September 06, 2009
Is Quantum Mechanics Messing with Your Memory?
Imagine if a cold cup of coffee spontaneously heated up as you watched. Or a cracked pane of glass suddenly un-broke. According to physicist Lorenzo Maccone at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, you see things like this all the time – you just don't remember.
In a paper published last week in Physical Review Letters, he attempts to provide a solution to what has been called the mystery of "the arrow-of-time".
Briefly, the problem is that while our laws of physics are all symmetrical or "time-reversal invariant" – they apply equally well if time runs forwards or backwards – most of the everyday phenomena we observe, like the cooling of hot coffee, are not. They never seem to happen in reverse.
We have a statistical law that describes these everyday phenomena called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law tells us that the "entropy" or degree of disorder of a closed system never decreases. Roughly speaking, a process in which entropy increases is one where the system becomes increasingly disordered. Windows break, thereby increasing disorder, but they will not spontaneously unbreak. Gases will disperse but not spontaneously compress.
However, entropy describes what happens with large numbers of particles. We presume that it must arise from what happens with individual particles, but all the laws that govern the behaviour of individual particles are time-reversal invariant. This means that any process they allow in one direction of time, they also allow in the other.
So why will your coffee spontaneously cool down, but not heat up?
Maccone's solution is to suggest that in fact entropy-decreasing events occur all the time – so there is no asymmetry and no associated mystery about the arrow of time.
He argues that quantum mechanics dictates that if anyone does observe an entropy-decreasing event, their memories of the event "will have been erased by necessity".
Posted by Robin Varghese at 01:38 PM | Permalink



















Comments
If there are entropy decreasing events wouldn't there be anomalous gains in order and energy showing up in various records independent of memory?
Posted by: Pete Chapman | Sep 6, 2009 4:42:49 PM
Pete, what record is that? Somebody would have had to have remembered the event long enough to record it. It is not clear to me from the article whether the decreases in entropy the writer refers to must occur anywhere but in perceptions, which "must" in turn be forgotten. However, anyone who has ever been pulled back from the grave probably recalls it.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 6, 2009 6:30:38 PM
Whoops, Maccone has subtly made the same error that Loschmidt caught Boltzmann in at the start of this whole story. Loschmidt pointed out that Boltzmann assumed that probability arguments applied to the future, not the past, thus implicitly inserting the time asymmetry which he purported to derive.
Essentially, Maccone is deriving the physical asymmetry in time (whether viewed as the increase of conventional entropy or as the increase of remote quantum entanglements) from the asymmetry of our knowledge. However, that asymmetry is not an inevitable consequence of consciousness but an empirical fact, most likely due to the underlying physical asymmetry. The time-reversed version of our minds would know something about the future world (i.e. have quantum entanglement with it) then forget the event (lose entanglement) when it happened. Such processes could exist in parallel with the standard ordering. Of course that's not how our world works, but Maccone has not made any new suggestion to help understand why it doesn't.
Posted by: Michael Weissman | Sep 6, 2009 10:19:06 PM
Fascinating, Michael! Write more!!!
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Sep 6, 2009 11:59:31 PM
not even wrong
Posted by: joel hanes | Sep 7, 2009 1:53:07 AM
Elatia:
I'm referring to the various devices that we've set up to record the world around us, everything from surveillance cameras to satellites and the various timing and synchronization schemes that we use to network these devices together. If these entropy decreasing events exist then certainly they would bump up against one of these devices and a resultant "gain" would show up quite independent of our memories. Unless of course these entropy reversals are completely global in their effect and create perfect closed loops in time at the exact same instant and everywhere, in which case they would be totally self negating and essentially non-existent. Which makes them very much like your hypothetical resurrected formerly dead person.
Posted by: Pete Chapman | Sep 7, 2009 2:58:02 AM
As I've pointed out before, in a world where time ran backwards, lawyers would pay us for their time. That proves that the notion is impossible.
Posted by: aguy109 | Sep 7, 2009 11:56:21 AM
Post a comment