| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Wednesday Poem | Main | the importance of dead whales »

October 28, 2009

foxy

091102_talkcmmntillu_p233
In 2008, half the people who watched the Fox News Channel were over sixty-three, which is the oldest demographic in the cable-news business, and, according to a poll, the majority of the ones who watched the most strident programs, such as Sean Hannity’s and Bill O’Reilly’s shows, were men. All that chesty fulminating apparently functions as political Cialis. Fox News shows should probably carry a warning: Contact your doctor if you have rage lasting more than four hours. By effectively cornering the market on anti-Administration animus, Fox News has had a robust 2009 so far, and the recent decision by the White House to declare war on the channel is not likely to put a dent in the ratings. That decision has dispirited some of the President’s well-wishers. It has also puzzled them. In American politics, it should be considered a good thing when, after you have won a Presidential election by more than nine million votes, your chief critics accuse you of filling your Administration with Nazis, Maoists, anarchists, and Marxist revolutionaries. That is the voice of the fringe, and the fringe is exactly where you want the opposition to set up permanent shop.
more from Louis Menand at The New Yorker here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 10:48 AM | Permalink

Comments

Excellent article. I am no supporter of Fox News, but I can say as a media professional of 25 years in India, that there is nothing to be gained by confronting it.

Posted by: manoj | Oct 28, 2009 12:52:26 PM

Never get into a fight with a pig. You'll just get covered in mud and the pig loves it.

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Oct 28, 2009 1:20:01 PM

This the most foolish thing that the Obama administration has attempted to do. The Tea Partiers are ecstasic and the blow hards on FOX are gloating like injured martyrs.

The Obamaites should learn from Coke and Pepsi. Never acknowledge your rival or critic. And never make your enemy look like David when you yourself are a Goliath.

(Hi, Manoj)

Posted by: Ruchira | Oct 28, 2009 4:44:01 PM

No, don't get in muddy fights with pigs.

Yes, arrest criminals.

For example, treason is a crime, also sedition, espionage, subversion of government, broadcasting threats of bodily harm to elected officials, fraud by deception or dereliction of civil rights statutes. To start with.

FOX News is not news as 'news' is defined. It broadcasts lies and false representations. It broadcasts threats and sabotage against public persons and works. It airs expensive partisan political campaign advertisements without reporting the dollar-value contribution as required by Federal Election Commission regulations and laws.

It defiles and dishonors Press traditions and journalism ethics and any colleagues or organizations which accept, defend, or associate FOX News lies with reputable professional standards ... such as Louis Menand and The New Yorker, are disgraced in disregarding the difference between themselves, their work, and FOX News's lying.

The indictment of FOX News is not referring to celebrity-hosted opinion programs, (although those present the same and worse content). Cited lies refer exactly to news reports and programming identified as 'News' or 'FOX News'.

The readiness of (most) other media properties to side with FOX News and in some manner rebut the White House statements of fact quite surprised me. That 'other media' appear to be unknowing of what FOX News airs, in the first place, and in the second place unknowing what difference there is between FOX News and mainstream media news -- seemingly none.

Especially surprising since the whole of the matter is thoroughly detailed in compiled documentation years deep, easily read at Media Matters .ORG

30 reasons why Fox News is not legit, Eric Boehlert, October 27, 2009

"Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information." -- Society of Professional Journalists

Why the Beltway press has invested so much time and energy in recent weeks defending Fox News, with one scribe even claiming that the White House's public critique of the network was "dangerous to press freedom," and why the press refuses to acknowledge what's so obvious about the cable channel's political pursuits, remains baffling.

The facts regarding Fox News' lack of professionalism seem rather obvious (as I detail below 30 different times). And that ought to be plain for Beltway journalists as well. But whether for reasons having to do with external professional, social, or political pressures, many journalists have opted to pretend that Fox News is a serious outlet, that it's just like its cable and network TV news competitors.

They insist that any suggestion that Rupert Murdoch's cable channel isn't legitimate is completely off-base and that the White House is not even allowed to have an opinion on the issue.

...

Indeed, the loophole, or the caveat, to journalism's gentleman's agreement has always been that the guidelines were voluntary and self-policing. There was no governing body, either within journalism or without, that regulated the product. The only collective deterrent from producing bad journalism, aside from rather lax U.S. libel laws, is a collective sense of shame, a shared feeling that making a factual error -- or worse, purposefully pushing false information under the guise of journalism -- was both unprofessional and unacceptable.

But clearly, Fox News does not share that sense of shame, because it's not part of the larger journalism brotherhood. Fox News doesn't feel like rules such as fairness, accuracy, neutrality, and independence apply, which is obvious since Fox News breaks those rules with stunning regularity.

...

let's put it in perspective in terms of what constitutes a legitimate news organization.

Here's how the Society of Professional Journalists describes the craft:


Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.

The organization's Code of Ethics declares "the Society's principles and standards of practice."

Below are some cornerstones to journalism's Code of Ethics, followed by clear-cut examples of how Fox News tramples that code:

-- Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.

After teasing story by saying "Obama makes a little girl cry," Fox News' Kelly acknowledged it was not true

...

And 29 further examples follow at the website, each with active link to the source material, mostly video, for The New Yorker visitors here or anyone (like me) who has not actually watched, gritting clenched teeth, to judge the debasement of news journalism and therefor democracy, or not.

FOX News' mockery of the press is worse than the self-defacement of 30 cuts. In further example is this passage where each 'another' is an active link (in this report) of veritable subversion ... for the FOX News channel embedded in the Basic bundle getting paid a snip of every cable TV payment every month whether or not anyone watched or, even, the TV was turned off the entire month.


TV critic can't figure out how Fox News is different from MSNBC - October 29, 2009

... here's an example of how the Fox News family isn't quite like MSNBC. Here's another another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another.

If [Baltimore Sun TV critic] Zurawik is so sure MSNBC is just like Fox News, than he ought to produce a similar, detailed list showcasing obvious examples of how MSNBC has walked away from the traditions of mainstream journalism and has purposefully pushed falsehoods, lies and smears under the guise of news. I'm not looking for Zurawik to explain that Olbermann and Maddow lean left. Everybody knows that. And the White House isn't attacking Fox News because it leans right.

The White House is attacking Fox News because it no longer functions as a legitimate news org.

The White House didn't demonize 'FOX', it disparaged 'FOX News.' Maybe the simplest remedy for the contretemps is to take away from 'FOX' the word 'news' everywhere it's not.

Posted by: Meremark | Oct 30, 2009 1:20:19 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Klausi on the defeated

Anjuli on Perceptions

gautam on The Human Peacock’s Ghastly Tail

VirtualMachine on What goes into making beautiful celestial images?

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

Namit on The search for a two-thousand-year-old city

Anjali Kelling on Adagio in Blues

Phil S. on KILL THE CAPS LOCK, And four other modest proposals for improving the contemporary computer keyboard

Adam on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

whatev on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

Sara on Superbowl Spleen

Liam on The Human Peacock’s Ghastly Tail

Anand Manikutty on Adagio in Blues

Sagredo on How To Implode A Myth

Michael Harbour on The Emptiness of Pluralism

Kai Matthews on Superbowl Spleen

Albertan Atheist on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

Kai Matthews on Adagio in Blues

Nick Smyth on The Emptiness of Pluralism

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed