September 30, 2009
dying satyr
The fiction of Richard Powers sometimes resembles a dying satyr—above the waist is a mind full of serious thought, philosophical reflection, deep exploration of music and science; below, a pair of spindly legs strain to support the great weight of the ambitious brain. Powers thinks, and thinks well, and his almost nostalgic devotion to the European modernist tradition of “The Magic Mountain” and “The Man Without Qualities” makes him rare in American fiction. In his best books, “The Gold Bug Variations” (1991) and “Galatea 2.2” (1995), he displays an impressive command of the languages of music, genetics, computer science, and neurology, but more exciting is his willingness to engage in abstract thought, to argue and persevere, to carry arguments through the rooms of logic. (“The Gold Bug Variations,” in particular, contains several profound essays on Bach.) Contemporary American novelists, compared with Powers, can seem like intellectual visitors, fiddling in the foyers of the mind.more from James Wood at The New Yorker here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 10:10 AM | Permalink
Comments
Ouch...This is a very appreciative demolition job and I'm having a hard time shaking Wood's assessment of Powers. He's got a good eye for the weaknesses in the later novels. Right now, I don't see how "The Prisoners' Dilemma" or "Three Farmers on Their Way to a Dance" even remotely fit the scheme but a lot of everything from "Galatea 2.0" onwards sits very clearly in Wood's sights. Where his take becomes attenuated is in the short shrift he gives the questions Powers raises about science, logic and technology. He also doesn't seem to get the humour. He knows that those elements are there but he just notes them in passing. If he did any more than that I'd like to think this would be a very different review. Thanks for the post, Morgan.
Posted by: Pete Chapman | Sep 30, 2009 4:12:59 PM
Post a comment