know when they're better off need to be airlifted to Haiti...
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 30, 2010 10:48:30 PM
Echoing Gaddeswarup in the other thread (Don't ever tell anybody anything), I too like Morgan's piece the best among everything else I have read since Salinger's demise. Which is why I wanted to see it here.
I read Catcher early enough, probably in the latish teens. My reaction to it was a bit like the cheeky hormone machines of today although I didn't know Prozac. But in my case it may have been more of a cultural thing. I was a young girl in India - a different milieu and very different quality of angst. For similar reasons perhaps, Kerouac's On the Road failed to connect. On looking back, that one seems more like the self absorbed ramblings of a bad blogger although it had its moments.
Posted by: Ruchira | Jan 31, 2010 12:18:01 AM
Nice piece, very nice. Inevitable question; so who are the heroes for the current crop of kids and where are these heroes to be found (I doubt that it's in novels; unless they're vampires or student wizards but I could be wrong)?
I know something is happening but I don't know what it is.
Posted by: Pete Chapman | Jan 31, 2010 10:36:54 AM
who are the heroes for the current crop of kids
Judging by the 14-15 year olds I know, Holden will have tough competition from Arnold Spirit, Jr. in Sherman Alexie's "The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian."
Posted by: Vicki Baker | Jan 31, 2010 11:18:53 AM
Vicki, there was a time in my late teens when I feared Holden was about to get elbowed by Jonathan Livingston Seagull. That felt like the End of Days. If Arnold Spirit, Jr., is about to stride into the forecourt, then I'm fine with that.
Morgan, I love the essay. Write more about kids!!!
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 31, 2010 12:18:14 PM
Elatia Harris, you do not believe in absolute conditions only relativism?
Posted by: snogs berg | Jan 31, 2010 7:50:15 PM
Snogs berg, of course I believe in the absolute value of certain works of literature. It's one of the few things I'm unwavering about. But then, there's the Zeitgeist... I don't have to subscribe to it to notice how mighty it is.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 31, 2010 8:12:10 PM
Post a comment