July 21, 2009
An Undogmatic Daniel Dennett
Robert Wright at The Daily Dish:
My week of guest-blogging at the Dish finds me walking into an animated conversation about Daniel Dennett and the "new atheism". I’m looking forward to getting into more God talk in the next few days, but for now let me say briefly that: (a) I like this Dish reader’s terminology--'atheism' vs. ‘anti-theism’--very much; (b) Last week at the Huffington Post I published an assault on the anti-theist part of the “new atheism”; (c) This assault was so poorly worded, and got so much atheist blowback, that I half-apologized for it here; (d) Dan Dennett can indeed sound intolerant at times, but I think he comes off as pretty open-minded in this several-year-old video exchange between me and him. In the exchange, I’m arguing that maybe natural selection is subordinate to some larger purpose—a purpose imbued by a Deistic God, or maybe by extraterrestrials who seeded our planet a few billion years ago after inventing or refining the algorithm of natural selection, or whatever. Dan starts off very resistant to the idea, but he rolls with the punches and is never dogmatic. Check it out.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:20 PM | Permalink



















Comments
I caught Wright on Bill Moyers the other day. He gave an amazingly honest statement of "belief in belief" (as Dennett calls it). He came just short of saying "Of course I'm not simplistic enough to believe in the sky god, but it's very good for society that the peasants do."
Posted by: Frank | Jul 22, 2009 3:05:25 PM
RobertWrightOnTheRationalAtheists
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jul 23, 2009 11:07:23 PM
Frank, what he said was:
It seems to me a not necessarily bad form for the conscience to assume belief in a personal god.
Not quite the same, especially when coupled with the insistence that:
I don't think people have to believe in god to be-- I know plenty of conscientious people who don't believe in god.
http://tinyurl.com/muacsv
Posted by: Chris Schoen | Jul 24, 2009 10:46:32 AM
Post a comment