| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« life before the segway | Main | America, ‘Amerika’ »

January 04, 2009

the elements of spam

514B109M2PL

14. Use the active voice.

Notice how aloof the passive voice is.

Your balls are to be slurped the most by cum-starved nymphos!!!!!

Hardly persuasive. The five exclamation points feel tacked on, an attempt by an inexperienced writer to breathe life into a desiccated construction. The active voice, however, allows you to write with verve and straightforwardness.

Cum-starved nymphos will slurp your balls the most!!!!!

16. Use definite, specific, concrete language.

Generalities enervate your writing; strong details invigorate it.

In short order, you'll notice enhanced length and girth.

What is meant by "short order"? A week? A month? The imprecision is suspicious. Further, avoid bankrupt modifiers such as enhanced. Rewrite with exactness.

Your exactly one week away from an 11-inch jizz stick.

more from McSweeney's here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 09:06 AM | Permalink

Comments

Blog writing is a different art from ground writing. More often than not, blog posts are written as if it was published in a magazine - huge mistake. People online do not want to negotiate that much text, and they want straightforward (non passive) communication. Of course you can be humorous and creative, but not at the expense of the most efficient communication.

Posted by: MIchelle McCormack | Jan 4, 2009 10:22:09 AM

Hilarious. But proper grammar would make it stronger: "*You're* exactly one week away..."

Posted by: Showman | Jan 4, 2009 7:22:33 PM

Michelle, I beg to differ. Online reading habits -- scanning, skipping around, and so forth -- do not demand a special prose style. A reader scanning is more efficient than a writer crafting lunchmeat. There is such a thing as failing, as a writer, to take advantage of your medium, and "writing to word" is of course very good discipline. But basing your bid for a reader's attention on how little of their online time you propose to take up is not the same as creating value with what you write. If you attend to the latter, you may get read. If you attend to the former, you may get read. I'd rather look to the quality of the experience I was creating for readers, and let them deal with time management their own way. Which they will do, anyhow.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 4, 2009 9:02:05 PM

Couldn't agree more, Elatia.

Thanks.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Jan 5, 2009 3:50:53 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD ADVERTISING


3QD on Twitter


Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google


Recent Comments

Shatha on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Chris Horner on Want to keep your wallet? Carry a baby picture

John Ballard on Saieen Zahoor, Rohail Hyatt, Noori: Aik Alif

Lambness on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

aguy109 on A new technology called compressive sensing slims down data at the source

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Ken Pidcock on Debating Unscientific America

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jim on Wednesday Poem

DavidG on Are the "New Atheists" are Right-Wing on Foreign Policy?

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Norman Costa on Wednesday Poem

Carlos on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

giotto on Debating Unscientific America

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Chris Schoen on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

billy on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Christopher on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Elatia Harris on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Louise Gordon on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Jonathan on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton

Dave Ranning on Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton


Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.


The 3QD Prizes

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Subscribe to this blog's feed