| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« perceptions | Main | Monday Poem »

December 01, 2008

Interpretations: Maurizio Cattelan, Daddy Daddy (2008)

(Interpretations is a new, occasional series of reflections on artworks, films, songs, signs, artifacts, and other items by Asad Raza and other contributors.)

Picture 1In Maurizio Cattelan's Daddy Daddy, Pinocchio has met his end, floating face-down in the Guggenheim's fountain--presumably having jumped, fell, or been pushed off the ramparts of the museum's ascending spiral ramp.  There is no clear cause, just a result: this body, the record of a dismal yet laughable turn of events, the death of a lovable Disney character.  The sculpture is site-specific: for its memorable visual joke to work, it depends on the airy grandeur of Lloyd Wright's atrium.  You have to be able to look up and see the many places from which a person, or a puppet, could fall.  By imagining this disastrous outcome, the piece transforms the museum's spatial splendor into a droll vertigo. (Photo: The Guggenheim Museum.)

Blackly comic in tone, Daddy Daddy recalls the scenarios of many previous works by Cattelan.  As with his stuffed squirrel suicide, posed face-down at a kitchen table with revolver in hand (Bidibidobidiboo, 1996), a cute character suitable for children meets an untimely end.  Cattelan once displayed a rope made of bedsheets tied togther leading from the window to the ground below, having first used it to climb out of the gallery; Daddy Daddy also posits a hero paralyzed by the fear of inauthenticity ("Am I a real boy?").  Cattelan's work Now (2004), a life-size sculpture of a saintly, barefoot John F. Kennedy in a coffin, symbolizes a loss of hope and a sense of rightness with the world.  In Untitled (2007), a horse is suspended in a sort of anti-majesty, its head having disappeared into the wall.  Each of these works performs the characteristic Cattelan gesture: staging a climactic punch-line to a narrative of futility. 
 
The use of Pinocchio is appropriate in another sense as well: Cattelan often represents himself mock-heroically as a liar and a thief.  For an exhibition in Amsterdam in 1996 he stole the contents of another gallery and installed them in his own, entitling the piece Another Fucking Readymade.  On the night before an opening of his in 1992, he went to the police falsely claiming his non-existent work had been stolen, then displayed the police report in the gallery.  What better surrogate for himself in his work than the Italian boy-puppet, caught lying in a vain attempt to fit in and prove he belongs, that's he's a real boy?  Daddy Daddy is a concise, witty summation of an anxious, futile desperation to succeed and belong.   

In addition to these more obvious ways that Daddy Daddy represents a continuation of themes in Cattelan's work, there is another form of continuity operating here.  This has to do with Pinocchio's being a puppet.  Cattelan's sculptures are very frequently stuffed bodies of one kind or another.  Many of his works include them in their most conventional form, taxidermized animals.  Even works containing no mammalian forms, however, make reference to the stuffed body, as when he packed the rubble left by a terrorist bombing into large shipping bags (Lullaby, 1994)--a kind of macabre taxidermy that filled a soft container with fragmented detritus.  Cattelan seems always drawn to depicting organic bodies as hollow containers, stuffed rather than living objects.  The cartoon, which is our first point of reference for Pinocchio, is merely an extreme example this: a body delineated by an outline, but with no real interior.

There is, of course, a link between the Cattelan's narratives of demise and failure and his use of taxidermic or obviously cartoonish bodies to express them: both are ways of questioning holistic understandings of human identity.  These hollow shapes disrupt a naturalized sense of ourselves as organic beings.  They cast our psychological interiors as mere stuffing.  And I think this literal emptying-out of the category of being touches something quite deep within the contemporary idea of what it means to be a person.  The ideal of secular modernity is meritocracy: the goal of personhood is to travel upwards, achieving and accomplishing as much as one can without unfair impediment.  Yet the meritocratic model renders social life as a competition for high status, which, by definition, remains scarce and graspable by only a few.  An ideal meritocracy, then, must leave most of its constituents in the depressing position of having achieved second-rate status--a depression only made more acute in cases of fair and just competition.

A further contradiction of the logic of meritocracy is that it rewards those who most fully internalize the fear of being second-rate: temperamental insecurity and anxiety about accomplishment, that is, are the motivating forces of the high achiever.  This is also true of Daddy Daddy.  Far from being the record of Cattelan's failure to thrive, it is the latest example of a great success: the achievement of extremely high status in the art world, which allows him to display his work in high-status cultural institutions.  Thus Daddy Daddy is pleasing and surprising because it is redolent of the absurdity of contemporary life, which often allocates its greatest rewards to those who are most anxiously unable to be content with them--a situation Daddy Daddy comes close to parodying, with its transformation of angst into comedy.

As a consolation for the bleakness of professionalized social life, Cattelan offers his own example.  As he has said of his vocation as an artist, "this is the one profession where I can be a little bit stupid and people will say, 'Thank you, thank you for being so stupid!'"  This statement updates the familiar nineteenth-century concept of the aesthetic field as the opposite of the ruthlessness of the market.  Art, in this understanding, is not a utopian alternative.  It is an adjacent, but equally competitive, field to the professions--but one which values rather than represses reflections on the nature of "the game."  In keeping with this paradox, Cattelan is the ultimate professional unprofessional: he is unconcerned to demonstrate mastery of craft, except the twin crafts of directing fabricators to realize his ideas and eliciting support from curators and collaborators.  His work, a series of sculptural vignettes or gestures, expresses not a poetics of mastery, but a comedics of failure.  "Laughter is the whole of wisdom," goes a line by the satirical novelist James Hamilton-Paterson.  Cattelan's work tends to confirm this. 

Posted by Asad Raza at 01:11 AM | Permalink

Comments

Good going, Asad, it's a little gem of art analysis. Looking forward to more...

Best,

Abbas

Posted by: S. Abbas Raza | Dec 1, 2008 11:21:06 AM

Asad, it's good to know you'll be writing more about art and other visual media in this space. Post-studio art is intriguing precisely because it relies on discourse and interpretation for reality, and is only as interesting as the comments it generates. Putting the critic in the position of someone ancient who augurs from entrails in that, if the reading is no good, it's just offal in the bronze tray. So, today, it looks like Maurizio Cattelan is interesting. Not every seer can add value thus!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 1, 2008 9:52:29 PM

I've re-read my comment above, and it sounds pretty bitchy and snide -- about an extremely interesting essay on the subject of an important artist, too. I want to revisit my point, for the record.

While Cattelan may not be my cup of fur, how and why he is interesting is indeed interesting to me, as it should be to others. What it takes for art to enter culture -- no, I don't mean marketing, but penetration of a deeper kind -- is a tremendous subject. And how the critical and public reception of post-studio art works is quite fascinating, if one sees the discourse about art as being an important element in its creation as an event in culture. Here, Cattelan has been the occasion for Asad to be a sort of mediumistic writer -- as if he were water-gazing, and something vastly associational happened, summoning the work into a heightened level of reality. Compared to how he might have looked and written about Jenny Saville, for instance. Water-gazing is nicer than auguring from innards, so I wish that was the image that had first occurred to me.

Some art is a point of departure for thought about the culture it arises from -- it is there that it is most real, entering an audience's perception in a way it could not otherwise do. Other art achieves it largest significance behind language or even in spite of language. An art historian (can't think who right now) wrote decades ago, trying to pin down the difference between Venetian and Florentine painting, that Florentine painting would have concrete reality if you switched off the room lights, whereas Venetian painting would disappear. I think about that observation often -- transposed to other axes: art, for example, that would be bereft of its half-life if commentary were interdicted, as opposed to art that would linger wordlessly, a presence. In my opinion, this essay did elevate Cattelan's work by holding up the mirror to it. The work exists to make people talk and think, and fails only if it doesn't do that. That's different from the implication that the work is itself insubstantial.

At the time the abstract expressionists were starting out, they considered themselves the practice wing of a movement that consisted equally of theory and practice. Decades later, the theorists Rosenberg and Greenberg are completely unnecessary to anyone finding pleasure and meaning in De Kooning, Kline, inter al. And more -- completely unnecessary to anyone who reflexively dislikes these same painters, too, because theory that has fallen away will not make good painting in the eye of later comers. When time has passed -- half a century? I doubt it -- we will see what the connection of the art of our era and the commentary about that art is. Will they form a palimpsest, with one layer of meaning extraneous to the others except that they appear on the same parchment? Or more like poem and gloss?

As long ago as the 1920s, you had Aby Warburg devising a method for decoding the art of the Renaissance, a method depending on a far broader notion of culture than the high culture of the 15th and 16th centuries. By the time WWII made a refugee of Warburg, his method had begun to be systematically studied at the Courtauld Institute of London University. I believe that art in every era arises from a cultural conversation that bids fair to be lost, and that some art will enter history with that animating conversation intact. Post-studio art, in its performant aspect, is almost a monument to this idea, with interpretation being its concrete other half.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 2, 2008 11:41:50 AM

man, you've set a good precedent for this series. i love the image you used, and the puppet as a sign of demise, failure and emptiness is so profoundly tragic...

Posted by: jaffer | Dec 2, 2008 4:34:23 PM

Please forgive the pedantry Elatia, but Warburg was never a refugee, having died in 1929 in his home city of Hamburg. But his incomparable library was moved to London in 1933 to be kept out of the hands of the Nazis.

Posted by: Jesse | Dec 2, 2008 9:05:37 PM

And as for Pinocchio playing at Mr. bill, I think this whole tragedy could have been avoided if Geppetto had simply tried harder.

Posted by: Jesse | Dec 2, 2008 9:48:01 PM

You're not being pedantic, Jesse -- I pictured Warburg along with his library incurring great risk, his having to be moved without looking up from his books to think things through. Now I know he was truly not engaged with the issues of the day. Perhaps I was conflating his personal details with the final chapter in the story of that other student of arcana and interpretation, Sigmund Freud.

The Warburg method is absolutely vital to the interpretation of art. It prompts scholars to look for the roots of the imagery in the folkloric, in popular culture, in sources forbidden by the church (science, for example), and in the black arts. This instead of the assumption that, across the ages, high culture references only high culture.

Anybody who wants to find out about the Warburg Institute can look at their digital collection -- I found the link under "Resource Sites" on BibliOdyssey.

http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/mnemosyne/DigitalCollections.htm

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 2, 2008 9:53:03 PM

I love Cattelan's work! Last week I was lucky enough to see the preview of his last piece in Houston, Texas, the cat in the cage, which I found brilliant, just published some photos here, enjoy! http://www.flickr.com/photos/56191010@N05/

Posted by: Eric Irving | Nov 22, 2010 11:59:25 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Joe on the culture animal

Sundar on the culture animal

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Matt on The Science Mystique

Eleutheria on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed