May 29, 2009
A Human Language Gene Changes the Sound of Mouse Squeaks
Nicholas Wade in The New York Times:
People have a deep desire to communicate with animals, as is evident from the way they converse with their dogs, enjoy myths about talking animals or devote lifetimes to teaching chimpanzees how to speak. A delicate, if tiny, step has now been taken toward the real thing: the creation of a mouse with a human gene for language.
The gene, FOXP2, was identified in 1998 as the cause of a subtle speech defect in a large London family, half of whose members have difficulties with articulation and grammar. All those affected inherited a disrupted version of the gene from one parent. FOXP2 quickly attracted the attention of evolutionary biologists because other animals also possess the gene, and the human version differs significantly in its DNA sequence from those of mice and chimpanzees, just as might be expected for a gene sculpted by natural selection to play an important role in language.
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, have now genetically engineered a strain of mice whose FOXP2 gene has been swapped out for the human version. Svante Paabo, in whose laboratory the mouse was engineered, promised several years ago that when the project was completed, “We will speak to the mouse.” He did not promise that the mouse would say anything in reply, doubtless because a great many genes must have undergone evolutionary change to endow people with the faculty of language, and the new mouse was gaining only one of them. So it is perhaps surprising that possession of the human version of FOXP2 does in fact change the sounds that mice use to communicate with other mice, as well as other aspects of brain function.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 09:00 AM | Permalink






















Comments
For the record...
1)FOXP2 is not a "language gene"
2)The disruption in the speech of the K family is not subtle and not restricted to language or speech.
Posted by: icastico | May 29, 2009 11:08:43 AM
I definitely do not nominate this story for a Quark award.
Wade can be a fine writer, but this piece follows the standard formula for hacktacular popular science writing:
1) Write a provocative headline (in this case implying that FOXP2 "causes" language and that non-linguisitic organisms like mice can be made to speak if they undergo the proper genetic modification)
2) Reaffirm the provocation in the lede, (Or, in the NYT, where headlines are generally more sedate, up the ante: ("A tiny step has been taken toward [talking with animals]")
3) Summarize findings that don't come within a yarn-spinner's tabackker-spitting radius of your lede ("The humanized baby mice, when isolated, made whistles that had a slightly lower pitch, among other differences, Dr. Enard says.")
4) BONUS: reinforce normative ethical concerns that most people never have opportunity nor cause to question, in no small part because articles like this make the research seem so much more dramatic and ambitious than it actually is:
Glad that's settled!
Posted by: Chris Schoen | May 29, 2009 2:50:51 PM
"Now come inside, or go away!"
or, better
"Same thing we do every night Pinky...Try to take over the world!"
Posted by: Carlos | May 29, 2009 9:35:48 PM
They say the following was King Henry VIII's favourite joke:
A condemned man petitions the King by stating: "Your majesty - if you spare my life for a year I will teach your horse to talk."
The King, anxious to converse with his horse, granted the request. As the prisoner was being led out of court one of the jailers asked him if he was mad.
"Not at all," replied the man. "Within a year I might die, the King might die, the horse might die - or the horse might talk."
LINK
Posted by: John Ballard | May 30, 2009 6:40:09 AM
Post a comment