| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« What the Obama Candidacy Means for Scholars of Race | Main | Poets and the People: Reflections on solidarity during wartime »

September 07, 2008

Buffered and porous selves

Charles Taylor in The Immanent Frame:

Almost everyone can agree that one of the big differences between us and our ancestors of five hundred years ago is that they lived in an “enchanted” world, and we do not; at the very least, we live in a much less “enchanted” world. We might think of this as our having “lost” a number of beliefs and the practices which they made possible. But more, the enchanted world was one in which these forces could cross a porous boundary and shape our lives, psychic and physical. One of the big differences between us and them is that we live with a much firmer sense of the boundary between self and other. We are “buffered” selves. We have changed.

This is not a mere “subtraction” story, for it thinks not only of loss but of remaking. With the subtraction story, there can be no epistemic loss involved in the transition; we have just shucked off some false beliefs, some fears of imagined objects. Looked at my way, the process of disenchantment involves a change in sensibility; one is open to different things. One has lost a way in which people used to experience the world.

Disenchantment in my use (and partly in Weber’s) really translates Weber’s term “Entzauberung,” where the key kernel concept is “Zauber,” magic. In a sense, moderns constructed their own concept of magic from and through the process of disenchantment. Carried out first under Reforming Christian auspices, the condemned practices all involved using spiritual force against or at least independently of our relation to God. The worst examples were things like saying a black mass for the dead to kill off your enemy or using the host as a love charm. But in the more exigent modes of Reform, the distinction between white and black magic tended to disappear, and all independent recourse to forces independent of God was seen as culpable. The category “magic” was constituted through this rejection, and this distinction was then handed on to post-Enlightenment anthropology, as with Frazer’s distinction between “magic” and “religion.”

The process of disenchantment, involving a change in us, can be seen as a loss of a certain sensibility that is really an impoverishment (as against simply the shedding of irrational feelings).

Posted by Robin Varghese at 06:32 PM | Permalink

Comments

Thank sweet non-existent Christ for Charles Taylor. Watching him write on religion in today's intellectual climate is like watching Usain Bolt line up in the 100m against a kindergarten class.

He is a genealogist of the highest order.

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Sep 7, 2008 11:56:42 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    Casey on Cooking Up a Pot of Civilization

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Daniel Rourke on Desire Paths: Reading, Memory and Inscription

    Space Toast on India, China and the polemics of the East

    Chris Schoen on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Jeff Strabone on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Victoria Nwobodo on Facebook Poetry – Oxymoron or Hamburger-Chain Art?

    Zara on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Joe Y on Summer time and the eating is easy

    hmmm on Losing the Plot (The Hotel)

    Cyrus Hall on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    Louise Gordon on In God's name

    Manisha Verma on India, China and the polemics of the East

    sw on Kiarostami's 'Shirin': watching a movie about watching a movie

    J. Hawkins on In God's name

    kerg on The Israeli thought-police is here

    J. Hawkins on The Israeli thought-police is here

    IJ on The Israeli thought-police is here

    andy on Summer time and the eating is easy

    DRK on In God's name

    Elatia Harris on Summer time and the eating is easy

    Tasnim on Perceptions

    Frances Madeson on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed