| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Tuesday Poem | Main | op-art radovan »

January 27, 2009

wyeth's particulars

Saltz1-21-09-1s
Andrew Wyeth, the most famous American painter that almost no one in the art world ever thought of or cared much about, died in his sleep, in his home near Philadelphia, at the age of 91. Known for his sketchy, dry, goldenrod-and-ochre-colored scenes of working farms, rundown sawmills, nature studies, working people, military garb and rustic interiors -- he was very good at depicting peeling paint and rotting wood -- Wyeth, who was the son of the well-known illustrator N.C. Wyeth, is responsible for one of the most recognized and beloved American paintings of the early 20th century, Christina’s World. Painted in 1948, the work was a stroke of luck and delayed memory. One day, as Wyeth happened to look out his upstairs window, he saw his next-door neighbor -- a young woman named Christina Olsen, whom he had been painting for some time -- crawling across a field of wheat. Christiana had had polio as a child. Later, Wyeth made sketches of the Olsen house, added a field surrounding it, and, as an afterthought, inserted Christina in a pink dress in the foreground.
more from Artnet here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 09:46 AM | Permalink

Comments

Since Wyeth's death it has become extremely tiresome to listen to the contnuous carping of the "art critics" who like to demean his work. In this case, apparently, Wyeth was too conservative, failing to incorporate the Avant Garde in his work. Thank goodness for that! His work is timeless, evocative, beautiful, and definitively artistic.

This is why so many of us who love art turn a deaf ear to the critics: I personally don't need someone to tell me what is and what is not art.

Posted by: Rick Mac | Jan 27, 2009 1:38:51 PM

I don't understand a sensibility that can't put Wyeth right next to Schiele right next to Kiefer right next to Morandi right next to Fischl right next to Stella right next to Morrisot right next to Hodler...

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Jan 27, 2009 7:13:46 PM

Stella...I think I used to have some sheets by him.

Posted by: Carlos | Jan 27, 2009 8:43:54 PM

Anyone remember when Tuli Kupferberg "improved" _Christina's World_ by painting it out?

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 27, 2009 9:53:50 PM

No. Can't find a link either. My least favorite of all of Andrew's work, I must admit.

Posted by: Carlos | Jan 27, 2009 10:54:08 PM

Well, certainly, re-seeing this painting as a polio victim dragging herself across a rural field goes a way towards redeeming the Hallmarkish overtones of the painting's title. Names and titles (re-imagine The Beatles as called "The Liverpool Swingers" or F. Scott Fitzgerald as "Izzy Klemp" or Las Vegas as "Tonopahville") are more important to our perceptions than we casually admit.

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Jan 28, 2009 7:47:54 AM

What an utterly predictable piece of middle-brow damning with faint praise from someone obviously locked firmly within the inherited parameters of New York taste, a very conservative article. A shame, Wyeth’s achievement deserves more and I hope people that have long put to bed brainless pejoratives like “illustrator” and are willing to challenge them (rather than a slyly ambiguous mention – what does Saltz really think?) will work on doing his corpus justice with words.

It might be so obvious that it turns out to be completely wrong, but am the only one who can’t look at his pictures for any sustained period without thinking of Frost’s poetry, that bleak New England landscape with a kind of hidden horror to it?

Posted by: Jesse | Jan 28, 2009 12:49:42 PM

Well, PA is not New England, but I hope my drift was caught.

Posted by: Jesse | Jan 28, 2009 12:58:12 PM

Jesse, Wyeth and I go way back. I can remember when he was the only American artist the man in the street might have been able to name, when either you got Jasper Johns or you liked Andrew Wyeth, but you didn't speak their names in the same breath. His stature as an American classic, whether you admired him or middlebrowed him, took a huge tumble apropos the Helga Paintings, which were hideously funny. That was almost 25 years ago, and people would show up at Beaux-arts balls in platinum wigs, car coats trimmed with ric-rac, and vinyl boots, some even bringing a tree to grab onto. Nobody didn't get it. Cool people will not accept Wyeth for 15 more years, and then some hipster will do for him what Kurt Cobain did for Hushpuppies.

I think it's defensible to go on admiring any painter of skill and vision whose work is distinctive, regardless of whether you're in good company. Otherwise, as someone who paints and looks, you're about nothing but taste. The Wyeth revival -- whenever it comes -- will be about nothing but taste.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 28, 2009 6:00:41 PM

Elatia,

I remember seeing Wyeth's Helga pictures on tour, I was probably in my early teens or perhaps a bit younger. "hideously funny" didn't show up for me and I recall finding a couple of those works quite mesmerizing. It's his bleak landscapes, washy, punctuated with birds, the occasional stark interior (and here again the formula of a recieved sensibility, Staltz slips into visually obtuse Modern art critic mode when he talks of Wyeth's "photographic" quality which according to a tired script earns him relevance, Wyeth could be a little corny sometimes perhaps, but mechanical never) that I continue to find most rewarding.

I don't really understand your last two sentences, but I'm incredibly tired - will try again tomorrow. And Cobain and Hushpuppies? I just remember the plaid and a haircut I'd rather forget.

Posted by: Jesse | Jan 29, 2009 5:28:39 AM

Which is why hipsters (along with their first cousins, the trainspotters) are a distraction best ignored (or seen through) while trying to look at a painting. They tend to give good party, though.

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Jan 29, 2009 6:50:29 AM

I am the only one old enough to remember when Kurt Cobain bought Hushpuppies -- the least cool footwear around -- and started a megatrend? 1993, or thereabouts. But then, I can remember when Madonna and I were both young, too -- it happened the same year.

I think Wyeth is compared with illustrators, not with real painters, the way 19th century academic painting is compared to taxidermy; one thing you can always do before a dazzling skill set is to condescend. It's the same impulse that requires us to relegate very beautiful girls to the province of the empty-headed, and it's actually the same impulse that requires us to conflate awkward sub-competence and a quality of directness.

Time is on the side of great illustrators, however. Norman Rockwell will outlast Damien Hirst.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 29, 2009 10:01:54 AM

Wyeth brings out a spaciousness and bleakness that for me, brings on a feeling of isolation.
Never thought about it, but you are probably right Elatia, great illustrators will outlast everyone else.
I live with someone who supports herself through illustration.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Jan 29, 2009 12:45:18 PM

"I am the only one old enough to remember when Kurt Cobain bought Hushpuppies -- the least cool footwear around -- and started a megatrend?"

Being much older, I even remember Paul Westerberg (The Replacements) saying Nirvana wasn't "real rock 'n roll" (and I agreed)...

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Jan 29, 2009 1:11:22 PM

Steven-
I thought Nirvana was a refreshing change, and a much needed slap in the face to the decaying rock of the time. I was living in Hollywood, immursed culturally with writers and musicians at the time , and the Seattle music scene shook the tired corporate decaying 80's world.
Those were interesting days, everything I touched turned to gold.

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Jan 29, 2009 11:10:57 PM

Dave!

I'm not saying that not being "rock n roll" (whatever it is, beyond Chuck Berry) isn't good. I still don't listen to Cobain's stuff for pleasure, but I appreciate what's strong (and what was fresh) about it; I recommend a similarly bifurcatable aesthetic judgment system to everyone! Being able to appreciate things I don't even like really helps, I find.

Posted by: Steven Augustine | Jan 30, 2009 10:20:47 AM

Steven-
I could not agree more. Genera's I had a total aversion to, I now enjoy (country music, being one).
Re program those entrenched neuro pathways!

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Jan 31, 2009 3:00:28 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

JonJ on Moving books

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story – Part 2

omar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed