| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Enid Blyton and the post-colonial world | Main | From Aria, Julien Temple's "Donna e mobile" »

December 19, 2009

The Truths Copenhagen Ignored

Johann Hari in CommonDreams.org:

Discarded Idea Three: Climate debt. The rich world has been responsible for 70 per cent of the warming gases in the atmosphere – yet 70 per cent of the effects are being felt in the developing world. Holland can build vast dykes to prevent its land flooding; Bangladesh can only drown. There is a cruel inverse relationship between cause and effect: the polluter doesn't pay.

So we have racked up a climate debt. We broke it; they paid. At this summit, for the first time, the poor countries rose in disgust. Their chief negotiator pointed out that the compensation offered "won't even pay for the coffins". The cliché that environmentalism is a rich person's ideology just gasped its final CO2-rich breath. As Naomi Klein put it: "At this summit, the pole of environmentalism has moved south."

When we are dividing up who has the right to emit the few remaining warming gases that the atmosphere can absorb, we need to realise that we are badly overdrawn. We have used up our share of warming gases, and then some. Yet the US and EU have dismissed the idea of climate debt out of hand. How can we get a lasting deal that every country agrees to if we ignore this basic principle of justice? Why should the poorest restrain themselves when the rich refuse to?

A deal based on these real ideas would actually cool the atmosphere. The alternatives championed at Copenhagen by the rich world – carbon offsetting, carbon trading, carbon capture – won't. They are a global placebo.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 10:54 AM | Permalink

Comments

I guess I ought to feel guilty, but I've begun to look upon this whole climate change controversy as a superior form of comedy.

Consider, for example, this amusing flame-war cum law suit for libel which I stumbled upon:

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:LKfp8dYJ30AJ:utsl.gen.nz/media/air-con-blog-wars.pdf+Rapp+wegman+sue+%22deep+climate%22&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera

How about this ludicrous accusation-of-plagiarism cum defamation-of-character flame war over at Deep Climate:

http://deepclimate.org/2009/12/17/wegman-report-ghostwriter-revealed/

The best writers in the world couldn't make them any funnier.

Posted by: Luke Lea | Dec 19, 2009 12:17:05 PM

OLIGOPOLIES

at copenhagen

the dictators prevail

leafless trees!

Posted by: jim sharp | Dec 19, 2009 4:34:24 PM

How accountable for this debt can we be if there was no intent? Certainly nations emerging now know(from historical evidence) they're sealing their own fate by dumping more co2 into the atmosphere. How clear was this relationship of temperature and co2 to the leadership of developed countries over a century ago? Perhaps it is unfair that a retroactive debt be imposed on people who had no idea what they were doing. It certainly seems less fair to me that a government should be allowed to knowingly and deliberately cause more damage to the atmosphere while those who had no idea what damage they did are punished.

Posted by: electric | Dec 19, 2009 5:17:19 PM

electric: "Perhaps it is unfair that a retroactive debt be imposed on people who had no idea what they were doing."

I thought that way too until I thought about the nature of inheritance in a community. When born into a wealthy western community, we inherit the wealth of that community -- the infrastructure, the industry, the life support systems. We can't take all that for granted, and then deny the inheritance of the debt that was unwittingly accumulated in producing the wealth.

It's unfair to inherit a retroactive debt, just as it is unfair to inherit a retroactive prosperity. Life isn't bound by rules of fairness, but in this case, having wealthy nations pay for their current prosperity (built on previous ignorant resource consumption) seems like a fair deal.

Posted by: Virge | Dec 19, 2009 8:17:22 PM

If you want to know what is going to happen, think of a small island, over populated, with no way for anyone to leave, alive.

Posted by: eric | Dec 19, 2009 9:28:55 PM

What Hari is saying is: Let the developing countries pump out as much carbon as they like, because thats what we did. Atmospheric chemistry doesn't care about Justice. The path should be to shape development along "greener" lines. In some ways this is easier to do because developing countries have less of a fossil fuel infrastructure to replace and (in most cases) a lot more sunshine.

Posted by: aguy109 | Dec 21, 2009 5:54:00 AM

Seems that China veto'd the Copenhagen summit. Is anybody surprised?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas

Posted by: electric | Dec 23, 2009 9:03:36 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Nominations Now Open

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Gordon on Jonathan Haidt Decodes the Tribal Psychology of Politics

fa on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Elatia Harris on Smells (and the people who write about them)

rjm on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Rohan Maitzen on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

ray Butlers on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Pepito on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

Jaya Aninda Chatterjee on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Steve on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

ed rackley on That's not music – that's just noise!

Philosopher's Beard on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

DS on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Michael Cunningham on Suicide as Scene and Spectacle: Notes on The Bridge and Aokigahara - Suicide Forest

Bilal Tanweer on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Nithin on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

omar on Learning Urdu

Ankur on Learning Urdu

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Namit on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Ankur on Learning Urdu

Frank on Smells (and the people who write about them)

Nick Smyth on That's not music – that's just noise!

Jeff Strabone on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

panopticonopolis on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed