October 28, 2008
Careful What You Wish For: Two novelists portray the allure—and limitations—of liberation
In different ways, Philip Roth’s Indignation and Ian McEwan’s On Chesil Beach force us to confront difficulty. Both are short, and both contain surprises at the end. Both raise initial fears in the reader that he will be subjected to a politically correct tract; both subvert political correctness in the end.
The protagonist of Indignation, set in the beginning of the 1950s, is Marcus Messner, the only child of a kosher butcher in Newark. Marcus is a model son, a brilliant and industrious student who delights in helping his father in the shop. His father, who started working when he was ten years old, hopes that his son will do far better than he did. Unfortunately, Messner Senior undergoes a change. Two developments render him anxious and neurotically overprotective of Marcus: the establishment of a supermarket nearby that threatens to undermine his business and the onset of the Korean War. Having lost two nephews in World War II, he fears he will lose his son in the new conflict. To escape his father, Marcus transfers from a New Jersey college to one in Winesburg, Ohio (an artful reference to Sherwood Anderson that conjures a world of quiet desperation). Winesburg is more provincial than the East Coast, of course, but for Marcus, Middle America is a new world: at the price of some social discomfort, he finds that the move broadens his horizons.
Marcus spends what for him is a small fortune on preppy clothes, but finds when he arrives at Winesburg College (which is a Baptist establishment) that he fits in socially among neither the Jews nor the Gentiles. Impoverished, he works in a bar on weekends, where he hears mildly anti-Semitic jibes. He befriends a beautiful young student, Olivia, the daughter of well-to-do parents, with whom he has his first sexual experiences, but he discovers two things about her that undermine his confidence: first, despite her relatively privileged background, Olivia is mentally unstable and has made a suicide attempt by cutting her wrists (itself a warning that life is not automatically made easier by easy circumstances); second, she has a reputation for loose morals. His sexual experience, then, does not make much of a conquest.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 08:48 AM | Permalink











Comments
Theodore Dalrymple is always worth reading -- thanks for sharing this.
Posted by: Larry May | Oct 28, 2008 10:46:51 AM
jesus, did you just link City Journal? WTF? Dalymple?
Posted by: instafaggot | Oct 28, 2008 11:38:08 AM
The slapped on conclusion to the Roth novel--the final paragraph--suggests that all sorts of things get into play and screw us up. Which is to say: no matter what he does nor does not do, the main character in this novel is doomed.
The 2nd novel may bother some because of the sexual reticence but it is good to recall that the novel is set back at an earlier time. The fault, in my reading, is that the male character (narrator) lacks sufficient understanding and sympathy and so is in large measure responsible for the mess that is made.
Posted by: nzuckerman | Oct 28, 2008 2:37:28 PM
jesus, did you just link City Journal? WTF? Dalymple?
What, should 3 Quarks only link to articles that validate your particular world view?
I don't agree with the 3 Quarks party line on every issue. Nonetheless, there are interesting points raised even in articles I don't agree with.
Keep posting links to both "left" and "right" articles. If I wanted to read the Nation or National Review exclusively, I wouldn't come here.
Posted by: Wade Nichols | Oct 28, 2008 2:44:13 PM
My point, Wade, is that not all opinions are valid.
Dalrymple is completely beyond the pale with his reductionism and partisanship. He is the partisan, not I. Thus, my objection.
There's nothing interesting or refreshing (or right or left for that matter) about the crude partisan complaints of City Journal. City Journal is the propaganda arm of a partisan non-partisan think tank with a racist, homophobic, anti-intellectual agenda. It's a magazine filled with hate, Dalrymple being the most vicious. It's ludicrous to blame some distorted interpretation of a philosophy for the worlds ills. He's the type who blames Paris Hilton for all of his problems with things he doesn't like. City Journal is intellectually and morally bankrupt.
Links from right wing sources are perfectly fine. Links from partisan propaganda and intellectual garbage are questionable.
Posted by: instafaggot | Oct 28, 2008 5:32:57 PM
City Journal is the propaganda arm of a partisan non-partisan think tank with a racist, homophobic, anti-intellectual agenda.
Oh, I see. City Journal is "homophobic". But, your nom de plume "instafaggot" is reflective of some sort of postmodern ironic wittiness perhaps, and therefore exempts you from the dreaded homophobic Scarlet "H"?
Don't even bother telling me how you're entitled to use of the term, in the same manner as blacks being able to appropriate the N-word, because you're gay yourself. I don't have time for your brain clotting pseudo-intellectual jargon.
Posted by: Wade Nichols | Oct 28, 2008 7:09:57 PM
Watching Dalrymple try his matter-flecked hand at Litcrit inspires in me a dewy-eyed longing for James Wood's work (or a nice medieval trepanning). Stick to abhorring the hoi poloi, Ted.
Posted by: Steven Augustine | Oct 28, 2008 7:22:01 PM
Just here to thank 3quarksdaily for the pleasures it brings every day—and today's link to this book review was an exceptional treat: thank you Azra.
Now i read in the comments that the article is deemed out-of-bounds and offensive because of its author, and that the link should not have been provided. i want to personally thank the red khmers who gladly decide for us all who we can read or not. "instafaggot" is a nice pun for a name, but i think that in your case, you misspelled it: you don't need the two Gs—"instafagot" will do nicely (or try "pitchfork").
Posted by: jean-paul | Oct 28, 2008 8:03:49 PM
Jean-paul, Wade.
Thanks for the personal attacks and further conflation of my quality argument.
Posted by: instafaggot | Oct 29, 2008 10:37:08 AM
instafaggot,
Can you please provide some evidence that Dalrymple is "filled with hate"?
How about some evidence that City Journal has "a racist, homophobic, anti-intellectual agenda"?
Because I don't see it, and those are pretty strong accusations. All of their stuff is online, so you should be able to provide some links.
Thanks.
Posted by: Steven | Oct 29, 2008 11:10:53 AM
Thanks for the personal attacks and further conflation of my quality argument.
You're most welcome!
Personal attacks? Hardly.
Further conflation of your "quality argument"? Maybe in your own personal alternate universe. But go ahead, continue deluding yourself into believing you're some sort of free speech maverick braving the "chilling climate" of intolerance and "Orwellian" suppression.
Look back at your own disjointed screeds that you try to pass off as intellectual brilliance. There's actually a kernel of truth in your own ramblings:
"not all opinions are valid"
You were on to something there, just apply that sentiment close to home, and you'll be alright.
Posted by: Wade Nichols | Oct 29, 2008 11:28:47 AM
Time to break out the biscotti, Wade.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Oct 29, 2008 6:38:55 PM
Post a comment