| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Monday Poem | Main | Asian Food for Thought »

March 02, 2009

LUI: Living Under the Influence

by Shiban Ganju

We spent approximately $115.9 billion to buy alcohol in the USA in 2003 and spent billons more to treat its ravaging effects on our bodies. We are not alone. All people - Asian, European, American, and African – enjoy and suffer almost equally. No society is exempt; rich spend discretionary income while poor spend sustenance money; liberal societies buy it from the local liquor stores and conservative societies get surreptitious home delivery. And our world has about 140 million LUI - living under the influence.

One of them may be Mark, your high school buddy who staggers towards you and slurs at your class reunion. You notice: Mark has changed more than others; he looks different - the purplish hue of his face, red dots below his visible collar bone, lush thick hair, his tremulous hands with pink palms - he has aged more. You suspect alcohol. How do you verify? Simple: apply the CAGE test. Ask four questions. Are you concerned that you may be drinking too much and want to cut down? Are you annoyed when asked about your alcohol habit? Do you feel guilty about drinking? Do you need an ‘eye opener’ - a drink early in the morning just to get started? If Mark cares to entertain your curiosity and says yes to at least two questions, he has a problem.

Your classmate, like millions of others, was probably genetically predisposed – not by a single gene but a complex interaction of a number of genes acting in cohesion. His nurture was also permissive; his father relaxed with a six-pack of beer after work. And Mark’s enabling peers started drinking in high school. He fell into the trap of early start like many teenagers but unlike them he was unlucky and succumbed to his genes.

Mark started with beer. “ I don’t do hard liquor, just beer.” He had heard his dad announce in a moral tone many times. So beer was OK. And so was its euphoria and adventure. He drank mostly over the weekends and sometime sipped a beer or two during the week. His liver kept up with his pace; it slogged overtime and manufactured more enzymes to detoxify the poison. The metabolism would convert alcohol into acetaldehyde. Excess of acetaldehyde would flush his skin; give him headache, nausea and stomach pain – a hangover. Another enzyme - acetaldehyde dehydrogenase – would now rush to his rescue by neutralizing accumulated acetaldehyde and relieve him of misery.

Mark, propelled by his dad’s genes and convinced by his morality, did not seek any help. It was just beer, after all. But that did not last long.

On his prom night Mark , dressed up in a rented tux, bought a bottle of Champaign and twenty-four long stem red roses. He borrowed his dad’s car and went to pick up his sweet heart, only to find that she had gone with his best friend. He drove back home, parked his car in his driveway and found solace in a bottle of Champaign, which he had planned to share with her but had to gulp it all alone. A swirling head, high bass rap on the radio and vivid red color of the left over rose bouquet made the evening bearable. When he woke up, he found himself crumpled in the driver’s seat.

Next night and for many nights after, he craved for the same effect. But he had to drink more to get the buzz.

After high school Mark worked as a painter and made enough money to buy cheap hard liquor. He could not wait for his two off days every week, when he would binge with his friends. Sometimes it went non-stop for twenty-four hours, only to leave him deathly sick afterwards. Three years later, he decided to become a truck driver and he tried to stop drinking. But he suffered tremors, sweaty palms, racing heart and confused thoughts. He had to drink just to steady himself. He had developed four cardinal features of alcoholism: tolerance – drinking more to replicate pleasure; craving – compulsive need to drink; loss of control to stop after starting; and withdrawal symptoms if he stopped. Mark had graduated from high school into the fraternity of approximately 20 million alcoholics in the USA.

Alcohol abuse takes it toll. WHO estimates, alcohol causes 4.4 percent of the world morbidity and 3.7 percent of world mortality. In the USA, an estimated 100, 000 people die of alcohol-linked events, which include respiratory infections, heart failure, liver diseases, accidents, car crashes, suicides and homicides. Alcohol is a link in forty percent of auto accident deaths, thirty percent of suicides and sixty percent of homicides. And this all comes with a heavy financial burden. In 2002, the WHO estimated, between $210 billion and $665 billion was the cost of global alcohol abuse.

We have no cure for this disease. A preventive approach of legal prohibition by the government or abstinence by the individual has been the historical solution. After the US Civil War, the temperance movement morphed into a National Prohibition Party and became a loud cry for preserving the family and eradicating immorality of alcohol. In 1919, with prohibition law about to become national, a leader, Billy Sunday addressed ten thousand people. “The reign of tears is over. The slums will soon be a memory. We will turn our prisons into factories and our jails into storehouses and corncribs. Men will walk upright now, women will smile and the children will laugh.”

By 1933, it was obvious that prohibition had not delivered promised utopia to the American society and the law was repealed.

In 1935, two alcoholics - Robert Smith, a doctor and Bill Wilson, a stockbroker met and started Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) fraternity. The main premise was that an alcoholic is powerless over his drinking habit and a support group suffering from the same condition will help him in achieving abstinence. It recognizes that alcoholism is an inborn disease, hence a life long condition. An alcoholic is constantly on the brink – always recovering but never recovered. AA demands total abstinence and a need to surrender to a higher power to gain control of life. AA mixes biological etiology of alcoholism with a quasi-religious cure and has occupied the therapeutic space with considerable success. (Mention of God occurs six times in its twelve-step program, which also include elements of confession, repentance, prayer and spirituality.)

Recently the quest for a gene that predisposes to alcoholism has accelerated. Evidence points to chromosome 15 and multiple genes closely located on this chromosome seem to play a part. Alcoholism may also be closely related to nicotine addiction, anxiety state and possibly ‘over active’ brain seeking comfort in alcohol. But the mechanism is far from clear. Many Chinese and Japanese are fortunate to carry a mutant gene, which renders the detoxifying enzyme – acetaldehyde dehydrogenase - ineffective. After a drink they accumulate acetaldehyde, which takes all the fun out of alcohol and gives them all the horrible effects. The mutation protects them from alcoholism. Some drugs also imitate this effect. Doctors have used drugs like Antabuse to inactivate acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, which makes drinking a punishing habit. But alcoholics must swallow this pill before they drink and obliging alcoholics are rare.

Since we do not understand the biology of the disease, our approach to therapy - by abstinence or prohibition - has not changed in centuries. We have invoked political-social-moral-religious-economic-legal methods with limited success. While we have started drinking early in life, the consumption has stayed almost unchanged for the past 150 years in the USA. Annual per capita consumption was 2.27 gallon in 2006, 2.60 gallons in 1906 and 2.10 gallons in 1850. Based on the current data, the WHO has suggested some therapeutic strategies in March 2008. They include political commitment, raising awareness, community action, screening, and establishing public policy about marketing, availability, pricing, production and drunk driving.

We hope, that in near future, cure will come from understanding the genetics of this disease, yet till that time no society can wish away alcohol and its serious consequences. It may help if we change our perception about alcohol. As Abraham Lincoln observed about alcohol in his contemporary society, "None seemed to think the injury arose from the use of a bad thing but from the abuse of a very good thing." The attitude has not changed; we still find a desirable goodness in a cocktail.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 12:09 AM | Permalink

Comments

Living near a university I am always reminded of the alcoholic monkeys of St. Kitts whenever I see a "Mark"

Posted by: ThinkAfrica | Mar 2, 2009 2:39:40 PM

This piece seems to have no deep insight or thesis. What is the point?

Posted by: JMW | Mar 2, 2009 4:42:42 PM

Dear Shiban,
This is one of your most brilliant pieces so far. It is not only out together very well, but is also provocative at many levels. In thinking about why Prohibition failed so miserably, I was reminded of my favorite Abraham Lincoln speech which is known as his Temperance speech since it was delivered to the Temperance Society in 1842. In this incredibly intelligent speech, he asked a very simple rhetorical question: “Let me ask the man who could maintain this position most stiffly, what compensation he will accept to go to church some Sunday and sit during the sermon with his wife's bonnet upon his head?” The answer he gave was of course nothing would persuade a man to wear his wife’s bonnet to church even though there is nothing irreligious or immoral in the act because of the fear of being laughed at. It would not be fashionable. And with this, he cleverly pointed out two things; that fashions matter and that public opinion matters. In order to get rid of social evils like smoking or excessive drinking, we have to make them UN-fashionable and unacceptable, using reason as the solution. This came as an unexpected shock to the Temperance Society since the 33 year old Lincoln’s suggested “kind unassuming persuasion” rather than the stern heavy handedness of the temperance efforts. And then he proceeded to his remarkable conclusion with these words: Happy day, when all appetites controled, all passions subdued, all matters subjected, mind, all conquering mind, shall live and move the monarch of the world. Glorious consummation! Hail fall of Fury! Reign of Reason, all hail!

And even as you demonstrate that tendency to alcoholism may be genetic, do you think there is room for this Lincoln type approach at least early in life as the teenagers are just embarking on this dangerous path? And if so, what social adjustments do we need as a Society? We know the age-limit for getting alcohol does not work.
Azra.

Posted by: Azra Raza | Mar 2, 2009 5:12:42 PM

The point, JMW, is to be informative, and Shiban achieves that point very well.

I suggest you look elsewhere for the "depth" you are seeking.

Or have a damn drink!

Posted by: S. Abbas Raza | Mar 2, 2009 5:15:37 PM

It may help if we change our perception about alcohol. As Abraham Lincoln observed about alcohol in his contemporary society, "None seemed to think the injury arose from the use of a bad thing but from the abuse of a very good thing."

I think if we substituted the word religion for alcohol, the above quote would be even more to the point.

But agreed, alcoholism is a huge problem.
I think we need to get away from the 12 step program, as this superstition based recovery model has had a very low success rate, but does help some people immensely.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 2, 2009 5:42:10 PM

What kind of societies encourage being "driven to drink" or overeating, smoking, gambling and all the other physical and process addictions that AA-style groups now purport to heal? Since addiction invites escape from stress and pain, seems perhaps people should try to figure out why there's so much of it, while they also examine genetic predispositions to alcoholism.

Are other addictions also considered diseases or is alcoholism a disease because of the effects on the liver and other physiology? Overeating can also cause cirrhosis. Does that make it a disease?


theepochtimes

Would overgambling be a disease?

Dave, I know from your comments on Chris Hedges that you believe religion is so toxic that in some cases "health" will forever elude those you consider superstitious.

Apropos of nothing, I wanted you to consider one great musician's religious belief and his exceptional musical "health" (if there is such a thing) that prevails despite what you consider toxicity-based memes. I went to a Dave Brubeck Quartet concert last June, when Dave, then age 87, played as beautifully as he did in the 1960s. Maybe you could write to him and tell him what an unscientific fool he is to believe beliefs. You know, set him straight about believing atheist beliefs instead and invite him to join the "Brights."


wicn


jazz

I guess I'm thinking of Brubeck because I never knew about his Catholicism until I read about it last June. I know it's "off-topic" here. And for all I know, belief in the spaghetti monster and the tooth fairy or other misapprehension of reality may also inspire music as wonderful as Brubeck's or Handel's.

I do, however, agree with you on the advisability of finding something very different from and better than 12-step programs.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Mar 2, 2009 7:27:51 PM

Louise-
I'm a Brubeck fan also, but just as Hawking can think with his debilitating ALS, Brubeck can perform with his Catholic disability.

I mean, even the Grand Warlock (pope) when not talking about the good old days in the Nazi Youth, can probably make a good basket in his therapy class.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 2, 2009 7:57:41 PM

I'm a Brubeck fan also, but just as Hawking can think with his debilitating ALS, Brubeck can perform with his Catholic disability.

Some sufferers of Atheism, however, seem absolutely immobilized by it.

Posted by: Carlos | Mar 2, 2009 8:47:49 PM

Carlos-
Let's agree to disagree.
We don't really to go any further on this one.
What is your observation on 12 step recovery? I think we can converse on that one.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 2, 2009 9:05:09 PM

All 3QD discussions eventually end up on atheism or Palestine. But since we're talking alcohol and religion, here's Blake's The Little Vagabond:

Dear Mother, dear Mother, the Church is cold,
But the Ale-house is healthy & pleasant & warm:
Besides I can tell where I am use'd well,
Such usage in heaven will never do well.

But if at the Church they would give us some Ale.
And a pleasant fire, our souls to regale:
We'd sing and we'd pray all the live-long day:
Nor ever once wish from the Church to stray.

Then the Parson might preach & drink & sing.
And we'd be as happy as birds in the spring:
And modest dame Lurch, who is always at Church
Would not have bandy children nor fasting nor birch

And God like a father rejoicing to see.
His children as pleasant and happy as he:
Would have no more quarrel with the Devil or the Barrel
But kiss him & give him both drink and apparel.

Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 2, 2009 11:56:26 PM

But since we're talking alcohol and religion
Thanks, thats great!

But it usually opiates that are linked with religion-
"Religion is the opiate of the masses"
(paraphrasing Marx)<'i>

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 3, 2009 1:33:30 AM

This an excellent, clearly written and always timely post.
I was born and grew up in 'merry' England, where being permanently swazzled on beer and spirits is the hallowed norm. Drinking a pint or two during work lunchbreaks and anoher 5-6 every evening is the accepted heart of social life for most Brits. No party is ever complete without several dripping beer kegs in the kitchen and trails of vomit around the bathroom. As Jews we were a bit different: traditionally, even small children were encouraged to drink wine at the Sabbath meal and on Passover, while on Purim it was considered a mitzvah to get a little drunk...however the beer fixation and steady drinking were held up as foreign, goyisher and unworthy. I think it is a matter of record that diaspora Jewish communities have historically had a much lower rate of alcoholism than the Christian host countries.
When I arrived Israel in 1978 I encountered an almost entirely sober country. There were only a couple of types of weak bottled beer available, only one bar in the whole of Haifa where draught (tap) beer was sold -full of sailors and binging tourists. At grown-up parties people drank fruit juices and sung songs whose words were projected onto the wall with slides. It was wonderful, I began to see how truly disgusting Western drinking habits really are and what a terrible toll they take in terms of wasted money, road deaths and alcoholism. (Israelis killed more more people on the roads, by being rude intolerant bad drivers, but they were usually sober -- then..)
The sober society vanished very quickly: The beer and spirits companies invested massively in advertizing and marketing, the spread of air conditioning made drinking more comfortable, the Russian immigrants arrived with their rivers of vodka... In under a decade every school yard was littered with beer cans. A precious opportunity to protect the young of a whole nation by raising prices or limiting marketing was simply ignored. Sad to watch.

Posted by: aguy109 | Mar 3, 2009 3:51:34 AM

What is your observation on 12 step recovery? I think we can converse on that one.

Everything I know about 12 step recovery I learned from reading Infinite Jest (at the suggestion of 3QD). I loathed the book for structural reasons but the path to redemption followed by the big guy was very noble. Personally, the only drinking problem I have is forgetting to finish them.

Posted by: Carlos | Mar 3, 2009 8:49:23 AM

Simple: apply the CAGE test. Ask four questions. Are you concerned that you may be drinking too much and want to cut down? Are you annoyed when asked about your alcohol habit? Do you feel guilty about drinking? Do you need an ‘eye opener’ - a drink early in the morning just to get started? If Mark cares to entertain your curiosity and says yes to at least two questions, he has a problem.

I've known people who've read about the negative effects of alcohol and who have become concerned that their 2 or 3 drinks a week are harming them. They naturally feel guilty when they drink, because they are so concerned. Are they alcoholics?

Similarly, an AA test asks: "do you ever drink alone"? This is supposed to be some kind of big red flag.

Not only are these kinds of tests patently ridiculous, they spring from a kind of hysteria over alcohol consumption. While eradicating alcoholism is surely important, we must be careful to keep this legitimate project free of prohibition-era moral reactions.

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Mar 3, 2009 2:27:02 PM

Thank you, Shiban -- this is good stuff. Nick, these questions may not be scientific, but they're not ridiculous. The trouble is that no one with a bad problem, even in its early stages, is likely to answer them honestly or -- the real meaning of denial -- impute significance to whether they've answered honestly.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Mar 3, 2009 2:59:58 PM

I have never understood the attraction alcohol has for so many. Beer is a disgusting, bitter drink. Wine tastes better, but still makes me groggy and tired, and the next morning I feel a little poisoned, even after 1 glass. Now coffee - it is the exact opposite. It makes me feet alert, energetic, intelligent, awake. I just don't "get" alcohol.

Posted by: J. Hawkins | Mar 3, 2009 3:59:22 PM

J. Hawkins:

Right, YOUR drug is fine, but all others are awful and bad. Personally I find coffee bitter and disgusting, and from what I understand, caffeine is a much more addictive substance than alcohol.

So, how do you feel without your cup or two in the morning, "groggy and tired"? Perhaps you should talk to someone about your addiction.

Posted by: Anon | Mar 3, 2009 6:06:34 PM

Good thing I didn't mention green tea.

Posted by: J. Hawkins | Mar 3, 2009 7:01:40 PM

"To alcohol! The cause of . . . and solution to . . . all of life's problems."

H.S.

Posted by: Bryon | Mar 3, 2009 7:02:40 PM

Nick Smyth,
You are right.Physicians too face this dilemma daily. What is the line between social drinking and alcoholism ?
CAGE test is an accurate screening test and not diagnostic. More elaborate tests like Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (MAST from University of Michigan) or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT from WHO)are available.
Please check the following:
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/300/17/2054

J Hawkins:
You are lucky. We know people metabolize alcohol differently, and probably it has to do with genes.

Anon:
For a person to be called "addicted" to any substance he has to show four features: craving, tolerance, psychological dependence and physical withdrawal symptoms when the addicting substance is not available.Caffeine does not fall into that group but nicotine (smoking) does.

Posted by: shiban ganju | Mar 3, 2009 8:17:48 PM

Dear Azra,
Thanks for your insight and pointing the temperance speech. You are right, until we discover the biology of addiction, we ought to make drinking unfashionable just as we did to smoking. May be we should start at home and with the medical fraternity parties.

Another social approach will be screening the young in vulnerable groups and putting them through preventive counseling and therapy before they have their first drink.

Posted by: shiban ganju | Mar 3, 2009 8:33:18 PM

Shibu,

I think you overstate the extent to which alcoholism can be considered a medical condition. Neither JAMA nor the DSM define alcoholism as a condition with a genetic or other physical cause. The one gene that most strongly correlates to alcoholism (DRD2) is not itself a reliable predictor of the disease.

Meanwhile, as Louise comments, there is a long-studied social pathology associated with alcoholism. Abuse, trauma, and other psychological concerns are, statistically, much stronger predictors of alcohol abuse. (Psychologically based treatments are also much more effective than you imply when you write "there is no cure" and "our approach to therapy ... has not changed in centuries.")

I also have to comment on what seems to be a strain of puritanism in this essay. In your paragraph on WHO estimates, you write that alcohol (not alcoholism) is the cause of "4.4 percent of world morbidity and 3.7 percent of world mortality. This is deeply misleading. Social drinking doesn't cause liver failure, heart disease, or homicide, and with proper education it doesn't cause car crashes and industrial accidents either. Later, in comments, you write "we ought to make drinking unfashionable." This is your right, of course, but your essay would be better served if you had either been more explicit about your moral position, or, alternately, left it out altogether.

Finally, while we're invoking Lincoln, let's not forget that when people complained about General Grant's drinking, he asked his aides to find out what brand of whiskey he liked, and send casks of it to the other generals.

Posted by: Chris Schoen | Mar 3, 2009 9:52:34 PM

One the largest study of longevity and health, one of the factors for a long life span was moderate use of alcohol. The others were:
Not Smoking
Exercise
Diet high in Fruits and Vegetables
Moderate use of alcohol

If you were a non drinking, couch potato who ate junk food, you lived almost 7 years less.
The alcohol was a real surprise in this study (to the researchers).
This was a large study, with many subjects.
Personally, alcohol interferers with my meditation practice, so it is not much of an option -- Maybe the benefits of meditation will make up for my low alcohol consumption!

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Mar 3, 2009 10:35:35 PM

Chris Schoen,
Thanks for your comments. Allow me to clarify:
1. I rechecked WHO reference and WHO mentions 'alcohol" and not alcoholism as the cause of morbidity. Please check
http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/facts/alcohol/en/index.html

2. Any cause: psychological, social or biochemical that incapacitates one into being nonfunctional could be viewed as a medical condition in conversation.

3. I used the term cure in the sense of a one time disease. Alcoholism can be treated like hypertension but not cured like pneumonia. And the long remission rate is low.

4.Social drinkers who are not alcohol addicts are known to drown, fall off the ladders and of course get pulled up for DUI besides many other accidents. I agree they may not get organ damage like heavy chronic drinkers do.

5. If I sounded moralistic or puritanical, it was unintentional.

6. The verdict on the genetic causation is not clear yet, but my guess is the big thrust will come from that field.

Posted by: shiban ganju | Mar 3, 2009 10:59:45 PM

"I rechecked WHO reference and WHO mentions 'alcohol" and not alcoholism as the cause of morbidity."

Well then the WHO is wrong, or at least banal to the extent that ladders, power tools, boats, medicines and electric appliances also "cause" fatality and morbidity, but no one is talking about how we can decrease their use.

"Alcoholism can be treated like hypertension but not cured like pneumonia."

I dispute this. I note that most often when someone with a drinking problem is able to change their behavior, it is determined the person wasn't a "real" alcoholic in the first place. That's tautology, not medical science.

"Social drinkers who are not alcohol addicts are known to drown, [and] fall off the ladders."

Yes, and sometimes they even do so when sober. There's a responsible context for alcohol use. We take away someone's keys when they are tipsy, but we also take them away when someone is distraught, or sleep deprived, or on medication.

The point is that there is no unique property of alcohol that makes it a negative health factor. Like many activities, drinking needs to be socially contextualized and regulated. But wringing our hands over our helplessness in the face of its awesome capacity to harm us bestows on it a power it need not possess.

Posted by: Chris Schoen | Mar 4, 2009 4:02:28 PM

How best to introduce our children to alcohol? Does a glass of wine at family dinner help teach a 16-year-old the skill of responsible (i.e. limited) drinking, or does it simply encourage drinking, and thus more likely to lead to alcoholism? How might we compare (for instance) France and the United States in this regard, or indeed aguy's Jews and goyim in England?

This cab I'm drinking is rather good, by the way. Should we really consider those genetically impaired of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase as fortunate?

Posted by: Sagredo | Mar 5, 2009 1:46:46 AM

Too much alcohol can definitely lead to multiple health problems, injuries and violence. However is it necessary that people who drink to excess are segmented as “alcoholics”? Alcohol-related problems also are there due to excessive drinking -- especially binge drinking -- among persons who are not alcoholics i.e. individuals who, when they drink, typically drink to get drunk. They are often young individuals, like college students, who drink irresponsibly but most of them not yet alcohol dependent. As written by you, counseling at the right time may be important, especially in conservative societies where “a drink” is still a fashion or a style statement rather than a normal social activity.

This differentiation may be important because historically, prevention resources have tended to be directed towards treatment of “alcohol dependence” rather than prevention of more prevalent forms that could be responsible for a large proportion of alcohol-related issues or be dangerously close to them

Bitu

Posted by: Bitu | Mar 18, 2009 7:39:16 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Colette on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Dana on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Dredd on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on Race Is Not Biology

prasad on Race Is Not Biology

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sundar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Loneliness, isolation and desperate yearning

carlos on The Gut-Wrenching Science Behind the World’s Hottest Peppers

Dredd on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

JonJ on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

JonJ on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

allsmiles on A Mother, a Son and a Wife

sverson on Race Is Not Biology

carlos on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

araldo on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed