January 20, 2009
Lab-Worn Doctor-Lady
Carl Zimmer discusses an example of atrocious science writing in his excellent blog, The Loom:
I…I just don’t know where to begin with the opening to this article in the latest issue of Esquire. “Pretty lady”? “The new poor part of town”? A noxious martini of mixed metaphors topped with an olive of ridiculous hype. (Forget it–I can’t compete with this stuff.)
If we science writers want to defend our old-fashioned craft against its critics, how do we defend stuff like this?
First thing that happens when you have a heart attack, an unlucky part of your heart turns white. The blood’s stopped pumping to that spot, so it becomes pink-speckled bloodlessness, coarse and cool like grapefruit gelatin.
This is the moment when, if they could think, these heart cells in this new poor part of town would go, “Well, shit.” Mortal things have a godly way of knowing when they’ll die.
Next comes the back-alley bruise of organ death. The cells turn from white to black, all shitted up like a body pit in a war, two weeks after. Suddenly, soldier, this part of your heart is dead, only it’s still in your body, attached to the good section — the 90210 ventricle — and the good part is smirking, it’s saying, “Come on, rebuild yourself, man!”
But the dead part can’t fix itself. And the healthy part can’t throw it a bloody rope. So the whole heart begins to die — 650,000 American deaths a year.
But now look here, a woman. She is a pretty lady of Pakistani heritage who highlights her soccer-mom layers, which you don’t expect from a lab-worn doctor-lady. And she’s got ideas. Wild ones. Hina Chaudhry believes she can do what the body can’t: fix the dead parts.
Our discussion yesterday about bad science writing took a sharp turn, jumped the rails, and landed over at Language Log, where my brother Ben takes over. Suddenly I feel a new kinship with the
PsalmsBook of Proverbs….
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 06:22 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Thanks for the link. The picture of Dr. Chaudhry you've put alongside my blog post prompts me to stress that I am only criticizing the article, not the scientist it portrays. Here is an example of the quality of Dr. Chaudhry's research: http://circres.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/100/12/1741
Posted by: Carl Zimmer | Jan 20, 2009 9:04:26 AM
Thanks, Carl.
Posted by: S. Abbas Raza | Jan 20, 2009 9:17:09 AM
Thanks for collecting this awful writing, the best way to fight it is to bring it all together and make fun of it as you have done.
Posted by: aguy109 | Jan 20, 2009 10:01:11 AM
Post a comment