| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The Philosopher's Annual 10 Best Philosophy Papers, 2007 | Main | Politics, Spectacle and History Under Open Sky »

August 29, 2008

Akeel Bilgrami on Gandhi

From MKGandhi.org:

Screenhunter_03_aug_28_2102In the philosophical tradition Gandhi is opposing, others are potential objects of criticism in the sense that one’s particular choices, one’s acts of moral conscience, generate moral principles or imperatives which others can potentially disobey. For him, conscience and its deliverances, though relevant to others, are not the well-spring of principles. Morals is only about conscience, not at all about principles.

There is an amusing story about two Oxford philosophers which makes this distinction vivid. In a seminar, the formidable J L Austin having become exasperated with Richard Hare’s huffing on about how moral choices reveal principles, decided to set him up with a question. ‘Hare’, he asked, “if a student came to you after an examination and offered you five pounds in return for the mark alpha, what would you say?” Predictably, Hare replied, “I would tell him that I do not take bribes, on principle!” Austin’s acid response was, “Really? I think I would myself say, ‘No thanks’. ” Austin was being merely deflationary in denying that an act of conscience had to have a principle underlying it. Gandhi erects the denial into a radical alternative to a (western) tradition of moral thinking. An honoured slogan of that tradition says, “When one chooses for oneself, one chooses for everyone”. The first half of the slogan describes a particular person’s act of conscience. The second half of the slogan transforms the act of conscience to a universalised principle, an imperative which others must follow or be criticised. Gandhi embraces the slogan too, but he understands the second half of it differently. He too wants one’s acts of conscience to have a universal relevance, so he too thinks one chooses for everyone, but he does not see that as meaning that one generates a principle or imperative for everyone. What other interpretation can be given to the words ‘One chooses for everyone’ in the slogan, except the principled one?

In Gandhi’s writing there is an implicit but bold proposal: “When one chooses for oneself, one sets an example to everyone.” That is the role of the satyagrahi. To lead exemplary lives, to set examples to everyone by their actions.

More here.  [Thanks to Thomas Zipp.]

Posted by Abbas Raza at 12:04 AM | Permalink

Comments

A very subtle and nuanced exposition of Gandhian thinking.Unfortunately it does not address the fundamental pragmatic concern.Can any moral system maintain its credibilty without the threat of coercion and violence either physical or psychological? The answer is clearly no.But did Gandhi really think that Satyagraha or truth force would suffice?Could the right to vote be a part of his arsenal?

Posted by: sumant | Aug 29, 2008 4:01:31 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

3QD Science Prize

Logo designed by Vicki Winters

Iran Twitter News

Andrew Covers Iran

The Lede on Iran

HuffPo Liveblogging

Help 3 Quarks Daily

3QD on Twitter

Search Using Lijit

Lijit Search

Bookmark This Page

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

3QD FEED FOR GOOGLE


Add to Google

3QD ADVERTISING


Compare prices

  • Canada (French)
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Brazil
  • Recent Comments

    colindale on The Israeli thought-police is here

    Elatia Harris on Cooking Up a Pot of Civilization

    aguy109 on The Israeli thought-police is here

    Pete Chapman on Sunday Poem

    gs on The Crack Cocaine of Auction Sites

    mookid on The Crack Cocaine of Auction Sites

    Anonimous on The Crack Cocaine of Auction Sites

    Anonimous on The Crack Cocaine of Auction Sites

    Abbas Raza on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Abbas Raza on 'What's exciting is that writing has become a weapon'

    Abbas Raza on Saturday Poem

    Jim on Saturday Poem

    gitanjali on Saturday Poem

    Carlos on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Jonathan on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Chris Horner on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Pete Chapman on Saturday Poem

    Jonathan on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Lambness on Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism

    Billie Mintz on The Ponzi Avenger

    fred lapides on The History of Jazz, by Darcy James Argue

    Louise Gordon on Everyone Should See "Torturing Democracy"

    Louise Gordon on The Swedish dream is no more

    atomburke on Will Europe’s Economies Regain Their Footing?

    aguy109 on my ten favorite fetishes

    Acclaim For 3QD

    ------XXX------

    "I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

    "I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

    "Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

    Subscribe to this blog's feed