March 26, 2009
Islamic liberalism under fire in India
Martha C. Nussbaum in the Boston Review:
As it became clear that Pakistani Muslims perpetrated the horrendous terrorist attacks in Mumbai last November, many feared a wave of violence against India’s own Muslim community. The community, which represents 13.4 percent of Hindu–majority India, suffers from poverty and systemic discrimination, as the government’s recent Sachar Commission report documents. It has also been targeted by the Hindu right, which, in 2002, murdered as many as 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, in the state of Gujarat.
That violence, like the violence of Hindu–right mobs against Christians in the eastern state of Orissa in 2008, surely deserves the name of “terrorism.” Yet, in India as elsewhere, the word “terrorism” is now frequently confined to the actions of Muslims, and Muslims are suspects almost by virtue of their religion alone. There was reason, then, to fear that mobs would take the Mumbai blasts as the occasion for a renewed assault on an already beleaguered minority.
This assault did not materialize—largely because India’s Muslim community strongly condemned the terrorist acts and immediately took steps to demonstrate its loyalty to the nation. Muslim cemeteries refused burial to the perpetrators. Muslims wore black armbands on Eid, showing solidarity with mourners of all religions and nationalities. The world saw a deeply nationalist community, one loyal to the liberal values of a nation that has yet to treat it justly.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 07:37 AM | Permalink



















Comments
Robin posted this on March 14. But I agree that it is a good article and worth bringing to the front once again.
Posted by: Ruchira | Mar 26, 2009 10:04:39 AM
Oops, sorry Robin, I was busy with Morgan umm... hiking, that week and I guess I missed it. Oh well, I'll leave it up now...
Posted by: Abbas Raza | Mar 26, 2009 10:48:44 AM
Nussbaum claims that "there is a distinctive and genuinely Islamic form of liberalism." How would she know without having studied Islamic law? I notice that far too many white liberals sufficiently consumed by guilt insist upon referring to what ordinary Muslims say and do as "Islamic," even if those ordinary Muslims don't know a bloody thing about their own religious system. The logic is, if ordinary Muslims don't practice stoning, then stoning isn't Islamic. If ordinary Muslims treat their Christian and Hindu neighbors cordially, then Islam is peaceful toward other religions.
This then just becomes one more way of shielding Islam from criticism, by counterposing Islamic law to Muslim practice, and conferring upon the latter the status of "Islamic".
Posted by: Sign of Saturn | Mar 26, 2009 1:59:22 PM
I just want to say that I think Nussbaum is an otherwise brilliant thinker. However, the idea that there is such a thing as "Islamic liberalism" is demonstrably false.
Posted by: Sign of Saturn | Mar 26, 2009 2:08:14 PM
Post a comment