November 09, 2009
Short Takes
by Gerald Dworkin
Hemingway was thought to have written the finest, very short, story. It was a classified advertisement whose text was “For sale. Baby shoes. Never worn.” I have always been attracted to very miniature versions of linguistic expression. It is interesting to seek the minimum number of words for various categories. So, for example, I have never found a better, shorter sentence that Ring Lardner, Jr’s “Shut up, he explained.” For five words, I have Woody Allen’s “ I am two with Nature.” but once one has that many words available there must be many others. Best short Seder text: "They tried to kill us. We won. Let’s eat.”
For many years I have been collecting aphorisms, jokes, witty remarks, etc. for a someday-to-be published Common-Place Book. It is divided into two sections.; one on general Philosophy and the other on Morality. I do not restrict myself just to short passages. But I do tend to favor brief encounters. Ideally the upper limit would be something like Nietzsche’s limit on aphorisms. “ It is my ambition to say in ten sentences what everyone else says in a book—what everyone else does not say in a book.” One of his best “All truth is simple…is that not doubly a lie?” comes in at ten words.
So today I present a sampling, a taste, a nibbling of very short takes on Philosophy. If there is sufficient interest I will follow up with material from the Morality section. Where I know the source I give it. Where I do not I welcome information as to the original. I divide them, roughly, into categories although they are obvious enough that they could be omitted.
Definitions of Philosophy
You make a few distinctions. You clarify a few concepts. It’s a living.
Sydney Morgenbesser
The ungainly attempt to tackle questions that come naturally to children, using methods that come naturally to lawyers.
David Hills
[Philosophy is] an attempt to see how things, in the broadest possible sense of the term, hang together, in the broadest possible sense of the term.
W. Sellars
Philosophy is the cure for which there is no adequate disease.
Jerry Fodor
A Philosopher is someone who worries that what works in practice will not work in theory.
?
The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as not to seem worth stating and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it.
- B. Russell
Philosophy is the critical examination of other peoples fundamental assumptions.
R. Nozick
Characterizations of Philosophy or Philosophizing
The relation between science and philosophy is like the symbiotic relationship between the countryside and town. The former provides the latter with food receiving garbage in return.
L. Kolokowski
What is the use of studying philosophy if all that it does for you is to enable you to talk with some plausibility about some abstruse questions of logic...if it does not improve your thinking about the important questions of everyday life?
Wittgenstein
Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible.
Mencken
It’s not things, it’s philosophers that are simple/
J.L. Austin
I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect.
Oscar Wilde
If, while making love, a woman says "faster" I will try. But if she says "deeper" she had better be looking for philosophy.
?
Of course pragmatism is true; the trouble is it doesn’t work.
S. Morgenbesser
In relation to their system most systemizers are like a man who builds an enormous castle and lives in a shack nearby. Kierkegaard
There are two styles of philosophers: e.g. philosophers and i.e. philosophers - illustrators and explicators. Illustrators trust, first and foremost, striking examples, in contrast with explicators, who trust, first and foremost, definitions and general principles.
A Margalit
To have a system is to lack integrity.
Nietzsche
Put-downs
This book fills a much-needed gap in the literature.
?
John Dewey wrote as " God would have spoken, had He been inarticulate, but keenly desirous to tell you how it was."
O.W Holmes
A student asked Harry Wolfson—the Harvard scholar of Jewish Philosophy—whether he thought solipsism was true? Wolfson replied, “Who’s esking?”
When a philosopher announced that the title of his talk was “Why is there Something rather than Nothing?” Sydney Morgenbesser said to the man sitting next to him, “If there was Nothing he would still complain.”
When another visiting philosopher claimed that in no known language are two positive affirmations equivalent to a negative , Morgenbesser said “Yeah,Yeah.”
When Chisolm was once accused of making a circular argument he replied, “ I seem to be accused of the fallacy of affirming the antecedent.”
He is a quantum philosopher. I can’t understand him and his position at the same time .
S, Morgenbesser
He never opens his mouth without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge.
?
