| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« In Nutshell Code | Main | Fragments of Bone and Clay »

February 02, 2009

A Scientist Goes to an Ashram for a Personal Retreat – Part 1

by Norman Costa

(Note: I do not use the real names of people, nor do I identify the specific Ashram. I changed a few details. The purpose is to protect the privacy of the individuals. Readers who are familiar with this Ashram will probably recognize it.)

What the Heck is an Ashram?

Ashram is a Sanskrit word denoting a spiritual community in the Hindu tradition. It is a place of religious retreat where knowledge and spirituality is pursued. In ancient India it was a hermitage or monastery where sages lived in peace and tranquility amidst nature, usually in a forest. It is a secluded residence where a spiritual Master (guru) lived alone or with disciples. It was a place of instruction for the guru's students and aspirants. There they led a communal life of meditation, simplicity, discipline, quiet and solitude. They engage in spiritual practices and study the sacred teachings of yoga. The Ashram is a sanctuary.

I was not looking for a religious experience and practice, let alone simplicity, solitude, and discipline. Nor was I looking forward to a vegetarian diet. I smuggled a small amount of contraband food items with me. What if the housekeeping staff finds my stash, I thought. Will I be summarily discharged and be spat upon as I left? Upon taking my first meal I realized it was a vegan diet. That meant there was not even yogurt with fruit on the bottom, along with high fructose corn syrup. Last year I hired the daughter of a faculty colleague to do some administrative work and light housekeeping for me. I didn't know she was a vegan, and I had nothing in my pantry that I could feed her. Shopping for a vegan was not easy the first time around.

What I was looking for was a sanctuary of quiet and seclusion. As a young man I spent two years in a Catholic monastery. Although I did not stay, it was the best two years of my life. But why was I looking for a repeat performance for one week in a tradition that was not part of my heritage? Why go to a religious community when I do not believe in a personal God? True, I am more comfortable with Spinoza's God and Einstein's Cosmic Consciousness, but, I maintain an ecumenical and tolerant attitude. I enjoy comparative religion, speculative theology, and studying religion as a natural phenomenon.

I wanted to find a place where I could focus on some important decisions I had to make. I didn't want to be distracted by my main file server that was down, paying my bills, crying over split milk (huge paper losses in my very modest portfolio), and avoiding all the work I had to do to cleanup my apartment. So how did I pick an Ashram in the south, you ask. Well, I'll tell you. I visited friends, a couple at the Ashram, over 15 years ago. Swami Giri and his wife Yukteswar had been with the Ashram for a number of years. Yukteswar was completing a Masters Degree in Nursing (a mid-life career change) at a State University. Giri was the administrative director and personnel manager for the Ashram. They had a small house near the Ashram property, as did many devotees and their families. I was more a tourist than participant, although I did join an evening circle of joining hands and giving response chants to the Master and founder, Swami Ramananda, and watching the children of the community do a May pole dance. I came away with a good feeling about the place and liked the members of the community.

I can't pass up the opportunity to tell you about Giri and Yukteswar. Giri was an Italian kid from Brooklyn, NY. Italian was the primary language in his home. In his youth he was a drummer in a rock band. He's a little heavy with long hair and full beard. If he wears Indian garments or robes he is the iconic image of a Swami or guru. If he wears jeans and a sport shirt, he is the spot on incarnation of Jerry Garcia. Today he's a licensed acupuncturist and massage therapist. He teaches and lectures on Yoga. Recently he published an original book of commentary on the sutras. They now live in Manhattan where Yukteswar supervises a hospice service.

Getting There

I made my reservations for one week in January, this year, when the prices were reduced by 20 percent, and reserved a private room in one of their motel-like facilities. I am too old to adjust to an eight person bunk bed dormitory room and share one bathroom with seven young people. They were terrific people, some as poor as church mice, and, besides, I'm a late sleeper. The last time I slept dormitory style with bunk beds, no privacy, about 40 other guys, turned lights out to 'taps', and rose with 'revele' was a long time ago in the military. I took Amtrak to a station about forty miles from the Ashram, and by prearrangement they sent a car to pick me up. Amarananda, a member and employee of the community, had transportation duty that day. Since I was the only arriving Ashramee, I sat in the front seat and had a great conversation with Amarananda. I thought she was French-Canadian, but she's from France. She came from Rennes, on the Atlantic coast of Brittany. I had been to Rennes so we started with that small speck of 'something in common'. It turns out we had a lot more in common.

Amarananda said I looked familiar. I didn't know how that could be, but I said I visited once before. It turns out, after more than 15 years, Amarananda recognized me, others at the Ashram recognized me, and I recognized them. More on this later. She asked what drew me to the Ashram, and I told her about Giri. Of course, everyone there knows Giri, and he visits every so often to teach a class on the sutras. She said she had been there quite some time and raised her son there. He is now a successful lawyer in the State Capitol. We talked about Obama, religion, sky gods versus earth gods, and her preference for the spiritual practices of Tibetan Buddhism. I didn't say anything to her then, but I thought I had three CD albums of Tibetan ritual chants, in mp3 format, on my laptop. (Yes, I take my laptop everywhere, even to an Ashram.) She dropped me off at my 'motel', and said I would probably see her around since she worked in the multimedia department, in the same building as the dining hall. I rested, unpacked, ate some of my contraband candy, and confirmed that the Tibetan chants were on my laptop. Good, because I'd like to return the favor of her company by transferring the mp3s to her home computer. I knew she would love them. Eventually, that would be the start of a wonderful friendship. But more on that later.

The Scientific Perspective and Scientific Ballyhoo

Before I go further into my experience at the Ashram, I should explain why Western science and some scientists, believers and non-believers, have a problem with Hindu spirituality, and that of other traditions. The problem can be summed up in one word: Energy. To scientists in the physical and life disciplines, energy is the left side of an equation that states the product of mass and the square of the speed of light in a vacuum. It's concrete, it's unambiguous, it's simple, it's powerful, it's elegant, it's beautiful, and, so far as we know, it's complete. Hell, it's damn near transcendent and spiritual. To Hindu spiritual tradition, and others, energy has many manifestations, uses, and explanatory powers; All these have varying degrees of clarity, or lack thereof, in their definitions and uses. The physicist says, energy, or, mass-energy equivalence, and that's it. There is nothing more to say. The spiritual Master has a lot more in the way of usages, modifiers, delimiters, extenders, and synonyms. Here are a few examples: Positive energy; Negative energy; Aura; Life energy; Spiritual energy; Life force; Creative Vibration; Creative vibratory activity; Finite Vibratory Creation; The flow of the life force and consciousness outward through the spine and nerves; The light of the medulla flowing into the eyes; You can give me energy and I can send it back to you; A tree has energy but a stick doesn't. Consider the following quote from Paramahansa Yogananda (1893 to 1952) in his two volume commentary on the teachings of Jesus.

“India's yogis (those who seek union with God through formal scientific methods of yoga) lay the utmost importance on keeping the spine straight during meditation, and upon concentrating on the point between the eyebrows. A bent spine during meditation offers real resistance to the process of reversing the life currents to flow upward towards the spiritual eye. A bent spine throws the vertebrae out of alignment and pinches the nerves, trapping the life force in its accustomed state of body consciousness and mental restlessness.”

Lest anyone think I'm mocking the author, let me clear: I am not. In fact, I'm reading Discourse 6 “The Baptism of Jesus”. It's fascinating. For those interested in the study of comparative religions, believers or non-believers, it's a rare chance to see the Gospels of the Christian testament from the point of view of a Hindu mystic. The point I am making is that these uses of the concept of energy drive some physicists, and other scientists, up the wall. It's even enough to give Daniel Dennett apoplexy, or make Richard Dawkins fall out his chair laughing. What it does for their spines and nervous systems, is akin to the scratching of finger nails on a black board. A family member, 35 years ago, graduated from a nursing program that used the concepts of 'positive energy' and 'negative energy' as core elements and foundations in the curriculum. As far as I can tell, no patient received care that was inferior to care provided by nurses from a more standard curriculum.

