August 30, 2009
Godless: The Church of Liberalism
Christopher Hitchens in The Liberal:
TRY sipping this single sentence and then rolling it around your tongue and palate for a while:
If Hitler hadn’t turned against their beloved Stalin, liberals would have stuck by him, too.
Well, I am being paid to parse and ponder that statement and I don’t understand it, either. Does it intend to say that liberals loved Hitler but drew the line at his invasion of the Soviet Union? Should it, rather, be interpreted as meaning that liberals were in love with Stalin but jumped ship when he was attacked by Hitler? It is remarkable to find so much intellectual and syntactical chaos in an assertion that contains no more than fifteen words.
But then, I have the distinct feeling that people do not buy Ann Coulter’s creed-screeds and speed-reads in order to enhance their knowledge of history or their command of syllogism. She has emerged as a persona because she has mastered the politics of resentment, and because she can combine the ideology of Human Events (the obscure ‘Joe McCarthy was right’ magazine) with the demand of the chat-show bookers for a tall blonde with a very rapid delivery on a wide range of subjects. The cover of this book – which follows the success of its forerunners Treason and Slander: titles that require little elucidation – shows her in a low-cut black dress with a prominent crucifix dangling over a modest cleavage. The needs of showbiz notwithstanding, I cannot fathom the reason for this slight come-hitherishness. Miss Coulter is not married and ought therefore, by her own loudly-proclaimed standards, to be a virgin and to remain so until further notice.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 10:01 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Liberals did not love Hitler. Liberals did love Russian (man, that is) but many refused to bail out of the party when Hitler attacked Russia. Many, however did give up on Comunism/Russia when Stalin signed a pact with Hitler (not when Hitler invaded Russia).
But who cares what that lady has to say? Why bother reviewing her book at all?
Posted by: fred lapides | Aug 30, 2009 2:02:31 PM
It actually sounds similar to something I heard once from a similar source. It went something like: aside from the anti-semitism and genocide, what is it about national socialism that you don't like?
So, if related, she might be trying to connect liberals to Hitler's platform more than his true legacy.
Now begging y'all's pardon, but you know I do see a connection between the German eugenicist movement and the one Sanger contributed to here. Her heirs in Planned Parenthood are the darlings of the left today, and while all decry the deaths of innocents in Nazi Germany, they continue here today in similar numbers. "Not human" is the out, but that's the same reason Hitler gave, isn't it?
Also, just a minor point, but Chris here seems to imply that Rev. King was on the left. I thought he was a Republican.
Posted by: Carlos | Aug 30, 2009 2:51:59 PM
Carlos has shown me that my liberalism carries with it the contamination of Hitler and Nazism, because he sees a strong connection between my support of choice, and Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger and Nazi Germany's eugenics program. So I'm a Nazi murder. Ann Coulter, eat you heart out.
Posted by: Christopher York | Aug 30, 2009 3:47:50 PM
Christopher,
Don't feed the trolls.
Posted by: Jonathan | Aug 30, 2009 5:47:40 PM
Isn't this article in a 2007 issue of the magazine? Is this awful woman in the news again?
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Aug 30, 2009 10:03:52 PM
Let's not forget: Christopher Hitchens and Ann Coulter agree that the invasion of Iraq was a terrific idea. And nothing is more nauseating than the spectacle of Hitchens agreeing with Coulter that the important thing about the Niger yellow-cake/Valerie Plame affair was not that the President told lies about Iraq's non-existent nuclear weapons program in his State of the Union address as part of a campaign of disinformation to sell an illegal, immoral, and disastrous war, but rather that the conceited Joe Wilson made "bogus claims." Give me a break. Christopher Hitchens should be as ignored as Ann Coulter.
Posted by: burple | Aug 31, 2009 7:21:19 AM
Burple, that's not fair: Hitchens is a much better stylist.
Posted by: Michael Drake | Aug 31, 2009 8:36:59 AM
Hitchens is an alcoholic whore who gives whores a bad name. He was an unapologetic G.W. Bush supporter who through the the Iraq war was a great idea because it improved the lot of the Kurds. A good Stylist? Only if you like style over substance.
Now that the tide has turned and the people that Hitches supported have been entirely discredited, he's trying to get a new act going. Really, Hitchens is pathetic.
Posted by: Foo | Aug 31, 2009 1:19:08 PM
I agree with Foo but I read Michael Drake's comment as a humorous one. I think he's agreeing with me.
Posted by: burple | Aug 31, 2009 7:49:46 PM
Post a comment