| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Sunday Poem | Main | tesla lives »

August 30, 2009

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

Christopher Hitchens in The Liberal:

TRY sipping this single sentence and then rolling it around your tongue and palate for a while:

If Hitler hadn’t turned against their beloved Stalin, liberals would have stuck by him, too.

AnnCoulterGodless Well, I am being paid to parse and ponder that statement and I don’t understand it, either. Does it intend to say that liberals loved Hitler but drew the line at his invasion of the Soviet Union? Should it, rather, be interpreted as meaning that liberals were in love with Stalin but jumped ship when he was attacked by Hitler? It is remarkable to find so much intellectual and syntactical chaos in an assertion that contains no more than fifteen words.

But then, I have the distinct feeling that people do not buy Ann Coulter’s creed-screeds and speed-reads in order to enhance their knowledge of history or their command of syllogism. She has emerged as a persona because she has mastered the politics of resentment, and because she can combine the ideology of Human Events (the obscure ‘Joe McCarthy was right’ magazine) with the demand of the chat-show bookers for a tall blonde with a very rapid delivery on a wide range of subjects. The cover of this book – which follows the success of its forerunners Treason and Slander: titles that require little elucidation – shows her in a low-cut black dress with a prominent crucifix dangling over a modest cleavage. The needs of showbiz notwithstanding, I cannot fathom the reason for this slight come-hitherishness. Miss Coulter is not married and ought therefore, by her own loudly-proclaimed standards, to be a virgin and to remain so until further notice.

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 10:01 AM | Permalink

Comments

Liberals did not love Hitler. Liberals did love Russian (man, that is) but many refused to bail out of the party when Hitler attacked Russia. Many, however did give up on Comunism/Russia when Stalin signed a pact with Hitler (not when Hitler invaded Russia).
But who cares what that lady has to say? Why bother reviewing her book at all?

Posted by: fred lapides | Aug 30, 2009 2:02:31 PM

It actually sounds similar to something I heard once from a similar source. It went something like: aside from the anti-semitism and genocide, what is it about national socialism that you don't like?

So, if related, she might be trying to connect liberals to Hitler's platform more than his true legacy.

Now begging y'all's pardon, but you know I do see a connection between the German eugenicist movement and the one Sanger contributed to here. Her heirs in Planned Parenthood are the darlings of the left today, and while all decry the deaths of innocents in Nazi Germany, they continue here today in similar numbers. "Not human" is the out, but that's the same reason Hitler gave, isn't it?

Also, just a minor point, but Chris here seems to imply that Rev. King was on the left. I thought he was a Republican.

Posted by: Carlos | Aug 30, 2009 2:51:59 PM

Carlos has shown me that my liberalism carries with it the contamination of Hitler and Nazism, because he sees a strong connection between my support of choice, and Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger and Nazi Germany's eugenics program. So I'm a Nazi murder. Ann Coulter, eat you heart out.

Posted by: Christopher York | Aug 30, 2009 3:47:50 PM

Christopher,

Don't feed the trolls.

Posted by: Jonathan | Aug 30, 2009 5:47:40 PM

Isn't this article in a 2007 issue of the magazine? Is this awful woman in the news again?

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Aug 30, 2009 10:03:52 PM

Let's not forget: Christopher Hitchens and Ann Coulter agree that the invasion of Iraq was a terrific idea. And nothing is more nauseating than the spectacle of Hitchens agreeing with Coulter that the important thing about the Niger yellow-cake/Valerie Plame affair was not that the President told lies about Iraq's non-existent nuclear weapons program in his State of the Union address as part of a campaign of disinformation to sell an illegal, immoral, and disastrous war, but rather that the conceited Joe Wilson made "bogus claims." Give me a break. Christopher Hitchens should be as ignored as Ann Coulter.

Posted by: burple | Aug 31, 2009 7:21:19 AM

Burple, that's not fair: Hitchens is a much better stylist.

Posted by: Michael Drake | Aug 31, 2009 8:36:59 AM

Hitchens is an alcoholic whore who gives whores a bad name. He was an unapologetic G.W. Bush supporter who through the the Iraq war was a great idea because it improved the lot of the Kurds. A good Stylist? Only if you like style over substance.

Now that the tide has turned and the people that Hitches supported have been entirely discredited, he's trying to get a new act going. Really, Hitchens is pathetic.

Posted by: Foo | Aug 31, 2009 1:19:08 PM

I agree with Foo but I read Michael Drake's comment as a humorous one. I think he's agreeing with me.

Posted by: burple | Aug 31, 2009 7:49:46 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

JonJ on Moving books

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story – Part 2

omar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Norman Costa on My Father: A Veteran's Story

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

jo smith on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Dredd on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Dredd on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

R. Michael on Moving books

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed