| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Lunar Refractions: Hasten Slowly | Main | Will the Manhattan Project Always Exist? »

September 28, 2009

Polański's latest thriller

Krzysztof Kotarski

When Roman Polański was arrested this weekend, I immediately thought of this.

This is the genius of Dave Chappelle—that sentence could have been spoken in Polish, English or French, and “Nóż w wodzie”, “Chinatown” or “the Pianist” could fit in rather nicely in place of “Thriller” depending (of course) on one’s age and cultural demographic.

Polanski

Now, I write about this not because I hold a particular grudge against Polański. In fact, considering the tragic turns that his life has taken, I find it rather difficult to pass judgment on the man, even if I remain genuinely revolted by his deeds.

Considering his complicated biography, which includes a number of obviously traumatic events, it is difficult to say with any certainty which way the cosmic scale would tip for someone like him. Like his biography, that uncertainty neither absolves him of his guilt nor does it automatically condemn him, although it must be pointed out that according to our earthly laws and customs, the morality and legality of what happened in 1977 should be reasonably clear.


But that is not why I write about him today—Polański’s worth as a human being is not for me to decide. I simply find the hypocrisy surrounding his case impossible to swallow.

Polański’s arrest in Switzerland brought out the usual sentiments from the defenders of this particular Man Of Genius Who May Have Erred In A Minor Way (But Anyway, He’s So Talented And It Was A Long Time Ago). That it is the Americans who are ultimately pursuing Polański makes it all the more ridiculous.

I am not certain that anyone in the Western world (save for members of Canada’s Conservative Party) admires or respects the reality (as opposed to the theory) of America’s justice system, but hearing the reaction to Polański’s arrest in Switzerland, one would think he had disappeared from the streets of Zurich in broad daylight (maybe to a secret Polish prison?) and that John Yoo himself tortured him for David Addington’s amusement.

470px-Frédéric_Mitterrand_2008

French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand (speaking about Polański, not Yoo):

"I think this is awful and totally unjust.”

“Just as there is an America which is generous and which we like, so there is an America which is frightening, and that is the America which has just revealed its face."*

* If the America that executes its judicial warrants through the proper channels is what frightens Mr Mitterrand, then he has not been reading his world news lately.

British novelist Robert Harris, whose novel Ghost is being turned into a film by Polański:

“This is a high-profile action designed to send out some sort of message to someone somewhere."

"No one condones what happened in the 70s, but I think this is pretty appalling.”*

* For someone who has written a fictional account of Tony Blair’s and George Bush’s foray into the Middle East, the word “appalling” seems to come rather easily.


Director Andrzej Wajda heads a long list of Polish cultural luminaries who wrote to Poland’s president asking for diplomatic support.

1997_wajda

“Free Polański!”*

“We feel that Roman Polański deserves a negative moral assessment for the events from 30 years ago. But we would also like to point out the fact by fleeing from the United States, Roman Polański escaped a judicial lynching.”

* So long as it’s a talented filmmaker, a negative moral assessment will obviously suffice. Unlike, say for others, who may face mandatory chemical castration, presently pushed by Poland's parliament... 

Responding to the pressure, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski has indicated to Polish reporters that he and his French counterpart, Bernard Kouchner, may seek a presidential pardon from Barack Obama.*

* While he’s at it, maybe he can tell a couple more jokes...

In any case, why all the fuss about Polański?

This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence—once more, without getting into the particulars of the case, the focus and the indignation of the world’s cultural (and political) elite is woefully misplaced, and a number of people who really should know better look to make a martyr out of a man who, despite his immense talent, is hardly in a position to play the part.

But then again, the Americans are pretty scary.

And he made “Thriller.”

“Thriller.”


(See Chappelle’s take on the R. Kelly trial)

Posted by Kris Kotarski at 05:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

"Why all the fuss about Polanski?"
Why? I'll tell you why: because it's politically convenient bullshit. Because Polanski, not the first male in history to sleep with a sexually aggressive teen female who made it her business to look and act much older than she was, provided a convenient vaguely left-wing target for typically
American pathological anti-sex rage, which can be counted on to distract the great masses of the unthinking from the real atrocities which are going on.
The woman herself, married and mother of several children, begs that Polanski be left alone, for her own sake as well as for his.
And please, please cease all this crap about "...although I deplore/despise what he did..."? What, that he had sex with someone who turned out to be younger than she pretended? People, are you equating Polanski with some perv who prowls around for 6-year-olds to screw? Come on.

Posted by: dveej | Sep 28, 2009 12:50:27 PM

This is why I like 3QD, good post.

Posted by: Shabbir | Sep 28, 2009 1:06:33 PM

Dveej,

Take a look at the unsealed grand jury documents (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskicover1.html) before you say that Polanski is "...not the first male in history to sleep with a sexually aggressive teen female who made it her business to look and act much older than she was," or that "he had sex with someone who turned out to be younger than she pretended."

In this case, the she's-asking-for-it defense is a pretty massive stretch.

Sex with a minor is sex with a minor. Whether it's Europe or North America, that tends to be frowned upon so I'm not certain that American pathological anti-sex rage has too much to do with this (as it did, for example, in Bill Clinton's various adventures).

Posted by: Kris Kotarski | Sep 28, 2009 1:25:28 PM

Well, what were the Swiss supposed to do? Ignore their legal obligation? I would say they had stretched their police prioritization excuse pretty thin after letting him live on and off in Switzerland for a decade and half. When the L.A. police call and asks for the arrest at a specific place and time you can't exactly say no.

Dveej, if you think the consent laws in the U.S. need revision, I'll be right there with you (although I'm not sure this is the case to exemplify the need). But to ask for special treatment in this case because of Polanski's stature is treat him unequally under the law. Anyway, the Swiss will likely deal with this fairly - if they think there is a case for undue punishment, they can refuse to extradite.

Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Sep 28, 2009 3:17:09 PM

Great post, Kris. And an equally good job of exposing the superciliousness of European moralists and glitterati everywhere looking down their patrician noses at the big, bumbling, Ugly American.

The woman herself, married and mother of several children, begs that Polanski be left alone, for her own sake as well as for his.

dveej: She does not decide what the law is. And the thirteen going on thirty defense of old and middle aged lechers, no matter how talented, has no place in the legal system.

Sagredo: I hope your revision of consent laws will surely find a thirty year age difference when one of the participants is in his / her early teen years, unacceptable. I think you did say that it would.


Posted by: Ruchira | Sep 28, 2009 8:24:23 PM

Oops, that should be Cyrus, not Sagredo. Sorry.

Posted by: Ruchira | Sep 28, 2009 8:31:11 PM

I have a minor question that seems not to have come up as far as I can tell. Is fleeing during a trial, especially after the verdict as appears to be the case here, not a crime itself?

Posted by: No.7 | Sep 28, 2009 9:02:31 PM

What were the circumstances of his plea bargain? I poked around but couldn't find out.

Does this "negative moral assessment" imply jail time?

Is the present "judicial lynching" more or less "appalling" than "what happened in the 70s"?

When a 13 year old girl is drugged and raped, should we be more concerned that someone was drugged and raped, or that a 13 year old girl had sex?

Posted by: Sagredo | Sep 29, 2009 12:21:42 AM

Ruchira-

As I said, I don't think this case is a good one to exemplify the problems with AOC laws. Drugs and teens rarely equal well thought out decisions, and quickly add up to coercion and rape.

In general, I think age makes an rather poor determinate once people are past puberty, and age ranges always end up snagging some unjustly. There are two overarching, inconsistent themes in modern AOC thinking: teens are incapale of legal consent; even small age differences between teens equals automatic coercion (thus implying that consent is possible if they are the same age). Both are clearly false. It is typically true that adults out of college are in privileged power positions over teens, and such situations are understandably viewed critically, but teenage relationships are often complicated in ways the legal system has decided not to reflect.

The number of young adults now marked as sex offenders because their parents or friends turned them in while having sex with their 17 year old significant other is ridiculous. Sex-texting has similarly turned a whole generation into sexual criminals just waiting to be caught. These "offenders" are marked for life for a crime that never existed except in the minds of a morally ignorant legal system. Those are the kind of situations that need to be address and the laws reformed.

Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Sep 29, 2009 4:46:04 AM

For those not familiar with the details of the case, here is an article that tries to cut through some of the media whitewash:

Salon: Whitewashing Roman Polanski

Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Sep 29, 2009 5:01:35 AM

"not the first male in history to sleep with a sexually aggressive teen female who made it her business to look and act much older than she was"

Polanski "achieved" the perfect rape, the rape in *every* sense of the word. He didn't just have sex with someone despite her saying no, or statutory-rape a 13 year old, or just have sex with someone he'd plied with alcohol and drugs, he did every one of those things at the same time. Aggressive indeed. I'm not a big fan of Kate Harding, but she hits the right note here.

Posted by: D | Sep 29, 2009 10:11:59 AM

Cyrus: I agree with you. A nineteen or twenty one year old involved with a teenager of seventeen is in a completely different ball park than a thirty or forty year old in the same situation.

True, that age difference is not always the most reliable way to determine coercion or consent. I also realize that younger people sometimes are attracted to older partners just as the converse is true. However, to protect the unwilling (or the unwitting) young targets of older sexual predators, the law has to draw the line somewhere and in doing so, some consensual non-predatory relationships will get snagged unfairly within that arbitrary boundary. It is a bit like issuing a driver's license. Some youngsters can be excellent drivers at thirteen and others remain unreliable on the roads even in their twenties. Still we legally permit teenagers to operate a vehicle only at the arbitrarily "safe" age of sixteen (I personally feel they should be eighteen). Similarly, those sixteen or seventeen year olds in mature relationships with twenty or twenty two year old lovers must wait a bit like the crack thirteen year old drivers, to get the legal green signal just so that other physically precocious but mentally immature teens can be safe from the likes of Mr. Polanski.

D: You said it.

Posted by: Ruchira | Sep 29, 2009 10:28:29 AM

Not at all relevant to case in which there was no consent, but...

At what age do we draw that line? Wikipedia has a map. Why is it lower in Europe than in America?

Posted by: Sagredo | Sep 29, 2009 3:56:37 PM

Ruchira-

Consent is, without a doubt, a tricky topic when those doing the consenting still have developing brains. Age is used as a proxy, marking the stage in development society considers full enough. While this simplification is understandable, I would suggest it is unrealistic and unfair (at least without some careful additions). Sex play, no matter what the fundamentalists may wish to believe, is a normal step in maturation. Such play *will* occur no matter what the laws may say. It is a must that such actions do not end up criminalizing kids and teens. I think we largely agree on this.

Sagredo-

Consent at 9 in some countries?! I had no idea...

As for Europe, people are less hung up on sex, and feel less of a need to legally protect teens. That said, I don't think there is a significant higher rate of teen sex. Indeed, if the numbers are correct, European teens either have less sex, or are much safer about it. Can't find any information on the age discrepancy question however. But I doubt there is a significantly higher number of adult-teen relationships (at least where I live).

Posted by: Cyrus Hall | Sep 29, 2009 7:06:10 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Klausi on the defeated

Anjuli on Perceptions

gautam on The Human Peacock’s Ghastly Tail

VirtualMachine on What goes into making beautiful celestial images?

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

Namit on The search for a two-thousand-year-old city

Anjali Kelling on Adagio in Blues

Phil S. on KILL THE CAPS LOCK, And four other modest proposals for improving the contemporary computer keyboard

Adam on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

whatev on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

WJAbbe on Illuminating the history of medicine

Sara on Superbowl Spleen

Liam on The Human Peacock’s Ghastly Tail

Anand Manikutty on Adagio in Blues

Sagredo on How To Implode A Myth

Michael Harbour on The Emptiness of Pluralism

Kai Matthews on Superbowl Spleen

Albertan Atheist on Canadian Insights on America’s Lunatic Fringe

Kai Matthews on Adagio in Blues

Nick Smyth on The Emptiness of Pluralism

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed