August 07, 2008
The Neurological Roots of Genius
From Scientific American:
Within hours of his demise in 1955, Albert Einstein’s brain was salvaged, sliced into 240 pieces and stored in jars for safekeeping. Since then, researchers have weighed, measured and otherwise inspected these biological specimens of genius in hopes of uncovering clues to Einstein’s spectacular intellect. Their cerebral explorations are part of a century-long effort to uncover the neural basis of high intelligence or, in children, giftedness. Traditionally, 2 to 5 percent of kids qualify as gifted, with the top 2 percent scoring above 130 on an intelligence quotient (IQ) test. (The statistical average is 100. See the box on the opposite page.) A high IQ increases the probability of success in various academic areas. Children who are good at reading, writing or math also tend to be facile at the other two areas and to grow into adults who are skilled at diverse intellectual tasks.
Most studies show that smarter brains are typically bigger—at least in certain locations. Part of Einstein’s parietal lobe (at the top of the head, behind the ears) was 15 percent wider than the same region was in 35 men of normal cognitive ability, according to a 1999 study by researchers at McMaster University in Ontario. This area is thought to be critical for visual and mathematical thinking. It is also within the constellation of brain regions fingered as important for superior cognition. These neural territories include parts of the parietal and frontal lobes as well as a structure called the anterior cingulate.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 05:41 AM | Permalink






Comments
In the practice of every child psychiatrist shows up some mother, or otherwise wealthy grandmother, that demands to know: Is my child (grandchild) a genius?
Nothing is to be gathered to advance our understanding of genius --- whatever that is ---from the research this article offers, unless is this:
"A 2007 study by Neubauer’s team of 90 adult tournament chess players similarly shows that practice and experience are more important to expertise than general intelligence is, although the latter is related to chess-playing ability. Even Einstein’s spectacular success as a mathematician and a physicist cannot be attributed to intellectual prowess alone. His education, dedication to the problem of relativity, willingness to take risks, and support from family and friends probably helped to push him ahead of any contemporaries with comparable cognitive gifts."
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, did it make a sound?
Posted by: Felix E F Larocca MD | Aug 7, 2008 7:26:33 AM
As I gather it, what researchers are looking for is a biological link to how well people can do on tests. It seems to me misleading to infer that this necessarily translates into "genius" or "intelligence."
It is fascinating inquiry to be sure, but does anyone else ever feel a bit unsettled by this type of research; wondering if maybe in the future people will be judged by the color of their cerebrum and not the content of their character?
Posted by: Forest Purnell | Aug 8, 2008 1:42:56 AM
Post a comment