January 13, 2009
nature sucks
This idea of nature's harmonious balance has become not just the bedrock of environmental thought, but a driving force in policy and culture. It is the sentiment behind Henry David Thoreau's dictum, "In wildness is the preservation of the world." It lies behind last summer's animated blockbuster "Wall-E," in which a single surviving plant helps revive an earth smothered beneath the detritus of human overconsumption. It underlies environmental laws that try to minimize the damaging influence of humans on land and the atmosphere. In this line of thought, the workings of the natural world, honed over billions of years of evolution, have reached a dynamic equilibrium far more elegant - and ultimately durable - than the clumsy attempts humankind makes to alter or improve them. According to the paleontologist Peter Ward, however, nothing could be further from the truth. In his view, the earth's history makes clear that, left to run its course, life isn't naturally nourishing - it's poisonous. Rather than a supple system of checks and balances, he argues, the natural world is a doomsday device careening from one cataclysm to another.more from Boston Globe Ideas here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 08:42 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Hi, folks! That's us right there, proving his point - created by nature, evolved to take advantage of our environment with little left to keep us in check besides our own self-destructive tendencies.
Posted by: DavidG | Jan 13, 2009 12:35:40 PM
It seems kind of oxymoronic to describe geologic time in terms of "boom and bust" cycles, just as it seems kind of ridiculous to discuss an apparently suicidal planet that has managed to stick on for some 4.5 billion years. It's not the planet's demise at the root of this argument, though, is it. It's the extinction of the human race. It's our survival at issue. The planet seems to be doing just fine.
Posted by: lambness | Jan 13, 2009 1:53:58 PM
Thanks for that, lambness. It's the same old Goldilocks argument, isn't? If the universe isn't catering to our every whim, it's "hostile." Ironically it's the same kind of instrumentalism favored by Biblical literalists, for whom all the biosphere was created for human satisfaction.
Posted by: Chris Schoen | Jan 13, 2009 2:03:29 PM
And now it's the biosphere's fault-inherent that it has slacked in fluffing the pillows, aye? I guess that is supposed to mean it is time for us to devote mass resources (the planet's) to teaching it a lesson in how to do it right, aye?
Posted by: Lambness | Jan 13, 2009 7:34:02 PM
One species' cataclysm is another's golden moment!
Lambness is spot on!
Posted by: Bill | Jan 14, 2009 6:33:39 AM
Terraform Earth! Now!
Posted by: PeteChapman | Jan 14, 2009 11:33:21 AM
Post a comment