Some scientists are overly narrow and overly protective about their words when others appropriate them for their own use. We have quantum psychology which is purported to be derivative of some ideas in quantum physics. There are quantum theories of mind, as a disembodied ghost in the machine. My personal view is that they are not extensions of quantum physics, though the progenitors think otherwise. I use the concept of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle in my two-semester undergraduate and graduate psychological research methods classes. I draw an analogy to psychological testing to make the point that measurement changes that which is measured. There are physicists that insist it only applies to the velocity and position of subatomic particles, and doesn't apply to opinion surveys. True enough, but, by analogy, I instruct my students that human nature can not be understood in a fully deterministic way. Our predictions of behavior are expressed in probabilities not in certainties. Einstein stated that God did not play dice. I tell my students that human nature plays craps all the time.

Sneak Peek at Part 2

  • Why I really came to the Ashram.

  • I learn a good lesson in humility.

  • I was afraid I wouldn't remember how to meditate from my days in the monastery. It was just like getting on a bicycle, again.

  • Aum made my muscles relax.

  • Amarananda made me the regional dish of Rennes – Les galettes.

  • The founder had a dark side.

  • I like being a vegan – well, almost.

  • The one true path vs. a path to the truth.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:11 AM | Permalink

Comments

Hi Norm,

I must say, my cringing reactions to the sort of passage you quote by Yogananda above are pretty much in line with Dennett and Dawkins. But your story is intriguing as a teaser and I look forward to part 2...

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Feb 2, 2009 8:14:56 AM

I'm hooked. And I have no problem with straight spines and energy metaphors.

Posted by: eli | Feb 2, 2009 11:31:47 AM

Well, Norman, if it isn't ENERGY that the yogis are playing with, what is it, METAenergy? Or do you believe that nothing is moving up or down that straight spine? If that is the case, why do people from religious traditions all over the world and all over time talk as if there is something moving somewhere? Here's another way to put that last question: if the movement of energy is a metaphor (as it might well be), for what is it a metaphor?

You know, if you don't want to answer those questions, I don't blame you. Most people don't enjoy playing with the contents of a can of religious worms.

Posted by: Rhea | Feb 5, 2009 3:06:48 PM


Rhea,

You ask, "[I]f the movement of energy is a metaphor (as it might well be), for what is it a metaphor?"

You question is spot on, and get's to the heart of the matter. Physicists have to stand back and realize that it can't be criticized according to the properties of mass-energy equivalence. Spiritual Masters are not necessarily talking about E = mc^2. The romantic poet may have an ache in the heart for a love who is far away, but we now know that hearts don't ache, let alone break por mon amour.

Q. So, for what is the metaphor used?

A. I don't know. The mystic or spiritual Master is trying to express something transcendent, possibly ineffable, in their experiences. They use words that seem right to them, and which others may find meaningful. So far, the best that neuro-cognitive science can do is to plot neuro-biological correlates. A good example is the research of Andrew Newberg who teaches at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School.

Let us assume, for argument sake, that the mind is what the brain does, and that there is no disembodied reality to mind. It does not mean that the spiritual Master's personal approach to enlightenment and discovering what it means to lead a good life is less valid than what Carl Sagan came to understand as leading a good life.

When I train my students as scientists, I tell them that science is AN approach to understanding nature and ourselves. We use systematic observation and the recording of data. Then we organize our information into a body of knowledge.

There are other approaches to understanding nature and ourselves. We should not criticize spiritual Masters simply because they suck at physics and chemistry. The same goes for Shelley, Mahler, the cave painters at Lascaux, and Hildegard von Bingen. They all sucked at physics.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 5, 2009 4:13:36 PM

Norman,

On the other hand, David Bohm's and Erwin Schroedinger's investigations in physics led them to what the skeptics-cum-reductionists might refer to as woo woo. Some people seem to think that any sense of a sacred universe or a human meeting of the immanent and transcendent, means belief in Dave Ranning's "Psychopathic Sky Daddy." That is, literal-minded belief in texts that employ symbols, albeit some primitive ones, to try to elucidate reality.

So it seems to me that "other approaches to understanding nature and ourselves" get dismissed as superstition, belief in sky god, the tooth fairy, the flying spaghetti monster, Zeus, Athena, et al. Some people see reason, rationality as the only legitimate way to understand anything.

Yet in everyday life, who listens to music, e.g., through reason or rationality alone? I'm sure there are reductionist explanations for experiencing music, too. Soundwaves reaching eardrums and signals or sinewave stuff causing x, y, z responses in the brain.

