| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones | Main | Mistaking Beauty for Truth in Science and in Economics »

September 06, 2009

Is Quantum Mechanics Messing with Your Memory?

Broken-glass-003Michael Slezak in the Guardian:

Imagine if a cold cup of coffee spontaneously heated up as you watched. Or a cracked pane of glass suddenly un-broke. According to physicist Lorenzo Maccone at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, you see things like this all the time – you just don't remember.

In a paper published last week in Physical Review Letters, he attempts to provide a solution to what has been called the mystery of "the arrow-of-time".

Briefly, the problem is that while our laws of physics are all symmetrical or "time-reversal invariant" – they apply equally well if time runs forwards or backwards – most of the everyday phenomena we observe, like the cooling of hot coffee, are not. They never seem to happen in reverse.

We have a statistical law that describes these everyday phenomena called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law tells us that the "entropy" or degree of disorder of a closed system never decreases. Roughly speaking, a process in which entropy increases is one where the system becomes increasingly disordered. Windows break, thereby increasing disorder, but they will not spontaneously unbreak. Gases will disperse but not spontaneously compress.

However, entropy describes what happens with large numbers of particles. We presume that it must arise from what happens with individual particles, but all the laws that govern the behaviour of individual particles are time-reversal invariant. This means that any process they allow in one direction of time, they also allow in the other.

So why will your coffee spontaneously cool down, but not heat up?

Maccone's solution is to suggest that in fact entropy-decreasing events occur all the time – so there is no asymmetry and no associated mystery about the arrow of time.

He argues that quantum mechanics dictates that if anyone does observe an entropy-decreasing event, their memories of the event "will have been erased by necessity".

Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:38 PM | Permalink

Comments

If there are entropy decreasing events wouldn't there be anomalous gains in order and energy showing up in various records independent of memory?

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Sep 6, 2009 4:42:49 PM

Pete, what record is that? Somebody would have had to have remembered the event long enough to record it. It is not clear to me from the article whether the decreases in entropy the writer refers to must occur anywhere but in perceptions, which "must" in turn be forgotten. However, anyone who has ever been pulled back from the grave probably recalls it.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 6, 2009 6:30:38 PM

Whoops, Maccone has subtly made the same error that Loschmidt caught Boltzmann in at the start of this whole story. Loschmidt pointed out that Boltzmann assumed that probability arguments applied to the future, not the past, thus implicitly inserting the time asymmetry which he purported to derive.

Essentially, Maccone is deriving the physical asymmetry in time (whether viewed as the increase of conventional entropy or as the increase of remote quantum entanglements) from the asymmetry of our knowledge. However, that asymmetry is not an inevitable consequence of consciousness but an empirical fact, most likely due to the underlying physical asymmetry. The time-reversed version of our minds would know something about the future world (i.e. have quantum entanglement with it) then forget the event (lose entanglement) when it happened. Such processes could exist in parallel with the standard ordering. Of course that's not how our world works, but Maccone has not made any new suggestion to help understand why it doesn't.

Posted by: Michael Weissman | Sep 6, 2009 10:19:06 PM

Fascinating, Michael! Write more!!!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 6, 2009 11:59:31 PM

not even wrong

Posted by: joel hanes | Sep 7, 2009 1:53:07 AM

Elatia:
I'm referring to the various devices that we've set up to record the world around us, everything from surveillance cameras to satellites and the various timing and synchronization schemes that we use to network these devices together. If these entropy decreasing events exist then certainly they would bump up against one of these devices and a resultant "gain" would show up quite independent of our memories. Unless of course these entropy reversals are completely global in their effect and create perfect closed loops in time at the exact same instant and everywhere, in which case they would be totally self negating and essentially non-existent. Which makes them very much like your hypothetical resurrected formerly dead person.

Posted by: Pete Chapman | Sep 7, 2009 2:58:02 AM

As I've pointed out before, in a world where time ran backwards, lawyers would pay us for their time. That proves that the notion is impossible.

Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 7, 2009 11:56:21 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Al on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

aguy109 on The Pathology of Stabilisation in Complex Adaptive Systems

Ken Pidcock on How to win a fight against twenty children

Erich on How to win a fight against twenty children

reader on How to win a fight against twenty children

Carlos on Franzen, Wallace and the Question of Realism

Janet Kerr on Olivia Chaney -Aupres de ma Blonde

omar on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

j_93 on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

droog on How to win a fight against twenty children

Mike Cope on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Dredd on Sanctions Don’t Promote Democratic Change

Louise Gordon on How to win a fight against twenty children

Seyma on Snowboarding at Night

aguy109 on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

aguy109 on Matzo ball memories

j_93 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Mike H. on Whitney Houston: Didn't we almost have it all

Jim on the tyrant's wife

Evert Cilliers on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

modernguy(NeanderthalGuy) on Why Is the Amazing Movie Directed by Angelina Jolie not on the Oscar List?

aguy109 on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Orla Schantz on Bubbles: Spheres, Volume I: Microspherology

Kabir on Reacting to Reactionary Muslims

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed