October 28, 2008
Hitchens on Sarah Palin's War on Science
The GOP ticket's appalling contempt for knowledge and learning.
Christopher Hitchens in Slate:
In an election that has been fought on an astoundingly low cultural and intellectual level, with both candidates pretending that tax cuts can go like peaches and cream with the staggering new levels of federal deficit, and paltry charges being traded in petty ways, and with Joe the Plumber becoming the emblematic stupidity of the campaign, it didn't seem possible that things could go any lower or get any dumber. But they did last Friday, when, at a speech in Pittsburgh, Gov. Sarah Palin denounced wasteful expenditure on fruit-fly research, adding for good xenophobic and anti-elitist measure that some of this research took place "in Paris, France" and winding up with a folksy "I kid you not."
It was in 1933 that Thomas Hunt Morgan won a Nobel Prize for showing that genes are passed on by way of chromosomes. The experimental creature that he employed in the making of this great discovery was the Drosophila melanogaster, or fruit fly. Scientists of various sorts continue to find it a very useful resource, since it can be easily and plentifully "cultured" in a laboratory, has a very short generation time, and displays a great variety of mutation. This makes it useful in studying disease, and since Gov. Palin was in Pittsburgh to talk about her signature "issue" of disability and special needs, she might even have had some researcher tell her that there is a Drosophila-based center for research into autism at the University of North Carolina. The fruit fly can also be a menace to American agriculture, so any financing of research into its habits and mutations is money well-spent. It's especially ridiculous and unfortunate that the governor chose to make such a fool of herself in Pittsburgh, a great city that remade itself after the decline of coal and steel into a center of high-tech medical research.
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 06:09 AM | Permalink










Comments
Any freshman biology student can tell you that the snail darter and fruit fly are among the best known species in science, with the possible exception of the labratory rat. Drosophila is as basic to genetic research as gravity is to physics. The woman's ignorance is embarrassing.
Posted by: John Ballard | Oct 28, 2008 5:02:00 PM
Hitchens from 2004: the candidate "notwithstanding shortcomings of intellect, has been able to say, repeatedly and even repetitively, the essential thing: that we are involved in this war without apology and without remorse. He should go further, and admit the evident possibility of defeat--which might concentrate a few minds--while abjuring any notion of capitulation."
Now, fruit flies evidently are "the essential thing."
Posted by: Nate Frentz | Oct 28, 2008 6:30:02 PM
Listening to Sarah Palin talk about science makes my stomach hurt. I can only imagine what would happen to science funding if Mccain won.
http://notimeforclocks.wordpress.com/2008/11/02/15/
Posted by: Grant | Nov 2, 2008 8:08:36 AM
Post a comment