There are three grades of criticism. Wrong. Completely Wrong. Not even Wrong.
His claim was the last.
W. Pauli
?
There are two critical responses to any philosophical position. "Oh, yeah!" and "So what!"
Nicholas Sturgeon
That's not a counter-example to my thesis; that's my thesis.
Paul Grice
`For example' is not proof.
Yiddish proverb
Hegel loses a lot in the original.
D. Stove
It cannot be an accident...that thought and language arrive together , in Hegel, at the highest degree of corruption of which either is capable.
D.Stove
He speaks in semi-entendres.
?
Refutation of Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is the view that the right thing to do is what will promote the greatest happiness of the greatest number. There is no greatest number.
H. Putnam
Any competent philosopher who does not understand something will take care not to understand anything else whereby it might be explained.
David Lewis
Miscellaneous
\
Power corrupts. Powerpoint corrupts absolutely.
Steffi Lewis
Paul Weiss was once lecturing his class in metaphysics about the A'ness of B'ness and a wave of laughter started to spread through the classroom. When he realized the cause of the laughter he immediately switched to talking about the P'ness of Q'ness!
I’d like to make a distinction here. But I can’t think of one.
G.A.Cohen
Shortest Philosophical Book: Our Duties to Others by Ayn Rand
Jewish philosophy
1) Logic: P, so why not Q?
2) Ethics : Can implies Don't
3) Metaphysics_:_This is the best of all possible worlds?
S. Morgenbesser
Causes of the Death of Philosophers
Thales: Drowning
Abelard: Nun
Ayer: Unverifiable
Ockham: Cut himself while shaving
What does the Lowenheim-Skolem theorem prove? Jews are smart.
H Putnam
One rabbi is arguing to another that David wore his hat in temple. He cites a biblical passage. But, the other rabbi replies, all that says is that David went into the temple.
The first replies, " I know but between us would David go into the temple without his hat on."
Too Long but a Favorite
A boy is going out on his first date and is very nervous about talking to his date. His father tells him that there are three topics which are guaranteed to get conversation flowing—Relatives, Food and Philosophy.
The date begins and after an awkward pause the boy asks “Do you have any brothers?” “No.” “Do you like bagels?” "No." " Desperate, he remembers Philosophy. "If you had a brother, would he like bagels?"
Posted by Gerald Dworkin at 12:25 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Fantastic. I would love to see a book of this stuff. I should also point out that Morganbesser's "Yeah, yeah" retort was (according to legend) to J L Austin's claim that no language had a double affirmative that expressed a negative. At least, this is according to Jim Holt's "Stop me if you've heard this".
Posted by: Vesuvium | Nov 9, 2009 9:44:17 AM
On a related note, my dad always says (not sure where he got this): Wagner's music is a lot worse than it sounds.
Posted by: Benny Goldberg | Nov 9, 2009 10:11:21 AM
A solipsist lives vicariously - through himself.
The only thing worse than being talked about is being knocked about.
"Having no talent is not enough"
(Gore Vidal)
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 9, 2009 11:53:20 AM
My favorite, by far, is "I’d like to make a distinction here. But I can’t think of one." Too brilliant! It pretty much sums up all comments made after philosophy talks. Thanks for this, Jerry. Morgan and I are sitting in my Alpine redoubt ROTFLOAO... (Plural of ROTFLMAO)
Posted by: Abbas Raza | Nov 9, 2009 12:41:09 PM
I have always heard the Wagner quote a bit differently, that Wagner isn't as bad as it sounds, which of course then is such a backhanded compliment, since music is EXACTLY as good, or bad, as it sounds. I guess your dad's version has this feature, too, but is no longer a backhanded compliment.
One other comment. If you want the funniest philosophy that has ever been written, it's Jerry Fodor. He's a great writer, a frustratingly good thinker (because I disagree with him so often, but everyone should have such opposition!), and knows almost everything about everything. I recommend him highly.
Posted by: brad | Nov 9, 2009 1:16:22 PM
For this quote "If, while making love, a woman says "faster" I will try. But if she says "deeper" she had better be looking for philosophy.", replace the question mark with "Author, presumably male, unknown."
Posted by: bronxilla | Nov 9, 2009 5:39:20 PM
"Philosophy is the cure for which there is no adequate disease.
Jerry Fodor"
May I ask where you got this quote? I can't find it with Google.
Posted by: Minklesby | Nov 9, 2009 7:40:28 PM
Nice selections.
The Wagner quip is due to Mark Twain: "Wagner's music is better than it sounds."
Posted by: Michael Drake | Nov 9, 2009 8:42:41 PM
It's 'Morgenbesser,' not 'Morganbesser', isn't it?
Posted by: Bob Talisse | Nov 10, 2009 12:33:30 AM
Great post. Off topic, but I once heard a bit of radio football commentary:
"... It was an own-goal, but a great one."
Posted by: aguy109 | Nov 10, 2009 1:10:47 AM
First you have:
There are two styles of philosophers: e.g. philosophers and i.e. philosophers - illustrators and explicators. Illustrators trust, first and foremost, striking examples, in contrast with explicators, who trust, first and foremost, definitions and general principles.
A Margalit
Then you have:
`For example' is not proof.
Yiddish proverb
Since the latter phrase (we are told) has a history of having been uttered often enough to be a proverb, we can suspect that Eastern European Jews have some some collective preference for explication, for definitions and principles. Or maybe they just had a running problem with people who did think in terms of striking examples rattling about unmoored from rational principles. I find myself very sympathetic to their view.
Posted by: Tom Buckner | Nov 10, 2009 1:42:49 AM
"Wagner isn't as bad as it sounds" is very similar to "Every piece he performed was better than the next!"
"A solipsist lives vicariously - through himself": "Only you can prevent solipsism"?
"They did very well that which was not worth doing at all" (by an unattributed theatre critic in the 1940's)
Posted by: Chuck Erikson | Nov 10, 2009 4:30:24 AM
any yogi berra in here?
Posted by: odysseus14 | Nov 10, 2009 7:42:55 PM
"Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language"
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 - 1951)
I would amend this to "Philosophy is the bewitchment of our intelligence by language"
Posted by: J. Hawkins | Nov 10, 2009 8:55:30 PM
Very amusing compilation. Thank you!
In the last "too long but a favourite"-bit, I believe, 'family' may have been 'food' at some stage.
Posted by: Melf | Nov 12, 2009 2:20:29 AM
Morgenbesser apparently asked someone the following shortly before he died: "Is God punishing me because I don't believe in him?"
Kripke reputedly invoked the law of the excluded middle in a lecture. Someone in the audience suggested dropping it, and Kripke responded, "Ok, and let's keep it too."
Posted by: KJF | Nov 12, 2009 11:14:22 AM
A Philosopher is someone who worries that what works in practice will not work in theory.
?
This is Ronald Reagan talking about economists.
http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/3251
It does seem to apply to philosophy too.
I also like a quote I've seen in various forms attributed to various people (including Cicero, Descartes...) but my favourite formulation is due to John Burgess: The mere absurdity of a proposition is no guarantee that some philosopher will not endorse it
Some other good snippets:
Let us not pretend to doubt in philosophy what we do not doubt in our hearts - C.S. Pierce
Anyone who can handle a needle convincingly can make us see a thread which is not there - E.H. Gombrich
If God had wanted us to do philosophy he would have created us - Marek Kohn
Posted by: Seamus | Nov 12, 2009 11:21:18 AM
Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies, and hardly any specific cures.
- Chamfort
Posted by: EG | Nov 12, 2009 12:18:35 PM
At a conference a few years ago, someone challenged an argument of Tim Williamson's by pointing out that the argument wouldn't do anything to persuade the philosophers he was arguing against and Williamson responded with something like:
"Arguments aren't for convincing your opponents, they are for winning over unaffiliated graduate students."
(sorry I don't remember the exact wording)
Posted by: Lewis Powell | Nov 12, 2009 12:19:08 PM
Providing for a math department is a lot cheaper than a physics lab, since the former need only paper, a pencil and a recycling bin. A philosophy department is even cheaper than a math department, since they only need paper and a pencil.
Great minds think alike. Philosophers never do.
Posted by: Mats | Nov 12, 2009 12:29:44 PM
Re: David Hill's definition
So, could law be interdefined as the gainful attempt to tackle questions that come naturally to the middle-aged using methods that come naturally to philosophers?
Posted by: Jurispruneface | Nov 12, 2009 12:55:51 PM
The right response to "Yeah, yeah" is "No, no."
Posted by: Charles Young | Nov 12, 2009 1:32:12 PM
Philosophy is the misuse of a terminology which was invented for just this purpose.
Walter Dubislav
Posted by: Tim Maudlin | Nov 12, 2009 1:40:47 PM
In addition to the corrections made above: "Chisholm", rather than "Chisolm".
Generally, as funny as some of this is, correct punctuation and orthography would make it easier to appreciate.
For instance,
"I know but between us would David go into the temple without his hat on."
is almost incomprehensible.
Posted by: pedant | Nov 12, 2009 2:18:27 PM
I enjoyed reading these. Thanks.
The last one should be corrected to "Relatives, Food and Philosophy" instead of "Relatives, Family and Philosophy."
Posted by: Roger Ariew | Nov 12, 2009 2:23:11 PM
I have a few I'd like you to consider:
H.L.A. Hart reportedly succeeded in analysing Mill's definition of causation in seven words: “The invariable unconditional antecedent of an event.”
In `A Subjectivist's Guide to objective Chance' David Lewis writes: "I have given undefended answers to my four questions. I hope you found them obviously right, so that you will be willing to take them as evidence for what follows. If not, please do reconsider. If so, splendid--now read on."
I quite like this piece too, although I've never found any source for it so can't be sure it ever happened. During a Ms. America contest upon being asked, "If you could live forever, would you and why?"
Ms. Alabama reportedly replied: "I would not live forever, because we should not live forever, because if we were supposed to live forever, then we would live forever, but we cannot live forever, which is why I would not live forever."
Posted by: Obstreperous Dogey | Nov 12, 2009 2:53:16 PM
At a conference a couple of years ago, a friend of mine came up with a recipe (at least I assumed he came up with it) for a quasi-theological argument against doing x, for any x you don't want to do. When asked why he was taking the elevator just one floor, and not using the stairs, he replied "If God had wanted me to take the stairs, He would have existed." It applies to any x, and it's always true.
Posted by: Alastair Norcross | Nov 12, 2009 5:01:56 PM
I've heard Dennett say the practice-theory thing, but maybe he took it from somewhere else.
By the way, I'd also like to see a collection of the best written philosophy papers (stylistically speaking).
Posted by: Alex Leibowitz | Nov 12, 2009 9:37:37 PM
"This book fills a much needed gap in the literature" is from a review by the linguist Geoffrey Pullum (author of "The Great Eskimo Snow Hoax"). One of the weird things about it is how many linguists misparsed the insult, later asking him why he inexplicably praised the book at the end of a damning review.
Posted by: Jon Cogburn | Nov 12, 2009 10:43:31 PM
I just heard one today that someone might find interesting:
"We find a view that's obviously false, and then we try to show that it's true. That's philosophy." - Michael Loux
Posted by: Bradley | Nov 12, 2009 11:11:37 PM
KJF, is Kripke likely to have confused excluded middle with non-contradiction?
Posted by: Nat | Nov 12, 2009 11:52:47 PM
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there."
-William James
Posted by: Mirah | Nov 13, 2009 12:21:18 AM
P'ness is only illegal if it's a member of A'ness.
Posted by: Martin | Nov 13, 2009 2:32:22 AM
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there."
-William James
Just change "philosopher" to theologian and it is perfect.
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 13, 2009 9:55:38 AM
If a man's good for nothing else, he can at least teach philosophy.
William James
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 13, 2009 10:27:26 AM
Philosophers doubt that the body exists until they get a toothache.
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 13, 2009 10:42:10 AM
"I know but between us would David go into the temple without his hat on."
is almost incomprehensible.
Try reading it aloud in a Jackie Mason voice.
Posted by: Carlos | Nov 13, 2009 11:05:38 AM
Sed nescio quo modo nihil tam absurde dici potest, quod non dicatur ab aliquo philosophorum
Cicero de divinatione II 119
Perhaps someone can identify the author of this definition of philosophy: "You ask a philosopher a question, and they talk about it for half an hour, and at the end of the half hour you don't understand the question." Was it Jennifer Hornsby?
Posted by: Cat | Nov 13, 2009 1:58:21 PM
Thank you for all the comments and for many suggestions. Given the enthusiastic response I will do a column with stuff from the Ethics and Political philosophy section of the manuscript.
Here is a vorspeise sent in by one of the readers, Kay.
"Proof that all governments are unjust: In order to prove that something holds for all members of a set X, it is sufficient to show that it holds for an arbitrary member of X. So, take an arbitrary government. Arbitrary governments are clearly unjust. Therefore, all governments are unjust."
Posted by: Jerry Dworkin | Nov 13, 2009 2:10:40 PM
@ Cat: that was Philippa Foot, I think, in Stephen Pike's collection of photographs of philosophers.
Posted by: iain | Nov 13, 2009 4:41:20 PM
"Platitudes with attitude."
Posted by: Jurispruneface | Nov 13, 2009 8:57:56 PM
The cat quote from James has received an addendum (I don't know from where) which makes it even better:
'A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there; a theologian is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there while yelling "I've got it"'
Posted by: G.D. | Nov 14, 2009 1:52:48 AM
Philosophy is to science as pornography is to sex: it is cheaper, easier, and some people seem, bafflingly, to prefer it.
— Steve Jones
Posted by: mtraven | Nov 14, 2009 10:33:50 PM
Metaphilosophy happens when you ask a philosopher, "What do you do for a living?" a little too interestedly.
Posted by: Joshua | Nov 16, 2009 9:03:32 AM
"Philosophy cannot bake bread--but it can bring us God, freedom, and immortality."
"Philosophy is actually homesickness--the urge to be everywhere at home."
"The philosopher lives on problems as the human being does on food. An insoluble problem is an indigestible food."
-Novalis
Posted by: gabe | Nov 16, 2009 8:04:59 PM
And of course there is F H Bradley's:
"Metaphysics is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct, but to find these reasons is no less an instinct"
- preface to Appearance and Reality
Posted by: Robert Stern | Nov 17, 2009 9:43:10 AM
"The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool"
William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616), "As You Like It", Act 5 scene 1
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 17, 2009 10:35:00 AM
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance"
Socrates
Posted by: J.H. | Nov 17, 2009 10:42:29 AM
How about this one on the Kantian transcendental conception of the person?
"Inside every imperfectly rational being is a perfectly rational one waiting to get out."
Posted by: Dan Callcut | Nov 18, 2009 9:44:38 PM
Here's are just a couple from Nietzsche on philosophy (more or less).
The worst readers - The worst readers are those who proceed like plundering soldiers: they pick up a few things they can use, soil and confuse the rest, and blaspheme the whole. (Kafumann’s translation Mixed Opinions and Maxims section 137. Page 155 in Basic Writings of Nietzsche)
Being deep and appearing deep – Whoever knows he is deep strives for clarity; whoever would like to appear deep to the crowd, strives for obscurity. For the crowd considers anything deep if only it cannot see the bottom: the crowd is so timid and afraid of going in to the water. (Gay Science section 173, page 172 in the Basic Writings)
Posted by: yuko | Nov 30, 2009 7:00:19 PM
the older we grow the stronger in theories we get.
Posted by: Amit | Dec 3, 2009 4:42:41 PM
"We have first raised a dust and then complain we cannot see."
Berkeley, Intro to PHK, 3.
Posted by: John Roberts | Dec 5, 2009 4:11:30 PM
Post a comment