It seems so much energy is being focused on trying to get people to abandon antropomorphic beliefs in sky god that too little energy is directed toward "understanding nature and ourselves" in anything except a reductionist way -- which is referred to as a rational way.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 6, 2009 7:55:03 AM

Louise Gordon,

Thanks for your comments. I'm afraid I'm not being sufficiently clear, so let me give it another shot.

There is a good part of what you say with which I could agree. However, the issue is not that all such phenomena might yield, eventually, to reductionist explanations. Let's assume that they will. For example, there is evidence of a genetic basis for altruism.

The idea I am discussing is one of tolerance. I was going to develop this theme in the next chapter of the story of my visit to the Ashram. Central to this theme is the question, “What does it mean to lead a good life?”. When Part 2 is published on March 2, 2009, we can all see how successful I am – or not.

What I don't want to do is revisit the debate of faith versus science. I don't want to deal with the arguments or proofs for God's existence. The philosophers have had 2,500 years and have arrived at the same place where they started. Nor am I looking to reconcile faith and science. Many believers, in self-referencing arrogance and ignorance, cannot fathom the non-believer being good without God. Strident anti-religionists cannot fathom the believer being good with God. This is all nonsense.

I greatly admire Edwin O. Wilson who joined forces with evangelical and fundamental Christians in efforts to deal with global climate change and protecting the resources of our planet. Their philosophies and motivations cannot be more irreconcilable. The last thing that would convince Wilson is revelatory scripture admonishing us to be good stewards of God's gift of creation. I don't think he would sign up for the Pope's recently published view that environmental pollution could be a grievous offense against God, and thus a sin. Science and faith informed different communities about what it means to lead a good life. As a scientist, I am more convinced by Wilson. As someone who does not believe in a personal God, I am not impressed with arguments based on revealed sacred texts, or theological apologetics. I rejoice when both embrace the conscious caring of our only home as part of what it means to lead a good life.

I'll save the rest for Part 2.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 6, 2009 2:29:31 PM

Norman,

Well, all right. I'll skip Meister Eckhart and the Vedanta for the West. Look forward to Part 2 on March 2nd.


harvardmagazine

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 6, 2009 5:22:56 PM


Louise,

I promise not to disappoint. I will be commenting on Meister Eckhart.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 6, 2009 7:47:34 PM

People go to ashrams all the time. But when a scientist does so, it becomes more respectable, evidently.

Are scientists just so worthwhile that even their non-scientific opinion, observations etc. matter more?

Posted by: Komal | Feb 7, 2009 7:51:25 PM


Komal,

You ask, "Are scientists just so worthwhile that even their non-scientific opinion, observations etc. matter more?"

More than what? Would you please elaborate.

Thanks.

Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 7, 2009 10:10:06 PM

Fascinating, since I, too, spent this same month in silence (though not at an ashram -- a Jesuit retreat house) and am also a scientist...

It was an extraordinary experience.

Posted by: Michelle | Jun 7, 2009 8:48:59 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

Nominations Now Open

3QD ADVERTISING

Find the best prices on Las Vegas Show Tickets at Best of Vegas and Orlando Theme Parks at Best of Orlando!

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Gordon on Jonathan Haidt Decodes the Tribal Psychology of Politics

fa on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Elatia Harris on Smells (and the people who write about them)

rjm on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Rohan Maitzen on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

ray Butlers on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Pepito on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

Jaya Aninda Chatterjee on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Steve on Becoming Condoleezza Rice

ed rackley on That's not music – that's just noise!

Philosopher's Beard on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

DS on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Michael Cunningham on Suicide as Scene and Spectacle: Notes on The Bridge and Aokigahara - Suicide Forest

Bilal Tanweer on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

Nithin on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

omar on Learning Urdu

Ankur on Learning Urdu

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Namit on Gish Jen to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Arts & Literature Prize

hairlessOrphan on That's not music – that's just noise!

Ankur on Learning Urdu

Frank on Smells (and the people who write about them)

Nick Smyth on That's not music – that's just noise!

Jeff Strabone on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

panopticonopolis on Tax Justice: The Next Great American Movement

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed