May 29, 2009
More WTF is Wrong with the Human Rights Council: UN Praises the Sri Lankan Massacre of Civilians
Sri Lanka claimed a propaganda victory last night after the United Nations Human Rights Council passed a resolution praising its defeat of the Tamil Tigers and condemning the rebels for using civilians as human shields.
China, India, Egypt and Cuba were among the 29 developing countries that backed a Sri Lankan-proposed resolution describing the conflict as a “domestic matter that doesn’t warrant outside interference”. The resolution also supported Colombo’s insistence on allowing aid group access to 270,000 civilians detained in camps only “as may be appropriate”.
The Sri Lanka Ambassador in Geneva said that European nations had failed with their “punitive and mean-spirited agenda” against his country. “This was a lesson that a handful of countries which depict themselves as the international community do not really constitute the majority,” Dayan Jayatilleka said. “The vast mass of humanity are in support of Sri Lanka.”
Western diplomats and human rights officials were shocked by the outcome at the end of an acrimonious two-day special session to examine the humanitarian and human rights situation in Sri Lanka after the blitzkrieg of the final military offensive that wiped out the Tiger force.
The vote is extremely disappointing and is a low point for the Human Rights Council. It abandons hundreds of thousands of people in Sri Lanka to cynical political considerations,” Amnesty International said.
Sri Lanka, unable to stop the Human Rights Council taking up its case, rushed its own motion to the floor in time to beat a more censorious resolution tabled by Switzerland.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 11:23 AM | Permalink
Comments
"WTF is Wrong with the Human Rights Council"? If you want an answer, look at the membership list. The surprising thing is that a few of their decisions occasionally actually do support human rights.
Posted by: X | May 29, 2009 4:38:15 PM
Statement from Human Rights Watch.
X is right about the membership. HRW blames good countries not running.
Posted by: Sagredo | May 29, 2009 7:05:40 PM
China, India, Egypt and Cuba were among the 29 developing countries that backed a Sri Lankan-proposed resolution describing the conflict as a “domestic matter that doesn’t warrant outside interference”.
It is hardly surprising that by supporting the govt. of Sri Lanka, these nations would like to keep military options open against similar insurgencies within their own borders.
This week's Newsweek has a brief column about the "end" of the conflict in Sri Lanka. I can't figure out if the government's counter-insurgency measures are being lauded or not. The other thing that I don't quite understand is whether the Tamil civilians had indeed become so sick of Tiger tactics that they now tacitly support the govt. in Colombo. Or are they so enervated by the decades long warfare that it no longer matters who the killer is?
Posted by: Ruchira | May 29, 2009 7:49:55 PM
Post a comment